Notices
Series I Major Horsepower Upgrades This is the place to discuss Super Chargers and Turbos, Nitrous, Porting, etc

Broke my first part after being turbo'd

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 03-23-2005, 11:43 AM
  #51  
'O' - 'H' !!! ...
 
RX8_Buckeye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Detroit (Westland), MI
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by crossbow
Rx8 buckeye,

Btw the original mount wasn't torn...thats how they designed it =/. But ya I agree with you. I'd also like to point out that though NVH differences may not be completely noticable on a stock suspension car...the second you start stiffening the springs and shocks, the chassis will transmit even more of the vibration from the stiffer mounts.

Of course for some people, this won't bother them one bit . I came from a 1974 grand am pontiac...there isn't a piece of rubber left in that entire NVH system. lol.
That's a curious void in the Mazda6 roll restrictor. My guess is that they needed those holes to achieve a desired stiffness along a certain axis while keeping uniform stiffness in other directions. In any case, it goes to show that there is more to mount design than stuffing some rubber of a certain durometer in a metal shell.

I'm not sure I completely understand your statement about NVH differences not being as noticeable with the stock suspension. The powertrain mounts, while they do influence the natural frequency of certain combined vibration modes of the powertrain and suspension, are primarily to isolate vibration from the powertrain itself, not the suspension inputs. Generally, shock and vibration from road inputs is trasmitted through the springs/shocks and control arm bushings into the body. If anything I'd say that you'd be less likely to notice NVH differences on a vehicle that has a modified suspension--because the driver is probably somewhat adjusted to a very rough ride! The degradation I'm talking about will be most noticeable at idle and during smooth-road acceleration where the main noise and vibration sources are from the powertrain.
Old 03-23-2005, 01:50 PM
  #52  
Where the air is rare
 
JoeMamma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
Weird. Mine doesn't even looked stressed. Wheel hop?

BTW - spoke to Benny at Greddy and Scott at Mazsport yesterday. Scott is helping some Florida forum members with their problems.

Benny said the second dongle is to change the water-temp circuit, not the AFM. That isn't what I expected, but it is understandable in seeing how it affects some vehicles - the old "resistor" trick for the water temp circuit. It didn't work on the ODB-II Miatas and it won't work on the RX-8.

I got my laptop back from Dell today (the display completely crapped after we were done last week) so I'm up for more tuning on Sunday if you have time.
This sounds interesting, with my temp gauge has been "spazzing out" since I dumped and loaded a different map in my system...Hmmmm...need to give Benny a call...
Old 03-24-2005, 06:50 PM
  #53  
ttt
Registered User
 
ttt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
scott is the man
Old 03-24-2005, 07:08 PM
  #54  
Registered User
 
crossbow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 839
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Buckeye,

Forgive my ignorance. I noticed that after the mount was installed, my suspension seemed to float more...as if now that the engine was tightened down, the suspension had to take up the slack instead of the engine mounts. I figured if you then stiffened up the suspension to take up the slack, you'd then notice more vibration transfered to the chassis itself, and thus more noticable to ones self.
Old 03-25-2005, 04:29 AM
  #55  
'O' - 'H' !!! ...
 
RX8_Buckeye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Detroit (Westland), MI
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by crossbow
Buckeye,

Forgive my ignorance. I noticed that after the mount was installed, my suspension seemed to float more...as if now that the engine was tightened down, the suspension had to take up the slack instead of the engine mounts. I figured if you then stiffened up the suspension to take up the slack, you'd then notice more vibration transfered to the chassis itself, and thus more noticable to ones self.
Okay, now I understand what you're saying. It's true--the engine on its mounts acts like a "vibration absorber" for road force inputs to the suspension. When you stiffen up the engine mounts, the engine and mounting system lose the ability to "absorb" some of the energy associated with low-frequency road inputs, thus you will notice more suspension activity. However, for powertrain vibration transmitted to the PPF and body, the suspension characteristics have very little influence.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Crazy.8
Series I Interior, Audio, and Electronics
3
04-18-2017 03:17 PM
RicerX1
West For Sale/Wanted
5
01-11-2016 05:59 PM
RXeckless
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
6
08-16-2015 12:51 PM
AllSeeingChris
RX-8 Parts For Sale/Wanted
6
08-16-2015 12:35 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Broke my first part after being turbo'd



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:36 PM.