Brettus NA power project 11
The following 2 users liked this post by Brettus:
Diarmuidbr (02-15-2023),
kevink0000 (02-14-2023)
04-03-2023, 05:45 PM
#52
More to come on this in the coming months ... Had given up on this build, but I had another idea that may just rescue it from oblivion. Am busy getting this ready to try out.
It's going to be a lot of work as engine has to come out (among other things).
It's going to be a lot of work as engine has to come out (among other things).
The following users liked this post:
Laminar (04-13-2023)
The following users liked this post:
RX0004 (04-05-2023)
04-05-2023, 09:12 PM
#60
why would I equate someone responding that way to be on my level?
I’d propose that it’s only people like yourself who are proclaiming me to be righteous rather than myself. Because you clearly hang on my every word even more than you complain about my every word. To the point that even suggesting for people to block me out, and completely ignore anything I post, only infuriates you even more. What does it really say?
Yet if I was self righteous then why would I suggest that people who either can’t control their emotions or give me even the slightest benefit of doubt to block me out? You don’t even have the eye to see or the ear to hear that the very words you posted above only demonstrate yourself to be the very thing you accuse me of. Who else but someone matching those words would post them?
I’d further suggest that it’s not me who has you in such derision. If I possess any righteousness at all then it’s not my own, and in so professing openly admit to not possessing any on my own. There’s no ill will or intention in my replies last night.
I hadn’t even been back to this thread since that previous reply many days or weeks before, nor read any of the comments that came after, just happened to see his chill out comment and only attempted to be mildly humorous in my responses. Nothing more. Which if you were paying any attention at all beyond looking for any excuse to have a total meltdown over nothing, it was me he was responding directly to in bumping the thread.
Again, you misinterpret everything even more than you blame me for everything. There’s no need to be self righteous with someone who doesn’t even understand that it takes two to tango. The very thing defines itself for all to be witness of on their own accord.
.
I’d propose that it’s only people like yourself who are proclaiming me to be righteous rather than myself. Because you clearly hang on my every word even more than you complain about my every word. To the point that even suggesting for people to block me out, and completely ignore anything I post, only infuriates you even more. What does it really say?
Yet if I was self righteous then why would I suggest that people who either can’t control their emotions or give me even the slightest benefit of doubt to block me out? You don’t even have the eye to see or the ear to hear that the very words you posted above only demonstrate yourself to be the very thing you accuse me of. Who else but someone matching those words would post them?
I’d further suggest that it’s not me who has you in such derision. If I possess any righteousness at all then it’s not my own, and in so professing openly admit to not possessing any on my own. There’s no ill will or intention in my replies last night.
I hadn’t even been back to this thread since that previous reply many days or weeks before, nor read any of the comments that came after, just happened to see his chill out comment and only attempted to be mildly humorous in my responses. Nothing more. Which if you were paying any attention at all beyond looking for any excuse to have a total meltdown over nothing, it was me he was responding directly to in bumping the thread.
Again, you misinterpret everything even more than you blame me for everything. There’s no need to be self righteous with someone who doesn’t even understand that it takes two to tango. The very thing defines itself for all to be witness of on their own accord.
.
The following users liked this post:
Laminar (04-13-2023)
04-10-2023, 06:21 PM
#63
Dark Moderator
iTrader: (18)
Perhaps my comment wasn't direct enough.
Last I checked, this thread was about Brettus NA build. Unless, of course, it has changed.. No? K.
So, we can stay on topic, stop cluttering the threads with pointless arguements and snide remarks OR, we can take a vacation altogether.
Clear enough?
Great!
Travis
Last I checked, this thread was about Brettus NA build. Unless, of course, it has changed.. No? K.
So, we can stay on topic, stop cluttering the threads with pointless arguements and snide remarks OR, we can take a vacation altogether.
Clear enough?
Great!
Travis
The following 2 users liked this post by Williard:
Laminar (04-13-2023),
sil80drifter (06-07-2023)
06-08-2023, 05:11 PM
#66
I have my doubts, but actually hope it pans out if/when you get back to it.
the one thing I’ll add is that you have to look at the Renesis as a fully engineered package all centered around the no intake/exhaust overlap timing concept. Which is highly intake-tuning dependent because again; there is no exhaust tuning without overlap timing. That’s why Mazda poured so much effort and engineering flow analysis cost into designing the intake assembly and port positions/timing. When you start messing with that it can easily result in a negative impact rather than positive.
Or in the case of adding overlap timing, you’re looking at a major engineering redesign of the entire package. That’s pretty much what most people are either still not understanding and/or are refusing to accept. That’s why I dumped the entire hybrid idea many years ago. Unless you’re going to make new plates that reposition and eliminate ports with new properly tuned intake and exhaust systems then the chances of making any substantial gains are likely near zero.
but again, I wish you well to prove otherwise if possible.
.
the one thing I’ll add is that you have to look at the Renesis as a fully engineered package all centered around the no intake/exhaust overlap timing concept. Which is highly intake-tuning dependent because again; there is no exhaust tuning without overlap timing. That’s why Mazda poured so much effort and engineering flow analysis cost into designing the intake assembly and port positions/timing. When you start messing with that it can easily result in a negative impact rather than positive.
Or in the case of adding overlap timing, you’re looking at a major engineering redesign of the entire package. That’s pretty much what most people are either still not understanding and/or are refusing to accept. That’s why I dumped the entire hybrid idea many years ago. Unless you’re going to make new plates that reposition and eliminate ports with new properly tuned intake and exhaust systems then the chances of making any substantial gains are likely near zero.
but again, I wish you well to prove otherwise if possible.
.
Last edited by TeamRX8; 06-08-2023 at 05:14 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
fruitspunch
New Member Forum
10
09-13-2022 02:38 PM