Notices
Series I Major Horsepower Upgrades This is the place to discuss Super Chargers and Turbos, Nitrous, Porting, etc

Axial Flow Supercharger

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rating: Thread Rating: 34 votes, 4.53 average.
 
Old 02-13-2006, 06:54 PM
  #2826  
Banned
 
Beodude123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Ely, UK
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Doesn't methanol contain oxygen in it, so if you do inject it, you have to richen anyways to get more gas into there, so you don't run lean. I know that the top fuel racers run with something like 5 or 6:1 A/F.
Old 02-13-2006, 06:59 PM
  #2827  
Registered
 
rotarygod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 9,134
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by mike1324a
The idea of adding more fuel before the manifold is good but what about the idea of the build up of fuel and residue as a result of fuel just sitting in the manifold sections thats valves are closed off like the runners that open at the higher RPMs. the less that valve is open the more build up you will get. So the runners that only open at 7000+ rpm would have a huge build up due to the fact that they are not open very offen. Is this a solid presumption, Richard or Rotarygod, any ideas?
It's not a problem. Think about carburators on piston engines for a minute. They inject fuel at the throttle plate at low pressures and then need the fuel to stay in suspension until it gets into the engine. To make matters worse, each valve is only open for a small amount of time every other engine revolution. When the fuel is added at low pressure, it isn't atomized in the slightest. It is almost just being dumped in. This is especially true at idle where airflow is very slow yet they still work just fine.

If Richard ever did do a fuel injector before the blower in the future, it would only come on after a set rpm when airflow is much faster. Also consider that a fuel injector has a much higher pressure fuel stream which is a much finer mist. The blower will make sure that this mist really gets dispersed into little bits. When the fuel is atomized to this amount, it goes where the air goes. When certain intake runners are closed off, air doesn't go there. The fuel won't either. It will just bypass these runners until they open.
Old 02-13-2006, 07:13 PM
  #2828  
Bummed, but bring on OU!
 
therm8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 2,036
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Richard Paul
In fact this might be easier on a four port. It looks like the four port is dead and they will not be making them anymore.
It might be dead now, but there's ten's of thousands of us out here...
Old 02-13-2006, 08:16 PM
  #2829  
The Professor
 
staticlag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 3,479
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Beodude123
Doesn't methanol contain oxygen in it, so if you do inject it, you have to richen anyways to get more gas into there, so you don't run lean. I know that the top fuel racers run with something like 5 or 6:1 A/F.
Water contains oxygen in it also.
Old 02-13-2006, 09:09 PM
  #2830  
Int'l Man of Mystery
 
Japan8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 3,651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Richard Paul
This probably will not happen as the air is going toward the vacuum sorce which is the open port. If in fact it did happen a small 1/8 hole in each blade would handle the problem without any effect on airflow design.
We would love to do it this way for the highspeed fueling but the electronics are more difficult and we will leave this for a later date. In fact this might be easier on a four port. It looks like the four port is dead and they will not be making them anymore.

I really deel that the Mazda is the ideal engine for prehomoginized fuel. It makes sense when you look at its big problem of the extended combustion chamber. I wish Mazda would give me a research project to try this under lab conditions. It wouldn't cost much and the potential is great. Now that we are a tad away from having the install ready it would only take the fueling hardware and managment software. Are yo out there Mazda??

What if that were the breakthrough? Would Mazda switch to rotorys for more models? Does that save money? What costs more to make a rotary or piston engine?
Hmm... it is very interesting. I wonder how well it would work in conjunction with direct injection direct spark (DISI for Mazda, DSI for Mitsubishi)... on both rotaries and piston engines. Either way, I'd like to see the results of some research on this one too...

If it was the "breakthrough"? Well the design rotary that Mazda uses still does burn oil... which is an issue (people are lazy). Also something I have been wondering is the service life of your blower. This is only because jet engines used in aviation seem to require such significant amounts of service to keep them running properly and the chances of ending up with a compressor blade ending up in the combustion chamber. Nothing to do with your work... just that jet engines seem to be a little... delicate. That's all. I figure Mazda/Ford would also ask the same question too since your blower isn't in widespread use in the automotive world.

More rotaries in more cars? Well. Mazda might... they do have the hydrogen powered version and the hybrid version (which also adds FWD configuration)... so who knows. There are just a few issues though...

1. The engines are assembled by hand in the original factory (from back in the day). Not much capacity there. Any significant changes/retooling/improvements/whatever will cost some cash flow.

2. Even if Mazda put a rotary in everything they make... it's not used anywhere else... so there is a limit to economy of scale here... especially when combined with #1.

3. Because of #1 and #2, the rotary isn't so cheap to make. In theory... if it was being produced on the scale that piston engines are... considering less parts and simple assembly... it should be less expensive. Should be.
Old 02-13-2006, 09:51 PM
  #2831  
Race Steward
iTrader: (1)
 
Hymee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 5,430
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Considering the continous hours of service that turbine engines do at high power settings, I feel they have a better "service life". And one of the reasons they are so fastidiously serviced in aviation circles is the human life saftey factor.

I guess they are delicate if they ingest something (FOD). But so are all engines, even rotars. I also remember a particular start line incident where a V12 Jag injested a small peice of headlight glass... Not long till it was a V11, then a V0.

Cheers,
Hymee.
Old 02-13-2006, 11:04 PM
  #2832  
Registered
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
Richard Paul's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Chatsworth Ca
Posts: 2,433
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 9 Posts
I don't really know the actual hrs that service is required for modern turbine engines but I think in the thousands for the C section. Even the Hot section goes for far more hours then a piston engine does. Turbine_pwr can give you the numbers or maybe some of our pilot friends can chime in here.

Wildcard, John Corbitt. Don't we have two helo pilots on this thread named Jon?
And some more military that I'm not aware of, you have to be there.
How about some aircraft maintaince guys.


Just reread that and have to touch on something. What we have here is one rotating part that touches no other part. Other then the bearings and gears no wear can be antisapated. The bearings are rated for over full speed of the blower and yet the blower spends very little time even close to top speed. That is one thing about aircraft engines, they spend thier life almost full speed and 80% load.

Nothing driven on the road can ever do that kind of service. Only in the air or on the ocean is there full load full speed continuos duty possable. Those pilots always back off from there after getting to speed. But only a %.

A tuna trawler might at time see full service for a distance though. Maybe warships and offshore sex boats.

Last edited by Richard Paul; 02-13-2006 at 11:16 PM.
Old 02-14-2006, 12:05 AM
  #2833  
Int'l Man of Mystery
 
Japan8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 3,651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Hymee
Considering the continous hours of service that turbine engines do at high power settings, I feel they have a better "service life". And one of the reasons they are so fastidiously serviced in aviation circles is the human life saftey factor.
Ah... "human life saftey factor"... that is very true. Especially in commercial aircraft.

I guess they are delicate if they ingest something (FOD). But so are all engines, even rotars. I also remember a particular start line incident where a V12 Jag injested a small peice of headlight glass... Not long till it was a V11, then a V0.

Cheers,
Hymee.
Ouch!





Originally Posted by Richard Paul
I don't really know the actual hrs that service is required for modern turbine engines but I think in the thousands for the C section. Even the Hot section goes for far more hours then a piston engine does. Turbine_pwr can give you the numbers or maybe some of our pilot friends can chime in here.

Wildcard, John Corbitt. Don't we have two helo pilots on this thread named Jon?
And some more military that I'm not aware of, you have to be there.
How about some aircraft maintaince guys.


Just reread that and have to touch on something. What we have here is one rotating part that touches no other part. Other then the bearings and gears no wear can be antisapated. The bearings are rated for over full speed of the blower and yet the blower spends very little time even close to top speed. That is one thing about aircraft engines, they spend thier life almost full speed and 80% load.

Nothing driven on the road can ever do that kind of service. Only in the air or on the ocean is there full load full speed continuos duty possable. Those pilots always back off from there after getting to speed. But only a %.

A tuna trawler might at time see full service for a distance though. Maybe warships and offshore sex boats.
Good points guys. I did forget that these engines typically spend hours running at 80-100% load.

I was only trying to think of possible issues or questions the automakers would have about something like this. We all know how much *** covering they do... sometimes by necessity. Liability and service costs are obvious things they would be concerned with.

With how you've got your unit well over-spec'd... it sounds like there should be many years of problem-free operation.

HEY MAZDA! Give this man some research money... he might just have what you've been looking for.
Old 02-14-2006, 06:01 AM
  #2834  
Registered
 
djgiron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Denver
Posts: 585
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
Sorry, dont know how to thumbnail these:




Old 02-14-2006, 06:04 AM
  #2835  
Registered
 
djgiron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Denver
Posts: 585
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts


Old 02-14-2006, 06:05 AM
  #2836  
Registered
 
djgiron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Denver
Posts: 585
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 6 Posts
This last one was the best I could do:

Old 02-14-2006, 09:11 AM
  #2837  
Registered
 
globi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 664
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Beodude123
Doesn't methanol contain oxygen in it, so if you do inject it, you have to richen anyways to get more gas into there, so you don't run lean. I know that the top fuel racers run with something like 5 or 6:1 A/F.
Top fuel racers run nitromethane not methanol.
If anything you would need to lean the mixture somewhat in case methanol actually burns and if it burns it will burn oxygen during the combustion process. This can especially be seen on Diesel engines that inject a water/methanol mixture (black fumes).
Old 02-14-2006, 09:33 AM
  #2838  
Mmmmm... Rotary Donut
 
G8rboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Lake in the Hills, IL (NW Chicago Burbs)
Posts: 2,376
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
I don't know if a big hunk of aluminum ever looked so sexy
Old 02-14-2006, 11:23 AM
  #2839  
Registered User
 
deppenma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
RP I know you are a stickler for using your own designs/idea so there is no concern about something not being a quality product. However would the ELF (BRP ELF LINK ) work on the fuel side of things for now to get the monster up an running so we can see some dyno numbers.
Instructions on bottom of page; the instructions show the unit will work on engines with injectors varying from 2 to 4 with optional electrical tag for an additional injector or water injection.
Old 02-14-2006, 01:31 PM
  #2840  
Registered
 
John Corbitt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Ocala, FL
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
When our engines are at idle the 12 stage compressor is spinning at 62%. We can fly for 16hours nonstop with the engine running at about 95%. 5th stage bleed air is quite often over 40psi. Richards compressor putting out 6psi is hardly having to do any work. Any FOD (Forign Object Dammage) injested that would damage the compressor would certainly damage the rotary engine. This is why it is so important to always use an air filter.


John
Old 02-15-2006, 08:09 PM
  #2841  
Registered User
 
fenderlover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ATTENTION

is it possible to make a sticky of just the information given not all the posts because it's hard for me to get all the info from 190 pages!!!1

thx
Old 02-15-2006, 08:14 PM
  #2842  
Zoom-Freakin'-Zoom
iTrader: (5)
 
swoope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: orlando, fl
Posts: 14,602
Received 35 Likes on 31 Posts
if you go to the final 15 post 99% of the time you will find the answer to your ???s.

rp check pm.

beers
Old 02-16-2006, 02:12 AM
  #2843  
Registered
 
robertdot's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: BHM, AL
Posts: 1,071
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by fenderlover
ATTENTION

is it possible to make a sticky of just the information given not all the posts because it's hard for me to get all the info from 190 pages!!!1

thx
The only way to sticky the information, AFAIK, is for someone to read 190 pages, gather the info, make a new thread, and sticky that thread. So, if you are willing to go through the 190 pages and gather the important stuff and make a new post, feel free. If not, I doubt anyone will be motivated enough to do it for you... unless you give them money.
Old 02-16-2006, 10:35 AM
  #2844  
Registered User
 
Aseras's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,587
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Japan8
If it was the "breakthrough"? Well the design rotary that Mazda uses still does burn oil... which is an issue (people are lazy). Also something I have been wondering is the service life of your blower. This is only because jet engines used in aviation seem to require such significant amounts of service to keep them running properly and the chances of ending up with a compressor blade ending up in the combustion chamber. Nothing to do with your work... just that jet engines seem to be a little... delicate. That's all. I figure Mazda/Ford would also ask the same question too since your blower isn't in widespread use in the automotive world.
I've seen engineers at grumman chuck frozen turkeys through running engines to test their durability.. they are pretty damn hardy... since this isnt going to be exposed to anything thanks to ducting and a filter i'd expect it to last a VERY long time.
Old 02-16-2006, 12:59 PM
  #2845  
Need'd a Turbo
 
mike1324a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,328
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Aseras
I've seen engineers at grumman chuck frozen turkeys through running engines to test their durability.. they are pretty damn hardy... since this isnt going to be exposed to anything thanks to ducting and a filter i'd expect it to last a VERY long time.
Damn! That would be a sight to see. I dont think i need to worry about turkeys too much but ive been knownto be wrong from time to time. But seriously, im not worried about the durability.
Old 02-16-2006, 01:14 PM
  #2846  
Bigus Rotus
iTrader: (3)
 
Nemesis8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Missouri
Posts: 8,573
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I did not know that frozen turkeys could fly

RP, are you making a CF cold air intake to bring in air from the outside the front bumper similar to the REVi?
Old 02-16-2006, 02:19 PM
  #2847  
Registered
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
Richard Paul's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Chatsworth Ca
Posts: 2,433
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 9 Posts
https://www.rx8club.com/attachment.p...chmentid=22438


See page 14 post 204


At this time we are only making the SC to TB adapter from CF.
What comes from the TB on foward we don't know yet. We havn't gotten there.

Last edited by Richard Paul; 02-16-2006 at 02:22 PM.
Old 02-16-2006, 02:22 PM
  #2848  
I WAS BEES
 
Photic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Do they at least make some sandwiches/burgers with the now ground/slightly cooked turkey?
Old 02-16-2006, 02:40 PM
  #2849  
Rotary only since 1980
 
Blue87Sport's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Southeast of Seattle
Posts: 587
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Nemesis8
I did not know that frozen turkeys could fly
The standard answer is "With enough thrust anything will fly".

I don't think FOD is too much of a worry since the SC is downstream of filters and screens.
Old 02-16-2006, 05:58 PM
  #2850  
Registered User
 
DrFoster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Denver Metro Area
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the great laugh. I love reading threads like this...

I'll gladly take any of your guys hard earned cash and develop some sort of magic never before seen part that boosts 19psi and only raises air temps 10 degrees.. and my delivery time will be just like this - between now and someday...

Just shoot nos or buy a regular turbo instead of trying to think outside of the x-box on this one. It's a proven, reliable element that you can run for 100,000 miles at 7 psi...

If you want more power than that, just go buy a 20B and drop it in your '8.

LOL thanks! Great thread!


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 34 votes, 4.53 average.

Quick Reply: Axial Flow Supercharger



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:15 AM.