Notices
Series I Major Horsepower Upgrades This is the place to discuss Super Chargers and Turbos, Nitrous, Porting, etc

9krpmrx8's Boost Build Thread

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Nov 12, 2012 | 10:39 AM
  #3076  
ShellDude's Avatar
weeeeeeeeee
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 4,200
Likes: 229
From: Outside Philadelphia
now might be a good time to grab some Injector Dynamics ID1000s I have all the AP latency data for them if you're interested... based on a cool spreadsheet I threw together that allows for interpolation.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2012 | 10:47 AM
  #3077  
9krpmrx8's Avatar
Thread Starter
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 33,788
Likes: 462
From: San Antonio, Texas
TX

Originally Posted by ShellDude
now might be a good time to grab some Injector Dynamics ID1000s I have all the AP latency data for them if you're interested... based on a cool spreadsheet I threw together that allows for interpolation.
As it is I have too much fuel, I see no need for larger injectors. The yellows in the p1 and blues in the P2 should be plenty.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2012 | 06:30 PM
  #3078  
Sifu's Avatar
Opulence
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 1
From: Houston
Makes me wonder how much fuel I am getting with my injectors.

Can't wait till you sort out the tune and get this beast running 100%

Want to help me with a base tune in December haha?
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2012 | 08:13 PM
  #3079  
9krpmrx8's Avatar
Thread Starter
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 33,788
Likes: 462
From: San Antonio, Texas
TX

Originally Posted by Sifu
Makes me wonder how much fuel I am getting with my injectors.

Can't wait till you sort out the tune and get this beast running 100%

Want to help me with a base tune in December haha?
You really should have them tested at 60psi so you really know what they are flowing for your application. It's a learning process and I learn more everyday. I would be glad to help you man, we have been having group tuning meets so that we can correct each other and compare our notes against our research, etc. The biggest problem in learning how to tune is understanding the terms used because they vary depending on what tuner you talk too.

I have a good book for you to read if you want to go into super nerd mode. But honestly Kane is the man and without him and Brettus to speak with I would be way lost. I'm so close I can taste it.

The car actually ran great today, my injectors were behaving I guess because of the really cool weather and now that I think of it, they seem to act up even more when it's hot.


If you ever need to ask questions or talk to someone the guys and gal at home. They are local for me.
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2012 | 07:39 PM
  #3080  
TeamRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,936
Likes: 2,140
breaking out the broken record player again .... remember that for most Renesis FI applications that don't have a boost compensated fuel pressure system the true injector flow rate will be defined @ fuel pressure minus boost pressure
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2012 | 12:26 AM
  #3081  
9krpmrx8's Avatar
Thread Starter
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 33,788
Likes: 462
From: San Antonio, Texas
Resolving that issue sounds really, really complicated.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2012 | 12:45 AM
  #3082  
dannobre's Avatar
Modulated Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 13,720
Likes: 344
From: Smallville
Understanding it is most important. Then a strategy can be developed to deal with it
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2012 | 12:59 AM
  #3083  
9krpmrx8's Avatar
Thread Starter
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 33,788
Likes: 462
From: San Antonio, Texas
I understand Boost tries to push fuel back into the injector and I guess a return style setup would be ideal. I have some research to do.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2012 | 01:15 AM
  #3084  
Brettus's Avatar
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 20,845
Likes: 1,799
From: Y-cat-o NZ
it really isn't such a big issue as is being suggested here . Just understand that it exists as an issue but won't actually make that much difference at the boost level you are likely to run at and you will be fine.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2012 | 01:28 AM
  #3085  
9krpmrx8's Avatar
Thread Starter
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 33,788
Likes: 462
From: San Antonio, Texas
I just read Dan's return fuel system thread, I think I'll save that project for the next engine replacement.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2012 | 05:26 PM
  #3086  
Kane's Avatar
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,364
Likes: 44
From: PCB
Good lord guys, asked and answered like years ago.....

You don't need a return system, you just have to compensate for it. If you don't have a RISING rate regulator, then use the Fuel VE% Table. For lower boost applications it's fine.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2012 | 07:42 PM
  #3087  
olddragger's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 40
From: macon, georgia
it is not like we are pushing 15-30 psi of boost...not yet anyway.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2012 | 09:34 AM
  #3088  
TeamRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,936
Likes: 2,140
I'm not saying its an overriding issue. As long as the injectors are large enough then its easily compensated for. When you discuss/determine injector flow then its something to consider. If you intend to maintain 55 psig fuel pressure, yet not exceed 15 psig boost the you might consider requesting your injectors to be flow tested at 40 psig (55-15=40).

I recall a certain somebody railing on about a set of modified yellow secondary injectors don't flow up to their rating. Well they do actually under the NA pressure condition for which they were tested. It just wasn't the same as his actual fuel vs boost pressure setup.

There are other reasons to make the feed/return/regulated fuel system changes, but this is mostly for competition reasons. The typical street/play car doesn't really require it.

As usual, typical forum twisting a comment or two into something that wasn't meant or intended
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2012 | 10:14 AM
  #3089  
dannobre's Avatar
Modulated Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 13,720
Likes: 344
From: Smallville
I would tend to bump up the static fp to the higher end of the scale..say 65psi..and tune there...modify the latency change due to that increase .....and then have flow closer to what should be expected at normal boost levels. Ending up with 40psi after baro changes isn't ideal
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2012 | 10:29 AM
  #3090  
TeamRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,936
Likes: 2,140
It was just an example using the OE fuel pressure figure
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2012 | 10:50 AM
  #3091  
olddragger's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 40
From: macon, georgia
agreed in principle. It is just another factor that has to be considered when modifying an engine.
Thats all.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2012 | 12:44 PM
  #3092  
Brettus's Avatar
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 20,845
Likes: 1,799
From: Y-cat-o NZ
Originally Posted by TeamRX8

I recall a certain somebody railing on about a set of modified yellow secondary injectors don't flow up to their rating. Well they do actually under the NA pressure condition for which they were tested.
Interestingly ......... It was under NA conditions that the lack of flow from uncapped yellows became apparent to me.I would still disagree with the second sentence above.

Last edited by Brettus; Nov 17, 2012 at 12:49 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2012 | 12:50 PM
  #3093  
ShellDude's Avatar
weeeeeeeeee
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 4,200
Likes: 229
From: Outside Philadelphia
This recent fuel pressure tangent has done nothing but hurt my brain. If you've got the basic latency values plugged in for "static" pressure and +/- range provided then shouldn't it just be a matter of making adjustments via the VE table?

Does it really matter that much if the final VE % is a little higher or lower than the "true" value? No matter how hard you try to polish a hardened pile of ****, it will always be ****
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2012 | 07:40 PM
  #3094  
9krpmrx8's Avatar
Thread Starter
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 33,788
Likes: 462
From: San Antonio, Texas
It's always the little things. So today I pulled the UIM to install the new injectors and everything went smooth. But as I was putting the UIM back on, I noticed that the vacuum check valve on the brake booster hose looked different on mine than it did on other 8's I have worked on. Mine was covered in thick black tape (that was falling off and nasty) and when I looked at another 8 that is in my garage I noticed the valve on it was not covered in tape. So I removed the tape and found this:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/9krpmrx8/8194026321/
It looks melted, not sure how the dealer would have done this but no one else besides me and the dealer has ever worked on it.

I have never messed with it so the god damn dealer must have done it at some point during the couple of engine replacements or something. When you blow thru it air goes thru regardless of what side you blow on and air comes out of the crack. It explains my whacky idle at times I guess.

Last edited by 9krpmrx8; Nov 17, 2012 at 07:46 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2012 | 07:59 PM
  #3095  
dannobre's Avatar
Modulated Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 13,720
Likes: 344
From: Smallville
Originally Posted by ShellDude
This recent fuel pressure tangent has done nothing but hurt my brain. If you've got the basic latency values plugged in for "static" pressure and +/- range provided then shouldn't it just be a matter of making adjustments via the VE table?

Does it really matter that much if the final VE % is a little higher or lower than the "true" value? No matter how hard you try to polish a hardened pile of ****, it will always be ****
Basically the final result is what is important

You can get there in a few different directions....with the fuel tables, MAF, injectors and the Ve table....

Ideally it would be best to have rock solid fuel pressure with a rising rate regulator that would adjust for manifold pressure....injectors that you knew the perfect latency values...and a perfectly adjusted MAF.....then you could type in your "wanted" Lamba value and it could do it perfectly every time. And great adjustability for different ambient and engine conditions

The reality is you get a MAF that is fickle..injectors that change for a multitude of reasons, a regulator that isn't perfect.....you get the picture

and then we fudge stuff till we get out of it what we want

It ain't pretty...but it works 99% of the time.

The trick is knowing which variable is causeing strange little glitches in the Lamba that move around for no apparent reason despite trying to adjust for them. That is when having better values for the sensors and injectors etc will make them easier to figure out
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2012 | 03:16 PM
  #3096  
TeamRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,936
Likes: 2,140
Originally Posted by Brettus
Interestingly ......... It was under NA conditions that the lack of flow from uncapped yellows became apparent to me.I would still disagree with the second sentence above.
I suppose that would come down to who tested them and how it was done then. If done properly then the results just don't magically not add up.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2012 | 12:53 AM
  #3097  
9krpmrx8's Avatar
Thread Starter
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 33,788
Likes: 462
From: San Antonio, Texas
Giggity, Giggity.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/9krpmrx8/8198264231/
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2012 | 12:56 AM
  #3098  
dannobre's Avatar
Modulated Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 13,720
Likes: 344
From: Smallville
Good choice..now get some good pads and hit the track
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2012 | 01:04 AM
  #3099  
9krpmrx8's Avatar
Thread Starter
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 33,788
Likes: 462
From: San Antonio, Texas
I have a full set of ET300's and ET500's. Not track pads I know, but a start. Track time will be soon, the tune is almost there. I also have a broken (wasn't me this time) rear sway bar bracket bolt that needs to be drilled out, yay.

Last edited by 9krpmrx8; Nov 19, 2012 at 01:17 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2012 | 09:04 PM
  #3100  
TeamRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,936
Likes: 2,140
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:01 AM.