Fix for issues with CZ units in GB #2
Originally Posted by Magic8
Also does anyone know if leaning out the AFR would be detrimental to the CAT.
Oh yeah, I forgot to mention, the dips at 6 - 7K is very noticeable now. I actually thought that maybe it was knocking and so fuel had to be cut off or ignition retarded or something, but after checking the logs I wasn't even at levels that I would be pinging. I know that dip was there back before I got flashed with M config.
check out the last graph on this page:
http://tyrannical.org/cz/
I lowered some points by a set number, and logged the results.
In the blue area, i lowered those by 2 points, yet at 7000 rpm, it actually went up a little. I guess things change from run to run, so I'm trying to use this as a general overview of what's going on.
These are 2nd gear pulls btw.
http://tyrannical.org/cz/
I lowered some points by a set number, and logged the results.
In the blue area, i lowered those by 2 points, yet at 7000 rpm, it actually went up a little. I guess things change from run to run, so I'm trying to use this as a general overview of what's going on.
These are 2nd gear pulls btw.
I loaded up the original cz map and for some odd reason, at around 7k rpm the car appears to cut the fuel and leans it so much the canscan shows the car going to 20 AFR. At that point the car has some sort of internal cut off and stops it from going any higher. So I returned to the "lumpy" map I was working on. It's possible I screwed with the original map before saving it, but I can't know unless I get a copy from someone to compare.
Jason, Xyntax - are we the only three that's working on the CZ. How are you guys coming?
Looks like Jason still need some work. After two weeks of tuning I am close to nailing the AFR map. My AFR is almost flat around 13.5, I'll post a screen capture of my map when I'm done.
Looks like Jason still need some work. After two weeks of tuning I am close to nailing the AFR map. My AFR is almost flat around 13.5, I'll post a screen capture of my map when I'm done.
Yeah, I'm ready to scrap my map and start with a new one. I am getting tired of doing so many high rpm runs then sitting on the side of the road for 3 mins making a graph and making map adjustments before repeating the process.
Post a screenshot of your emanage map - I'd like to try yours out, especially if it's near flat at 13.5 - that would be awesome.
Post a screenshot of your emanage map - I'd like to try yours out, especially if it's near flat at 13.5 - that would be awesome.
Check out the Map Sharing Thread.
Note that I modified the Throttle Column (the one in Blue) in the AFR Map. It goes 90, 88, 84, 80 75,70..... I did this because when I logged with eManage my throttle never went beyond 88% even though my CanScan says it's 100%. Someone pointed this out to the board so I incorporated that info. I also changed the RPM range since I noticed that in my car, everything below 5600 RPM was fine.
Xyntax also saw that zeroing out the low voltage setting (2.90 or 3.00) in the ignition map helps eliminate advance from creeping into the low RPM ranges. My only change was that I didn't zero out the whole row, only the first cell. Thanks Xyntax for that observation.
I started fresh with the AFR map, but use the base CZ ignition map to start. The only change I incorporated into the CZ ignition map was to eliminate the zeros in the 6000 RPM range. I put in 5's and 4's. Feels pretty good.
Note that I modified the Throttle Column (the one in Blue) in the AFR Map. It goes 90, 88, 84, 80 75,70..... I did this because when I logged with eManage my throttle never went beyond 88% even though my CanScan says it's 100%. Someone pointed this out to the board so I incorporated that info. I also changed the RPM range since I noticed that in my car, everything below 5600 RPM was fine.
Xyntax also saw that zeroing out the low voltage setting (2.90 or 3.00) in the ignition map helps eliminate advance from creeping into the low RPM ranges. My only change was that I didn't zero out the whole row, only the first cell. Thanks Xyntax for that observation.
I started fresh with the AFR map, but use the base CZ ignition map to start. The only change I incorporated into the CZ ignition map was to eliminate the zeros in the 6000 RPM range. I put in 5's and 4's. Feels pretty good.
Last edited by Magic8; Oct 4, 2004 at 04:50 PM.
I've noticed mine refuses to leave closed loop control until it hits 5500 rpms no matter what the throttle position!?!? Or if it is out of closed loop, its running at 14-14.5 a/f ratio.
So I'm wiping out the stock map below that since a/f ratio's in the 14's don't need to be raised...
So I'm wiping out the stock map below that since a/f ratio's in the 14's don't need to be raised...
Originally Posted by pr0ber
oh, when you adjust the advance map - are the values you put in there the actual amount it degrees it will change?
like is a "7" worth 7 degrees of actual advance?
like is a "7" worth 7 degrees of actual advance?
i'm looking at your maps and i see values of like 7 for advance... what was your car stock?
my car already is at 30 degrees from 7000 up... 37 degrees of advance would seem extremely risky with a 13.5 a/f ratio. Or am I totally wrong on that?
my car already is at 30 degrees from 7000 up... 37 degrees of advance would seem extremely risky with a 13.5 a/f ratio. Or am I totally wrong on that?
Originally Posted by Magic8
Jason, Xyntax - are we the only three that's working on the CZ. How are you guys coming?
Currently mine is turned off because I am hearing noises that might be a slight ping.
I too will be working on it, but with my wedding coming up, I've just been way to busy. Hopefully once the last batch of crap is taken care of in the next couple weeks I'll start working on it.
Don't expect a mileage increase unless you drive aggressive. You lean out the fuel-air mixture at 5800 rpm and above. Personal when I cruise I don't spend much time in that region.
Below 5000 rpm the car runs in close loop and hits 14.7 almost all the time, so it's pretty lean.
I had the same gas mileage (~23 mpg) running highway before and after getting the CZ and tuning it.
Below 5000 rpm the car runs in close loop and hits 14.7 almost all the time, so it's pretty lean.
I had the same gas mileage (~23 mpg) running highway before and after getting the CZ and tuning it.
Hi,
did some basic tuning on a car with CZ Stage2 map, no noticable gain yet
USB connection and E-manage software works fine and easy to use. Checked the ignitin advance (worked fine) and calibrated the throttle position. Car was driven hard (wot only) so the throttle mod Magic8 described might be neccessary to gain anything.
I keep on trying!
did some basic tuning on a car with CZ Stage2 map, no noticable gain yet
USB connection and E-manage software works fine and easy to use. Checked the ignitin advance (worked fine) and calibrated the throttle position. Car was driven hard (wot only) so the throttle mod Magic8 described might be neccessary to gain anything.
I keep on trying!



