Notices
Series I Engine Tuning Forum EMS (Flash Tuning, Interceptor, Piggy Back, Stand Alone)

Blow Through Tuning

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 02-14-2010, 02:06 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Spoolin8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 726
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Blow Through Tuning

I plan on doing a blow through setup once i get my build going and i wanted some answers from the tuning guru's as to what EM setup would be best? I was planning on going with the AP and from what i have read it should work perfectly but i just wanted to get some other opinions.

Thanks
Old 02-15-2010, 02:43 PM
  #2  
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Spoolin8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 726
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I guess im entering into uncharted waters
Old 02-15-2010, 02:47 PM
  #3  
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
MazdaManiac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Under my car
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by Spoolin8
I guess im entering into uncharted waters
Not in the least.

Thoroughly charted. You just need to read up.
Old 02-15-2010, 04:01 PM
  #4  
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Spoolin8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 726
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
Not in the least.

Thoroughly charted. You just need to read up.
Thanks, ive been searching and it seems to be hit or miss on what i find.
Old 02-15-2010, 04:15 PM
  #5  
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
MazdaManiac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Under my car
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
There are a lot of discussions about what it takes to get the MAF happy with regards to airflow and placement.

Beyond that, air is air.
Old 02-15-2010, 04:20 PM
  #6  
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Spoolin8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 726
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ok so basically it will work fine as long as you have a consistent setup that allows for a steady stream of airflow? The few threads i have found over the subject just had a few people chime in with no solid information so i appreciate the info.
Old 02-15-2010, 04:31 PM
  #7  
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
MazdaManiac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Under my car
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by Spoolin8
Ok so basically it will work fine as long as you have a consistent setup that allows for a steady stream of airflow?
It has to precisely replicate the OE arrangement in diameter and flow direction.

The i.d. must be 3.375" and the MAF must center exactly in the tube, which must have at least one flow-straightening screen 3" before the MAF.
The tube may not change direction or diameter within 6 " of either side of the MAF.
The air cannot exceed 180°F and/or 480 g/sec total flow.
Old 02-15-2010, 05:28 PM
  #8  
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Spoolin8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 726
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thank you, exactly what i needed. Just need to make sure i dont get a turbo that flows more then 480 g/sec
Old 02-15-2010, 05:35 PM
  #9  
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
MazdaManiac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Under my car
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by Spoolin8
Thank you, exactly what i needed. Just need to make sure i dont get a turbo that flows more then 480 g/sec
Heh. Quite a design consideration, isn't it?

You can also replace the MAF with something else and rescale.
You had better know what you are doing, though. Otherwise, you are in for endless headaches.
Old 02-15-2010, 08:04 PM
  #10  
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
Spoolin8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 726
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I really just did not want to have the MAF located under and at the very rear of the car, but it may just be the better way to go about this. I was planning on going with a Precision SC61 and that thing roughly flows 65lbs/min which comes out to just over 500g/sec... The previous cars i have boosted were alot easier to tune and the MAF's could handle a decent about and were not as picky as the 8's. Thanks for the input and im going to talk to my buddy at cobb hopefully this weekend when i go in for a baseline dyno.
Old 02-20-2010, 03:46 PM
  #11  
Registered
 
Rote8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Boosted...
Posts: 1,574
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
What is the max voltage the MAF puts out?
Is that at 480 g/s?
Old 02-21-2010, 02:28 AM
  #12  
Registered User
 
Talic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Canada, UAE, Philippines.
Posts: 205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i plan on mine to extend the maf to the rear.
im in the process of checking the readings on the extention to see if it will affect with the volts/watts/amps/ohms etc ill let you know how it comes out
Old 03-06-2010, 01:31 PM
  #13  
Registered
 
thewird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
It has to precisely replicate the OE arrangement in diameter and flow direction.

The i.d. must be 3.375" and the MAF must center exactly in the tube, which must have at least one flow-straightening screen 3" before the MAF.
The tube may not change direction or diameter within 6 " of either side of the MAF.
The air cannot exceed 180°F and/or 480 g/sec total flow.
Is the 3.375" diameter a requirement of the MAF to be accurate? I always thought one could use a larger diameter intake and rescale the MAF so you could have a higher total flow limit. Or are you concerned about the MAF being inaccurate at low flow rates?

thewird
Old 03-06-2010, 02:03 PM
  #14  
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Y-cat-o NZ
Posts: 20,523
Received 1,489 Likes on 839 Posts
Originally Posted by thewird
Is the 3.375" diameter a requirement of the MAF to be accurate? I always thought one could use a larger diameter intake and rescale the MAF so you could have a higher total flow limit. Or are you concerned about the MAF being inaccurate at low flow rates?

thewird
The issue could be getting it in the exact centre of the airstream otherwise I can't see why that would'nt work
Old 03-06-2010, 09:43 PM
  #15  
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
MazdaManiac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Under my car
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by Brettus
The issue could be getting it in the exact centre of the airstream otherwise I can't see why that would'nt work
If I wanted more MAF flow (hint, hint) I would build and oval pipe section with a minor diameter of 3.375.
Solves both issues.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tbiggybig
RX-8 Discussion
35
07-14-2022 06:14 PM
Hunterkelley24
Series I Engine Tuning Forum
14
06-14-2022 08:32 AM
fourwhls
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
7
02-20-2019 05:16 PM
Danield97
Series I Trouble Shooting
1
09-30-2015 05:59 PM
pjwermuth
RX-8 Discussion
5
09-28-2015 11:36 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Blow Through Tuning



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:03 PM.