Notices
Series I Engine Tuning Forum EMS (Flash Tuning, Interceptor, Piggy Back, Stand Alone)

Best NA Power Mods

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 12-03-2009, 10:08 AM
  #51  
dont hate...just rotate!!
 
mattrotary34's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Pell City, AL
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by kennyfrc1
Here is the best mod for the RX8.
lol....
Old 12-03-2009, 08:32 PM
  #52  
Bigus Rotus
iTrader: (3)
 
Nemesis8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Missouri
Posts: 8,573
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Wait until Summer 2010 and you will have my results.
Old 12-04-2009, 05:03 AM
  #53  
Registered
 
PhillipM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 863
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts


I'm pretty sure that's not N/A....
Old 12-05-2009, 11:48 AM
  #54  
Owner of BHR
iTrader: (7)
 
Charles R. Hill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,101
Received 45 Likes on 32 Posts
Now, back to the subject matter, shall we?

My opinion;

1) BHR Ignition System.
2) Cobb AP.
3) Lightweight flywheel.
4) Catless midpipe.

Then, in no particular order;

5) Underdrive pulleys.
6) Lightweight wheels.
7) Cat-back exhaust system.
Old 12-05-2009, 11:54 AM
  #55  
Bigus Rotus
iTrader: (3)
 
Nemesis8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Missouri
Posts: 8,573
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Prepare for our resident "the sky is falling" climate czar to attack #4
Old 12-05-2009, 11:58 AM
  #56  
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Y-cat-o NZ
Posts: 20,525
Received 1,492 Likes on 840 Posts
Speaking of no. 4 . Does BHR have any plans to make the ultimate header/midpipe ?
Old 12-05-2009, 11:59 AM
  #57  
Owner of BHR
iTrader: (7)
 
Charles R. Hill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,101
Received 45 Likes on 32 Posts
I had that run through my mind when I posted it but he knows I hate the planet so I doubt he'll waste his time admonishing me. Besides, he is actually part of the solution so he has the right to soapbox once in a while, even if he bases his views on skewed, falsified, or deleted data.
Old 12-05-2009, 12:01 PM
  #58  
Bigus Rotus
iTrader: (3)
 
Nemesis8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Missouri
Posts: 8,573
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
It needs to be long tube and collect further back than the RB one, then to appease the climate czar, add this to the pipe. From there add your resonator.
Old 12-05-2009, 12:02 PM
  #59  
Owner of BHR
iTrader: (7)
 
Charles R. Hill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,101
Received 45 Likes on 32 Posts
Originally Posted by Brettus
Speaking of no. 4 . Does BHR have any plans to make the ultimate header/midpipe ?
I spent a decent amount of time discussing that with someone a few months ago but my repeated attempts to contact that "someone", in an effort to bring the idea to fruition, have gone unanswered.
Old 12-05-2009, 12:05 PM
  #60  
Owner of BHR
iTrader: (7)
 
Charles R. Hill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,101
Received 45 Likes on 32 Posts
Originally Posted by Nemesis8
It needs to be long tube and collect further back than the RB one, then to appease the climate czar, add this to the pipe. From there add your resonator.
BHR can easily build the midpipe that would fit all these parameters but I refuse to build the header because the man who did the research and development deserves to get paid for his efforts. As such, BHR will not make such a header without his explicit blessing/approval/contractual right to royalties.
Old 12-05-2009, 12:06 PM
  #61  
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Y-cat-o NZ
Posts: 20,525
Received 1,492 Likes on 840 Posts
tell that "someone" to take his head out of his *** and get with the program LOL
Old 12-05-2009, 12:07 PM
  #62  
Owner of BHR
iTrader: (7)
 
Charles R. Hill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,101
Received 45 Likes on 32 Posts
Originally Posted by Brettus
tell that "someone" to take his head out of his *** and get with the program LOL
I have been trying to, only with a bit more diplomacy and politeness than that.
Old 12-05-2009, 12:09 PM
  #63  
Bigus Rotus
iTrader: (3)
 
Nemesis8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Missouri
Posts: 8,573
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
There is a market for it, but you'll need to locate the front OE o2 sensor differently.
Old 12-05-2009, 12:12 PM
  #64  
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Y-cat-o NZ
Posts: 20,525
Received 1,492 Likes on 840 Posts
Well it is probably the last worthwhile untapped NA mod that there is . There has to be a market for it - especially if it achieves a measurable gain .
Old 12-05-2009, 12:13 PM
  #65  
Owner of BHR
iTrader: (7)
 
Charles R. Hill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,101
Received 45 Likes on 32 Posts
Originally Posted by Nemesis8
There is a market for it, but you'll need to locate the front OE o2 sensor differently.
I am rather confident BHR can provide an extension harness for the O2 sensors.
BHR is also working on a bunch of unrelated extension harnesses for a well-respected individual who needs them. Parts are tough to find but progress is being made with them.
Old 12-05-2009, 12:32 PM
  #66  
zoom zoom!
 
ronx8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: SoCal
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the access port is probably the biggest gain and tool for the rx8, but wouldnt it be more efficient to add all your exhaust and intake mods first, then buy the access port with the mazda maniac tune?

seems like you would get more out of your mods by doing so imo.
correct me if im wrong.
Old 12-05-2009, 12:41 PM
  #67  
Owner of BHR
iTrader: (7)
 
Charles R. Hill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,101
Received 45 Likes on 32 Posts
Once the AP is set to achieve a targeted A/F ratio, the PCM will seek that ratio even if intake and exhaust mods are implemented later, in closed-loop mode, that is. In open-loop, I doubt that intake/exhaust mods will change the mass airflow enough, if at all, to make any difference. I may be wrong in my understanding of this because Jeff is the expert on the team with the AP and it is an entire discipline unto itself, just as I have my specialties and disciplines that he doesn't care to delve into.

In short, I may be right or I may be wrong. Let's see..........

Last edited by Charles R. Hill; 12-06-2009 at 09:58 AM.
Old 12-06-2009, 03:34 PM
  #68  
No respecter of malarkey
iTrader: (25)
 
TeamRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,721
Received 2,009 Likes on 1,638 Posts
I had a significant WOT AFR change between two custom air filter intakes, but my thread where this was proven is gone

the extension harnesses are sold online and readily available, I have one around somewhere, never needed it


.

Last edited by TeamRX8; 12-06-2009 at 08:31 PM.
Old 12-06-2009, 05:40 PM
  #69  
Registered User
 
jdirk82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Cool

Originally Posted by kersh4w
omfg, i really cant believe i have to say this. seriously. do you not think this has been discussed to death.

christ.

SEARCH!
im sure it has but we all had to start somewhere!... all i do is research these threads for hours upon days at work and i just barley came across this thread... rx8 club has been great and i love you guys for all the precious info and insight that you all have provided me but if someone has a ?... just answer it dont get on his/her *** just for asking a simple ?,you could just refer them to a link to what thier wanting to know,no but instead some guys start trashing the tread flaming folks for stupid **** instead of helping the matter at hand...so this makes folks reluctant to ask any other questions for the fear of the same ridicule..so i say **** all y'all haters out there! cuz any true rotor head would be glad to give a helping hand to a brother in need.... so keep asking those questions guys..cause the jerks out there just need fist in thier mouth! s
The following users liked this post:
Old 12-06-2009, 05:51 PM
  #70  
Registered User
 
jdirk82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by cliffkemp
I agree with your #1 but, I have not messed with my computer yet and not going to for a while.

#2 is not worth the money if you are going to stay NA as the stock coils are good for NA use. I just changed mine out at 58k miles and only one showed any wear and I drive my car just like most people and redline it all the time. Only if the connections are bad or go bad (have to know more about electricity) will your coils fail. Usually they will fail due to overheating because of a bad connection at the sparkplug. This mod will not give you any more hp than you already have. It will restore lost hp if your stock coils are in bad shape but, that is it.

#3 A lighter flywheel gave my car nearly 4 rwhp and 6 rwtq according to the dyno so not sure I agree with you there and drivability is basically the same. If you notice the car is harder to get going, need to learn to drive.

#4 Lighter rims are a good idea as you lose rotating mass and lose weight of the car all at the same time. I would do that as #1 in hindsight.

#5 I have yet to see a header to make much usable power but, could be but bang for the buck is not good still on this one. exhausts are mainly for show and will not give you much at all.

#6 This may or may not help depending on the weight of the person. For some it could help alot and is up to the owner.

All in all, for the money/looks the best thing to do is get much lighter rims and keep the same width if you go smaller to a 17 which is probably the best thing to do. Staying with 18s is very good to as you keep the stock characteristics and getting lighter rims is more expensive but, depends on how deep your wallet is but, you get that double whammy of loss of weight and loss of unsprung weight as well.

Almost forgot, I do have an AP pulley and it gave me almost 6 hp and 2.5 tq at the wheels for $200 installed. That is good bang for the buck.
thank you sooo much this is exactly what i wanted to hear i pretty much figured ,but i just needed some one to confirm thanks alot cliffkemp !! good lookin out
Old 12-06-2009, 06:09 PM
  #71  
Registered User
 
jdirk82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by kennyfrc1
Here is the best mod for the RX8.
LMFAO !!!! i second the notion haha with all the problems ive been having with my 8 im sadly coming to the realization that this might be the best one of them all ! haha
Old 12-06-2009, 06:45 PM
  #72  
Registered
 
cliffkemp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Atlanta area
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I can respect Flashwing as, he was not rude.
Old 12-07-2009, 01:12 AM
  #73  
Brettward is/has a G
 
RyansRx8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ls swap, go lol
Old 12-07-2009, 10:15 AM
  #74  
Registered Zoom Zoomer
iTrader: (2)
 
Huey52's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: New England
Posts: 4,089
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
I was becoming a bit lost myself..

The stock coil/'plug cable system is pretty good and will get the job done in a stock vehicle. The rub is that the coils have been shown to deteriorate more readily than the higher quality components of other systems in the RX-8. Electrical systems tend to work adequately right up to the point of total failure so they can mask marginal performance.

You therefore may be leaving some performance on the table staying with the stock coil setup.

Thanks to Mazda's design that wringed about as much stock NA performance as it could there's not too much that can enhance that performance. A stronger and more reliable coil-'plug wire setup and a better tune is about it. Other mod's like intake and exhaust are more 'ear of the beholder' items than performance enhancing, agan as Mazda already pretty well optimized the design right off the assembly line.



Originally Posted by JinDesu
I'm lost now. I came in here for the best NA power mods, and now I'm learning about wiring!

*cough*

How accurate is this statement that I make:

The stock ignitions system - regardless of length of life - is sufficient for stock usage. The BHR ignition system is best used to replace the stock system after the stock system is determined to be deteriorating. Replacing the stock system while the stock system is running strong isn't going to provide any added benefits.

Please pick apart the above statement for my understanding. I always saw the BHR system as a replacement to my system after mine starts fizzing out.
Old 12-07-2009, 10:27 AM
  #75  
went back to srsly broke
iTrader: (2)
 
JinDesu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Flushing, NY
Posts: 2,040
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by cliffkemp
Determining when the stock system is going bad is something for an expert to evaluate. It could happen at any time/milage interval. You may get lucky and it last a long time. you may have one that is bad from the start. this is where you have to decide what you want to do and why you want to do it and what you want to spend and decide if it is worth it. If you believe the BHR system is the answer and you have the money and time to have it done, by all means do it. I work with electrical components for a living and therefore, I can evaluate my own conditions to deal with and what to do about it. The choice is yours. I believe what I do based on my own dealings with electricity.
Well, if I suffer power loss and I look at my coils and see burn marks on top of them, I can safely assume they are on their way out.

My choice for a replacement would be the BHR system - not on a basis of electrical requirements, since the stock one was sufficient for that - but on a basis that the BHR coils should last longer. Whether the lifetime of the BHR product will outweigh the cost, I don't know. But I am willing to find out.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Best NA Power Mods



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:23 PM.