Notices
Series I Aftermarket Performance Modifications Discussion of power adding modifications

what is your 8's top speed????

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Sep 26, 2007 | 07:24 PM
  #201  
Spinning Sushi's Avatar
I <3 Sushi
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,967
Likes: 4
From: SoCal
I'm like 100% sure that they don't have afterburners.
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2007 | 07:30 PM
  #202  
Spinning Sushi's Avatar
I <3 Sushi
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,967
Likes: 4
From: SoCal
Yep, called up a friend in the airforce who flies an F-18 Super Hornet and he said that the F-22's have thrust vectoring and eliminates the need for afterburners. People sometimes mistakes the F-22 as to having afterburners at full thrust when they really don't. The afterburners would be a big giveaway to enemy radars because of the heat that would be produced and would defeat their stealth capabilities.
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2007 | 07:31 PM
  #203  
tajabaho1's Avatar
Destroying Threads
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,296
Likes: 2
From: (swartsnegga state)
i c, no afterburner? USAF fails, USN wins! f-15 for ever!
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2007 | 07:51 PM
  #204  
nmarz77's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 388
Likes: 2
From: Schaumburg, IL
I nailed 174 once! It was crazy!!!!! The whole car started to shake and there was noise everywhere!!!!!! I'm pretty sure she had more in her too but I was afraid the car was gonna fall off the jackstands.
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2007 | 08:01 PM
  #205  
tajabaho1's Avatar
Destroying Threads
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,296
Likes: 2
From: (swartsnegga state)
.........dyno ftw
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2007 | 02:37 AM
  #206  
Spinning Sushi's Avatar
I <3 Sushi
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,967
Likes: 4
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by tajabaho1
i c, no afterburner? USAF fails, USN wins! f-15 for ever!
LOL! Even with no afterburner, they still can easily go past MkII
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2007 | 11:46 AM
  #207  
nmarz77's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 388
Likes: 2
From: Schaumburg, IL
I saw a show on the F22. Those are bad *** aricraft. One of the F22 pilots claimed being able to take on as many as 5 F18's at once in practice and nailing them all without them even knowing he was coming.
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2007 | 12:21 PM
  #208  
tajabaho1's Avatar
Destroying Threads
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,296
Likes: 2
From: (swartsnegga state)
I'm still a fan of the f-15, cus i got to sit in a cockpit of 1 when i was a kid XD
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2008 | 08:32 AM
  #209  
Mister Man's Avatar
Six Kinds of Wonderful
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
From: Kitsap County, WA
Originally Posted by nmarz77
I nailed 174 once! It was crazy!!!!! The whole car started to shake and there was noise everywhere!!!!!! I'm pretty sure she had more in her too but I was afraid the car was gonna fall off the jackstands.

Reply
Old Jul 6, 2008 | 04:20 PM
  #210  
XlYesterdaYlX's Avatar
Zoom x 2
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
From: 209
80MPH. On the freeway, don't have much chances to actually go really fast.
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2008 | 05:07 PM
  #211  
paulmasoner's Avatar
Asshole for hire
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,214
Likes: 3
From: Colfontaine, Belgium
Originally Posted by tajabaho1
i c, no afterburner? USAF fails, USN wins! f-15 for ever!
SE3P is right no afterburners on F-22.

fwiw the Navy doesnt fly F-15's either, the only US force to fly them is the USAF

downside to the F-22... the are completely GPS leashed. A few months back, six of them left hawaii enroute to japan. as they crossed the dateline, the hit a programming glitch that affected their GPS. they had to turn back to hawaii and fly blind as they have no standard compass or anything. its all electronic.

i've sat in a bunch of military aircraft including fighters like the F-14 before retirement, F-15, F-16, F-18, F-22, A-10 etc the F-22 feels like your sitting in a VR simulator.
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2008 | 07:29 PM
  #212  
tajabaho1's Avatar
Destroying Threads
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,296
Likes: 2
From: (swartsnegga state)
no i meant I went to the air show or something when I was 8........I swear to god that F15 has USN on it!! and you cant convince me otherwise!!!
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2008 | 12:18 AM
  #213  
Greek Racer 8's Avatar
Colorado's Fastest RX-8
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
From: Denver, CO
125 MPH is my max speed. This was a while ago on a spiritted drive with Speed3's and Speed6's. Had a tuff time keeping up. Altitude sucks. I beleive I was in 4th gear. That is the speed we all stopped at. Not sure what the car could do but according to this calculator 6th gear final speed should be 186MPH. How beleivable IDK.

Reply
Old Jul 7, 2008 | 12:32 AM
  #214  
RotaryFiend's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Greek Racer 8
125 MPH is my max speed. This was a while ago on a spiritted drive with Speed3's and Speed6's. Had a tuff time keeping up. Altitude sucks. I beleive I was in 4th gear. That is the speed we all stopped at. Not sure what the car could do but according to this calculator 6th gear final speed should be 186MPH. How beleivable IDK.

The car won't hit 186mph without some serious extra horsepower, but redline in 6th gear is mostly likely 186mph (300km/h) which is a pretty standard top speed there's some kind of agreement/deal/guideline thing about 300km/h, it's more widely known about with bikes since several of them actually go 186mph.


I have a remanned 4 port a/t and it does 120 on flat ground...

Last edited by RotaryFiend; Jul 7, 2008 at 12:34 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2008 | 02:55 AM
  #215  
2fastforuride's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
150 Mph Is The Fastest I Drive But My Revs Were In About 8000rpm .love To Live In Germany No Speed Limit.hehehe
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2008 | 04:46 AM
  #216  
tajabaho1's Avatar
Destroying Threads
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,296
Likes: 2
From: (swartsnegga state)
^ yea but you will have to deal with germans forever
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2008 | 07:18 AM
  #217  
Falken's Avatar
Drop it into 3rd
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 462
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by Renesis SE3P
Yep, called up a friend in the airforce who flies an F-18 Super Hornet and he said that the F-22's have thrust vectoring and eliminates the need for afterburners. People sometimes mistakes the F-22 as to having afterburners at full thrust when they really don't. The afterburners would be a big giveaway to enemy radars because of the heat that would be produced and would defeat their stealth capabilities.
Mais non.

Thrust vectoring and afterburners are unrelated. Thrust vectoring is the technology that allows the nozzles at the end of the engines to pitch 20 degrees either way, increasing agility. The F-22 is powered by two F119-100 thrust vectoring, afterburning turbofans.

The confusion stems from something called "supercruise", which basically means that to preserve stealth, the aircraft's engines are powerful enough to push it all the way to M1.7 without using the burner. WITH the burner, it has been tested to M2-ish.

Originally Posted by paulmasoner
SE3P is right no afterburners on F-22.

fwiw the Navy doesnt fly F-15's either, the only US force to fly them is the USAF

downside to the F-22... the are completely GPS leashed. A few months back, six of them left hawaii enroute to japan. as they crossed the dateline, the hit a programming glitch that affected their GPS. they had to turn back to hawaii and fly blind as they have no standard compass or anything. its all electronic.

i've sat in a bunch of military aircraft including fighters like the F-14 before retirement, F-15, F-16, F-18, F-22, A-10 etc the F-22 feels like your sitting in a VR simulator.
Yeah, but who cares when one F-22 can shoot down 4 F-15s in a knife-close dogfight? Without the F-15s ever seeing it? Have you seen the latest red flag scores for the plane? 221 kills, 0 losses.

I'm sticking with the raptor.

/Endthreadhijack
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2008 | 08:59 AM
  #218  
tajabaho1's Avatar
Destroying Threads
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,296
Likes: 2
From: (swartsnegga state)
and the europeans are so proud of their euro-fighter typhoon...........lawlzor
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2008 | 09:03 AM
  #219  
learycd's Avatar
Hold DSC for 7 Sec
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
whats the point of finding out? i think its stupid

just my two cents
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2008 | 09:10 AM
  #220  
chancejat's Avatar
Drive it like u stole it!
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,050
Likes: 0
From: mobile, al
Originally Posted by RotaryFiend
The car won't hit 186mph without some serious extra horsepower, but redline in 6th gear is mostly likely 186mph (300km/h) which is a pretty standard top speed there's some kind of agreement/deal/guideline thing about 300km/h, it's more widely known about with bikes since several of them actually go 186mph.


I have a remanned 4 port a/t and it does 120 on flat ground...
5th gear redlines at 142 on he road........i guess it could be wind resistance that causes this......
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2008 | 09:12 AM
  #221  
tajabaho1's Avatar
Destroying Threads
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,296
Likes: 2
From: (swartsnegga state)
I guess with the stock bodykit, 155 is drag limited.......
anyone here with bodykits and turbos ever go above that let us know
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2008 | 03:31 PM
  #222  
GaMEChld's Avatar
Registered Noob
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 808
Likes: 0
From: Long Island (Suffolk), NY
Ah, I thought the car was electrically limited to 147 or something, never considered the fact that wind resist would kill it before it hit a limiter. I am putting in a turbo kit at the moment, so I'll have the extra juice needed to cut through the wind and possibly get up to 6th gear's redline, though I might not have the stones to do it. Can't think of a safe road to do that on Long Island. Probly gonna have to take it to a track or something someday.

That being said, I went 143MPH on a barren interstate highway in North Carolina when on a road trip, and did 140MPH recently on Long Island but couldn't push it further because the road wasn't the best (too many gentle rises and falls that impaired long distance sight)
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2008 | 03:44 PM
  #223  
paulmasoner's Avatar
Asshole for hire
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,214
Likes: 3
From: Colfontaine, Belgium
ah, you are correct about the supercruise and the burners... i guess i also got sucked into the standard line of thinking so much i forgot about that...

Originally Posted by Falken

Yeah, but who cares when one F-22 can shoot down 4 F-15s in a knife-close dogfight? Without the F-15s ever seeing it? Have you seen the latest red flag scores for the plane? 221 kills, 0 losses.

I'm sticking with the raptor.

/Endthreadhijack
yeah, i've heard about the red flag stuff, but i'm sure theres more interesting stories/data/narratives out there. i'm just not in any of the proper email chains to recieve them. guess i shoulda been a maintenance guy instead of a fireman
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2008 | 04:25 PM
  #224  
kristopher_d's Avatar
Drive Master
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,670
Likes: 0
From: Redmond
Yeah, a turbo should get you to Redline in 6th. It takes just under 230 whp to push the air out of the way at that speed, plus overcoming rolling resistance. BTW, just adding another 30mph requires nearly double the HP. Needless to say, you'll be sucking down a LOT of fuel at those speeds.
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2008 | 08:56 PM
  #225  
smy266's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: Austin
Ok... for everyone that is talking about the planes... the f/a-18 is a navy only plane... f-22 do have afterburners, and the f-15 is an airforce plane
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:02 AM.