Notices
Series I Aftermarket Performance Modifications Discussion of power adding modifications

Racing Beat REVi Intake System

Old May 6, 2005 | 05:21 PM
  #626  
Dave_Muoio's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: Issaquah, WA (i.e. Seattle)
My REVi results

I have had the REVi on for a few days, although have only driven it twice because I had to get the water pump replaced.

Anyway, I have not felt any power increase except that it does not drop off as much after 8500. So between 8500 and 9000 I can tell that the engine is still pulling. But every where else it feels the same. If there are increases, they are too small for me to feel. This reflects the HP numbers produced by Racing Beat.

As far as sound goes, the difference is subtle for me. Almost like the sound of my RB exhaust except coming from the front (and much quieter). Kind of balances where the sound is coming from (front to back). Can also hear a bit of sucking sound at higher rpms.

Bottom line for me: I was a bit underwelmed based on the initial feedback here. The combo of the RB exhaust and intake does improve the audible feedback but the HP difference is too small to notice.


-Dave
Reply
Old May 6, 2005 | 06:13 PM
  #627  
goforwand's Avatar
Raced with Joy & Abandon
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
From: Indy
Originally Posted by Dave_Muoio
I have had the REVi on for a few days, although have only driven it twice because I had to get the water pump replaced.

Anyway, I have not felt any power increase except that it does not drop off as much after 8500. So between 8500 and 9000 I can tell that the engine is still pulling. But every where else it feels the same. If there are increases, they are too small for me to feel. This reflects the HP numbers produced by Racing Beat.

As far as sound goes, the difference is subtle for me. Almost like the sound of my RB exhaust except coming from the front (and much quieter). Kind of balances where the sound is coming from (front to back). Can also hear a bit of sucking sound at higher rpms.

Bottom line for me: I was a bit underwelmed based on the initial feedback here. The combo of the RB exhaust and intake does improve the audible feedback but the HP difference is too small to notice.


-Dave
All I can say is "ditto"....sort of :o

At first, my thoughts toward the intake were less than enthusiastic. I thought, I'm sure it's a quality product, but why spend $300 for 2 HP.

I must say, I got caught up in the frenzy and purchased one. Did I make a mistake, well, yes and no.

If my goal was to gain to HP that I could "feel" then I made a mistake. I, like you, was expecting a significant difference in performance, and quite frankly, it's not there.

However, there are beneifts to this intake. The sound is great at WOT, and the upper RPM's feel less strained versus the stock intake, which is nice.

The best benefit for me is that my "marbles in a can" sound which I had with the stock intake is virtually non-existent. :D That alone to me was worth the price of admission.

So, to summarize, for me the product is EXACTLY as RB described it. It gives minor HP gains, and greatly increses the "sensory" satisfaction of the 8.

Would I do it again? Well, if I had $300 laying around without a home, then I'd say definately. If I were on a budget or saving for FI, then I'd say pass on it.
Reply
Old May 10, 2005 | 12:55 AM
  #628  
Razz1's Avatar
Mu ha.. ha...
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,361
Likes: 3
From: Cali
OK, feedback from the track.

At Mazfest I experienced no problems with the Revi intake.

Speeds in triple digits and Rev's to 9,500.

If anything, I had more control due to the increased torque.

On the way home no problems except I think I'm getting about .5 more mpg.
Reply
Old May 10, 2005 | 09:00 AM
  #630  
L8APEX's Avatar
Smooth Criminal
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,467
Likes: 1
From: Atlanta, Georgia
As far as I know. Mine is better around town by a little. Even after some very hard driving this weekend, I was at 115 miles on 1/2 tank of gas. Which is just a little better than what is was prior to installation. Try resetting the ECU again.
Reply
Old May 10, 2005 | 09:14 AM
  #631  
WestCoastFun's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
From: Nanaimo, BC Canada
Originally Posted by Super
Am I the only one that seems to be getting worse gas mileage?
Mine has actually improved - and by a noticeable amount. It is most pronounced on the highway - and I almost always cruise above 4200 rpm in sixth - with plenty of 4th and 3rd gear 8500 rpm passes. Yesterday, while in the mountains I got 22 mpg Imperial - 18.3 US). If I keep it at the speed limit the milage is actually well in the 20’s (US) now.
Reply
Old May 10, 2005 | 09:19 AM
  #632  
MadDog's Avatar
Consiglieri
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,275
Likes: 0
From: yourI'mgirl
A thought:

Our cars seem to have significant differences off the assembly line. Some cars run rich, others lean, some dyno 160 stock - one guy dynoed 200 stock. I think the only way a new intake could produce more power is by 1) fooling the MAF by changing the way air flows around it and effectively changing the calibration. or 2) eliminating a restrictor plate effect when the car really wants to breath. I don't think our stock air box is acting like a restrictor. So, that leaves the MAF calibration hypothesis.

Since our cars are so different in terms of AFR, maybe that's why RB claims 2HP, Polak got 10HP, some claim a noticible performance increase, others don't. Personally, I think that I got a lot leaner after installing the REVi. I had to change my CZ maps drastically. I went from +40% in some cells to a max of +17% after installing the intake to maintain a 13.5-ish AFR.

But, as we all know, if you are trying to use a piggyback, you have to tune it you YOUR car. I bet the same differences go for the REVi - not that you have to tune it - but that some folks will see a lot more bang than others. just one of the joys of owning a car thats smarter than we are....

-MD
Reply
Old May 13, 2005 | 09:57 PM
  #634  
brownchiro's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
From: DFW, Texas
I filled up the tank and installed the REVI intake this tuesday, 5-10-05. Had 241 miles on the car and filled up. 24.7 miles per gallon. Was getting 20 miles per gallon since the n flash. Even pushing the car more now to hear the sound of the intake with the borla exhaust and still did better. Borla was put on in December. Could just be coincidence, I guess.
Reply
Old May 16, 2005 | 01:03 PM
  #635  
Aoshi Shinomori's Avatar
Kaiten Kenbu Rokuren
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 934
Likes: 2
From: Central Valley, NY
Sorry to drift off topic, but I have a quick question. It might have been answered but I did not find it. I recently ordered the RB intake and didn't see a list of required tools anywhere. I don't want it to arrive and not have the means to instsall it Thanks to anyone who can help
Reply
Old May 16, 2005 | 01:24 PM
  #636  
teebee's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
If you ordered it from Racing Beat it should come with full instructions as well as a list of tools required. There aren't any specialty tools needed.

Pretty much need:
Short phillips screwdriver
Medium phillips screwdriver
Flathead screwdriver
10mm socket and wrench
Long nose pliers

Later if you go to clean/change out the filter it's recommended that you have a torque wrench when reinstalling.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
8is>enuff
RX-8 Parts For Sale/Wanted
11
Sep 24, 2015 08:57 AM
8is>enuff
NE For Sale/Wanted
4
Sep 3, 2015 07:57 PM
PTQLam
Series I Aftermarket Performance Modifications
4
Aug 16, 2015 05:40 PM
RXeckless
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
6
Aug 16, 2015 12:51 PM


Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:
You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:41 PM.