Notices
Series I Aftermarket Performance Modifications Discussion of power adding modifications

mpg saving mods?

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Apr 4, 2006 | 10:56 PM
  #51  
yiksing's Avatar
the giant tastetickles
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,758
Likes: 0
From: in the basement
Originally Posted by chr1s
I agree with everything you say in your post, except this. Please provide some factual, legitimate, documentation to this process. I've been searching, but I can only find information hybrid engines employing this technique.

Also, even if coasting in gear does save you a minute amount of gas, you're also increasing wear on your engine and transmission. I'll take the (theoretical) negligible amount of mpg loss to gain improved mechanical life.
Well maybe in gear without throttle, no sparks are flying so no combustion takes place thus saves fuel.

Now please explain how the engine and transmission is wearing when you are in gear.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2006 | 11:03 PM
  #52  
carbonRX8's Avatar
U-Stink-But-I-♥-U
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,004
Likes: 2
From: 12 o'clock on the Beltway.
IMHO the best gas saving mod???? Spandex shorts, big quads, and a 14 lb Trek Madone!!!!

Allez! Allez!!! ALLEZ!!!!

Bike season is upon us!!!
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2006 | 11:19 PM
  #53  
LiL BenNy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bubblicious? DEF.
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,062
Likes: 0
Hmmm I see. But like I said, I get 240 to 250 every tank with about a gallon or so still left in the tank, and that's full city driving. I do stop-and-go to school and/or work every day, never get on the freeway.

This ends up being around 19mpg each time. Sometimes in the 18's, rarely in the 17's except when I really got aggressive or drove angry for a few days in a row.
Reply With Quote
ddub do you have any mods? if so what? also what rpms are you shifting at?
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2006 | 12:25 AM
  #54  
ddub's Avatar
always preoccupied.
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 827
Likes: 1
From: Kirkland, WA
Originally Posted by LiL BenNy
ddub do you have any mods? if so what? also what rpms are you shifting at?
At that point I had Unorthodox underdrive pulleys, AEM CAI, and like 20 lbs weight reduction.

Now I have a catless midpipe and a catback, same mileage so far, NO CHANGES.

Under normal conditions I cruise between 3200 and 4000 rpms. Shifting a bit before 4000. The key to good mileage is being a smart driver. I redline at least once a day, and do many 5-7k rpm shifts. I engine brake the car coming to every stop, and toss it into 2nd or 3rd coming up to a turn, don't use the brake, give some gas and am on my way again.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2006 | 08:34 AM
  #55  
JB_Rotary's Avatar
Always lurking
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
From: Chicago, IL
I know alot of people are saying light weight flywheels/pullies are the way to go but it really depends on where you are driving. If you do almost all highway like I do having a heavier flywheel/pullies is actually advantagous becasue you get to use its momentum to keep the car moving. Obviously there is a limit to that. A light weight flywheel(again on the highway) would require more energey for it to remain at a certian speed. I ususally get 19-22mpg highway, 17 city and about 8 at Auto X's. I have the base model(weighs the least) with JIC exhaust, grounding kit, M Flash and the horrible K&N Typhoon I intake. Keeping your cruising speed under 74mph keeps the RPM's under 3750 which helps considerably. Buying another car is also a really good idea. In addition to the 8, I hava a 92 MX-3 SOHC 5speed that gets me 34~36mpg and uses cheap gas. Not a bad $1200 investment.

Last edited by JB_Rotary; Apr 5, 2006 at 08:39 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2006 | 02:21 PM
  #56  
hoosteen's Avatar
"No 8 Left Behind"
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento, CA
man... lightweight wheels....

lightweight wheels.
Reply
Old Apr 5, 2006 | 06:17 PM
  #57  
ddub's Avatar
always preoccupied.
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 827
Likes: 1
From: Kirkland, WA
Originally Posted by dDuB
At that point I had Unorthodox underdrive pulleys, AEM CAI, and like 20 lbs weight reduction.

Now I have a catless midpipe and a catback, same mileage so far, NO CHANGES.

Under normal conditions I cruise between 3200 and 4000 rpms. Shifting a bit before 4000. The key to good mileage is being a smart driver. I redline at least once a day, and do many 5-7k rpm shifts. I engine brake the car coming to every stop, and toss it into 2nd or 3rd coming up to a turn, don't use the brake, give some gas and am on my way again.
Oops, that'd be some typo action. I meant to say I cruise between 2200 and 3000 rpms, shifting a bit before 30000.
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2006 | 05:26 PM
  #58  
Argento Otto's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
From: The City
Originally Posted by dsmdriver
My point was that "slow down" is not always an accurate statement. At some speed, "speed up" is an accurate statement.
If I understand this right, I think you mean "speed up" as fast as possible as long as you are in the highest gear (6th, for example) and the engine can produce enough rpms to keep the motor running with as little resistance as possible (i.e. no clutch chatter).

So, you wouldn't want to drive in 6th gear doing 35. You should speed up to at least 50 or 60 (or whatever) at the most effecient rpm, right? And this should equal the most fuel efficiency, right?

IIRC, when velocity doubles the resistance is squared? (or cubed?). So you must find the happy medium between going to too slow (engine working harder than it needs to ) and too fast (the resistance increases by a factor that offsets any high speed efficiency).

Last edited by Argento Otto; Apr 6, 2006 at 05:29 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2006 | 08:54 AM
  #59  
Howdy1606's Avatar
Howdy
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
From: College Station
just face it RX-8 get shitty gas mil.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2006 | 09:08 AM
  #60  
ddub's Avatar
always preoccupied.
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 827
Likes: 1
From: Kirkland, WA
Originally Posted by Howdy1606
just face it RX-8 get shitty gas mil.
I'm perfectly happy with 18mpg city and 20+ freeway. I don't consider that shitty at all.
Reply
Old Apr 10, 2006 | 09:12 AM
  #61  
brillo's Avatar
Go Texas Longhorns!
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,818
Likes: 1
From: Houston, Texas
Given that the older NA RX7's could get 20 mpg city is they were tuned properly, and we have a more efficient engine, with the right engine management, I bet we can get 20mpg city and 30 hwy.

I'm going to really work on that when I get my N/A interceptor, I'm going to lean out the car all over and work on the cuise maps, I should be able to push 15.5:1 when cruising in 6th, which will help.
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2006 | 10:36 PM
  #62  
RazzyBRX-8's Avatar
Representin'!
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
From: Fredericksburg, VA
Originally Posted by LiL BenNy
is it me or wasnt there something about short start ups are better and not warming up your car for long periods of time?
It was the only way in the cold weather to get it to proper temp before I got there. Now I start it, let the RPMs drop a little and go.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2006 | 01:08 AM
  #63  
silverx8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
From: Lompoc, CA
Check the brakes. Dragging pads will suck gas.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2006 | 09:00 PM
  #64  
BaronVonBigmeat's Avatar
Senor Carnegrande
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 871
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by brillo
Given that the older NA RX7's could get 20 mpg city is they were tuned properly, and we have a more efficient engine, with the right engine management, I bet we can get 20mpg city and 30 hwy.

I'm going to really work on that when I get my N/A interceptor, I'm going to lean out the car all over and work on the cuise maps, I should be able to push 15.5:1 when cruising in 6th, which will help.
You didn't give up on the megasquirt project did you?
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2006 | 12:04 AM
  #65  
brillo's Avatar
Go Texas Longhorns!
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,818
Likes: 1
From: Houston, Texas
nope, I'm waiting for the MS code writing folks to finish the ignition code. I decided to get the Interceptor as I plan on going FI later, so its a nice stepping stone. The MS is a usable solution, but the inteceptor has more resolution and features that i feel make it worth the money.

I'll try to finish that project once they get the MS code straight.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2006 | 01:01 AM
  #66  
nycgps's Avatar
Out of NYC
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 19,881
Likes: 36
From: Planet Earth
Im not sure about all these techincal stuff. but I dont really think that leaving your gear in will damage the Transmission or Engine much.

I mean Cars with Auto Transmission does it all the time, and Lets say for example my Father's 1995 Nissan Quest , after 10 years, with almost 140K miles. Transmission and engine still running strong(minor gasket leaks and thats about it)

and lets just not forget, Rotary use more gas/oil to run than normal engine, and its using oil in a way thats different than any piston engines out there.

ahh I dont know, correct me if Im wrong.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2006 | 08:12 AM
  #67  
mysql101's Avatar
⎝⏠⏝⏠⎠
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 8,625
Likes: 5
From: USA
Originally Posted by Fanman
I would definitely check AFR ratios & lean out a bit (Canzoomer) & get hp too. Also I think some people were selling a longer gear. Would hurt acceleration a bit, but give you better gas mileage.
CZ isn't going to help him. The Canzoomer only starts to work in the open loop., which means he'd be at high rpms to make use of it.

This flys in the face of fuel savings. In closed loop the car adjusts the AFR very well, you wouldn't want to run it leaner.
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2006 | 08:21 AM
  #68  
mysql101's Avatar
⎝⏠⏝⏠⎠
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 8,625
Likes: 5
From: USA
Originally Posted by chr1s
I agree with everything you say in your post, except this. Please provide some factual, legitimate, documentation to this process. I've been searching, but I can only find information hybrid engines employing this technique.
Just monitor your AFR when coasting and you'll be able to see for yourself.

0 fuel usage when engine braking.
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2006 | 01:52 PM
  #69  
nis270r's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: Queens, NY
yah i've read a lot on this gas mileage threads for couple weeks now. It seems to me people in the warmer cliamte generally do get better gas mileage, whereas people in the northeast or upper midwest are getting no better 18 mpg. Also, driving in city substantially kills gas, I live in NY and do about 70/30, city/highway. Normally i can only get 210-225 per tank when the low fuel light comes on. I've tried the trip meter reset trick and got maybe 1-1.5 mpg better, not much, but the car feel smoother after resetting. I have a 2004 wit 24k miles. I'm gona try using royal purple tranny and diff. oil, and maybe get a Revi intake, every little bit helps, gas price keep going up like this, i don't care what people say about owner of RX8 shouldn't be bitching at poor gas mileage, but 15-17 is just ain't gona cut it, it's not like we have 260+ hp to unleash. I recently saw the sticker on a 06 RX8, stated hp is 216 !!! Mazda needs to keep working on those flash update.
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2006 | 02:46 PM
  #70  
r0tor's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,754
Likes: 1
From: PA
Originally Posted by nis270r
I recently saw the sticker on a 06 RX8, stated hp is 216 !!! Mazda needs to keep working on those flash update.
congrats on seeing an new 6 speed automatic car
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2006 | 03:34 PM
  #71  
dsmdriver's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA
I found an awesome fuel savings mod- my wife.

She borrowed my car for a few weeks while I was out of town, and suddenly my RX8 got 18 MPG in the city instead of the 14 that I always get. She even made it beep a few times, so it's not like she drives it like a total granny.

At least I know it's me and not the car. I'm much happer yelling at my foot than my fuel injectors.
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2006 | 04:58 PM
  #72  
therm8's Avatar
Bummed, but bring on OU!
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,036
Likes: 1
From: Charleston, SC
On the last 2 tanks of gas (commuting), I cut my "normal" MPH back by 5mph (since I speed everywhere I go, it's easy ). My avg mpg went from just under 18mpg to just under 20mpg. The thing is, due to the stoplight I affectionately refer to as the "equalizer," I get to work at almost the exact same time. This is about 50/50 city/hwy driving.

The next step is to remove all the excess weight in the car. I figure I can get about 30-40 pounds off the weight by cleaning all the clothes and crap out of the trunk . Probably 3 pounds of spare change too. The jack seems kind of pointless considering I have no spare tire. You'd be suprised what a little spring cleaning might do.

Last edited by therm8; Apr 24, 2006 at 05:51 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2006 | 05:11 PM
  #73  
swerver's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
My car is brand new. Got 450 miles on it now. Its springtime warm here.

I'm driving like a Granny and was dismayed to see I'm getting just shy of 16 mpg on my first two tanks. Have yet to even rev it past 6000 rpm. My commute is er,, well, somewhat congested highway driving. Average about 60mph but lots of slow downs and speed ups.....

The only thing I can think of to help (more than my granny driving) is to keep my shift points below 3800 rpm. But jeez, come on. I didn't buy the car to get passed by the real grand-ma's..........

One question tho???

How many more miles do I have (approximately) when the warning lite comes on.......................
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2006 | 05:35 PM
  #74  
r0tor's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,754
Likes: 1
From: PA
best mpg mod... install a resistor after the tps sensor so the throttle only opens half as far as you push on it!!
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2006 | 09:00 AM
  #75  
Animagix's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
this is my MPG saving mod...
Attached Thumbnails mpg saving mods?-metrocard.jpg  
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:16 AM.