Do Ram Air intake systems really work?
#51
You would have to design the right "funnel" of the right varying diameters (inlet\outlet) etc. You can't do that given the difference in diameters (grille surface\intake pipe diameter).
#52
already made design. Just cannot believe i was first to do it. do not know yet how i am going to tune it since a dyno is out. No air flow, will be a few months to build prototype.lots of molds to make of the space behind the bumper find the golden path to the intake inlet. was hoping to get more insight but i guess someone has to be the innovator
Last edited by b2fast007; 02-06-2013 at 04:24 AM.
#53
Registered
iTrader: (2)
The ram air effect will be impossible to measure at anything like normal speeds. My airplanes had a ram air feature which bypassed the under-cowl air filter to take air directly from the nose of the plane. At 150 mph, opening the ram air increased the manifold pressure (and hence hp) by about 5%.
#54
running on double cream!
iTrader: (1)
I purchased one of these" 2003 to 2008 RX-8 the 69-6030-1TFK" and should have it friday. If anything it looks cool! I am hoping for a little bit of a HP increase. Also they sound good at WOT as well.
#55
Registered
iTrader: (3)
That's not a ram air intake, or even a cold air intake. That's a hot air intake. If you think that because it says K&N on the side it will magically make everything better, I have a K&N branded cement bag you can toss in your trunk. It's good for an extra 5mpg and 20hp... really it say so on the bag.
#56
WENTGERMAN
iTrader: (6)
That's not a ram air intake, or even a cold air intake. That's a hot air intake. If you think that because it says K&N on the side it will magically make everything better, I have a K&N branded cement bag you can toss in your trunk. It's good for an extra 5mpg and 20hp... really it say so on the bag.
#57
Un-Registered User
Thanks for the warm welcome folks. I really wasn't asking for the negative comments or any help for that matter. This very well may be will be the last time I share what I have done to my car with what are supposed to be fellow enthusiasts! I didn't rave about the k&n or say that I was going to have twice the power or anything like that. Nor was this a "noob" question. I have a list of things that I will do to this car and it is sad that this is the reaction I will have to my posts.
#58
Un-Registered User
just sell it, but an aem or a rb
you'll be fine, chin up
#59
was not aware they raced lincoln's. I bet they corner great at 100mph on back country roads, mountain passes, and road circuits. everyone on the import tuning sites is an expert about everything. Get used to it do what you want its your car and money. Just make sure you research your purchases wisely no before and after dyno with visible font size no buy good rule with rotary engine. So where is the next sanctioned Lincoln race want to go watch.
#61
eric embrace the losers. it won't take but a few more weeks to figure out who to not respond to. they stand out, view profiles of rude people, read their posts and you will see them for what they are.
Last edited by b2fast007; 02-07-2013 at 09:20 AM.
#62
Registered
iTrader: (4)
You may read, but you don't understand. What they are trying to tell you is the K&N system draws warm air from the engine compartment and is more restrictive than the OEM intake. This causes a slight reduction of MPG and HP. The only thing that it does increase is the amount of noise coming from the engine. These results have been documented, on this site, many times over about 8 yrs.
The K&N panel filter used in the OEM intake does increase HP slightly. This is because it is less restrictive than a OEM style filter. But, it will let through particles that hurt the engine. The RX8 racing teams used Mazda OEM filters on their race cars due to this reason.
The K&N panel filter used in the OEM intake does increase HP slightly. This is because it is less restrictive than a OEM style filter. But, it will let through particles that hurt the engine. The RX8 racing teams used Mazda OEM filters on their race cars due to this reason.
#63
Registered
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 16,684
Likes: 0
Received 240 Likes
on
110 Posts
reaper, it entirely depends on what you are looking to get for your money. If all you are looking to get is some extra noise and a change in the engine bay visuals that you find appealing at the cost of $198 + some lost horsepower, then by all means, you have achieved your desired goal.
Most of the longer term people here expect that people buy intakes to improve the car's performance, so they may have the wrong assumption of what your goals are. Many here (myself included), do not see the point of spending money to reduce the performance of an engine that is already thought of as weak and under-powered. Everyone is entitled to an opinion though.
Aside from goals and opinions however, keep in mind that you may not encounter it immediately, but you will probably start getting throwing a check engine light and may see a drop in idle stability. The K&N doesn't have a sufficiently appropriate design to keep the airflow straight across the MAF sensor, and the ECU will be struggling with the changing airflow profile. This part isn't opinion, and is intended simply to give you a heads up on what you can expect to deal with.
b2fast,
Our primary power problem is indeed airflow, but it isn't the pre-combustion airflow. It's the exhaust, and the restriction is at the engine. Until you can design around that "restrictor plate" of the small exhaust ports, gains will continue to be negligible. You are increasing the overhead room you would have on the amount of air the intake can flow however, so there is still value there for when you do get the exhaust ports opened up better.
Most of the longer term people here expect that people buy intakes to improve the car's performance, so they may have the wrong assumption of what your goals are. Many here (myself included), do not see the point of spending money to reduce the performance of an engine that is already thought of as weak and under-powered. Everyone is entitled to an opinion though.
Aside from goals and opinions however, keep in mind that you may not encounter it immediately, but you will probably start getting throwing a check engine light and may see a drop in idle stability. The K&N doesn't have a sufficiently appropriate design to keep the airflow straight across the MAF sensor, and the ECU will be struggling with the changing airflow profile. This part isn't opinion, and is intended simply to give you a heads up on what you can expect to deal with.
b2fast,
Our primary power problem is indeed airflow, but it isn't the pre-combustion airflow. It's the exhaust, and the restriction is at the engine. Until you can design around that "restrictor plate" of the small exhaust ports, gains will continue to be negligible. You are increasing the overhead room you would have on the amount of air the intake can flow however, so there is still value there for when you do get the exhaust ports opened up better.
#64
WENTGERMAN
iTrader: (6)
You may read, but you don't understand. What they are trying to tell you is the K&N system draws warm air from the engine compartment and is more restrictive than the OEM intake. This causes a slight reduction of MPG and HP. The only thing that it does increase is the amount of noise coming from the engine. These results have been documented, on this site, many times over about 8 yrs.
The K&N panel filter used in the OEM intake does increase HP slightly. This is because it is less restrictive than a OEM style filter. But, it will let through particles that hurt the engine. The RX8 racing teams used Mazda OEM filters on their race cars due to this reason.
The K&N panel filter used in the OEM intake does increase HP slightly. This is because it is less restrictive than a OEM style filter. But, it will let through particles that hurt the engine. The RX8 racing teams used Mazda OEM filters on their race cars due to this reason.
NA power will come from, porting, removal of the cat, tuning. You can make some minor adjustments to the stock intake system to improve its efficiency slightly.
#65
Registered
iTrader: (1)
Thanks to the guys in the last few posts. Your info was informative and at the same time not belittling. I appreciate that. I may return the filter set up and go with the other suggested. My car did not come a stock airbox. It only has a cone filter attatched to the stock intake hose. That said I was looking for a solution that had proper mounting. Again thanks
#66
WENTGERMAN
iTrader: (6)
Thanks to the guys in the last few posts. Your info was informative and at the same time not belittling. I appreciate that. I may return the filter set up and go with the other suggested. My car did not come a stock airbox. It only has a cone filter attatched to the stock intake hose. That said I was looking for a solution that had proper mounting. Again thanks
I'd recommend getting a stock setup, replacing your spark plugs and getting the BHR ignition eventually.
Thats a good baseline to start from.
#67
Hay Dood... You gotta have thick skin here and look before you ask.. our it will get kinda hot on ya real quick.. lol.. Any how, the Racing Beat REVI intake with the cold air duct or the AEM/Mazdaspeed intake are the way to go.. BHR ignition, and a good exhaust and you are off to a good start.
#68
Registered
iTrader: (1)
Hay Dood... You gotta have thick skin here and look before you ask.. our it will get kinda hot on ya real quick.. lol.. Any how, the Racing Beat REVI intake with the cold air duct or the AEM/Mazdaspeed intake are the way to go.. BHR ignition, and a good exhaust and you are off to a good start.
#71
...Yes...you can...
[QUOTE=rotarygod;1146569]
...Hmm...covered the whole subject very accurately...and I'm all for people running on a bit when they know what they're talking about...do have a problem with this statement however..
"Also remember you can't measure ram air on a dyno. A lot of people only believe in dyno numbers. It's an incomplete way of thinking."
...Well...yes you can...why would you think you couldn't?
...Hmm...covered the whole subject very accurately...and I'm all for people running on a bit when they know what they're talking about...do have a problem with this statement however..
"Also remember you can't measure ram air on a dyno. A lot of people only believe in dyno numbers. It's an incomplete way of thinking."
...Well...yes you can...why would you think you couldn't?
#73
40th anniversary Edition
The AEM/Mazdaspeed and Racing Beat CAI are the only ones that will give you a slight bump in hp. All the other CAI will cost you HP. A "good" CAI on a Renesis engine ("good" meaning actually taking in air from a cooler air location than stock setup, and of proper length and design not to mess with the airflow over the MAF ) can give you up to one hp improvement for every 10-15 degrees of cooler intake air. Many knowledgeable folks here will argue that point. I respect their opinions.
In my case I have used CAI on a few of my RXs and it has made a small hp improvement in my cars. I have the Mazdaspeed CAI on my 2008 40th Anniversary Edition RX8. Note: the location of the air filter on the Mazdaspeed/AEM CAI has some slight risk of possible water ingestion in flood conditions. (less risk with the filter sock, standard on recent models)
I agree reducing exhaust restriction will yield a greater improvement, but most of us live in states where emissions won't allow us to legally run catless straight open exhaust systems. BHR and others have great catless exhaust systems now and in development that promise and deliver better hp improvement than any current intake.
My non street-legal RX7 had free flow exhaust and a Racing Beat built ported and turbocharged (specially built w/ low compression rotors and special apex seals so it could run high boost and stay together) 13B Rotary engine and with lots of other mods (intake,ignition,fuel system, cooling ,tranny,diff. etc ) was a beast with 400+ hp.
Follow the advice of experienced folks here and return to the stock box for the safest good choice.
In my case I have used CAI on a few of my RXs and it has made a small hp improvement in my cars. I have the Mazdaspeed CAI on my 2008 40th Anniversary Edition RX8. Note: the location of the air filter on the Mazdaspeed/AEM CAI has some slight risk of possible water ingestion in flood conditions. (less risk with the filter sock, standard on recent models)
I agree reducing exhaust restriction will yield a greater improvement, but most of us live in states where emissions won't allow us to legally run catless straight open exhaust systems. BHR and others have great catless exhaust systems now and in development that promise and deliver better hp improvement than any current intake.
My non street-legal RX7 had free flow exhaust and a Racing Beat built ported and turbocharged (specially built w/ low compression rotors and special apex seals so it could run high boost and stay together) 13B Rotary engine and with lots of other mods (intake,ignition,fuel system, cooling ,tranny,diff. etc ) was a beast with 400+ hp.
Follow the advice of experienced folks here and return to the stock box for the safest good choice.
Last edited by gwilliams6; 11-20-2014 at 05:39 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
8is>enuff
NE For Sale/Wanted
4
09-03-2015 07:57 PM