Notices
Series I Aftermarket Performance Modifications Discussion of power adding modifications

AEM needs an RX-8

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Jul 21, 2004 | 04:10 PM
  #1  
AEM_Tech's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
AEM needs an RX-8

AEM needs to use a stock bodied RX-8 for 1 week to finish the CAI. If anyone is interested please email me asap for the details. benl@aempower.com

Thanks for everyone's patience.
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2004 | 04:20 PM
  #2  
RotorMotor04's Avatar
RX-8 "SE3P"
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
From: Florida Gulf Coast University
Where are you located
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2004 | 04:26 PM
  #3  
AEM_Tech's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
2205 W. 126th Unit A
Hawthorne, CA 90250
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2004 | 05:13 PM
  #4  
blksf8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
From: Fremont, California
Originally Posted by AEM_Tech
AEM needs to use a stock bodied RX-8 for 1 week to finish the CAI. If anyone is interested please email me asap for the details. benl@aempower.com

Thanks for everyone's patience.
hey Ben, we've all been patient w/ this project. Here is the thread you guys started back in March.

https://www.rx8club.com/series-i-tech-garage-22/aem-back-looking-rx-8-a-22231/
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2004 | 02:25 AM
  #5  
Charles R. Hill's Avatar
Owner of BHR
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,101
Likes: 45
I would be more than happy to ship my 8 out to Hawthorne, from Detroit, to assist in developing a new EMS system.

Charles
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2004 | 06:08 PM
  #6  
ashmason's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
From: Torrance, CA
Ok, Ben is taking temporary possession of my RX-8 on Monday.

Looking forward to the results. Hope it's not loud, my wife l kill me since she drives it more than I do! :D

Stay tuned for updates.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2004 | 06:14 PM
  #7  
davefzr's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,473
Likes: 0
From: Diamond Bar, Ca
Sweet.. Is it going to be a short like the typhoon and RE or something "different"....?

Do you know any details....
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2004 | 06:22 PM
  #8  
ashmason's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
From: Torrance, CA
Ok guy's all I know is my car is going in on Monday cause I offered and Ben took me up on it. I do not know anything about the intake itself.

I do know that the V2 intake on my S2000 does make a noticable difference and has a loud snarl to it, but only above 6000 rpm, or full throttle. Moderate around town driving is fine. Hopefully this Mazda application will have similar characteristics.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2004 | 06:40 PM
  #9  
Nemesis8's Avatar
Bigus Rotus
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,573
Likes: 1
From: Missouri
Its gotta to be a cold air arm that extends out in front of the car. A short arm will only draw in heated air - not good. They even have a part number for it: 21-485. I called them today to ask about it, and they said the main problem IS the sound - it is too loud currently. So, I assume they want a car to do some sound research I bet.

Hope they figure it out :D
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2004 | 07:32 PM
  #10  
BIU's Avatar
BIU
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,501
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver
it would NOT be a V2 as far as i know because i have talked to Ben and he has told me it is a AEM CAI not a V2 simply because the V2 piping is too large to be fitted inside the 8's engine bay.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2004 | 07:34 PM
  #11  
Nemesis8's Avatar
Bigus Rotus
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,573
Likes: 1
From: Missouri
What does the part number mean? Is 21 the code for CAI?
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2004 | 10:22 PM
  #12  
XeRo's Avatar
Normality is Obscene
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,053
Likes: 0
From: AL/GA...you pick
To large to fit in the engine bay!? have you seen the space you gain after removing the stock airbox...there is tons of space in there,....
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2004 | 11:00 PM
  #13  
BIU's Avatar
BIU
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,501
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver
Originally Posted by XeRo
To large to fit in the engine bay!? have you seen the space you gain after removing the stock airbox...there is tons of space in there,....
Well the V2 top piping is ridiculously large but hey thats how the V2 is designed to make it work...

well if Ben says it is.... then it is... lol
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2004 | 03:40 PM
  #14  
AEM_Tech's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
I want to thank everyone for the prompt responses. I hope the final development goes smoothly.
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2004 | 03:45 PM
  #15  
davefzr's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,473
Likes: 0
From: Diamond Bar, Ca
care to share any other info about the intake?
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2004 | 07:26 PM
  #16  
mikeb's Avatar
100% Italian
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 9,422
Likes: 0
From: orange,ca
Originally Posted by blksf8
hey Ben, we've all been patient w/ this project. Here is the thread you guys started back in March.

https://www.rx8club.com/showthread.php?t=22231

are we not answering this??
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2004 | 07:28 PM
  #17  
davefzr's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,473
Likes: 0
From: Diamond Bar, Ca
I think he means.. promises promises....
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2004 | 01:31 AM
  #18  
Bet on Black's Avatar
Alopecian in a black 8
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
From: Lincoln, Nebraska
I can't wait to see what they come out with. Every AEM product I have put on a car has never given me any problems at all. So I will patiently wait for their intake and buy one up as soon as it is ready!
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2004 | 01:43 AM
  #19  
Japan8's Avatar
Int'l Man of Mystery
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,651
Likes: 0
From: Central Florida
Ben, look at the market. The K&N Typhoon (which required a heat shield in the end), Rotary Extreme, AutoExe, FEED (underdevelopment), Blitz, HKS... there is a pattern here. Really it's all falling into two camps... ones short arm intakes with heat shielding like Rotary Extreme or the sheilded cone like Blitz. The only company that seems to possibly trying something different is Racing Beat. No telling what their prodcut will be like, but it'll produce power and not as much noise as K&N. I'm stating the obvious here when I'm saying stay away from traditional intakes. Be a little daring... try to work on something different. Search this forum for postings... there is a good discussion going on about the SDAIS system and there have been some about the VFAD. Use the ideas being tossed out there by various people and let's see something different. A different airbox and VFAD could show some real promise...
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2004 | 02:45 AM
  #20  
Xyntax's Avatar
THREAD KILLER
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,342
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, California
Yup, the existing intakes out there are basically derived off of the traditional design, ie. FOR PISTON CARS. Not much research and testing has been done to those units, and that is why none of them have produced satisfactory results. I think SR Motorsports' intake was heading the right direction. Those short ram intakes are no good, just as useful as those big double decker wings on a Civic.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2004 | 02:59 AM
  #21  
robertdot's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,071
Likes: 0
From: BHM, AL
well, i don't think it's that these style (short arm type) are only for piston engines. If honda, etc., wanted to, they could make an equally impressive system for their cars. But they don't. It would have been easy (and cheap) for Mazda to stick a pipe and filter on the end of the intake, but they didn't; they engineered a really nice intake system. Since they didn't take the easy way it's not going to be easy to do better, esp. if all you do is stick a pipe on the end. This method works fine for Hondas, etc, because there is so much restricted airflow to begin with. It doesn't fly on the '8 like it does on other cars.

Sure, many will jump on a new product, but many of us are waiting to be wowed. If companies want to charge us several hundred dollars for a shiny metal tube, that is their business. Anyone can make a short arm intake or cold air intake for the '8. People on this forum are making them. If they want respect from the community, they need to put some thought / engineering into these designs. Respect is what will get repeat business, which is how companies like Racing Beat operate.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2004 | 04:12 AM
  #22  
wakeech's Avatar
mostly harmless
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 0
From: Greater Vancouver Area, BC
but it's a cost and profit issue. i mean, i doubt if many of these companies actually employ people who understand (i mean in the fullest sense, not the hazy no-numbers internet version) the principles that would be employed in creating a serious performance intake.

think also of the manufacturing costs, how they would have to re-think their factory to produce all these different (like ACTUALLY different, not just assorted lengths, diameters, and degree bends in the same stuff) components that would be needed to cover the entire market base they already have.

making stuff that's really, really good is not normally within the realm of the mass production aftermarket company. they make things that look spectacular, sound spectacular, and add an aura of enhancement and performance. it doesn't actually matter that people don't realize they're gaining like a measly 2% increase in efficiency (and in the case of the RX-8 i will gladly state a REDUCTION in efficiency) for $400 or $500 or $600.

these companies like weapon r and injen and whatever just don't have anyone with the brains to design the sort of thing that's really goign to make a significant difference, outside of thinking to replace a bunch of intake resonators and a 8 sq.in. surface area filter with a straight peice of piping and a bigger filter (for 8 owners, the filter is already more than sufficient in area and flow efficiency, which you can swap anyway, and replacing the vfad with a tube isn't... well, obviously isn't the thing to do). they don't have the capital to invest in the kind of machinery and people it would take to manufacture these sorts of things. the market also doesn't have the demand, or money that would support such a move, either.

things are the way they are, but i'd like to reiterate that you should save the money from the intake and get a computer like teh Canzoomer.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2004 | 09:52 AM
  #23  
smrx8's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,752
Likes: 0
From: WHITE HOUSE
last i heard from racing beat there intake system was only going to make 4 hp
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2004 | 10:30 AM
  #24  
Japan8's Avatar
Int'l Man of Mystery
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,651
Likes: 0
From: Central Florida
... and less noise than the competition. That already makes it a winner in my book.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2004 | 11:48 AM
  #25  
Nemesis8's Avatar
Bigus Rotus
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,573
Likes: 1
From: Missouri
Originally Posted by smrx8
last i heard from racing beat there intake system was only going to make 4 hp
Where did you hear that? I'm curious
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:17 PM.