AEM Cold Air Intake
#26
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Fremont, California
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I had AEM use my old crappy Eclipse NA and make an intake for it back in 96. It dynoed 8 to the wheels. Think about it...that 8hp is actually 9-10 to the crank. And for performance, yes it did make a difference. I went to Pomona the next week and my 1/4 mile time dropped by .15....but of course, this can be attributed to driver as well.
#29
Originally posted by AEM_Tech
Changes are being made to the prototype so no dyno's to post. The intake should be under $350.
Changes are being made to the prototype so no dyno's to post. The intake should be under $350.
AEM-tech - don't take this seriously. I'm just teasin' ya. :p
#30
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Fremont, California
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
you know, I was thinking the same thing before I read your post....the numbers were bad.
AEM, can you let us know at least how much max HP gains you got so far?
...my guess is that it will cost around $250, but only $100 for folks on this forum...hehe
AEM, can you let us know at least how much max HP gains you got so far?
...my guess is that it will cost around $250, but only $100 for folks on this forum...hehe
#32
4AT poor mileage king
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: now... 818 area code
Posts: 587
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You guys are STILL missing my point. Yeah, so an intake gives you an extra 8 horses at redline, big f'ing deal. Do you drive like that all the time, at redline? Under normal driving conditions, an intake will only give you sound.
Funny part is all the guys asking for dyno numbers will probably never buy an intake anyway...
Funny part is all the guys asking for dyno numbers will probably never buy an intake anyway...
#33
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Fremont, California
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by 310Guy
You guys are STILL missing my point. Yeah, so an intake gives you an extra 8 horses at redline, big f'ing deal. Do you drive like that all the time, at redline? Under normal driving conditions, an intake will only give you sound.
Funny part is all the guys asking for dyno numbers will probably never buy an intake anyway...
You guys are STILL missing my point. Yeah, so an intake gives you an extra 8 horses at redline, big f'ing deal. Do you drive like that all the time, at redline? Under normal driving conditions, an intake will only give you sound.
Funny part is all the guys asking for dyno numbers will probably never buy an intake anyway...
#34
Originally posted by 310Guy
You guys are STILL missing my point. Yeah, so an intake gives you an extra 8 horses at redline, big f'ing deal. Do you drive like that all the time, at redline? Under normal driving conditions, an intake will only give you sound.
Funny part is all the guys asking for dyno numbers will probably never buy an intake anyway...
You guys are STILL missing my point. Yeah, so an intake gives you an extra 8 horses at redline, big f'ing deal. Do you drive like that all the time, at redline? Under normal driving conditions, an intake will only give you sound.
Funny part is all the guys asking for dyno numbers will probably never buy an intake anyway...
No, I don't drive at redline all the time. I have 8999 rpms I have to go through first THEN I hit redline.
I've purchased an exhaust and the CZ1 so good chances are I'll buy an intake if I like it.
Now, go away...:D :D :D
#35
RX8 HA HA
Originally posted by 310Guy
You guys are STILL missing my point. Yeah, so an intake gives you an extra 8 horses at redline, big f'ing deal. Do you drive like that all the time, at redline? Under normal driving conditions, an intake will only give you sound.
Funny part is all the guys asking for dyno numbers will probably never buy an intake anyway...
You guys are STILL missing my point. Yeah, so an intake gives you an extra 8 horses at redline, big f'ing deal. Do you drive like that all the time, at redline? Under normal driving conditions, an intake will only give you sound.
Funny part is all the guys asking for dyno numbers will probably never buy an intake anyway...
#36
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Fremont, California
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by 310Guy
Funny part is all the guys asking for dyno numbers will probably never buy an intake anyway...
Funny part is all the guys asking for dyno numbers will probably never buy an intake anyway...
#37
Registered
As many people know I am a big supporter of tuned intake systems rather than just bolting on a cone filter but I will admit that there is a little power to be had from these systems. I have always just believed that there is more inherent potential in a properly designed tuned system. It is only because of such a little gain in power that I agree with 310 in saying that it isn't feelable. I also feel that these intake systems are not a good way to spend money but I only mean this from the standpoint that it is the ONLY performance mod. It isn't enough to feel on its own. Combine this with a good exhaust and some ecu programming and you could have a very nice package. Sometimes the sum is greater than it's individual parts. Just remember that 2 mods that are each about halfway to a feelable gain in power add up to something you can notice.
#38
The most gain was 10 repeatable hp. Some configurations gave 3-5 throughout the midrange and fell off on the top end, where some gave 1-2 over stock and peaked out over the top end. There will be more configurations to test. There is also such a fitment issue with a lack of room in the car. This car provides a unique challenge.
#39
Originally posted by AEM_Tech
The most gain was 10 repeatable hp. Some configurations gave 3-5 throughout the midrange and fell off on the top end, where some gave 1-2 over stock and peaked out over the top end. There will be more configurations to test. There is also such a fitment issue with a lack of room in the car. This car provides a unique challenge.
The most gain was 10 repeatable hp. Some configurations gave 3-5 throughout the midrange and fell off on the top end, where some gave 1-2 over stock and peaked out over the top end. There will be more configurations to test. There is also such a fitment issue with a lack of room in the car. This car provides a unique challenge.
#40
NOT SEARCHING
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Olathe, KS
Posts: 753
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I will buy an intake once I find the highest quality one. I do want to also just for my own sake want to know the HP increase wether it is 1/2 HP or 25 HP or whatever the company claims. I do like the change in sound with an intake and I usually get a little better fuel mileage with it as well.
I just can't understand why people are getting so heated over intake discussions.
One of the best setups I ever had on my 3rd gen Eclipse V-6 was a ghetto *** intake that I used off of my old 2nd gen. I used the old MAF adapter and a generic cone style filter. With just a straight through muffler and this "ghetto" intake my car made almost 16 HP at the wheels! It also sounded awesome. I did this b/c no one had come out with any parts for the car yet.
The bottom line was that I liked the way it sounded, it made decent HP and I was happy.
I later on bought an Injen Race Division intake with a heat shield that made less HP and did not sound nearly as good. I only did this because it looked cleaner and matched the rest of the Injen dress up parts under my hood, I drilled and tapped the old one for nitrous, and I also got it for 1/2 the price of the AEM intake.
Something else to consider is filter size and position under the hood. If the filter is larger and also closer to the driver and also closer to the edge of the engine compartment it will be considerably louder than a CAI intake that picks up air closer to the ground.
The bottom line is this, if you buy the intake and you are happy with the sound and the looks and it makes you even feel like your car is a little bit faster then I think it's worth every penny.
I just can't understand why people are getting so heated over intake discussions.
One of the best setups I ever had on my 3rd gen Eclipse V-6 was a ghetto *** intake that I used off of my old 2nd gen. I used the old MAF adapter and a generic cone style filter. With just a straight through muffler and this "ghetto" intake my car made almost 16 HP at the wheels! It also sounded awesome. I did this b/c no one had come out with any parts for the car yet.
The bottom line was that I liked the way it sounded, it made decent HP and I was happy.
I later on bought an Injen Race Division intake with a heat shield that made less HP and did not sound nearly as good. I only did this because it looked cleaner and matched the rest of the Injen dress up parts under my hood, I drilled and tapped the old one for nitrous, and I also got it for 1/2 the price of the AEM intake.
Something else to consider is filter size and position under the hood. If the filter is larger and also closer to the driver and also closer to the edge of the engine compartment it will be considerably louder than a CAI intake that picks up air closer to the ground.
The bottom line is this, if you buy the intake and you are happy with the sound and the looks and it makes you even feel like your car is a little bit faster then I think it's worth every penny.
Last edited by SHOWOFF; 03-23-2004 at 02:18 PM.
#42
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Boulder County, Colorado
Posts: 7,966
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
3 Posts
Originally posted by VividRacing.com
OK, easy guys. No need to draw blood over an intake. Everyone has thier own opinions and thats all that they are, Opinions.
OK, easy guys. No need to draw blood over an intake. Everyone has thier own opinions and thats all that they are, Opinions.
#43
I got nothing good to say
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Tysons Corner, VA
Posts: 450
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
10 HP? That's better than I expected to see. I would be interested in one if the power gain is verified and, of course, the dollars/hp is decent . . .
#44
i dont get some of you talking about its crap and waste of money,
some of you act like you have to keep it stock
to let some of you know i CAN feel a difference with me borla exhaust
some of you act like you have to keep it stock
to let some of you know i CAN feel a difference with me borla exhaust
#45
Originally posted by DemonRX-8
10 HP? That's better than I expected to see. I would be interested in one if the power gain is verified and, of course, the dollars/hp is decent . . .
10 HP? That's better than I expected to see. I would be interested in one if the power gain is verified and, of course, the dollars/hp is decent . . .
#46
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Illinois
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ok....just a thought but how much different is the AEM intake going to be from the Typhoon? Obviously unless it is a true cold air intake then alot. But if not then what is really going to make this intake different from those currently available? Element size? Just giving some thought.
#47
AEM_Tech,
How long does it take to get a new intake to market once the final prototype is approved for sale?
I've got a $500 American Express debit card burning a hole in my pocket.
Thanks
How long does it take to get a new intake to market once the final prototype is approved for sale?
I've got a $500 American Express debit card burning a hole in my pocket.
Thanks
#48
Registered
Originally posted by MyRx-8yourcar
Ok....just a thought but how much different is the AEM intake going to be from the Typhoon? Obviously unless it is a true cold air intake then alot. But if not then what is really going to make this intake different from those currently available? Element size? Just giving some thought.
Ok....just a thought but how much different is the AEM intake going to be from the Typhoon? Obviously unless it is a true cold air intake then alot. But if not then what is really going to make this intake different from those currently available? Element size? Just giving some thought.
#49
Originally posted by rotarygod
You pretty much have it figured out. The biggest difference will be in filter size. Assuming that the filter used flows well, there shouldn't be any appreciable performance difference between the K&N and AEM. If either claims otherwise I'd be very skeptical of their claims. If they are both essentially designed the same way and both use similar filters, they can't be that different. If one company has a pipe that is 2 feet longer than the other company, then there will be a difference. This is just another "cone filter" jump on the bandwagon product. Don't think you will get any advantage over any other aftermarket intake system out there. Like the K&N and Rotary Extreme kits, AEM better do something to address the engine bay heat issue.
You pretty much have it figured out. The biggest difference will be in filter size. Assuming that the filter used flows well, there shouldn't be any appreciable performance difference between the K&N and AEM. If either claims otherwise I'd be very skeptical of their claims. If they are both essentially designed the same way and both use similar filters, they can't be that different. If one company has a pipe that is 2 feet longer than the other company, then there will be a difference. This is just another "cone filter" jump on the bandwagon product. Don't think you will get any advantage over any other aftermarket intake system out there. Like the K&N and Rotary Extreme kits, AEM better do something to address the engine bay heat issue.
#50
Originally posted by rotary_it_up
AEM_Tech,
How long does it take to get a new intake to market once the final prototype is approved for sale?
I've got a $500 American Express debit card burning a hole in my pocket.
Thanks
AEM_Tech,
How long does it take to get a new intake to market once the final prototype is approved for sale?
I've got a $500 American Express debit card burning a hole in my pocket.
Thanks