Notices
Series I Aftermarket Performance Modifications Discussion of power adding modifications

0-60, 1/4 times after canzoomer stage 1???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 01-26-2004, 12:12 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
NECurve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question 0-60, 1/4 times after canzoomer stage 1???

Anyone have some G-tech times or slips after this mod?

How about others out there with some of the other mods available, car to share some times with us??
Old 01-26-2004, 03:43 AM
  #2  
Kas
- Senior Menber -
 
Kas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Melbourne,AU
Posts: 556
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
oh please, i'd love to know.
Old 01-26-2004, 05:12 AM
  #3  
Registered User
 
Speedy's Rx`8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Mobile, AL
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yea me too i am really looking forward to finding out just how much of an improvement it has on its acceleration alone ...so anyone?
Old 01-26-2004, 11:40 AM
  #4  
Pistons.. What are those?
 
tommy12g's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Miami and Ft Lauderdale, Fl
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
waiting here too!!
Old 01-26-2004, 11:51 AM
  #5  
Registered
 
murix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: La La Land
Posts: 740
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Since you mentioned the S2k earlier, based on weight and dynos, CZ's Stage I ECU should put the RX8 in the same straight line performance range as a stock S2k, but with space for 4. :D
Old 01-26-2004, 02:11 PM
  #6  
Registered
 
rotarygod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 9,134
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 21 Posts
I just noticed that most of the people that are asking live in a warmer part of the country/world than many (but not all) of the people that have gotten them. There is some pretty heavy snow going through the U.S. right now.
Old 01-26-2004, 02:28 PM
  #7  
Registered
 
murix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: La La Land
Posts: 740
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Very interesting point. Maybe it is because we get to go outside and actually drive thus spending all our money on petrol?

Snow. Eh. I try to avoid that stuff. I am trying to remember what it looks like.
Old 01-26-2004, 02:34 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
Broker73's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have driven a 2000, and 2002 s2000. Those cars had very close 5-60 times as the 8 stock. With the mod, I think the 8 will be faster. However, the newer s2000 will be close in stock form to the 8 with the stage one.....just my 2cents!
Old 01-26-2004, 04:02 PM
  #9  
yes, I bite
 
Speed-ER doc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 796
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is online ordering the only place to get one? Is the pro good enough or does the competition give that much more useful info (looks like the same data is produced, and for comparison purposes, seems like the basic one would be good enough to me).
Old 01-26-2004, 08:40 PM
  #10  
Registered User
 
amartin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Broker73
I have driven a 2000, and 2002 s2000. Those cars had very close 5-60 times as the 8 stock. With the mod, I think the 8 will be faster. However, the newer s2000 will be close in stock form to the 8 with the stage one.....just my 2cents!
I currently own a 2002 S2K and a 2004 RX-8... The RX-8 doesnt' come close 0-60 as the S2K. I'm pulling 5.2-5.4's with the S2K on a G-Tech, and 6.6 on the RX-8, thats 1.2 sec slower 0-60.. thats pretty huge..


And that if the RX-8 can even hook up because of the horrid wheel hop.

-- Aaron
Old 01-26-2004, 08:45 PM
  #11  
adkdai8e dkadloi98
 
zerobanger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by amartin
I currently own a 2002 S2K and a 2004 RX-8... The RX-8 doesnt' come close 0-60 as the S2K. I'm pulling 5.2-5.4's with the S2K on a G-Tech, and 6.6 on the RX-8, thats 1.2 sec slower 0-60.. thats pretty huge..


And that if the RX-8 can even hook up because of the horrid wheel hop.

-- Aaron
He said 5-60. 5-60 is the true test of a cars acceleration. based on the gearing and much better low end torque of the rx8 (yes I have driven both cars) that the comparision he is making. 0 - 60 in real life is very close between the cars, one mag got 5.9 for the rx8, I think they got 5.4 or so for the S2000 but I'd have to check on that.
Old 01-26-2004, 08:46 PM
  #12  
adkdai8e dkadloi98
 
zerobanger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 469
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BTW, I'm not saying the rx8 is good at the 5-60, I am sure both cars suck, its just that the rx-8 has more low end so it should be faster from 5-60.
Old 01-26-2004, 08:47 PM
  #13  
Registered
 
murix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: La La Land
Posts: 740
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
GTEC is a poor comparison.

The RX8 can run a mid 14 stock and the 2000 can run a low 14 high 13 stock. The wheel hop argument is lame. Neither car is made for drag racing, but they are not that far apart in performance. I still stick with the belief Stage 1 puts the RX8 around the same as a S2k in performance. The only way to ever find out is line them up at a strip. That would be a good race.

With either, while it is fun to go fast in a straight line (I spent enough time myself at the drag strip) they are both the wrong car. Even saying that I will still take my car to a drag strip. It is just fun.

And remember, before we start arguing, for comparison, a $20k SRT-4 will kick both our asses at the strip.
Old 01-26-2004, 08:50 PM
  #14  
Registered
 
murix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: La La Land
Posts: 740
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by zerobanger
BTW, I'm not saying the rx8 is good at the 5-60, I am sure both cars suck, its just that the rx-8 has more low end so it should be faster from 5-60.
I will completely go with that and believe it to be true as well. Yes, I have experience with both cars.
Old 01-26-2004, 11:12 PM
  #15  
Registered
 
rotarygod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 9,134
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally posted by murix
GTEC is a poor comparison.

You have obviously never used one. That is a big excuse of lack of experience.
Old 01-26-2004, 11:14 PM
  #16  
Registered
 
Omicron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Boulder County, Colorado
Posts: 7,966
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Canzoomer ran a 13.78 s 1/4 mile, timed with a GTech Pro Comp. That should equate to roughly a 0-60 MPH in around 5.4 seconds. Yeah yeah, I know, it was "just" a GTech, but it's the closest thing to "real" numbers we have right now.
Old 01-26-2004, 11:24 PM
  #17  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
NECurve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
:D

Omicron-

Do you know what the mph were at the end of that 1/4 run?
Old 01-28-2004, 12:12 AM
  #18  
Forum Vendor
 
canzoomer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 1,223
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
13.78 at 163.51kmh, or 101.6mph.

Before we get too excited, some facts:

NOT stock wheels and tires.

17" wheels with Nokian WR low profile winter all season tires.
They are soft and sticky, although it was pretty cold out that day. +6C or 43F.

I think the 17" wheels make a pretty big difference in the 1/4.
With the low profile tires that is a 5% shorter gear ratio.
I suspect that accounts for probably .4 seconds of my improvement.
But, for comparison, same setup, Stage1 turned OFF I got 14.57 on best run that day.
So, the net gain was .79 seconds.

ASSUMING I got as good quality on both runs, hookup, slip, clutch, response times, etc.

My runs in each condition varied about .5 seconds from worst to best, so i am not very consistent.

I did 4 runs stock and 5 with the Stage1 turned on.


I am NOT a professional drag racer!
Old 01-28-2004, 12:37 AM
  #19  
FourOneMuthaFcuknFive
 
Dookie_Rx-8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 512
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Omicron
Canzoomer ran a 13.78 s 1/4 mile, timed with a GTech Pro Comp. That should equate to roughly a 0-60 MPH in around 5.4 seconds. Yeah yeah, I know, it was "just" a GTech, but it's the closest thing to "real" numbers we have right now.
So you got 13.78 with the GTech sounds alot better than 14's
Old 01-28-2004, 01:19 AM
  #20  
Registered
 
Omicron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Boulder County, Colorado
Posts: 7,966
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Maurice, can you tell us how you launched to get that time? Clutch drop at X RPM, clutch slip at X RPM, what?
Old 01-28-2004, 03:36 AM
  #21  
Forum Vendor
 
canzoomer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 1,223
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Drops at 3,500rpm, anything higher just made tons of wheelspin and i do not want to join Judge Ito in the blown tranny class.

Slipped clutch slightly, at launch, and at 1st/2nd shift up to 4500rpm.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Audio Concepts ATL
New Member Forum
21
09-26-2021 01:59 PM
WingleBeast
Series I Wheels, Tires, Brakes & Suspension
22
05-23-2016 09:22 PM
Ccrosskno21
Series I Trouble Shooting
62
01-09-2016 05:43 AM
dancingdan42
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
0
08-19-2015 09:29 AM
TheWhiteAce
Series I Engine Tuning Forum
1
08-06-2015 02:26 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: 0-60, 1/4 times after canzoomer stage 1???



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:24 AM.