Notices
RX-8 Racing Want to discuss autocrossing, road-racing and drag racing the RX-8? Bring it here. This is NOT a kills/street racing forum.

The STX thread!

Thread Tools
 
Rating: Thread Rating: 2 votes, 5.00 average.
 
Old Feb 16, 2010 | 03:51 PM
  #851  
chiketkd's Avatar
Thread Starter
Row faster, I hear banjos
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,217
Likes: 2
From: Charlottesville, VA
Originally Posted by TeamRX8
it's well proven in Solo that you don't have to be on the fastest tire, just the tire that you're capable of winning on

there's some wisdom buried in there somewhere
That's a very good point Mark. It could really simplify my decision process...
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2010 | 05:15 PM
  #852  
GeorgeH's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,666
Likes: 3
From: Portland OR
^Yup. Pick a tire and optimize the setup, and more importantly your driving, around that tire.

And, ask yourself some pragmatic questions, such as:

If you can only afford one tire (i.e., no rains) how comfortable are you with the idea that, if it rains, you will be WAY off the pace - not just slower than the Subies, but also the RX-8s and BMWs that happen to have a decent rain tire?

If you are not comfortable with that scenario, then the 'Kooks probably aren't for you.

I suspect this is why so many people run the Dunlops.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2010 | 06:04 PM
  #853  
TeamRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,936
Likes: 2,141
In that case it has more to do with the cost than anything .... otherwise they'd have different wet/dry tire sets

.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2010 | 06:17 PM
  #854  
GeorgeH's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,666
Likes: 3
From: Portland OR
Not really - the 'kooks are in the same ballpark as the Dunlops, price-wise. But again, if that's your only tire, you better make sure you are not worried about competitiveness in the wet.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2010 | 09:15 PM
  #855  
altiain's Avatar
Sparky!
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
From: East Jesus (Murphy, TX)
Originally Posted by TeamRX8
it's well proven in Solo that you don't have to be on the fastest tire, just the tire that you're capable of winning on

there's some wisdom buried in there somewhere
There's a lot of wisdom buried in there.

The top tires are all close enough in performance (at least in the dry), that if you lose, it won't be because you're on the wrong brand, or because you picked the 255 over the 265. That's my opinion.

Of course, if this thread is to be believed, all of the tires we're talking about here are about to become obsolete anyway.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2010 | 09:34 PM
  #856  
TeamRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,936
Likes: 2,141
I seriously doubt they'll make it past the exclusion list ...
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2010 | 07:37 AM
  #857  
randallprince's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 55
Likes: 1
With many talking about the stiffness requirement that the 17" 265s might not give on a 9" rim, what are everyones thoughts on a staggered setup with the softer side-walled tires in the rear, where getting on the power early is a boon? I've had some great success on Dunlops (and Yokohamas) here in the Atlanta Region and though I want to do some testing with RE-11s (due to Bryce and their general widespread success) and the 17" R1Rs (Matt Glagola has had great things to say about them on his STR S2000), I would also love to test 255s Dunlops on the front and 265s on the rear. The 255s (on a 328is) are already on the edge of fitment in the front, but the rear has some room to play width due to the lack of steering angle changes. Atlanta is a reasonably fast region (we had 2-3 courses the required a 2-3 shift over the course of last season) and that extra .4" might give me some speed to limit the shifting on the longer courses we see at National Tours.

I know Chris Connant tried this last year with his E30 M3 (245/255 for the same reasons as me) with moderate success (still been meaning to ask him how the Kuhmos performed on concrete, in the heat of Nationals). Thoughts?
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2010 | 08:39 AM
  #858  
chiketkd's Avatar
Thread Starter
Row faster, I hear banjos
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,217
Likes: 2
From: Charlottesville, VA
While not a horrible idea in concept, I wouldn't want to start off with staggered set-up.

The RX-8 can easily swallow max width tires front and rear, so if someone did go with a staggered set-up, it would be to tune around a handling vice of the car. Personally, if I tried it, I'd go 265/35-18 in front (for the short & stiff sidewall) and 255/40-17 in the rear.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2010 | 09:22 AM
  #859  
chiketkd's Avatar
Thread Starter
Row faster, I hear banjos
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,217
Likes: 2
From: Charlottesville, VA
Originally Posted by GeorgeH
And, ask yourself some pragmatic questions, such as:

If you can only afford one tire (i.e., no rains) how comfortable are you with the idea that, if it rains, you will be WAY off the pace - not just slower than the Subies, but also the RX-8s and BMWs that happen to have a decent rain tire?
Well, I decided to get the Continental Extreme Contact DW as my daily driver tires. Getting them mounted up today. Hollis has said good things about these tires in the wet, especially in standing water.

So I'm leaning even more towards the Hankook RS-3's...but I really wish someone would test the new Falken RT-615K tires.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2010 | 10:09 AM
  #860  
GeorgeH's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,666
Likes: 3
From: Portland OR
Cool, good choice on the Contis, I'm thinking of doing the same as DD tires.

Although, it's worth pointing out that Andy reccomended the Contis as standing-water tires, not necessarily tires for use when it is simply cool & raining, which are conditions the R1-Rs (or perhaps one of the other contenders) excel.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2010 | 10:13 AM
  #861  
chiketkd's Avatar
Thread Starter
Row faster, I hear banjos
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,217
Likes: 2
From: Charlottesville, VA
Originally Posted by GeorgeH
Although, it's worth pointing out that Andy reccomended the Contis as standing-water tires, not necessarily tires for use when it is simply cool & raining, which are conditions the R1-Rs (or perhaps one of the other contenders) excel.
Agreed. I'll definitely be lacking an intermediate rain tire, but as I'm just doing local stuff and maybe a divisional and/or NT, I should be fine.
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2010 | 10:33 AM
  #862  
TeamRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,936
Likes: 2,141
This isn't Formula 1. You either need deep tread or you don't, especially on 140+ TWR tires
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2010 | 09:38 AM
  #863  
murph1379's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
From: Minneapolis, MN
Originally Posted by chiketkd
Personally, if I tried it, I'd go 265/35-18 in front (for the short & stiff sidewall) and 255/40-17 in the rear.
Agreed, Conant did smaller up front because that's all he could fit. If you run smaller tires, it's for the gearing, and we have RWD cars. (also I'm guessing Conant would have been better off 245 all around, given his motor)

I plan to experiment with 265/255 and even 265/245 this season.
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2010 | 10:07 AM
  #864  
TeamRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,936
Likes: 2,141
Given the allowed suspension modifications that makes no sense to me, but have at it ....
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2010 | 10:14 AM
  #865  
chiketkd's Avatar
Thread Starter
Row faster, I hear banjos
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,217
Likes: 2
From: Charlottesville, VA
Originally Posted by TeamRX8
Given the allowed suspension modifications that makes no sense to me, but have at it ....
Hey, I was trying to be nice to our 'guests'.

This would be way down in my lists of things to try to fix a handling issue on an RX-8. BMWs are a different animal though...
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2010 | 10:29 AM
  #866  
TeamRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,936
Likes: 2,141
I thought it was nice enough not to call it a dumb idea ... oops
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2010 | 10:43 AM
  #867  
NotAPreppie's Avatar
What am I doing here?
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,606
Likes: 652
From: 2017 Miata RF Launch Edition
Originally Posted by TeamRX8
I thought it was nice enough not to call it a dumb idea ... oops
"Who do I look like? Kissinger?"
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2010 | 10:49 AM
  #868  
TeamRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,936
Likes: 2,141
Originally Posted by NotAPreppie
"Who do I look like? Kissinger?"



srsly, in Stock maybe because of the rules limitations

I know the E36 chassis well. All the right parts are out there to balance the handling properly. Tires are expensive consumables to address it otherwise.
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2010 | 12:08 PM
  #869  
TopGear8's Avatar
mkuhnracing.com
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,212
Likes: 4
From: Charlotte, NC
Got the Star Specs mounted and the BBK installed and I love it!

First event is tomorrow, will let you know how I do.
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2010 | 12:15 PM
  #870  
Zelse's Avatar
悪魔のR
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,528
Likes: 0
From: Boston
^-- You'll probably go slower...because of your AMAZING BRAKE TECHNIQUE!! :o lol Good luck man. Curious to hear your feedback.
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2010 | 12:23 PM
  #871  
Anijo's Avatar
Cone Abuser
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,010
Likes: 0
From: Redmond, WA
Buying my Star Specs today... been one of those weeks though, temps got back down to freezing the last 2 days. I just KNOW, the day I get them on, it's going to snow
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2010 | 03:20 PM
  #872  
chiketkd's Avatar
Thread Starter
Row faster, I hear banjos
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,217
Likes: 2
From: Charlottesville, VA
I plan to order my RS-3's in another week or so. My RPF1's look so lonely w/o tires mounted on them...
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2010 | 11:02 PM
  #873  
S0l08's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 245
Likes: 1
From: Paulina, LA
Originally Posted by chiketkd
I plan to order my RS-3's in another week or so. My RPF1's look so lonely w/o tires mounted on them...
Thinking of going the same direction. RS-3 listed as 2 lbs less then the Star Specs. RPF1's are 3 lbs less than my current wheels. 5 lbs less per corner is looking pretty good to me. I'll keep my star specs as dd and rain till they wear and then get a set something good in the wet for dd.
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2010 | 11:30 PM
  #874  
TopGear8's Avatar
mkuhnracing.com
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 6,212
Likes: 4
From: Charlotte, NC
And he finally makes up his mind
Reply
Old Feb 20, 2010 | 12:27 AM
  #875  
chiketkd's Avatar
Thread Starter
Row faster, I hear banjos
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,217
Likes: 2
From: Charlottesville, VA
Originally Posted by S0l08
Thinking of going the same direction. RS-3 listed as 2 lbs less then the Star Specs. RPF1's are 3 lbs less than my current wheels. 5 lbs less per corner is looking pretty good to me. I'll keep my star specs as dd and rain till they wear and then get a set something good in the wet for dd.
Tire weight didn't play a part in my decision, but the "handling characteristics" of the tire.

In the end, my final two choices were the RE-11 and RS-3. The RE-11's have a number of positives going for them, but I was concerned that a number of respected drivers described their "at the limit" handling as being edgy. The RS-3's should be a much easier tire to "read" at the limit. The fact that they also happen to be one of the best UHP tires for putting power down early at corner exit is a great bonus.
Originally Posted by TopGear8
And he finally makes up his mind
Ha ha. The new Continental tires I picked up to drive to events on, made my decision a lot easier.
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 2 votes, 5.00 average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:26 PM.