whiterex

I just recieved a RB swaybar, as well as the RB end links. Here is my question - I know that we have talked a bit about end links in the past, should I even need to use the RB endlinks? Will my stock end links handle the bigger swaybar? I am leaning toward trying it out with the stock end links, I could always take it off to drill and install the new ones if need be. Than you in advance for your thoughts.

I guess while I am down there I should go ahead and take the rear shocks off and put them all the way stiff. Since I put them on at around 50/50 the first(oh wait second) time.

BlueRenesis82

use the RB endlinks!

tuj

I speak from experience last year with the RB front bar. I lost my stock endlinks midseason, which I attribute to autox'ing the car on r-compounds, and partly to my (imperfect) driving style, which has been hard on the front end. I am on my second set of stock endlinks, but they seem to be doing well. I suspect if you do not drive in such a style on r-compounds in competition, you may never have a problem. One warning though, the RB endlinks require some drilling to install. The RB endlinks are basically a bigger version of the stock units by something like 2mm with a bigger bolt. There are also some race suppliers with a completely solid endlink with no bushings and these units are expensive.

ULLLOSE

iTrader: (1)

Not only should you not use the endlinks you should not use that bar. imho It is way to big.

dknv

If you are wanting to run scca autox in stock class, I concur. I had that bar in 2004, and I fought the car pushing all year (altho I was on street tires then). But I had an rx7 driver, a miata driver, and a rotafire driver all tell me the same thing, the bar is too big for the car without using the rear bar as well.

TeamRX8

iTrader: (25)

you'll have to run a lot less rear camber, the rear shocks won't have much effect because they are only transitional, but in the end it will be too stiff for a stock setup for all but very low grip surfaces, had you asked ...

tuj

I agree with the recommendation for less rear camber. I ran my rears at -1.5 and I would have took less. I typically ran my rears between 48-55! psi to tune the balance of the car. I may go below equal on the rears next year if I keep the RB bar on (ie. less negative than -1.1, which is what I have on the front).

I don't think the RB bar has the kiss of death in b-stock that some people think it does. Its been proven at least once that the RB bar was faster in a particular situation.

whiterex

My wife got it for me for Christmas... She heard me talking about a front swaybar to my friends that race miatas and subarus. They told her to get the RB bar. Most of the miata guys have the RB setup(front AND rear). They are not running in a stock class though. I hadn't decided on a bar yet, in fact not looked too hard at all. I have to give it up for my wife though, she is thinking the right way.

Sparky

I ran the RB bar and stock endlinks for a year and a half, probably 25 events and 15k miles with no problems. Tires were 275 Hoosiers. Car was pretty good with the rear camber pulled in, but it would still push on exit when I was on the gas. The main thing the swaybar provided is that it keeps the car off the bumpstops with R rubber. Without it and stock shocks the car will sometimes hit the bumpstop and go into a terminal push.

That was up until I put the konis on. With the koni shocks and RB swaybar the push was horrible! Ran 1 event that way and ended up with the front shocks full soft and 1/2" of rear toeout to get the car to turn. Stock bar went back on immediately after that and the car was much better.

IMHO if you are going to put shocks on the car, return the swaybar. It's a waste. Otherwise, the swaybar will help if you want to run sticky rubber.

Imp

That sums up my experience also to a T. Once the shocks went on, the bar was more a hinderance than a helper.

--kC

whiterex

Thanks to everyone for the input. In our region, we race at a couple of "road type" courses. My guess would be use the stock bar.(for now) We also frequent an airstrip that is just constant transitioning up, a turn around, and constant transitioning back. Would it be wise to use this swaybar for the airstrip events? I could definitely be thinking about this the wrong way, but wouldn't a bigger bar do better on a purely transitional course

TeamRX8

iTrader: (25)

this thread makes teh baby jeezus cry ...

Imp

"Where will you lose the most time on couse?" is the only question that needs to be answered to determine if the swaybar should be upgraded. If it's mostly transitions, but with a couple sweepers that you can lose more time than you gained in the transitions, then it makes sense not to put the bar on.

You're not going to gain a heck of a lot of time in transitions with a bigger bar. Does it help? Sure... I'd be crazy not to admit that... but (this is where my results differ) not by the factor of having copious amount of push entering and exiting the few sweepers.

It's all a trade-off, IMHO. I'd rather lose a little time in the transitions and maintain control and predictability in the sweepers than gain a litte time in the transitions to lose more time in sweepers.

because some are hawking copper as if it were gold? You stopped being impartial to this subject when you had a product for sale hawking it as the best thing since frankincense, gold and myrrh. So if baby jeezus is crying, he must have heard you where you're shoveling the **** out of the horses stall next to where he was born.

carbonRX8

iTrader: (1)

With the risk of a scathing sarcasm from Team, I shall ask the following:

Are all these comments directed towards BS autoX? If you have a stiff rear (bar), and adjustable coilovers, is the above whining about the front bar irrelevant? IMHO, switching out the front and rear bar on stock boingy bits was a night-to-day transition. Any understeer or oversteer could be dialed out with +/- a few pounds of tire pressure. This set up was great at speed and really opened up the throttle off/nose in tendencies of the car (which I found lacking at stock). Roll became a non-issue, while the stock tires were still communicative at the limit (this may change to the worse with stickier tires). I ask because I theorize that upgrading to Jic flt or tein flex should complement this current behaviour (with proper and constant dial in.) Am I off base? To reiterate, I am asking if the above comments are directed to cars sans rear bar, eg. cars in b-stock.

ULLLOSE

iTrader: (1)

Yes we are talking about BS front bar only cars... If you are not in BS and you have the rear bar to go with it I am sure you will be very happy with the RB bars.

whiterex

I'm not trying to argue that it is "the" swaybar, I was trying to see if I should sell it or not. If there is a good application for a huge front bar, I will keep it around for a while.

carbonRX8

iTrader: (1)

My apologies. It was not completely clear to me even after reading this thread for several days. I dont have any direct experience with front bar on only, but I would think that the tendency to push would be intolerable.

whiterex

Sorry for being unclear. I have a tendancy to do that.

NVMyRX8

I got the rb bar for Christmas too, it really wasn't the bar that I was thinking about buying, but I figure I will give it a try. I guess we will see.


Question: In nationals did any of the guys in the top 10 run this bar?

I know ULLLOSE runs the mazdaspeed, but I don't know about the rest of the guys, Anyone else know?

Thanks

Ronnie

ULLLOSE

iTrader: (1)

Yes 5th and 6th place ran the RB front bar... They ere 1st and 2nd the first day.

NVMyRX8

How did the course differ on the first day?

Ronnie

ULLLOSE

iTrader: (1)

http://maepro.uta.edu/fsae/news/05solo2natl.html

There are a couple of scans of it. The north course was changed before we ran it. They took the area near flag #4 and made a 90' right, cut off the other 180 sweeper, making a short slalom to the last left turn and the finish.

We ran the north course first and it was still a bit damp from early rain. For the most part it was all trans and short turns. The one sweeper we had got killed as there was water before it so you had to slow down to make it. Also the finish turn was very wet.

The south course had a lot of sweepers and long turns.

NVMyRX8

Thanks for the info.

Just to clerify: The RB bar is too stiff for the long sweepers because it makes it push? , Is that where the smaller bars are better, because the car is more neutral?

Does the smaller bar make the car have more oversteer? For some reason I thought the bigger bar would make the car oversteer more.

Ronnie

dannobre

iTrader: (3)

Big front = more oversteer

NVMyRX8

So, why do the cars with the bigger front bars not do as well in the sweepers?

Ronnie