Mazda is planning to release new versions of the RX-8
Registered
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
Originally posted by bwayout
and please bring back hid-a-way/pop-up headlights too!:D
and please bring back hid-a-way/pop-up headlights too!:D
In fact, why bring back the RX-7 at all? It's just a name or label. Let the RX-7 be what it was (and still is). Don't look back... look ahead... just make a 2 door super sport version of the RX-8.
I think this sketch of what a new RX-7 might look like is the best yet! I love it... despite what some others have said. Except it should not be an RX-7... just an optional version of the 8. Let the RX-7 moniker go... the future is the RX-8!
Registered User
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
From: Dallas Texas
Originally posted by brothervoodoo
... just consider the option of trying to make an "8" a convertible!!!
Probably would have to throw out the clam shell doors and god knows what else.. just wouldn't be the same car, would it. ...
... just consider the option of trying to make an "8" a convertible!!!
Probably would have to throw out the clam shell doors and god knows what else.. just wouldn't be the same car, would it. ...
Registered
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,845
Likes: 1
From: Calgary, AB
Originally posted by Speed Racer
RX-8 is not a feather weight at 3,053 lbs. It is 553 lbs. heavier than my Celica which also happens to be a hatchback.
Could they have made the the RX-8 a notch/hatchback? I'm sure that it is feasible but it would come with pros/cons just like the "Free Style" doors. I think that the RX-8 is full of compromises and most of them I agree with but the car would match my needs better if it was a hatchback.
RX-8 is not a feather weight at 3,053 lbs. It is 553 lbs. heavier than my Celica which also happens to be a hatchback.
Could they have made the the RX-8 a notch/hatchback? I'm sure that it is feasible but it would come with pros/cons just like the "Free Style" doors. I think that the RX-8 is full of compromises and most of them I agree with but the car would match my needs better if it was a hatchback.
. I agree that a hatchback would be more useful - ideally, I'd prefer if the RX-8 was a hatchback as well. I'd settle for fold-down seats, but those didn't happen either.It's kind of like the VW Passat - the FWD version of the sedan has a fold-down rear seat, but the 4Motion version has a fixed rear seat. The reason is that for stiffness and side impact requirements, the 4Motion version with it's independent rear suspension (vs. beam axle in the FWD) needed the extra rigidity provided by a stronger fixed rear seatback structure. With the freestyle doors, Mazda needed the rigidity of the fixed rear seatback structure in the RX-8.
If I can't have both, I'll stick with the improved stiffness and associated ride/handling improvements over the extra utility of the hatch space.
Regards,
Gordon
Registered
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
From: Viva Las Vegas!
Originally posted by pelucidor
...and a wagon version too! Sorry Windy (if you are still around)
...and a wagon version too! Sorry Windy (if you are still around)
(Q) My readers also would like to know about other body styles of the RX-8, like a convertible, or station wagon?
(Charlie) A station wagon?!?! (I displayed a post and photochopped pictures from RX-8 forum.com, they laugh out loud) No...
M0D Squad -charter member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 0
From: Alabama
The Celica is also a flexi-flyer when compared to the stiffness of the RX-8 chassis
The structure of the RX-8 is not unlike the S2000, so I suspect a convertible RX-8 in a few years, if all goes well with this launch.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ASH8
Series II Technical and Trouble shooting
7
Oct 30, 2021 12:50 PM
Audio Concepts ATL
New Member Forum
21
Sep 26, 2021 01:59 PM
