Notices
RX-8 Media News Report the latest RX-8 related news stories here.

Mazda to cut weight on next-generation models by 400 pounds (rotary mentioned)

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 09-25-2008, 10:58 AM
  #51  
Row faster, I hear banjos
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
chiketkd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Posts: 2,217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mazda developed Plastic Molding technology:

Mazda Develops Plastic Molding Technology Which Reduces Consumption of Plastic Resins by 30%

As part of its efforts to reduce vehicle weight, Mazda Motor Corporation has developed a new plastic molding technology that enables a substantial reduction in the weight of plastic parts used in vehicles. This plastic molding manufacturing technique cuts the consumption of plastic resins that are used as raw material by approximately 20 to 30%, with associated reductions in vehicle weight.

The most common manufacturing method for producing automobile plastic parts is injection molding. Mazda’s improved injection molding process involves mixing supercritical fluid (SCF), made from common inert gases such as nitrogen or carbon dioxide, with the plastic resin raw material.

A supercritical fluid is any substance at a temperature and pressure above its thermodynamic critical point. It can diffuse through solids like a gas, and dissolve materials like a liquid. Compared to their natural gaseous forms, nitrogen and carbon dioxide, as supercritical fluids, increase the solubility of plastic resin and enable it to form foam with a standardized micro-cell structure.

The Mazda process utilizes a particular characteristic of SCF to mix readily with other substances at the molecular level to raise the fluidity of the liquid plastic resin and cause it to expand rapidly when injected into a mold. As a result, smaller amounts of the raw material resin are needed to fill molds.

Furthermore, by using a core back expansion molding process—which enables thicker parts to be manufactured using less plastic raw material—Mazda has successfully developed plastic with a multi-layer structure.

Core back expansion molding is a form of injection molding. Once the foamed resin has filled up the mold, the volume of the mold is increased, causing the foam to expand. This means larger plastic parts, with low density and good rigidity, can be made from the same volume of plastic resin.

The bubbles in the outer layer of the plastic are kept microscopic to ensure each part has the necessary strength and rigidity, while the size of the bubbles in the core layer can be freely adjusted to reduce its density as desired.

With this proprietary technology, substantially less material is needed to manufacture plastic parts that are lighter and have equal or greater strength and rigidity characteristics compared to conventional, non-foamed parts.
This plastic foam molding technology can potentially be applied to nearly all plastic parts used in vehicles. Because the core back molding process enables control of the foam’s structure, it is possible to add extra value by enhancing the heat insulation and acoustic characteristics of plastic parts.

Conventional plastic foaming methods use a gas formed through the thermal decomposition of organic and inorganic compounds. However, through the use of SCFs, Mazda’s foamed resin molding technology does not result in adverse effects from residual chemical compounds, has a smaller impact on the environment, and produces parts that can be easily recycled.


http://www.greencarcongress.com/2008...-develops.html
chiketkd is offline  
Old 09-25-2008, 01:39 PM
  #52  
1935 lbs. FTW!
 
CosmosMpower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,134
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by simplyphp
Well **** if you weight 250lb and lose 100lb, your car is now 100lb lighter.

How about the **** in the trunk? Extra passenger?

How about Mazda adds some damn torque and optional turbo or twin turbo to the next rotary line up? Screw "UP TO 400lb", I can JUMP up to 400ft, but chances are I'll only get a foot off the ground. How about we get at LEAST 280ft-lb torque (159 currently in rx8, 280 in mazdaspeed3 - DAMN IF YOU DONT PUT MORE POWER IN YOUR SEDAN POCKET-ROCKET THAN YOU DO THE HALO SPORTS CAR), and I'll call it even for all the times some bi@tch has passed me in a car that weights more than mine and sounds like a goat gettin @$$ f*cked in a tunnel.
You obviously know nothing about sports cars. I would rather lose 400 pounds than gain 40 hp any day. The only thing that extra 40 hp does is help you accelerate faster. 400 less pounds helps with acceleration, braking, turning, fuel efficiency. That's why my 1935 lb Elise kicks the RX-8's *** in every performance category with 30 less rated factory HP. If you want to go fast and need more power just go buy a LS1 Camaro.
CosmosMpower is offline  
Old 09-25-2008, 02:19 PM
  #53  
Row faster, I hear banjos
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
chiketkd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Posts: 2,217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by CosmosMpower
I would rather lose 400 pounds than gain 40 hp any day. The only thing that extra 40 hp does is help you accelerate faster. 400 less pounds helps with acceleration, braking, turning, fuel efficiency. That's why my 1935 lb Elise kicks the RX-8's *** in every performance category with 30 less rated factory HP.
+12345 Agreed!
chiketkd is offline  
Old 09-28-2008, 11:42 PM
  #54  
Registered
 
arghx7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 654
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
news flash ladies and gentlemen... rotary sports cars have always had less power and torque than the competition. When 1st gen Rx-7 had 100hp, the 280zx had 130ish. When the 2nd gen nonturbo Rx-7 had 146, the nonturbo Supra had 200. When the 3rd gen twin turbo cars had 255, the 300zx had 300... rotary sports cars always kept up or exceeded the competitors due to superior chassis design.
arghx7 is offline  
Old 09-29-2008, 02:01 PM
  #55  
RX-8 = Japanese MG
 
SlideWayz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Bay area, CA
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ford will not authorize a car that cannibalizes sales from the Mustang.

A turbo Renesis in a fairly lightweight chassis would kill the Mustang.

...ain't gonna happen!
SlideWayz is offline  
Old 09-29-2008, 02:16 PM
  #56  
Registered
 
bulletproof21's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Charlotte
Posts: 665
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by SlideWayz
Ford will not authorize a car that cannibalizes sales from the Mustang.

A turbo Renesis in a fairly lightweight chassis would kill the Mustang.

...ain't gonna happen!
uh, Ford never stopped them from making the FD which spanked the mustang in all regards. I still think they should stay NA but Ford is not gonna stop them!
bulletproof21 is offline  
Old 09-29-2008, 02:25 PM
  #57  
Registered
 
devildog1679's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 1,202
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SlideWayz
Ford will not authorize a car that cannibalizes sales from the Mustang.

A turbo Renesis in a fairly lightweight chassis would kill the Mustang.

...ain't gonna happen!
Don't think Ford will be around long enough to stop them A turbo 8 won't pose much of threat because the mustang has a unique following as does the rotary.
devildog1679 is offline  
Old 09-29-2008, 02:26 PM
  #58  
Registered
 
devildog1679's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 1,202
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by bulletproof21
uh, Ford never stopped them from making the FD which spanked the mustang in all regards. I still think they should stay NA but Ford is not gonna stop them!
But Ford didn't acquire a majority stake in MAZDA after the FD was scrapped in the US, at least that's what I think.
devildog1679 is offline  
Old 09-29-2008, 06:16 PM
  #59  
Registered User
 
fd3s_jerry's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SlideWayz
Ford will not authorize a car that cannibalizes sales from the Mustang.

A turbo Renesis in a fairly lightweight chassis would kill the Mustang.

...ain't gonna happen!
all those rednecks driving rustangs aren't gonna buy a "piece of jap crap" it doesn't matter if its faster. if that were gonna happen, the mustang would have been scrapped, and the 300zxtt, supratt, fd, and the nsx would still be in production.
fd3s_jerry is offline  
Old 09-29-2008, 06:47 PM
  #60  
Registered User
 
DJF(NJ)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Lakewood, NJ
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SlideWayz
Ford will not authorize a car that cannibalizes sales from the Mustang.

A turbo Renesis in a fairly lightweight chassis would kill the Mustang.

...ain't gonna happen!
You maybe right. I talked to someone awhile back who worked for Mazda in the 90s and he said Mazda had an FD replacement on the drawing board around the time of the Ford takeover but they didn't give it the green light. The bursting of the Japanese bubble didnt help much either Im sure. I really hope that guy Takao Kijima is on board this project much in the same way he was behind the development of 'Operation Zero' for the FD.
DJF(NJ) is offline  
Old 09-29-2008, 08:17 PM
  #61  
Registered User
 
simplyphp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by CosmosMpower
You obviously know nothing about sports cars. I would rather lose 400 pounds than gain 40 hp any day. The only thing that extra 40 hp does is help you accelerate faster. 400 less pounds helps with acceleration, braking, turning, fuel efficiency. That's why my 1935 lb Elise kicks the RX-8's *** in every performance category with 30 less rated factory HP. If you want to go fast and need more power just go buy a LS1 Camaro.
Stfu dude, I never said I wanted to go fast, just that it's embarrassing getting passed in a car that looks fast, so stick your toe in your mouth and suck it. The mazdaspeed3 weighs ~3150, rx-8 weighs ~3029. 150<280 regardless if my rx-8 weights 150 less. Also, fuel consumption may have some to do with the weight but there's more to it than that nimrod, the speed3 gets better gas mileage than the rx-8 as well.

Also, let me make a quick remark about your Elise before you go on and compare it against an RX-8. The Elise isn't a multi-purpose car, it isn't a family car, it isn't a grocery car, it isn't anything but a lightweight sports car meant to - OH MY GOD - be fast and awesome on the track. While you're telling me to go get a camaro, which btw I would get a SVT Cobra before I got a LS1 camaro, you are completely voiding your previous comparison of the RX-8 against an Elise.

Nice try dickweed. I bet I know which picture you would pick...


So again, I stay firm with:
How about Mazda adds some damn torque and optional turbo or twin turbo to the next rotary line up?

Last edited by simplyphp; 09-29-2008 at 10:16 PM.
simplyphp is offline  
Old 09-29-2008, 09:52 PM
  #62  
Registered User
 
BlueEyes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,887
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Why so serious?
BlueEyes is offline  
Old 09-29-2008, 10:15 PM
  #63  
Registered User
 
simplyphp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BlueEyes
Why so serious?


simplyphp is offline  
Old 09-29-2008, 10:54 PM
  #64  
幹他媽!
 
Detrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Gabriel Valley, CA
Posts: 2,078
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
were u able to make it off the driveway?

Originally Posted by R8xing
I cause my car to be 90 pounds lighter by driving with the gas light on=]
Detrich is offline  
Old 09-30-2008, 09:44 AM
  #65  
Huge hole is huge
 
CyberPitz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Joplin, MO
Posts: 3,191
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by simplyphp
Stfu dude, I never said I wanted to go fast, just that it's embarrassing getting passed in a car that looks fast, so stick your toe in your mouth and suck it. The mazdaspeed3 weighs ~3150, rx-8 weighs ~3029. 150<280 regardless if my rx-8 weights 150 less. Also, fuel consumption may have some to do with the weight but there's more to it than that nimrod, the speed3 gets better gas mileage than the rx-8 as well.

Also, let me make a quick remark about your Elise before you go on and compare it against an RX-8. The Elise isn't a multi-purpose car, it isn't a family car, it isn't a grocery car, it isn't anything but a lightweight sports car meant to - OH MY GOD - be fast and awesome on the track. While you're telling me to go get a camaro, which btw I would get a SVT Cobra before I got a LS1 camaro, you are completely voiding your previous comparison of the RX-8 against an Elise.

Nice try dickweed. I bet I know which picture you would pick...


So again, I stay firm with:
How about Mazda adds some damn torque and optional turbo or twin turbo to the next rotary line up?
There are specific reasons the TQ is low in the RX-8. You do realize what engine is in our cars, right? The way it is created prevents it from turning more torque without putting out more power in general. They have it set at this power output to help with the US emission laws, which are getting more and more tight by the day. The reason there isn't a turbo 8? We are using very high compression rotors *10:1 if I'm not mistaken* in order to help with emission laws also. The higher compression rotors make it much more difficult to get maximum power out of the engine.

So please, get your head out of your *** and realize Mazda did not exclude the turbo just to stick it to the customer. We all want one, but they have their reasons. Weight reduction is in the right location to start with the 16X on the way.
CyberPitz is offline  
Old 09-30-2008, 10:18 AM
  #66  
Bland
 
8is>enuff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 856
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by simplyphp
Stfu dude, I never said I wanted to go fast, just that it's embarrassing getting passed in a car that looks fast, so stick your toe in your mouth and suck it. The mazdaspeed3 weighs ~3150, rx-8 weighs ~3029. 150<280 regardless if my rx-8 weights 150 less. Also, fuel consumption may have some to do with the weight but there's more to it than that nimrod, the speed3 gets better gas mileage than the rx-8 as well.

Also, let me make a quick remark about your Elise before you go on and compare it against an RX-8. The Elise isn't a multi-purpose car, it isn't a family car, it isn't a grocery car, it isn't anything but a lightweight sports car meant to - OH MY GOD - be fast and awesome on the track. While you're telling me to go get a camaro, which btw I would get a SVT Cobra before I got a LS1 camaro, you are completely voiding your previous comparison of the RX-8 against an Elise.

Nice try dickweed. I bet I know which picture you would pick...


So again, I stay firm with:
How about Mazda adds some damn torque and optional turbo or twin turbo to the next rotary line up?
This hurts the part of my brain that usually does the thinking.

If you could, please attach a funny picture that insinuates my intelligence level is sub-par based on my lack of ability to understand the logic behind your post.

Thanks in advance.

Last edited by 8is>enuff; 09-30-2008 at 10:50 AM.
8is>enuff is offline  
Old 09-30-2008, 10:44 AM
  #67  
Registered User
 
knicks1984's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Turnersville, NJ
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't care if it's n/a or fi, as long as it's faster and handles better than the current car then they got my money.
knicks1984 is offline  
Old 09-30-2008, 11:03 AM
  #68  
Grand Chancellor
 
delhi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Home of the NIMBYs
Posts: 2,730
Received 58 Likes on 47 Posts
No turbo rotaries in the future ok. This is from Mazda themselves. see latest Zoom-Zoom magazine.
I think direct injection is the way forward. IIRC the 16x will come with that technology. A bit late imho since alot of cars (piston) these days have it.
In terms of the comment about the elise vs. rx-8. I agree with the fella that seemed to have swallowed a lime comment. The Lotus is purpose built single focused sportscar. The fact that the rx-8 is comparable to the elise speaks alot for this unique rotary sedan. Comparing it as a overall car in itself the Elise falls short to the RX-8. Practicality, comfort, daily driving duties etc are some of the things that the Lotus will score 0. I have a feeling the Mazda will wipe the floor with the Elise in a race to ferry 4 people to a destination 30km away. But who does that on a day to day commute or school runs?
delhi is offline  
Old 09-30-2008, 05:19 PM
  #69  
Registered
 
robrecht's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Hunterdon County
Posts: 1,932
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes, the 16x has direct injection.
robrecht is offline  
Old 10-01-2008, 02:46 PM
  #70  
Registered User
 
knicks1984's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Turnersville, NJ
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm getting antsy already. How long do you guys think it'll be before we see a concept for the new rx.
knicks1984 is offline  
Old 10-01-2008, 02:59 PM
  #71  
Huge hole is huge
 
CyberPitz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Joplin, MO
Posts: 3,191
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I'd guess a couple years, considering the 2012 release is true.
CyberPitz is offline  
Old 10-03-2008, 09:48 PM
  #72  
Registered
 
77mjd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sheboygan Falls, Wisconsin
Posts: 1,134
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
^^^What??? 2012? What happened to 2010? If thats the case it looks like I'll be in a 370Z next year. I have an 04 8 and there is no way in hell I'm waiting until 2012 for the new rotary.
77mjd is offline  
Old 10-04-2008, 12:27 AM
  #73  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
User24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: California, Chula Vista, Otay Ranch
Posts: 772
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
You can witness Mazda's new plastic technology at work on the 2009 rx8. The "flow concept" people need to talk to the "plastic technology" people at Mazda, who then need to talk to the "consumer manufacturing" people--otherwise the plastic people will churn out a 2011 camaro in no time. Just you wait, you'll see what I mean.

Last edited by User24; 10-04-2008 at 12:41 AM.
User24 is offline  
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Audio Concepts ATL
New Member Forum
21
09-26-2021 01:59 PM
vetteor8
New Member Forum
3
08-09-2015 05:56 PM
MolecularConcept
New Member Forum
15
08-05-2015 04:43 PM
AussieGray
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
0
07-16-2015 03:58 AM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Mazda to cut weight on next-generation models by 400 pounds (rotary mentioned)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:22 PM.