Notices
RX-8 Media News Report the latest RX-8 related news stories here.

Mazda to cut weight on next-generation models by 400 pounds (rotary mentioned)

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 09-22-2008, 11:28 AM
  #26  
Power!!
 
shaunv74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sunny See attle
Posts: 4,412
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
I lost 44 lbs in 3 months without dieting simply by swapping my stock brake rotors and calipers for 2 piece Al units.
shaunv74 is offline  
Old 09-22-2008, 05:20 PM
  #27  
Registered User
 
simplyphp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I lost 300 pounds by kicking my wife and her friend out of my car!
simplyphp is offline  
Old 09-22-2008, 05:26 PM
  #28  
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Y-cat-o NZ
Posts: 20,525
Received 1,492 Likes on 840 Posts
did her friend have big t*ts ? If so you lost on that deal - heh
Brettus is offline  
Old 09-22-2008, 05:50 PM
  #29  
Registered User
 
simplyphp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Brettus
did her friend have big t*ts ? If so you lost on that deal - heh
simplyphp is offline  
Old 09-22-2008, 07:02 PM
  #30  
Registered
 
Musker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
this thread is wack xD
Musker is offline  
Old 09-22-2008, 07:03 PM
  #31  
Registered
 
77mjd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sheboygan Falls, Wisconsin
Posts: 1,134
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by rollerbldes
"Damn we just can't get any reliable power out of these things.."

"Well.. lets go with plan B"

My thoughts exactly. I think 400 lb. lighter is secret code for "still grossly underpowered"
77mjd is offline  
Old 09-22-2008, 07:12 PM
  #32  
Registered User
 
solito's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ocala, FL
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
True!!! My2Cents.
solito is offline  
Old 09-22-2008, 07:16 PM
  #33  
Hit & Run Magnet
iTrader: (3)
 
kersh4w's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: DC Area
Posts: 6,690
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
haha yeah.

i save weight by running 1/4 tank, taking out all the seats except the drivers, and taking everything out of the trunk.
kersh4w is offline  
Old 09-22-2008, 08:43 PM
  #34  
Registered User
 
simplyphp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by kersh4w
haha yeah.

i save weight by running 1/4 tank, taking out all the seats except the drivers, and taking everything out of the trunk.
I completely removed my trunk, it added 50hp and improved my exhaust sound.
simplyphp is offline  
Old 09-23-2008, 08:46 AM
  #35  
Registered User
 
knicks1984's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Turnersville, NJ
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This would be a great stride in bumping the performance stats of the 8. After reading the latest Motortrend article the driver did praise the 8 with its driving characteristics, but the lap time and the body roll were terrible.
knicks1984 is offline  
Old 09-23-2008, 09:11 AM
  #36  
Registered User
 
simplyphp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ja make it 2 seater and lower it, plus give us the 26B engine twin turbo charged. Mmmm k?
simplyphp is offline  
Old 09-23-2008, 10:33 AM
  #37  
Power!!
 
shaunv74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sunny See attle
Posts: 4,412
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Lower weight is better for everything. the FD ran circles around the higher powered 300ZX TT because it weighed 500lbs less. 400lbs is a huge number that will be better for everything about a car. And it does make a big difference on tire life and gas mileage. Just ask all those people that drive 300Cs.
shaunv74 is offline  
Old 09-23-2008, 12:30 PM
  #38  
Registered User
 
DJF(NJ)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Lakewood, NJ
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Z32TT was actually closer to 640-700pounds heavier than a FD depending on the year. But it didnt just beat because of lower weight. It had better weight distribution, a better chassis and suspension. I bought a brand new 95ZXTT(curb weight of 3502lbs) back in 96 and thought it was a great handling car. Then my buddy bought an R2 FD and took me for a ride through some turns and I could not believe how well it stuck where my Z would have been spinning out.
DJF(NJ) is offline  
Old 09-24-2008, 09:14 AM
  #39  
Registered User
 
knicks1984's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Turnersville, NJ
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If they can get this car down to 2600 to 2700 pounds and also bump the renesis to about 260-280hp, then this would definitely be competitive with the rest of the market. They definitely got to lose the back seats even though that was one of the reasons i bought the car. Can't wait till 2012.
knicks1984 is offline  
Old 09-24-2008, 01:45 PM
  #40  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
NgoRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: CA, Rowland Hts.
Posts: 10,239
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
dang 400 lbs. that would be nice. lol
NgoRX8 is offline  
Old 09-24-2008, 02:23 PM
  #41  
on his 3rd rx8
iTrader: (3)
 
dozer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: santa ana, ca
Posts: 6,034
Received 10 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by simplyphp
I lost 300 pounds by kicking my wife and her friend out of my car!
300/2 = 150 a piece...i prefer my girls to be under 120.....
dozer is offline  
Old 09-24-2008, 02:49 PM
  #42  
Registered
 
fahrfegneugen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Wash/Idaho
Posts: 1,467
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
^maybe they were tall
fahrfegneugen is offline  
Old 09-24-2008, 06:40 PM
  #43  
Row faster, I hear banjos
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
chiketkd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Posts: 2,217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by fahrfegneugen
^maybe they were tall
+1 LOL

Even though I'm with dozer. My wife is <120lbs.
chiketkd is offline  
Old 09-24-2008, 07:03 PM
  #44  
Grand Chancellor
 
delhi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Home of the NIMBYs
Posts: 2,730
Received 58 Likes on 47 Posts
I don't want a car that produces 300hp 300tq but weights 3500lbs. I rather a car that pushes out 250/200 that weighs 2600lbs. Weight savings is best. it not only applies to acceleration, but lateral transition and braking too.
That's why you see all those high hp heavy loafs handle and brake like a truck despite good accelerations.
Colin Chapman ftw!
delhi is offline  
Old 09-24-2008, 07:17 PM
  #45  
Power!!
 
shaunv74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sunny See attle
Posts: 4,412
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
That and the acceleration isn't even that great. Why does Chrysler's lead sled with the "Hemi" and 430 hp still take 6.5 seconds to get to 60? Because it weighs 2.5 tons!
shaunv74 is offline  
Old 09-24-2008, 08:22 PM
  #46  
Being (new) single rocks!
 
rx8thunder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,485
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by delhi
I don't want a car that produces 300hp 300tq but weights 3500lbs. I rather a car that pushes out 250/200 that weighs 2600lbs. Weight savings is best. it not only applies to acceleration, but lateral transition and braking too.
That's why you see all those high hp heavy loafs handle and brake like a truck despite good accelerations.
Colin Chapman ftw!
Totally agree!
rx8thunder is offline  
Old 09-25-2008, 12:09 AM
  #47  
rotary courage
 
m477's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: :uoıʇɐɔoן
Posts: 1,208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by delhi
I don't want a car that produces 300hp 300tq but weights 3500lbs. I rather a car that pushes out 250/200 that weighs 2600lbs. Weight savings is best. it not only applies to acceleration, but lateral transition and braking too.
That's why you see all those high hp heavy loafs handle and brake like a truck despite good accelerations.
Colin Chapman ftw!
+1

With every other manufacturer making each new model bigger and heavier, I think Mazda should really focus on making cars lighter and more agile. While this might be a smaller niche compared to the mainstream trend, I'd rather see Mazda do a good job at this than churn out a bunch of "me too" products.
m477 is offline  
Old 09-25-2008, 12:14 AM
  #48  
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Y-cat-o NZ
Posts: 20,525
Received 1,492 Likes on 840 Posts
Originally Posted by fahrfegneugen
^maybe they were tall
well , we know the freind had big t**s so there would have been some weight there ...
Brettus is offline  
Old 09-25-2008, 01:37 AM
  #49  
Destroying Threads
 
tajabaho1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: (swartsnegga state)
Posts: 2,296
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
if so, i shall buy their next rotareh

they should also have a weight test so no fat people can buy this car

and give 5% discount to hot chicks
tajabaho1 is offline  
Old 09-25-2008, 02:15 AM
  #50  
Super-impreza!
iTrader: (-1)
 
RedefineRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: SoCal/NY
Posts: 746
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
should be nice...
RedefineRX8 is offline  


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Mazda to cut weight on next-generation models by 400 pounds (rotary mentioned)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:59 AM.