Notices
RX-8 Media News Report the latest RX-8 related news stories here.

Edmunds long term review

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 10-01-2004, 10:30 PM
  #1  
I'm Tantalizing
Thread Starter
 
flatso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 780
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Edmunds long term review

here
flatso is offline  
Old 10-01-2004, 10:40 PM
  #2  
Not anymore
 
shelleys_man_06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: NorCal
Posts: 2,423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What in the hell?! Someone took the car out for a joyride, or at least that's what the author wrote. I need to watch out for stuff like that.
shelleys_man_06 is offline  
Old 10-01-2004, 10:54 PM
  #3  
Mulligan User
iTrader: (1)
 
ZoomZoomH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: caddyshack
Posts: 4,612
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
a 'practical sports car' huh

kinda sums it all up doesn't it, heh
ZoomZoomH is offline  
Old 10-01-2004, 11:28 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
rx8cited's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: DC Metro Area, USA
Posts: 1,554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the link.

In this review they did not whine about having to check and add motor oil as they did in their last review where they had
"Problems: Excessive oil consumption"
compared to this time's
"Problems: None".

I wonder if the M-flash made the difference with their prior excess oil consumption complaint?

rx8cited

Last edited by rx8cited; 10-01-2004 at 11:30 PM.
rx8cited is offline  
Old 10-01-2004, 11:49 PM
  #5  
VW coulda had it...
 
KKMmaniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Crystal, Minnesota
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
They probably decided to drop the oil consumption complaint after receiving too many letters from us as to why the engine consumes oil. Or, maybe the oil consumption decreased, as it did on my car and other RX8s?

BTW: the "joyride" situation seems to have been coming up a lot lately.

Last edited by KKMmaniac; 10-01-2004 at 11:55 PM.
KKMmaniac is offline  
Old 10-02-2004, 12:19 AM
  #6  
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
MazdaManiac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Under my car
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by rx8cited
I wonder if the M-flash made the difference with their prior excess oil consumption complaint?

rx8cited

M-flash probably won't decrease oil consumption.
One of the things adressed in the MSP04 is additional oil injection. The "loss of power" issue is occasionally caused by lack of compression sealing due to insufficient oil injection.
If anything, the M-flash should increase oil consumption.
MazdaManiac is offline  
Old 10-02-2004, 12:54 AM
  #7  
Registered User
 
6speed8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I already wrote the editors (as I did about their oil consumption listed as a 'problem') regarding their comments about mediocre fuel mileage.

Edmunds says ""Of course, not helping the fuel economy cause is the fun of keeping the engine on the boil. Road Test Editor John DiPietro clarified: "I'm like the kid who's always caught with his hand in the cookie jar; when conditions allow, I've got my foot on the throttle, just to feel the surge and hear the jet enginelike sound."

According to Edmunds their average MPG over the life of the vehicle for the RX-8 is
17.6 mpg with a high of 19.7.

Their long term test of the G35C has them saying "our inability to keep our foot out of the engine's power has resulted in some discouraging mileage figures. Guess we'll try to do better next time."

The problem is, the average fuel mileage on the G35C is 15.6 with a best of 16.8.
I think most will agree 15.6 is more mediocre than discouraging. They claim THEY will try to do better next time on the G35C, but apparently are not willing to accept responsibility for the RX-8 fuel economy.
6speed8 is offline  
Old 10-02-2004, 09:39 AM
  #8  
Registered User
 
cel1122's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
WTH? 23 miles put on the car during routine service...I definitely would not just walk away from that one.
cel1122 is offline  
Old 10-02-2004, 09:41 AM
  #9  
4AT poor mileage king
 
310Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: now... 818 area code
Posts: 587
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What a shocker... yet ANOTHER article mentioning poor gas mileage...
310Guy is offline  
Old 10-02-2004, 10:59 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
rx8cited's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: DC Metro Area, USA
Posts: 1,554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
M-flash probably won't decrease oil consumption.
One of the things adressed in the MSP04 is additional oil injection. The "loss of power" issue is occasionally caused by lack of compression sealing due to insufficient oil injection.
If anything, the M-flash should increase oil consumption.
I've exprienced decreased oil consumption and I thought I read that others exprienced the same after the L and/or M-flash.

I'm currently running with M, what do you have Jeff?

rx8cited
rx8cited is offline  
Old 10-04-2004, 02:16 AM
  #11  
yes, I bite
 
Speed-ER doc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 796
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good review. I laughed at the "V8 thirst" part....my 390 HP Cobra gets the same gas mileage as my (now wrecked) RX-8!
Speed-ER doc is offline  
Old 10-04-2004, 06:48 AM
  #12  
Like a record, baby...
 
TheColonel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My 400hp Z28 can get 27mpg :D .
TheColonel is offline  
Old 10-04-2004, 07:16 AM
  #13  
Registered
 
peterlemonjello's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: B'ham, Alabama
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I thought the article was suppose to be about the 8. 3 paragraphs wasted on a crappy service department and 4 paragraphs on the (optional) nav system. Not to mention whining about the display and sunroof's tilt functionality.

If all they can complain about are these nit picky things, IMHO the 8 did a damn fine job.
peterlemonjello is offline  
Old 10-04-2004, 07:23 AM
  #14  
'RX-EIGHT'
 
RXE16T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by peterlemonjello
I thought the article was suppose to be about the 8. 3 paragraphs wasted on a crappy service department and 4 paragraphs on the (optional) nav system. Not to mention whining about the display and sunroof's tilt functionality.

If all they can complain about are these nit picky things, IMHO the 8 did a damn fine job.

I agree wholeheartedly!

You know they're clutching at straws when they start nit picking at irrelevant, somewhat non-related topics.
RXE16T is offline  
Old 10-04-2004, 10:14 AM
  #15  
Mulligan User
iTrader: (1)
 
ZoomZoomH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: caddyshack
Posts: 4,612
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
well they can't just keep gushing about the fun the 8 brings!
ZoomZoomH is offline  
Old 10-04-2004, 10:59 AM
  #16  
czr
RX8 RX8!
iTrader: (3)
 
czr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Tampa Bay, FL
Posts: 1,189
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How can a long term review be primarily based on one bad service dept.

Maybe they took it to Manhattan Mazda?

https://www.rx8club.com/rx-8-discussion-3/did-dealer-install-wrong-radio-they-took-my-8-joyride-waytoo-much-oil-40506/
czr is offline  
Old 10-04-2004, 01:08 PM
  #17  
Registered User
 
6speed8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TheColonel
My 400hp Z28 can get 27mpg :D .

Yes it can, it is also faster than the RX-8 . The Z28 blends in with the hundreds of thousands of other Fbody cars, the rear tires jump all over the place on less than perfect road surfaces, the interior is by playschool, the body flexes like a wet noodle, some of the body seams are so big you can put your fingers in the gaps, the steering wheel looks like it came off an old mans car, but it gets great Fuel Economy especially considering the HP.
6speed8 is offline  
Old 10-04-2004, 01:09 PM
  #18  
I'm Tantalizing
Thread Starter
 
flatso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 780
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 6speed8
Yes it can, it is also faster than the RX-8 . The Z28 blends in with the hundreds of thousands of other Fbody cars, the rear tires jump all over the place on less than perfect road surfaces, the interior is by playschool, the body flexes like a wet noodle, some of the body seams are so big you can put your fingers in the gaps, the steering wheel looks like it came off an old mans car, but it gets great Fuel Economy especially considering the HP.
were you being sarcastic
flatso is offline  
Old 10-04-2004, 06:47 PM
  #19  
Registered User
 
Rob Tomlin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Riverside, CA
Posts: 1,160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by peterlemonjello
I thought the article was suppose to be about the 8. 3 paragraphs wasted on a crappy service department and 4 paragraphs on the (optional) nav system. Not to mention whining about the display and sunroof's tilt functionality.

If all they can complain about are these nit picky things, IMHO the 8 did a damn fine job.
That was my reaction as well.

Overall I think it is pretty obvious that they really like the car, and they are trying hard to come up with something that they can "criticize".

The first paragraph gives the 8 a lot of praise.
Rob Tomlin is offline  
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Hunterkelley24
Series I Engine Tuning Forum
14
06-14-2022 08:32 AM
Shankapotamus3
Series I Trouble Shooting
28
03-14-2021 03:53 PM
JimmyBlack
Series I Major Horsepower Upgrades
273
02-10-2020 10:23 PM
fourwhls
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
7
02-20-2019 05:16 PM
TJSiegrist
New Member Forum
9
09-10-2015 09:29 AM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Edmunds long term review



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:48 PM.