2010/2011 RX-7 Motortrend article
#101
#102
Administrator
ill tell you what i heard today from what i consider to be a credible source-
you all know how dedicated (possibly "obsessed") the rotary engineers are at Mazda- often working on their own time like during the "creation" of the renesis. Well they have apparently again been burning the mid-night oil on the "renesis 1.5/2.0 project" to the point that some of them were quite clearly exhausted. So Mazda has given them all a mandatory vacation for a little while.
this halt on rotary work could be the basis for the rumor ash heard
you all know how dedicated (possibly "obsessed") the rotary engineers are at Mazda- often working on their own time like during the "creation" of the renesis. Well they have apparently again been burning the mid-night oil on the "renesis 1.5/2.0 project" to the point that some of them were quite clearly exhausted. So Mazda has given them all a mandatory vacation for a little while.
this halt on rotary work could be the basis for the rumor ash heard
#105
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Santiago, Dominican Republic
Posts: 2,525
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
with todays technology maybe thats not the case anymore, maybe they can go much bigger now
Last edited by rotary crazy; 07-17-2007 at 07:46 PM.
#107
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Santiago, Dominican Republic
Posts: 2,525
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ill tell you what i heard today from what i consider to be a credible source-
you all know how dedicated (possibly "obsessed") the rotary engineers are at Mazda- often working on their own time like during the "creation" of the renesis. Well they have apparently again been burning the mid-night oil on the "renesis 1.5/2.0 project" to the point that some of them were quite clearly exhausted. So Mazda has given them all a mandatory vacation for a little while.
this halt on rotary work could be the basis for the rumor ash heard
you all know how dedicated (possibly "obsessed") the rotary engineers are at Mazda- often working on their own time like during the "creation" of the renesis. Well they have apparently again been burning the mid-night oil on the "renesis 1.5/2.0 project" to the point that some of them were quite clearly exhausted. So Mazda has given them all a mandatory vacation for a little while.
this halt on rotary work could be the basis for the rumor ash heard
Great news man thanks!
wait! dint they make you sing something?
Last edited by rotary crazy; 07-17-2007 at 07:55 PM.
#109
Downhill Touge FTW!!
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Buena Park
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#110
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Rohnert Park CA
Posts: 755
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mazda stated themselves that 300HP is there base target in the article. If Mazda said that why would they shoot for anything less. Doesn't and wouldn't make sense.
With technology getting better , Mazda could further upon the Renisis motor. Look at the current Renisis now, it makes 232HP in N/A form compared to its FD counterpart that made 255HP with TWIN TURBOS, not one turbo but two!
Thats 23HP more than our N/A rotary, and it used two turbos to get that 255HP goal.
And you guys really think Mazda couldn't give us a base line 300HP rotary? You guys are nuts or either you have a few brain cells that have died.
And as far as fuel econemy, what rotary that you know of gets good gas milage?
Its the nature of the beast......
With technology getting better , Mazda could further upon the Renisis motor. Look at the current Renisis now, it makes 232HP in N/A form compared to its FD counterpart that made 255HP with TWIN TURBOS, not one turbo but two!
Thats 23HP more than our N/A rotary, and it used two turbos to get that 255HP goal.
And you guys really think Mazda couldn't give us a base line 300HP rotary? You guys are nuts or either you have a few brain cells that have died.
And as far as fuel econemy, what rotary that you know of gets good gas milage?
Its the nature of the beast......
#111
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
glad to see mac11 and brillo mentioning direct injection. I honestly dont know all the details of it, but before all these rhumors (true or not) about the next gen rx/rotary engine, I remember people such as rotarygod discussing how DI would be a good way of increasing hp as well as better emissions and that it would be a good solution to some of the common issues people have with the renesis.
If anyone can elaborate on what a decent/normal set up with DI can do (as far as hp improvements or emissions) that would be nice. Nothing too detailed, just something to help show how much DI can do since some people find it hard to believe a 300 hp engine is possible without a turbo.
I havnt really seen much of what ice has said in the past, but from what some of you say he is reliable. But I do trust that zoom44 most likely not post something like that without good reason so for all those doubtful, have a little more faith
If anyone can elaborate on what a decent/normal set up with DI can do (as far as hp improvements or emissions) that would be nice. Nothing too detailed, just something to help show how much DI can do since some people find it hard to believe a 300 hp engine is possible without a turbo.
I havnt really seen much of what ice has said in the past, but from what some of you say he is reliable. But I do trust that zoom44 most likely not post something like that without good reason so for all those doubtful, have a little more faith
#112
My point on the matter is that Mazda built a new rotary that was shy of 23 Hp of a rotary that used FI. Nothing more nothing less. Just like Nissan built a VQ3.5 to attain 300 HP N/A without using twin turbos as the old Z32. Thats call improvement in technology, nothing more nothing less.
Yeah Mazda listening to their fans. What do "fans" usually want? How many rotary fans are there? How many will actually end up buying a new 30k+ car? Yeah... Doesn't work out very well. Not trying to beat on you or anything, but your posts don't work out too well.
How many people will buy a 30k+ car? Why don't you look at the sales figures of the RX-8 and compare them to previous sale figures of rotary cars of old. I know that awnser, but you need to look it up.
If Mazda built a new RX-7 next year, there would be plenty of people, new intrested ones and old vets alike who love rotaries that would buy one. No, the new rotary RX-7 will not sell like a Mazda 3 or 6, but it was never intended too, its a niche car, like most other sports cars on this planet.
#113
Registered
Where in my post did i say that two turbos are better than one? My point is that it took two turbos to achieve that 255HP. Mazda could have used one turbo to get that HP as well.Hell they could have used 4 turbos for that matter.... So whats your point?
My point on the matter is that Mazda built a new rotary that was shy of 23 Hp of a rotary that used FI. Nothing more nothing less. Just like Nissan built a VQ3.5 to attain 300 HP N/A without using twin turbos as the old Z32. Thats call improvement in technology, nothing more nothing less.
How many people will buy a 30k+ car? Why don't you look at the sales figures of the RX-8 and compare them to previous sale figures of rotary cars of old. I know that awnser, but you need to look it up.
If Mazda built a new RX-7 next year, there would be plenty of people, new intrested ones and old vets alike who love rotaries that would buy one. No, the new rotary RX-7 will not sell like a Mazda 3 or 6, but it was never intended too, its a niche car, like most other sports cars on this planet.
My point on the matter is that Mazda built a new rotary that was shy of 23 Hp of a rotary that used FI. Nothing more nothing less. Just like Nissan built a VQ3.5 to attain 300 HP N/A without using twin turbos as the old Z32. Thats call improvement in technology, nothing more nothing less.
How many people will buy a 30k+ car? Why don't you look at the sales figures of the RX-8 and compare them to previous sale figures of rotary cars of old. I know that awnser, but you need to look it up.
If Mazda built a new RX-7 next year, there would be plenty of people, new intrested ones and old vets alike who love rotaries that would buy one. No, the new rotary RX-7 will not sell like a Mazda 3 or 6, but it was never intended too, its a niche car, like most other sports cars on this planet.
#114
His point is that it didn't take 2 turbos to achieve 255 horsepower in the FD. You could do it easily with 1 and actually achieve a lot more horsepower. The FD had 2 turbos to decrease turbo lag. The turbos were piped up sequentially, not parallel, with a small turbo spooling first and then a large turbo spooling later.
#115
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Santiago, Dominican Republic
Posts: 2,525
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A 2700 lbs car and 280+hp will be a contender in 5 years without a problem, a rx-8 with 300lbs less and todays renesis would be a contender today
#116
Rotary , eh?
iTrader: (1)
I've seen nothing that said the final drive was different. but you can go play around with that calculator all you want. changing the final drive size doesn't change the E.T. or the trap speed just the RPM at which those are achieved.
And that is deff. a bhp not whp rated calculator.
#117
Let me see if I understand this. You're saying changing gear ratios can't increase speed?
#118
Rotary , eh?
iTrader: (1)
If anyone can elaborate on what a decent/normal set up with DI can do (as far as hp improvements or emissions) that would be nice. Nothing too detailed, just something to help show how much DI can do since some people find it hard to believe a 300 hp engine is possible without a turbo.
From what I have read you can see upwards of a 10% increase in power on direct injection alone.
I'm making some very broad generalizations here so lets not get all ******* but heres what I have been looking at.
current reneiss = (230bhp/1.3)/10 ~= 17.69hp/.1L
next renesis(1.5L) 17.69 * 15 = 265.35hp
add DI - 265.35 * 1.1 = 291.88.
#119
Rotary , eh?
iTrader: (1)
http://rx7.com/accel_calculator.html
Last edited by mac11; 07-18-2007 at 08:24 AM.
#120
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Santiago, Dominican Republic
Posts: 2,525
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I believe somewhere Mazda came right out and said DI was going to be the next step for the rotary.
From what I have read you can see upwards of a 10% increase in power on direct injection alone.
I'm making some very broad generalizations here so lets not get all ******* but heres what I have been looking at.
current reneiss = (230bhp/1.3)/10 ~= 17.69hp/.1L
next renesis(1.5L) 17.69 * 15 = 265.35hp
add DI - 265.35 * 1.1 = 291.88.
From what I have read you can see upwards of a 10% increase in power on direct injection alone.
I'm making some very broad generalizations here so lets not get all ******* but heres what I have been looking at.
current reneiss = (230bhp/1.3)/10 ~= 17.69hp/.1L
next renesis(1.5L) 17.69 * 15 = 265.35hp
add DI - 265.35 * 1.1 = 291.88.
#125
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Santiago, Dominican Republic
Posts: 2,525
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I dont get it, if a 1.5l rotary can be a sustantial improvement over the renesis why are they testin a 2.0l? what car would this engine be put in? how powerfull would a 2.0l DI rotary engine be?