16X Technical observations
#253
Administrator
iTrader: (7)
the 16x will be capable of 300, it's up to Mazda to determine what best suites the vehicle.
#255
Administrator
iTrader: (7)
keywords: 'capable'.
#259
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Last edited by Renesis_8; 09-11-2011 at 02:38 PM.
#260
#261
RX-8 = Japanese MG
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Bay area, CA
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
with a lower compression ratio than the Renesis, 1/2 bar of boost, low weight, and good gearing/suspension they'd be spanking M3s.
Oh, wait a minute, it would also blow away Mustangs.
Scratch that idea, since Mazda is Ford's bitch.
Oh, wait a minute, it would also blow away Mustangs.
Scratch that idea, since Mazda is Ford's bitch.
#262
10:1 isn't a high compression ratio, you don't want to go too low because you lose mid range, you just gain more boost ability for maximum top end.
300hp n/a rx-8 would kill M3s. They already out handle and under weigh them, now the same hp numbers?!
300hp n/a rx-8 would kill M3s. They already out handle and under weigh them, now the same hp numbers?!
#263
Needs A Rotary!
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Valley, VA
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Reading the forum, I've noticed that some people use 89 and 87 octane ratings in their car and it works fine as long as the pinging isn't out of control. Given the larger size of the new 16x, could it have a lower compression and therefore only use regular octane like 87 versus the "recommended 91+" that's on the current Renesis, and still make more power and torque? Then maybe the Mazdaspeed or what not could use higher compression rotors on the 16x to get more power if they don't ever want to go FI. Would this be possible, or am I thinking too much like a piston head?
#264
Registered
There is actually no appreciable power difference on a rotary between 9.0:1 and 11.0:1 compression. It's all about the same. Above 11.0:1 you actually LOSE power on a rotary!
#266
Registered
The thing that most people don't realize about raising the compression ratio too high on rotaries is that unlike piston engines, we don't jsut compress air. We also flow it through the engine. All the air must physically move through the rotor dishes as it is getting compressed. This doesn't happen in a piston engine. The air for the most part stays in one place. If the compression gets too high in a rotary, we now have the problem that airflow through these faces gets to be too difficult and we start incruing greater and greater losses. I've heard the argument that forced induction sends tons of air through there just fine. My response to that is two fold. First we are compressing the air. We get more in teh same amount of space. Second we are actually adding to the quantity of air which means more oxygen which means a bigger more powerful bang to overcome any losses. On a naturally aspirated engine, you aren't adding any more air. You are just trying to move it through a smaller and smaller area when you raise compression. The sweetspot on a rotary is between 9.0:1 and 11.0:1 compression.
#268
RX-8 = Japanese MG
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Bay area, CA
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#269
if they wait until 2010--2011 it is going to be too late for a gasoline powered rotary engine to sell to any measurable amount of customers.
olddragger
olddragger
Mazda needed to do FI like yesterday. They have shot themselves in the foot. Especially now that the ECU reflashers are here. All that FI money will go to Pro-Tuners. What is the point of Mazdaspeed anyway???
What will be interesting is FI on their present modified engine that corrected design flaws versus the 16X. In others word will you have Pro-tuner FI on the present renny/modified renny out doing the 16X in terms of HP and at equal MPG?
As is the case with the uglified 2009 RX-8 (though this is not the case for the Mazdaspeed front and it did increase the value of the old RX-8s), I'm concerned they would screw up with the looks of a 2010-11 model RX-8. So a new engine in a ugly *** car, will not be helpful.
Also, selling a modified version of the present rotary engine, seems like they would delay putting out the 16X. Even 2011 could be optimistic.
Bottom damn line, the RX-8 needs to be keeping up with its near competition like the 350Z.
The RX-8 needed 300HP yesterday, still needs to be at 300HP today, and needs to be up in the 330HP+ range in the future. By the time the 16X comes out, other cars in its class could be blowing it away in 0-60 to 1/4 mile times.
What keeps the RX-8 in the hunt is/was its cool looks and that back seat. 2 more things that Mazda may just f*ck up, in addition to a preference of underpowering the car or allowing Mazdaspeed to be lazy asses.
That Mazda executives can't seem to get "it" and insistence on new weird colors (like beige) and ugly plastic grille mods speaks volumes.
If Mazda puts that 16X engine in a semi-automatic RX-8, that gets over 300HP and near 20MPG, that has/keeps its looks and that back seat then all is forgiven. However, don't count on it, because that would be way too much like right for Mazda executives to handle.
Last edited by sosonic; 03-27-2008 at 08:48 PM.
#270
Zoom-Freakin'-Zoom
iTrader: (5)
The thing that most people don't realize about raising the compression ratio too high on rotaries is that unlike piston engines, we don't jsut compress air. We also flow it through the engine. All the air must physically move through the rotor dishes as it is getting compressed. This doesn't happen in a piston engine. The air for the most part stays in one place. If the compression gets too high in a rotary, we now have the problem that airflow through these faces gets to be too difficult and we start incruing greater and greater losses. I've heard the argument that forced induction sends tons of air through there just fine. My response to that is two fold. First we are compressing the air. We get more in teh same amount of space. Second we are actually adding to the quantity of air which means more oxygen which means a bigger more powerful bang to overcome any losses. On a naturally aspirated engine, you aren't adding any more air. You are just trying to move it through a smaller and smaller area when you raise compression. The sweetspot on a rotary is between 9.0:1 and 11.0:1 compression.
thanks fred.
beers
#271
Registered
Ok, now back to reality
#272
i think he means on its side like my avatar... lower center of gravity, spark plugs on top, intake and exhaust ports on the bottom.
i've been thinking bout this myself, it would allow more freedom for variable intake length tuning since you could "wrap" the intake runners around the engine towards the top...
i've been thinking bout this myself, it would allow more freedom for variable intake length tuning since you could "wrap" the intake runners around the engine towards the top...
#273
I say we need 300hp today. By the time 16x comes out, we'll need the 3-rotor engine from the Furai.
#274
Momentum Keeps Me Going
#275
has money, but unsure
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: find bombs, afghanistan
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts