RX8 refuses to crank for compression test
#1
Registered
Thread Starter
RX8 refuses to crank for compression test
I went and got a tester, and I am trying to perform a compression test. I disconnected the ESS, the 20A fuse for the fuel pump, and the Ignition Fuse which is the big black block. I have all the sparkplugs out, and when I try to crank it, it makes one click. The battery has power as the radio is blasting and working, and the windows. Is there something I'm missing or is there something I pulled out that caused it to not crank? The key light is also flashing rapidly, but it locks and unlocks just fine.. Most of the time atleast, only on occasion it wont work.
#2
Registered
I went and got a tester, and I am trying to perform a compression test. I disconnected the ESS, the 20A fuse for the fuel pump, and the Ignition Fuse which is the big black block. I have all the sparkplugs out, and when I try to crank it, it makes one click. The battery has power as the radio is blasting and working, and the windows. Is there something I'm missing or is there something I pulled out that caused it to not crank? The key light is also flashing rapidly, but it locks and unlocks just fine.. Most of the time atleast, only on occasion it wont work.
#3
Registered
Thread Starter
Don't really need to do all that stuff. If using the RCTV 5.2 tester, you only need to remove the two top spark plugs (trailing). The fuel pump fuse isn't needed as you can cut all fuel to the engine by depressing the gas pedal. The ignition fuse you removed is probably the culprit. All I do is disconnect the spark plug boots and depress gas pedal while cranking. Eliminates any spark or fuel from the system.
#4
Registered
The trailing plug is what is needed according to the directions. Printed right on my tester unless yours is different. Never tried in leading hole so unsure if that will cause a problem. You'll also want to leave your leading plugs in while testing as that will for sure skew your reading if testing with all 4 plugs removed.
Last edited by CaymanRotary; 12-22-2020 at 05:06 PM.
#6
Registered
Last edited by CaymanRotary; 12-22-2020 at 05:15 PM.
#7
Registered
Thread Starter
Got numbers... very worrying as they're in PSI, Rotor 2 was 49, 50, 59 PSI @280RPM and Rotor 1 was 50, 59, 50 PSI at @260RPM. It never did normalize and the block is cold because it took me too long to get it tested.. I would assume they're inaccurate hopefully, the car ran just fine today as well, no lumpy idling, no hesitant accelerating which still suprises me but its very possible..
Last edited by RX-8 40th Anniversary; 12-22-2020 at 06:09 PM.
#9
Registered
Got numbers... very worrying as they're in PSI, Rotor 2 was 49, 50, 59 PSI @280RPM and Rotor 1 was 50, 59, 50 PSI at @260RPM. It never did normalize and the block is cold because it took me too long to get it tested.. I would assume they're inaccurate hopefully, the car ran just fine today as well, no lumpy idling, no hesitant accelerating which still suprises me but its very possible..
#10
Registered
Thread Starter
I only disabled the ESS, and took out the fuel pump relay as well as unhook all the plugs. I did take out the leading plugs on accident and got no PSI and was wondering what I did wrong.. Then I put it back in and got the results but I couldn't think they were accurate. This was also on multiple tries as well, and the car starts up cold with hot-start problems..
No hesitant idle issues and no stalling issues.. So I'll try again and double-check everything and see if there's any difference.
#11
Registered
Thread Starter
#13
Registered
Thread Starter
I will do another test as it was done when cold and double check to see if I even plugged the tester in correctly.. I am still fairly new to rotaries but I try to learn as much as possible, and ever since the guy who sold me the car drove it like how it should be, I seriously fell in love with it... damn rotaries
I will keep you all updated and if I get the same results, well I will document the next engine build
#14
Registered
Definitely go with a new engine if yours is too expensive to fix. If you do rebuild a bridge port isn't necessary. It won't really give much benefit to a stock RX8. Port polishing is all that is required. Good luck! Maybe try to give the test on the warm engine again and see what happens. Those numbers shouldn't be that low.
#15
Registered
iTrader: (1)
Seals don't really fall out. I suppose one can crack and fall out but your compression is apparently low everywhere, which points to wear rather than damage. That said, your housings are probably not in great shape already, so I would also recommend a rebuilt engine rather than rebuilding yours.
I had one comp test (with the same tester I think) that showed 80 psi in 2014. Since then every other test has been over 100 to this day. Not sure why, but these things happen, apparently.
I had one comp test (with the same tester I think) that showed 80 psi in 2014. Since then every other test has been over 100 to this day. Not sure why, but these things happen, apparently.
#16
Project Seca
iTrader: (10)
I had a engine in my Rx8 with similar compression when hot and it ran completely normal. I could tell it was down on power just from having owned Rx8's since 2010 but there were no other recognizable symptoms of low compression believe it or not. While I don't believe the OP is doing everything 100% correct with his compression test at the moment (though it is possible OP is), its definitely not impossible for his motor to run at those compression numbers. That said however, his compression numbers are definitely indicative of his motor being toast assuming he is testing correctly regardless of if those are the hot or cold numbers.
#17
Registered
Thread Starter
I had a engine in my Rx8 with similar compression when hot and it ran completely normal. I could tell it was down on power just from having owned Rx8's since 2010 but there were no other recognizable symptoms of low compression believe it or not. While I don't believe the OP is doing everything 100% correct with his compression test at the moment (though it is possible OP is), its definitely not impossible for his motor to run at those compression numbers. That said however, his compression numbers are definitely indicative of his motor being toast assuming he is testing correctly regardless of if those are the hot or cold numbers.
#18
RX-Heaven
iTrader: (6)
I would run the engine to normal operating temperature and run the test again. Compression tests should be done with the engine at normal operating temperature.
When I do a compression test, I just the 20A fuel pump fuse and hold the throttle open. Thats just me. No need to remove the ignition fuse as mentioned above. The ESS connector being removed from the eccentric shaft position sensor does in fact cut spark and injector pulse. The fuel pump will still operate and pressurize the fuel system. Do what makes you comfortable. Bit definitely repeat the test with the engine warm and the throttle depressed 100% when cranking.
When I do a compression test, I just the 20A fuel pump fuse and hold the throttle open. Thats just me. No need to remove the ignition fuse as mentioned above. The ESS connector being removed from the eccentric shaft position sensor does in fact cut spark and injector pulse. The fuel pump will still operate and pressurize the fuel system. Do what makes you comfortable. Bit definitely repeat the test with the engine warm and the throttle depressed 100% when cranking.
#19
No respecter of malarkey
iTrader: (25)
not sure if my memory is correct, but I believe pulling the room fuse; which cuts the PCM from being powered (no fuel or spark) and then either jumping the starter solenoid power connections or the starter solenoid will get it to crank. The MOP won’t be operating either, but for cranking only to make a compression test it shouldn’t matter much, but should not be over abused either. You have to be absolutely sure it’s not in gear either or the car can potentially lurch forward to ruin your day/life.
I want to say that when the throttle is held down that in addition to cutting fuel it also results in the MOP going max setting too (my memory is not clear on this, been a while)? This would be good for helping overcome a fuel-flood situation, but could lead to an erroneous compression reading being higher than actual. The extra oil provides additional sealing that would otherwise not exist under normal operating conditions.
IMO it’d also be better to disconnect the ignition coil harness/control-wiring connectors rather than just pulling the spark wires off the plugs for those who choose that method. There’s no need to be powering and charging up the coils if the intent is not to discharge that potential energy as well. There’s a safety factor with that too.
regards.
.
I want to say that when the throttle is held down that in addition to cutting fuel it also results in the MOP going max setting too (my memory is not clear on this, been a while)? This would be good for helping overcome a fuel-flood situation, but could lead to an erroneous compression reading being higher than actual. The extra oil provides additional sealing that would otherwise not exist under normal operating conditions.
IMO it’d also be better to disconnect the ignition coil harness/control-wiring connectors rather than just pulling the spark wires off the plugs for those who choose that method. There’s no need to be powering and charging up the coils if the intent is not to discharge that potential energy as well. There’s a safety factor with that too.
regards.
.
Last edited by TeamRX8; 12-24-2020 at 09:31 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post