Notices
RX-8 Discussion General discussion about the RX-8 that doesn't fit in one of the specialty forums.

RX-8 vs. EVO

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 02-13-2007, 07:18 PM
  #126  
Ike
Blue By You
 
Ike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 9291150
You're picking the best of one and worst of another. Ok, let's stick with C&D, they also tested an 8 at .91 on Dunlops, and I saw two other tests of the Evo in C&D, one with .90 and another with .93 results. Hence my conclusion. I'm not even getting into transition/slalom times where the 8 also shows well.

No idea how that "exoticcarsite" sourced its data.
The only time I've ever seen the Evo and RX-8 compared on the same day on the same track I think the peak Lateral G for the Evo was 1.10 and the RX-8 was .95. IIRC the peak corner speed for the Evo was 73 mph and for the RX-8 it was 64 mph. The test was done at Rockingham. Evaluating a car based on a dry skidpad has its flaws as does just about every car test known to man. How much better the Evo is than the RX-8 on a skidpad is going to depend greatly on the conditions.
Old 02-13-2007, 07:23 PM
  #127  
Ike
Blue By You
 
Ike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MP3Guy
Oh, please, and you're calling everyone else "morons??"
Nope, mainly just you and dbb.
Old 02-13-2007, 07:26 PM
  #128  
Registered User
 
gh0st's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dbb
it's going to bleed some more now ...

http://www.ffcobra.com/FAQ/handling102_part2.html




I think we all agree so far ... an AWD has more grip and can carry higher corners speeds. No one is disputing that.

However ...

i dont see how this article supports your statement. but thanks for the read though. think about it this way...you said something like "when the tires break loose".

now theres understeer and oversteer for lack of traction.

when oversteering, since the front tires are applying torque as well, AWD usually increases controllability. i dont think this is what you were talking about though.

in the case of understeer which i suspect that is what you are referring to in your assumption, it is true that a RWD with enough torque and the right suspension settings, that a driver can correct with power oversteer.

however, with enough torque and the right settings an AWD car can power oversteer as well. in December, i installed a version 8 STI with motor and drive terrain into an 2.5RS. believe me, with a 40/60 (i think) mechanical torque split that thing oversteers. bad...

while it was a good read, there are points in that article that i dont necessarily agree with though. according to the article, AWD has more stability then RWD mid corner. from my experience RWD is more stable at high speeds mid corner. this article also speaks of AWD as if it never oversteers which just isnt true.

sorry for the bad pic quality
Attached Thumbnails RX-8 vs. EVO-dsc01323.jpg   RX-8 vs. EVO-dsc01323.jpg   RX-8 vs. EVO-dsc01328.jpg  

Last edited by gh0st; 02-13-2007 at 07:32 PM.
Old 02-13-2007, 07:29 PM
  #129  
jersey fresh
 
dillsrotary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 3,688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AH ghost that thing must be a total sleeper! nice pics
Old 02-13-2007, 07:30 PM
  #130  
Ike
Blue By You
 
Ike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Do other people besides myself find it as funny as I do that some guy is arguing about the feel of a car that he has never driven. It's like me writing a movie review without ever watching the movie.
Old 02-13-2007, 07:31 PM
  #131  
Registered User
 
tmak26b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by playdoh43
tmak26b is not alone, BMI have also made similar comments on multiple episodes. fanboys need not get bitter, no one said that rx8 is not a great handling car. in fact im pretty sure everyone here agrees that the RX8 is one of the best handling cars out there, Tmak26b included. Stop acting bitter everytime theres something negative is said. rx8 is not gods gift to men, nor is the evo or the 350Z, get over it.
amen, that's why my driveway is full of sports cars. Each one have their own pros and cons, I cant really complain.

Btw, I think the highway feel has a lot to do with the power steering of the 8. The steering is way too light on it for higher speeds.
Old 02-13-2007, 07:34 PM
  #132  
Registered User
 
gh0st's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ike
Do other people besides myself find it as funny as I do that some guy is arguing about the feel of a car that he has never driven. It's like me writing a movie review without ever watching the movie.

i find it simply hilarious
Old 02-13-2007, 07:49 PM
  #133  
Registered User
 
tmak26b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ike
The FQ-400 and it does not have any different suspension or steering from a standard MR. Unless of course Mitsubishi is lying to us... One thing I did forget to mention is that it does have upgraded brakes with Ferodo pads. As for turning like a truck, I'm guessing you're speaking of the turning radius. All Evos are like that, it's one of the drawbacks of the super quick and responsive steering. It just takes a few days to get used to it, but the first time I went to pull a U turn I was a bit shocked...
You do know the FQ400 is not a true factory car right? They were imported into England as a regular car, they got the swap done through RalliArt UK. You don't find that car in Mitsubishi's website. Plus, isn't an EVO a grey market car in the UK anyway? (I could be wrong on that one)

The TopGear video mentioned something about the turning circle. I have driven EVOs in person, they don't turn anything like that. 38.7 ft turning circle is far cry from being bad. It looked really bad in that video.
Old 02-13-2007, 07:51 PM
  #134  
Registered User
 
playdoh43's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: University of Maryland
Posts: 2,510
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
its something along the lines of the 500hp nismo GT-R z-tune. super limited production

Last edited by playdoh43; 02-13-2007 at 07:54 PM.
Old 02-13-2007, 08:06 PM
  #135  
Registered User
 
tmak26b's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by playdoh43
its something along the lines of the 500hp nismo GT-R z-tune. super limited production
that's why that was never in the conversation, or any of mine anyway. compare with what you can get, not what you wish you have
Old 02-13-2007, 08:10 PM
  #136  
Oh 'lil baby seven...
 
04RX8VR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Bay St. Louis, MS
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I actually used to own an evo. i loved the car and it was an absolutely amazing drive. my only problem was the body lines and the engine...i know that sounds weird, but i'm just more of a sports car body line guy. also the engine. it was fine yes, BUT IT WASN'T A ROTARY!!!
Old 02-13-2007, 08:16 PM
  #137  
Ike
Blue By You
 
Ike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by tmak26b
You do know the FQ400 is not a true factory car right? They were imported into England as a regular car, they got the swap done through RalliArt UK. You don't find that car in Mitsubishi's website. Plus, isn't an EVO a grey market car in the UK anyway? (I could be wrong on that one)

The TopGear video mentioned something about the turning circle. I have driven EVOs in person, they don't turn anything like that. 38.7 ft turning circle is far cry from being bad. It looked really bad in that video.
They absolutely do, I have one sitting in my garage and the turning radius is pretty bad. 39 ft. for a turn circle is poor compared to most cars, and is worse than any other car I've ever owned.

It's not gey market, they're sold through Mitsubishi dealers. But they are tweaked from the factory by a few places for Ralliart UK and were officially sold through Ralliart UK. It's confusing, I know. But it's not grey market and they are on Mitsubishi's site.

http://www.mitsubishi-cars.co.uk/evolution/range.asp

Last edited by Ike; 02-13-2007 at 08:23 PM.
Old 02-13-2007, 08:24 PM
  #138  
Registered
 
9291150's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Georgetown
Posts: 1,453
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ike
The only time I've ever seen the Evo and RX-8 compared on the same day on the same track I think the peak Lateral G for the Evo was 1.10 and the RX-8 was .95. IIRC the peak corner speed for the Evo was 73 mph and for the RX-8 it was 64 mph. The test was done at Rockingham. Evaluating a car based on a dry skidpad has its flaws as does just about every car test known to man. How much better the Evo is than the RX-8 on a skidpad is going to depend greatly on the conditions.
Not sure whta you're referring to here Ike.

I agree that the skidpad test isn't everything. That's why I liked the recent Car & Driver test - the "lightening lap" issue. Both the 8 and the Evo had identical average speeds through the handling sectors, and both had identical minimum speeds through the corners, beating far fancier hardware that they tested that day.
Old 02-13-2007, 08:29 PM
  #139  
Registered
 
9291150's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Georgetown
Posts: 1,453
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by playdoh43
Stop acting bitter everytime theres something negative is said. rx8 is not gods gift to men, nor is the evo or the 350Z, get over it.
WTF? I'm acting bitter? Can you show me where? You’re the one calling me a fanboi because I disproved what you said with facts? Oh, more facts…Automobile tested the 8 at .94 and the Evo at .91. Road & Track tested both at .88…shall I go on. All I said ever said is that there isn't this huge divide as you suggested.

After your 1200 posts you'd think you'd be right more often.
Old 02-13-2007, 08:33 PM
  #140  
Registered User
 
playdoh43's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: University of Maryland
Posts: 2,510
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by 9291150
WTF? I'm acting bitter? Can you show me where? You’re the one calling me a fanboi because I disproved what you said with facts? Oh, more facts…Automobile tested the 8 at .94 and the Evo at .91. Road & Track tested both at .88…shall I go on. All I said ever said is that there isn't this huge divide as you suggested.

After your 1200 posts you'd think you'd be right more often.
it wasnt directed at you only my man, i was speaking of people complaining in general. but i do feel you were sounding kind of bitter when you were talking about how Evo dosnt do as well in A stock. i also said that i dont feel theres a point in arguing about the skidpad numbers, for every set of numbers you claim are close there are sets of numbers where they are far apart. you are entittled to what you think. Fanboi

Last edited by playdoh43; 02-13-2007 at 08:48 PM.
Old 02-13-2007, 08:39 PM
  #141  
Registered
 
N10S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by 04RX8VR
I actually used to own an evo. i loved the car and it was an absolutely amazing drive. my only problem was the body lines and the engine...i know that sounds weird, but i'm just more of a sports car body line guy. also the engine. it was fine yes, BUT IT WASN'T A ROTARY!!!
I owned one as well, and loved almost everything about that car. A real hard-edged, no compromise performance car right off the dealers lot, and one of the easier cars I have owned when it came to modding and maintenance. The boy-racer image thing wore on me after a while, but if I were to get another it would have to be with the big wing and all...is just what the EVO is about.

Its funny though when I really compare the two....both the RX8 and the Evo both meet my needs from a handling standpoint. The EVO rings the bell on engine performance, and the RX8 has a more sporty personality and certainly looks a lot better and has a nicer interior in my opinion. At the end of the day they both excel at getting you from point A-Z on a twisty road faster than any other cars I have owned and I have owned a lot of performance cars.

JR

Last edited by N10S; 02-13-2007 at 08:42 PM.
Old 02-13-2007, 08:49 PM
  #142  
Ike
Blue By You
 
Ike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 9291150
Not sure whta you're referring to here Ike.

I agree that the skidpad test isn't everything. That's why I liked the recent Car & Driver test - the "lightening lap" issue. Both the 8 and the Evo had identical average speeds through the handling sectors, and both had identical minimum speeds through the corners, beating far fancier hardware that they tested that day.
It was in Autocar a few years ago. There were over 30 cars in the test and the MX-5/Miata ended up being chosen as the test winner due to price to fun ratio and how much it would appeal to the average driver. I don't remember the exact numbers from the C&D article, but that Evo didn't do great.
Old 02-13-2007, 08:53 PM
  #143  
Registered User
 
playdoh43's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: University of Maryland
Posts: 2,510
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by 9291150

After your 1200 posts you'd think you'd be right more often.
oooooooooooooo the ultimate internet nerd insult! post count!!! what can I say, Im wrong all the time and I postwhore a lot im sorry if I offended you dude, just joking around, seriously.
Old 02-13-2007, 09:02 PM
  #144  
Ike
Blue By You
 
Ike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 9291150
WTF? I'm acting bitter? Can you show me where? You’re the one calling me a fanboi because I disproved what you said with facts? Oh, more facts…Automobile tested the 8 at .94 and the Evo at .91. Road & Track tested both at .88…shall I go on. All I said ever said is that there isn't this huge divide as you suggested.

After your 1200 posts you'd think you'd be right more often.
If it makes you fel any better I think you're acting less fanboish than usual
Old 02-13-2007, 09:06 PM
  #145  
I h8 boards, just msg me.
 
nolz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Gloucester Point, VA
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jacques79
Who cares what other people think?

Thank God we don't all drive the same cars or else it would be a boooooooring world.

Enjoy life, if you have more pleasure driving an EVO than an RX-8 get an EVO.

Life is too short to stress about things like these.
This may have been said but I'm not going to read the last 3 pages just to find out. Gotta take this moment to mention I am a smartarse and in no way am I bring a *****, I am just joking with you, but ughm, this IS the RX8 Club website, technically we do all drive the same car. ;-)

Cheers,
-C
Old 02-13-2007, 09:07 PM
  #146  
dbb
DSC Disabling Officer
 
dbb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 468
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I found one of my Wheels magazine (Australia's top selling car mag) , August 2004 edition.

It has a EVO VIII vs RX8 vs HSV Clubsport (think of a 4 door Pontiac GTO) comparison.

It's a long article, so I'll try and be unbiased and put in the relevant quotes / points.

In the real world environment, the Evo VIII is the scruffy headed, trouble making kid with attention deficit disorder. It lags a tad off the line with a tallish first gear - there's another bomb hole below the cruising fifth - but in four tightly bunched gears there's no disguising the fire hose surge and manic cog snatching urgency of this turbomotor's mid range.

...

The Mazda's six slot box has the best shift action of this bunch, being lighter, shorter and quicker than the Mitsubishi's firm five speed

...

On the road the Evo VIII has only two states of being : ***** out, or unzipping in readiness. It's a shiv hidden in a running shoe.

... the steering has zero sneeze factor, and turn-in is outrageously immediate - helped, sometimes spookily, by a sensation of rear roll steer , largely the work of the active Yaw control rear differential.

... the Mazda RX8, the most low slung and lightweight of the three. It feels it, too, combining a broad and confident footprint with consistently weighted steering and great grip. The softish but stable chassis can be wheeled away late into corners and will simply scrub off speed in the turn in, then hold its line. It also boasts the best brake feel here, if not the outright stopping power to match the Mitsu ...
Old 02-13-2007, 09:15 PM
  #147  
Ike
Blue By You
 
Ike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dbb
I found one of my Wheels magazine (Australia's top selling car mag) , August 2004 edition.

It has a EVO VIII vs RX8 vs HSV Clubsport (think of a 4 door Pontiac GTO) comparison.

It's a long article, so I'll try and be unbiased and put in the relevant quotes / points.
Wheels Magazine huh?

Why don't we take a look at their handling olympics article where both the RX-8 and Evo competed. Why don't I just post the article rather than taking "unbiased" relevant quotes.

http://wheels.carpoint.ninemsn.com.a...Alias=wheelsau
Old 02-13-2007, 09:21 PM
  #148  
Ike
Blue By You
 
Ike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Amazing that a car that "isn't a drivers car" could do so well in such a test, huh dbb? Feel dumb yet?
Old 02-13-2007, 09:38 PM
  #149  
dbb
DSC Disabling Officer
 
dbb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 468
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've never said it wasn't quick. It is.

Look at the summary, they are comparing the EVO to the hallmark driver's car : the rx8.

Pete McKay rates the Evo as the slightly better drive, with a fun factor equal to RX-8’s.
From the same handling olympics article , the rx8 :

Grabs you early and firmly. Not an abundance of power, but has a beautifully balanced chassis, devoid of any obvious vices. Quicker than it feels, which is a sign of competency. Great front end, with little understeer. Neutral through most of the cornering exercises, with no clear urge to snap into oversteer. The Bridgies seem nicely mated to mature dynamics. Brakes feel strong. Slalom confirms good balance while skid pan reveals nothing but excellence – flat, settled suspension and little requirement for throttle adjustment. Hip-hugging seats round out an impressive package.
And, btw, I don't feel dumb, but I do take satisfaction you have lowered yourself to petty name calling. I suppose your argument style goes well with your boy-racer tricked up lancer with the low rent interior.
Old 02-13-2007, 09:46 PM
  #150  
Ike
Blue By You
 
Ike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dbb
I've never said it wasn't quick. It is.

Look at the summary, they are comparing the EVO to the hallmark driver's car : the rx8.



From the same handling olympics article , the rx8 :



And, btw, I don't feel dumb, but I do take satisfaction you have lowered yourself to petty name calling. I suppose your argument style goes well with your boy-racer tricked up lancer with the low rent interior.
Yeah, the 6th place car is the hallmark for the 1st place car. Do you really believe the **** you type? By the way, if I had said you're a dumbass, that would be calling names.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: RX-8 vs. EVO



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:36 AM.