Notices
RX-8 Discussion General discussion about the RX-8 that doesn't fit in one of the specialty forums.

RX-8 Versus Porsche 968

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 05-19-2008, 01:01 AM
  #51  
hakuna matata!
iTrader: (41)
 
alz0rz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 6,002
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
i didn't read all the others people responses but.. if you don't care about gas consumption then why would oil consumption bother you? it's only something like a quart in between oil changes (3.5k miles for me).. a quart isnt going to cost you $ wise if you don't care about gas. I really don't think you understand what the MPG numbers are like with this car.

Also, the flooding issue was taken care of long ago. Still though, this is NOT A PISTON ENGINE, YES it IS different. Different things are maintained different ways. That said.. it's a rotary. The rotary cannot be shut off cold, end of story. Let it warm up before you turn it off and you will be fine.

Lastly, yes torque sucks.

Research the MPG before you say it doesn't matter to you but oil consumption does.. wtf is that?
Old 05-19-2008, 10:26 AM
  #52  
Registered
 
9291150's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Georgetown
Posts: 1,453
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Now I like Porsche's, but in the 968 we're talking about a car that has lineage that goes back to the 924 in the 70's. Wasn't the 944 considered the "best handling car" when Crocket and Tubbs were considered cool?

But I almost bought a used 944 in '92, but found the big 4 cylinder to feel truckish - at the time I drove my solo 2 Swift GT with a modded 1.3 that ran like a swiss watch by comparison. But she handled well...but sorry, not RX8 well.

Can't imagine the 968 - that put the best features of the attractive 944/911/928 models into one unattractive car - to be much better.
Old 05-19-2008, 01:46 PM
  #53  
Registered User
 
Icemark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Rohnert Park CA
Posts: 755
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 911SC
^^^Correct! The 2.7 liter engine had major head stud issues and non-galv bodys. The 3.0 SC that came after was a much better car.
I'll agree with Icemark on the 924, but from the 944 on they were real Porsches. Built in Stuttgart with what was half the 928 engine.
The 944/951/968 body was still built by VW/Audi at Audi's Neckarsulm factory... sure the engine was Porsche, and in 86 they got rid of most of the Sirocco electrical system... but it was still only half way there when comparing to a 911 variant.

and you have to look at things like using the rear side window gasket to hold the rear seat side panels in, and just lame VW stuff like that.

Last edited by Icemark; 05-20-2008 at 12:27 AM.
Old 05-21-2008, 01:59 PM
  #54  
Registered User
 
asantana's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Icemark
The Zuffenhausen built 911 is a night and day better built car than the Audi/VW built 924/944/951/968 cars, and really can not be considered in the same ball park of reliability and build quality.
All Porsche 968 were Zuffenhausen built, right next to the 911, so built quality is fantastic. And from what I've been hearing, it's considered one of the most reliable Porsche's around. Yes, service and parts will be costly but that's offset by the fact the 968 cost me $20k less than a new RX8.

They are completely different cars. I love them both.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Randolph Alvarez
New Member Forum
5
05-30-2016 01:08 AM
BillBertelli
NE For Sale/Wanted
4
03-19-2016 03:01 PM
Brokegang
New Member Forum
27
01-03-2016 12:45 PM
zoom44
General Automotive
10
09-29-2015 09:56 PM
Tsurugi
New Member Forum
0
09-07-2015 08:27 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: RX-8 Versus Porsche 968



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:19 PM.