In Road & Track the new Rx-7 looks hot!!! - Page 2

May 8, 2008 | 03:54 PM

#26

zoom44

Administrator

Joined: Jul 2002

Posts: 21,958

Likes: 115

From: portland oregon

Quote:

Originally Posted by jayk

True. I guess what I'm getting at is that I don't really see the need to differentiate by name.

because you're not understanding. for clarification instead of thingking of the cars like a G35 sedan and a G35coupe think of them more like a

JC Cosmo(RX-8)

and an RX7(NEW RWD Coupe)

May 9, 2008 | 02:09 AM

#27

superglue

n00b post whore

Joined: Mar 2008

Posts: 535

Likes: 0

From: San Jose, CA

Quote:

Originally Posted by zoom44

its not similar weight at all. the target for this rx/mx whatever is 2400lbs. its RandT saying under 3k that make sit seem similar. there is a huge difference between what this car will be and what the RX-8 is.

I'm just going by the article dude. I haven't heard anything about 2400lbs which would not only make it lighter than an FC body and even the current MX-5. That would be one tiny car.

May 9, 2008 | 02:38 AM

#28

rx8phase1

Registered User

iTrader: (1)

Joined: Sep 2007

Posts: 410

Likes: 0

From: Chino CA.

i dont like how the rx-7 is gonna look it looks like the kabura the old style looked waaaay better

May 9, 2008 | 11:05 PM

#29

Icemark

Registered User

Joined: Sep 2004

Posts: 755

Likes: 0

From: Rohnert Park CA

Quote:

Originally Posted by zoom44

you know - all the mags say it that way now. even when talking about the kabura (which it seems to me is what we are really talking about here - a production variant of the kabura) instead of saying "shortened RX-8 platform" they say "modified MX-5 platform" i dont know why the switch or mix up..

Perhaps because readers know what a MX-5/Miata is more than a RX-8

May 9, 2008 | 11:48 PM

#30

Razz1

Mu ha.. ha...

Joined: Aug 2004

Posts: 14,361

Likes: 3

From: Cali

You need to learn how to understand what you read.

They said they don't know the name of the car with a 16x It could be a RX7 or something else.

Sure the number is there in print.

Also the HP is way off.