In Road & Track the new Rx-7 looks hot!!!
#1
In Road & Track the new Rx-7 looks hot!!!
In Road & Track the new Rx-7 looks hot!!! Suppose to have an upgraded Rx-8 engine in it and sleek as glass. Though its only predicted to have 250hp and be on a modified Mx5 frame with higher low end torque this car should be hot. Can't wait for it to come out and its starting price will be about what an Rx-8 cost today.
Sounds like buiscut, gravy you add the meat.
Sounds like buiscut, gravy you add the meat.
#4
Registered
#6
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Rohnert Park CA
Posts: 755
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
so since the writer didn't already know that... how much truth can you expect in any other part of the article.
#7
Don't hang the messager I'm only reporting what was writen in R&T you can believe it or not its a free world. But when I breeze by you this new sleek baby just remember I told you so. In another Thread above this one is the complete story. But to support my statement here is the quote from the review.
"With the MX-5 firmly established in Mazda's lineup, the new rotary-powered car will most likely be a 2+2 with distinct sports-car styling. That it will be built on an extended MX-5 platform is a given, which means it will share the dimensions and proportions of the Kabura concept car. Expect upper-and-lower A-arm suspension systems at both ends, as well as a low curb weight, something south of the 3000-lb. mark ".
I didn't write it or say it R&T said it. Don't mean its true but it does mean I'm only the messager of good news.
#8
n00b post whore
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Don't hang the messager I'm only reporting what was writen in R&T you can believe it or not its a free world. But when I breeze by you this new sleek baby just remember I told you so. In another Thread above this one is the complete story. But to support my statement here is the quote from the review.
I didn't write it or say it R&T said it. Don't mean its true but it does mean I'm only the messager of good news.
With the MX-5 firmly established in Mazda's lineup, the new rotary-powered car will most likely be a 2+2 with distinct sports-car styling. That it will be built on an extended MX-5 platform is a given, which means it will share the dimensions and proportions of the Kabura concept car. Expect upper-and-lower A-arm suspension systems at both ends, as well as a low curb weight, something south of the 3000-lb. mark .
#9
Are you referring to the bolded pieces in your quote? Distinct sports car styling and 3000lb weight? Seems to me both apply equally well to either car. 2+2 could also be either car, though I don't think they ever sold rx-7's with back seats in the US, at least in the third-gen model.
Last edited by jayk; 05-07-2008 at 02:54 PM.
#11
n00b post whore
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Are you referring to the bolded pieces in your quote? Distinct sports car styling and 3000lb weight? Seems to me both apply equally well to either car. 2+2 could also be either car, though I don't think they ever sold rx-7's with back seats in the US, at least in the third-gen model.
#12
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Boise Idaho
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Are you referring to the bolded pieces in your quote? Distinct sports car styling and 3000lb weight? Seems to me both apply equally well to either car. 2+2 could also be either car, though I don't think they ever sold rx-7's with back seats in the US, at least in the third-gen model.
hrm, well I know the FC's did for sure, and I believed the FD's had some as well... but would have to search to be 100%.
#13
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Boise Idaho
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#14
fd's were never sold with back seats in the us; in japan there're back seats on some models. here some people get the parts and put them in, but have you seen what kind of room it is? it's basically like the *back seats* on old 911's
in fc's rear seats were optional here but relatively rare. i've seen a number of them tho
i wouldn't call the rx-8 a 2+2; it's a proper 4-seater. in 2+2's the rear seats are usually jokes, more like small buckets for backpacks
in fc's rear seats were optional here but relatively rare. i've seen a number of them tho
i wouldn't call the rx-8 a 2+2; it's a proper 4-seater. in 2+2's the rear seats are usually jokes, more like small buckets for backpacks
#15
Vtak just kicked in yo!!
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Lake County IL
Posts: 4,053
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
....... That would be retarded, that car is an RX8 with 2 doors and Mazda would call it an rx7 as a marketing scheme. Think about it, 4 seats, 3000lbs, 250 NA horsepower = RX8.
GOOD DAY.
GOOD DAY.
#16
n00b post whore
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's close enough to a 2+2 to where there is no need for an RX-7 2+2 with the similar power and curb weight. Don't get all caught up in the semantics. The RX-8 is close enough R&T's description of the supposed RX-7 to where the provided description isn't believable. What they described sounds more believable as a redesigned RX-8 than an all new RX-7.
#17
Vtak just kicked in yo!!
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Lake County IL
Posts: 4,053
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's close enough to a 2+2 to where there is no need for an RX-7 2+2 with the similar power and curb weight. Don't get all caught up in the semantics. The RX-8 is close enough R&T's description of the supposed RX-7 to where the provided description isn't believable. What they described sounds more believable as a redesigned RX-8 than an all new RX-7.
#18
It's close enough to a 2+2 to where there is no need for an RX-7 2+2 with the similar power and curb weight. Don't get all caught up in the semantics. The RX-8 is close enough R&T's description of the supposed RX-7 to where the provided description isn't believable. What they described sounds more believable as a redesigned RX-8 than an all new RX-7.
#19
#21
Administrator
you know - all the mags say it that way now. even when talking about the kabura (which it seems to me is what we are really talking about here - a production variant of the kabura) instead of saying "shortened RX-8 platform" they say "modified MX-5 platform" i dont know why the switch or mix up..
#22
n00b post whore
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The rx-8 is essentially a redesigned rx-7 with a set of hidden doors, so what is the difference if they want to put performance back into the mark and start calling it an rx-7 again? Don't forget we are not just talking about the fd3s, the rx-7 family of cars has gone through so many changes that they could have called the rx-8 an rx-7 and nobody really would have complained. The only reason (IMHO) that they changed the name to an 8 was to market it to a slightly different audience.
#23
They could have called it an RX-7, but they called it an RX-8 and maintained rumors of bringing back the RX-7. Unless they plan on killing off the 8, why have two very similar rotary powered sports cars? There's not enough to differentiate the two. If the description said 2 seater coupe well under 3000lbs, that would make more sense. But similar weight, power, seating isn't enough to separate two rotary powered sports cars.
#25
Administrator
They could have called it an RX-7, but they called it an RX-8 and maintained rumors of bringing back the RX-7. Unless they plan on killing off the 8, why have two very similar rotary powered sports cars? There's not enough to differentiate the two. If the description said 2 seater coupe well under 3000lbs, that would make more sense. But similar weight, power, seating isn't enough to separate two rotary powered sports cars.