Notices
RX-8 Discussion General discussion about the RX-8 that doesn't fit in one of the specialty forums.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Just test drove an rx8

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Jan 14, 2005 | 01:09 PM
  #26  
MTCD01's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
From: Northern VA, USA
The SRT delivers more torque.

The 8s speed is very deceptive since it never really pins you to seat. The SRT should feel faster even if the difference is a small one (2-4 tenths to 60). This guy has a torque monster which will make it fairly difficult IMO to accept the 8. If he had a really twisty road to push the 8 through he might begin to see the beauty of the car.

I'm not sure about the handling of the SRT as I never researched them (I hate Neons but I still respect the performance of the SRT).

Specs from Edmunds:

Exterior
Length: 174.4 in. Width: 67.4 in.
Height: 56 in. Wheel Base: 105 in.
Ground Clearance: 6.1 in. Curb Weight: 2900 lbs.

Interior
Front Head Room: 38.4 in. Front Hip Room: 52.4 in.
Front Shoulder Room: 53.4 in. Rear Head Room: 36.7 in.
Rear Shoulder Room: 52.8 in. Rear Hip Room: 52.9 in.
Front Leg Room: 42.2 in. Rear Leg Room: 34.8 in.
Luggage Capacity: 13.1 cu. ft. Maximum Cargo Capacity: 13 cu. ft.
Maximum Seating: 5

Performance Data
Base Number of Cylinders: 4 Base Engine Size: 2.4 liters
Base Engine Type: Inline 4 Horsepower: 220 hp
Max Horsepower: 5100 rpm Torque: 245 ft-lbs.
Max Torque: 2400 rpm Drive Type: FWD
Turning Circle: 41 ft.

Fuel Data
Fuel Tank Capacity: 12.5 gal.
EPA Mileage Estimates: (City/Highway)
Manual: 22 mpg / 30 mpg
Range in Miles: (City/Highway)
Manual: 275 mi. / 375 mi.

:End Edmunds

There aren't any skidpad or slalom numbers listed but I have to think that this would do as well as the 8. Even if we could slightly edge the thing in a corner it is slightly lighter with a tad more power and a lot more torque (it should feel faster).
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2005 | 02:49 PM
  #27  
Shanezam203's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Thanks for the replies. I never really liked the srt 4's. I just thought about the rx8 because I thought it looked real sharp. I wasnt expecting it to be as fast as my car, I knew it was a whole different car. I just expected it to be a little quicker than it was. But it is still a very impressive car. And I wouldn't mind owning one, I just can't swing $24,000 and then keep the Cobra. And I wasn't as impressed as I thought I'd be where I'd get rid of the Cobra for it.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2005 | 02:55 PM
  #28  
Audioslave8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
From: Buffalo Grove IL
How many miles were on the one for 24,000?
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2005 | 03:13 PM
  #29  
RX8-TX's Avatar
Senior Geek
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,005
Likes: 0
From: Richardson, TX
Originally Posted by Shanezam203
Thanks for the replies. I never really liked the srt 4's. I just thought about the rx8 because I thought it looked real sharp. I wasnt expecting it to be as fast as my car, I knew it was a whole different car. I just expected it to be a little quicker than it was. But it is still a very impressive car. And I wouldn't mind owning one, I just can't swing $24,000 and then keep the Cobra. And I wasn't as impressed as I thought I'd be where I'd get rid of the Cobra for it.
It wouldn't make any sense to trade a Cobra -which is a very impressive performer and seems very very cheap to make even more stupidly fast- for an RX8. Especially if that it going to leave you in any kind of constrained financial situation.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2005 | 03:54 PM
  #30  
Shanezam203's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
The rx8 I drove had 9,000 miles I believe. I only thought of getting rid of the Cobra because I was tired of having two cars. I was looking for something more practical. At first thought, I figured the rx8 could be a nice sports car, and then also something that wouldnt eat gas, and kill me on insurance. Also I'm money ahead on the Cobra, it's worth around 28,000 and i only owe around 8 grand on it. So weather I sold that outright and financed the rx8. After I put some money down, I' be under $400 a month, and I'd have all that cash in the bank. Understand?
But then I went out and test drove one, and realized it'd be real tough to trade the Cobra in on an 8. And it isnt fair to compare the two cars, they arent much alike other than they are both rwd. If it was just a regular gt I owned, and the car wasnt supercharged. And it was from the factory pushing 325 horse or so, maybe I'd be able to do it. But like you said, speed it addictive, and it's tough for me to give up the Cobra. But I figured I'd give the rx8 a shot. It is a real impressive car. 238 hp out of a 1.3 is insane. And the car looks sharp both inside and out. I just am glad I was able to test drive the car, and I was given some time to think about it before I had to sign on any dotted line.
I'm going to continue to look for another car, but I will pry end up just leaving things the way they are. I was just tossing different ideas around in my head. Im not killing myself by keeping the cobra either, my payments are under $200 a month. Shane
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2005 | 04:16 PM
  #31  
RX8-TX's Avatar
Senior Geek
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,005
Likes: 0
From: Richardson, TX
Did you consider a G35c?
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2005 | 04:38 PM
  #32  
Shanezam203's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
At first, I liked those cars, but I don't know about them. I do like how they look, and the 350z, but I can't see myself driving one.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2005 | 04:48 PM
  #33  
RX8-TX's Avatar
Senior Geek
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,005
Likes: 0
From: Richardson, TX
The G is going to deliver in the kick in the pants department. It has a very well laid interior, good reliability reports (so far), decent gas mileage and performance overall. Its a little on the pricey side of things with the 6MT...but well worth consideration IMO.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2005 | 05:02 PM
  #34  
V_for_velocity's Avatar
One more couldn't hurt
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
From: Saskatoon, SK -- go to Winnipeg then head west
QUOTE
"At first thought, I figured the rx8 could be a nice sports car, and then also something that wouldnt eat gas, and kill me on insurance."

Oh oh, the RX-8 likes gas, oh yes.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2005 | 05:28 PM
  #35  
Shanezam203's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
yeah I know, thats what someone else on here said when I first started looking at them.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2005 | 05:57 PM
  #36  
MTCD01's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
From: Northern VA, USA
Oh oh, the RX-8 likes gas, oh yes.
Yeah a 1.3 that will drink just as much gas as that Cobra.
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2005 | 04:46 PM
  #37  
Shanezam203's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
why is the 1.3 so bad on gas?
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2005 | 08:30 PM
  #38  
vladan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
From: Fairfax, Va
Probably because it revs at much higher speeds than your regular 2 or 3 liter engine.
Reply
Old Jan 15, 2005 | 11:54 PM
  #39  
Ike's Avatar
Ike
Blue By You
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee
Originally Posted by Shanezam203
why is the 1.3 so bad on gas?

A few reasons, the rotary design just uses a lot of fuel, and it's not really a 1.3L when you compare it to a cylinder engine, when you do that you usually double the size.
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2005 | 12:37 AM
  #40  
RX8-TX's Avatar
Senior Geek
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,005
Likes: 0
From: Richardson, TX
Very good writeup by RotaryGod on rotary engine displacement & efficiency...
https://www.rx8club.com/showpost.php...24&postcount=7
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ladnarf1
New Member Forum
4
Apr 29, 2021 11:53 PM
T_Mags
New Member Forum
9
Jul 24, 2015 11:29 AM
Bamaham
New Member Forum
2
Jul 23, 2015 08:08 AM
Belalnabi
New Member Forum
9
Jul 17, 2015 07:48 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:02 PM.