Notices
RX-8 Discussion General discussion about the RX-8 that doesn't fit in one of the specialty forums.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Advice to potential buyer: 2008 RX8 or 2009 RX8?

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Apr 8, 2009 | 06:39 PM
  #26  
kersh4w's Avatar
Hit & Run Magnet
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 6,690
Likes: 3
From: DC Area
dude, i ran 14.4 on a stock 05 rx8.

so did all the magazines, or they ran a 14.5.
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2009 | 06:49 PM
  #27  
RX26b's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 444
Likes: 6
From: Chicago
^ With that sort of time one thing's certain...you can drive.

How do you launch?
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2009 | 10:46 PM
  #28  
borgkingkong's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by robrecht
Read the link I posted for you for lots of different opinions and some broad consensus around a few options.

I'm not sure what's easily available to you in your country, but many people use about 4-8 oz of Idemitsu premix per fill-up. It's specially made for rotary engines. It is also popular to add some form of lubricious cleaner and therefore a little less Idemitsu. Again, I use FP+ from LCD Inc in Texas, but that's probably not easily or cheaply available to you. Many recommend a lubricious cleaner over one that will harm your oil films so may not be good to use too much of some fuel injector cleaners that are often used on piston engines.

Premixing applies less for the '09 because of the 3rd 'injector' but, if I were you, I would still premix, probably a lower amount, maybe 3-4 oz per fill-up.
Thank you so much Robert. I have enquired with my local garage to see if they can do a custom order for the Idemitsu Rotary Premix. If he can, that solves my problems. If not, I will have to do a careful hunt and a recheck with everyone here on the 2 stroke oil I can find in my country (BTW, I'm from Brunei).

So if there are Rx8 owners here from South East Asian region who knows a distributor for Idemitsu Rotary Premix, let me know.

Last edited by borgkingkong; Apr 8, 2009 at 11:04 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2009 | 12:38 AM
  #29  
sytfu_Fe's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
ok, so check this **** out.....

the car runs a 15.8, no matter what i did no matter how i launched... 15.8, but i got a 15.6 once.

5 runs, reaction time all .180 and lower, 15.8 88mph. 5 times in a row.
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2009 | 12:46 AM
  #30  
YaXMaNGTO's Avatar
It's a Cavalier
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 5
From: Austin, TX
Originally Posted by sytfu_Fe

i drove the se3p for 2 weeks before i purchased the R3, and let me tell you. older version Fe's dont have anything on this revised model. the 4.77's take this car from a mid 15 sec car to a high 14, and also makes freeway driving a bit more relaxed due to less shifting. power is just about everywhere from 5k, and the handling...... if you liked the handling of the previous version... this one is simply brilliant! turn in can be had at just about any portion of the apex. brakes are very impressive, and the car is about 200 lbs lighter than previous models. fuel consumption is still the same, you definitely dont mind after 200+ miles of pure driving enjoyment. the recaro's hold you, the blutooth alerts you to the phone no matter how loud you have your stereo playing, or even if you have the sound system off.
The R3 has some nice updates, but you're on crack if you think it's lighter and it's faster and in the quarter.
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2009 | 12:48 AM
  #31  
volcomx31's Avatar
Silver Power
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 631
Likes: 0
From: Pasadena, CA
that's a rip off..
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2009 | 12:51 AM
  #32  
shazy's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 2,256
Likes: 0
From: Montreal,QC
Originally Posted by sytfu_Fe
ok, so check this **** out.....

the car runs a 15.8, no matter what i did no matter how i launched... 15.8, but i got a 15.6 once.

5 runs, reaction time all .180 and lower, 15.8 88mph. 5 times in a row.

One thing is for certain, Either you suck *** at driving, or there is something seriously wrong with your car. For god sakes, even my A/T Mazda 6 can beat that 1/4 mile time.
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2009 | 01:00 AM
  #33  
YaXMaNGTO's Avatar
It's a Cavalier
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,926
Likes: 5
From: Austin, TX
Originally Posted by sytfu_Fe
ok, so check this **** out.....

the car runs a 15.8, no matter what i did no matter how i launched... 15.8, but i got a 15.6 once.

5 runs, reaction time all .180 and lower, 15.8 88mph. 5 times in a row.
Sounds like somethings wrong and your car isn't making enough power. You can tell by your trap speed. 88mph is too low. Its should be in the low 90's at least.

Now, if you were trapping 92-94mph and you're still in the 15's, that truly means you're driving like ****, but your car is making plenty of power. That would just be a technique problem.

What RPM are you shifting at? You aren't short shifting, are you?
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2009 | 01:43 PM
  #34  
sytfu_Fe's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by YaXMaNGTO
Sounds like somethings wrong and your car isn't making enough power. You can tell by your trap speed. 88mph is too low. Its should be in the low 90's at least.

Now, if you were trapping 92-94mph and you're still in the 15's, that truly means you're driving like ****, but your car is making plenty of power. That would just be a technique problem.

What RPM are you shifting at? You aren't short shifting, are you?
launched at 4.5k shift at 9.2k 4 gear changes = 15.8 @ 88mph for me.
launched at 5-5.5 shift at 9.5k 4 gear changes = 15.7 @ 88mph for me.
launched at 4k shift at 9.5k 3rd ran out to 9.8k = 16.0 @ 88mph for me. etc.

its really hard to try to prove yourself on a forum, so i wont attempt to validate. but i do know my way around a 1320. i think i was just driving it to lightly prior to staging at the strip, due to breaking it in, and the ecu was locked in on fuel concervation instead of making the car perform. motorweek did a 14.9 (fastest time i have seen reported yet) @ 95mph. car had 6270miles on it. my car had 760 when i staged (breakin per manual is 700), and got a 15.8 @88mph. edmunds got 16 flat @ 86 with similar mileage. car and driver got 15.1 @93mph with 4000+ i think i just need to drive the car a little more, and more spirited prior to hitting the track.
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2009 | 02:28 PM
  #35  
Aznxkaiser's Avatar
Evolution Theory
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
What part of Asia you from? Oh and sweet car btw... 09's are sexy!
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2009 | 05:58 AM
  #36  
borgkingkong's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Aznxkaiser
What part of Asia you from? Oh and sweet car btw... 09's are sexy!
Brunei.... paperwork's being done and the car should be out by next week. Adding a rear wing/spoiler... can't wait!!!!!!!!
Reply
Old Apr 18, 2009 | 06:38 AM
  #37  
always.anthony's Avatar
is looking for his torque
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 841
Likes: 0
i ran 15's when i first started to learn how to drive my rx8... (new to manual ish, i practiced in class using my imagination , no joke)

high 14's for me now. working on kersh's time.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
michaelsk8er
RX-8 Parts For Sale/Wanted
12
Nov 9, 2015 07:06 AM
SupraG
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
7
Sep 21, 2015 12:09 AM
vetteor8
New Member Forum
3
Aug 9, 2015 05:56 PM
dbarber
Series I Trouble Shooting
14
Jul 25, 2015 01:34 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:14 PM.