Is the 8 really all that slow?
#176
Registered
I think we both agree we would enjoy the 8 more so with more power. I could care less if that extra power was from a turbo or not, I just want it. And I agree, if the current version of the 8 made 280 hp and more torque NA it would be awesome. I don't think anyone would be saying it's underpowered even though 280 is less than the 370Z.
My main grip speed wise is that I don't think the 8 has enough passing power. It's 50-70 sucks and that's more important than 0-60. When I'm on a highway going up hill and I need to pass a truck the 8 is slower than a lot of "non-performance" cars.
My main grip speed wise is that I don't think the 8 has enough passing power. It's 50-70 sucks and that's more important than 0-60. When I'm on a highway going up hill and I need to pass a truck the 8 is slower than a lot of "non-performance" cars.
#177
i totally agree with you. why does camaro SS, mustang GT, 370z, STI,challenger R/T, sell more over the rx8, and they all cost more than a rx8. thats where the rx8 should be priced with a turbo. people are paying 35k all the time for cars that like.
#178
Registered
I don't know. The FD RX-7 was about 40k and it had good power for its day. It didn't do too well.
It's not like you can't pay that extra and turbo the car now. There appear to be pretty good solutions out there currently.
It's not like you can't pay that extra and turbo the car now. There appear to be pretty good solutions out there currently.
#179
what put turbo of a rx8 and keep the boost within safe limits, and only be able to keep up with a stock sports car lol. .... not worth it to me.
#182
Not even close, a stock MT 8 does the 1/4 mile in about 14.5, at best. It's been proven again and again.
#183
Registered
#184
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Georgetown
Posts: 1,453
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's has plenty of power to pass trucks, just not enough to satisfy the insecure types...
#185
#186
Out of NYC
iTrader: (1)
I don't agree with that. A turbo RX8 costing about 35-40 grand would sell, if the performance was there. People are paying 25 for the 8 now, 10 grand more for a turbo version is doable.
Mazda already knows how to turbo a rotary and they already developed a turbo version of the 8. Now if you'rs saying a turbo renesis would be less reliable than a non turbo, I can't say I agree wholly with that. The rotary isn't the most reliable in any iteration so why not turbo it. Most likely, the main reason we didn't see a turbo renesis is because of emissions. I don't think Mazda, when they decided to make the 8 NA did it because they thought it would sell more. The 8 didn't sell well and Mazda had many years to correct its perceived weakness, and the biggest one is lack of power.
Mazda should develop the 16x with a turbo version from the jump so as to not repeat the same mistake. Rotaries make little torque, and the great equalizer has always been turbocharging.
Mazda already knows how to turbo a rotary and they already developed a turbo version of the 8. Now if you'rs saying a turbo renesis would be less reliable than a non turbo, I can't say I agree wholly with that. The rotary isn't the most reliable in any iteration so why not turbo it. Most likely, the main reason we didn't see a turbo renesis is because of emissions. I don't think Mazda, when they decided to make the 8 NA did it because they thought it would sell more. The 8 didn't sell well and Mazda had many years to correct its perceived weakness, and the biggest one is lack of power.
Mazda should develop the 16x with a turbo version from the jump so as to not repeat the same mistake. Rotaries make little torque, and the great equalizer has always been turbocharging.
if they add a TurboCharger in the exhaust path, there will be even more restrictions which might result in even more issues.
Emission has been a problem for Rotary since day 1, the side exhaust port alone can cut emission by around 50%.
if they can port the exhaust at factory it will help a lot, but that will drive the manufacture cost significantly (both time and f-xkups)
and Mazda learned its lesson back in 90s, they "can't" sell a car that cost too much.
16x will have Aluminum side plates, which is much lighter (about 11 lbs compare to cast iron like 20 ) and I assume they will use plasma sprays like RB has been doing for decades, which should be much more reliable than cast iron + gas nitrite.
as for "reliable", too much variables, some already got over 200K without single issue. some died in couple thousand miles (if not hundreds).
#187
Out of NYC
iTrader: (1)
2nd thing is back then not that many people "knew" about the power of the FD.
If right now I'm telling ya I give you a Mazda Rx-8.375 it has 350-400 hp Twin Turbo Rotary for 80K. would you buy it ? that's Cayman's price point. maybe you would, but 99% of the people wouldn't.
#188
Sorry to say but no one will buy a "Mazda" for 39K when you can get a "Porsche" for just a bit more. (back then
2nd thing is back then not that many people "knew" about the power of the FD.
If right now I'm telling ya I give you a Mazda Rx-8.375 it has 350-400 hp Twin Turbo Rotary for 80K. would you buy it ? that's Cayman's price point. maybe you would, but 99% of the people wouldn't.
2nd thing is back then not that many people "knew" about the power of the FD.
If right now I'm telling ya I give you a Mazda Rx-8.375 it has 350-400 hp Twin Turbo Rotary for 80K. would you buy it ? that's Cayman's price point. maybe you would, but 99% of the people wouldn't.
madza is not selling that many rx8s right now compared to other sports cars. that cost even more. so just because rx8s are a little cheaper, that still is not helping there sales when theres cars that are much faster, with decent handling. they better make a more powerful rotary or not sell them at all.
#189
Senior Member
iTrader: (1)
I don't agree with that. A turbo RX8 costing about 35-40 grand would sell, if the performance was there. People are paying 25 for the 8 now, 10 grand more for a turbo version is doable.
Mazda already knows how to turbo a rotary and they already developed a turbo version of the 8. Now if you'rs saying a turbo renesis would be less reliable than a non turbo, I can't say I agree wholly with that. The rotary isn't the most reliable in any iteration so why not turbo it. Most likely, the main reason we didn't see a turbo renesis is because of emissions. I don't think Mazda, when they decided to make the 8 NA did it because they thought it would sell more. The 8 didn't sell well and Mazda had many years to correct its perceived weakness, and the biggest one is lack of power.
Mazda should develop the 16x with a turbo version from the jump so as to not repeat the same mistake. Rotaries make little torque, and the great equalizer has always been turbocharging.
Mazda already knows how to turbo a rotary and they already developed a turbo version of the 8. Now if you'rs saying a turbo renesis would be less reliable than a non turbo, I can't say I agree wholly with that. The rotary isn't the most reliable in any iteration so why not turbo it. Most likely, the main reason we didn't see a turbo renesis is because of emissions. I don't think Mazda, when they decided to make the 8 NA did it because they thought it would sell more. The 8 didn't sell well and Mazda had many years to correct its perceived weakness, and the biggest one is lack of power.
Mazda should develop the 16x with a turbo version from the jump so as to not repeat the same mistake. Rotaries make little torque, and the great equalizer has always been turbocharging.
With the 16x, it depends a lot on the actual specs. Until we see production numbers, it's hard to say whether it needs more or less power. Depending on the weight, it could easily get by with NA power.
#190
Mazda cannot sell an expensive turbo rotary. They've proven that the hard way. Don't expect them to make the same mistake again.
We'll be lucky to see a new 16X rotary at all, given the global economy and gas prices. Don't expect another Porsche-killer like the FD, it ain't gonna happen. Adding a turbo will price them out of their brand, and Mazda knows this now.
We'll be lucky to see a new 16X rotary at all, given the global economy and gas prices. Don't expect another Porsche-killer like the FD, it ain't gonna happen. Adding a turbo will price them out of their brand, and Mazda knows this now.
#192
Out of NYC
iTrader: (1)
caymans.... 80k is 911 territory lol.... caymans are like 60k.
madza is not selling that many rx8s right now compared to other sports cars. that cost even more. so just because rx8s are a little cheaper, that still is not helping there sales when theres cars that are much faster, with decent handling. they better make a more powerful rotary or not sell them at all.
madza is not selling that many rx8s right now compared to other sports cars. that cost even more. so just because rx8s are a little cheaper, that still is not helping there sales when theres cars that are much faster, with decent handling. they better make a more powerful rotary or not sell them at all.
but point is still the same.
Rotary does not sell ---- the biggest problem is marketing/myth/word of mouth. dumb people always talk **** over something they know nothing about,we even saw a lot of them on this forum.
Plus to be honest, the lack of torque really kills it. I mean for me, my car pulls hard anything after 5-6 K on 3rd gear, but when you go have a test drive, how often would you pull it hard hard in 3rd gear?
Warranty issue ---- but we should blame this on "GREEDY" dealerships, they just wanna milk every single penny out of the customer's pocket, but the worst is, most of these idiots/wrench monkeys have ZERO idea how to fix a car, they just know how to read service manual, and always throw random parts here and there and "hope" it fixes the issue.
ok, enough of this talk, lets go back to ... Is the 8 really all that slow ?
#193
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Roselle, NJ
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If mazda made a Mazdaspeed RX8 from the factory that made say 350 hp and 250 ft lbs and only sold like 1500 in NA I believe they would sell out, even at 40 grand. People pay over 40 for an Evo. I've seen Chargers over 40. I don't think Mazda could sell a lot of turbo rotaries, heck they can't sell na rotaries, but I'd love to have the option.
#194
FULLY SEMI AUTOMATIC
iTrader: (9)
simple answer-is the rx8 that slow-NO
i dont drive mine daily but lately when i do i think of this thread and get confused. mine feels pretty quick and i love it so i say no
i dont drive mine daily but lately when i do i think of this thread and get confused. mine feels pretty quick and i love it so i say no
#195
Registered
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 16,684
Likes: 0
Received 239 Likes
on
109 Posts
They Mayans predicted the world would end in 2012 when Mazda would release a Mazdaspeed 8. The shockwaves of such a car would rip apart the fabric of reality and destroy the world.
True story.
True story.
#196
FULLY SEMI AUTOMATIC
iTrader: (9)
this thread sux. unless terch is gonna provide a vid of this miracle i vote it should be closed.
#197
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
If mazda made a Mazdaspeed RX8 from the factory that made say 350 hp and 250 ft lbs and only sold like 1500 in NA I believe they would sell out, even at 40 grand. People pay over 40 for an Evo. I've seen Chargers over 40. I don't think Mazda could sell a lot of turbo rotaries, heck they can't sell na rotaries, but I'd love to have the option.
Last edited by 9krpmrx8; 05-05-2011 at 10:05 AM.