Notices
RX-8 Discussion General discussion about the RX-8 that doesn't fit in one of the specialty forums.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Is the 8 really all that slow?

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Jun 27, 2011 | 11:29 PM
  #251  
9krpmrx8's Avatar
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 33,788
Likes: 462
From: San Antonio, Texas
So I see Terch1 is browsing the boards. What a loser.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2011 | 11:53 PM
  #252  
Roidz's Avatar
Strength/Confidence
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,428
Likes: 2
From: Utah
Haha this thread is still around?
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2011 | 12:11 AM
  #253  
9krpmrx8's Avatar
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 33,788
Likes: 462
From: San Antonio, Texas
TX

Originally Posted by Roidz24
Haha this thread is still around?

Of course it is, you just bumped it
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2011 | 09:07 AM
  #254  
kc chief's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
From: Lee's Summit, MO
I've subscribed to this one. Please Terch, give us the closure we so greatly desire...

This is the automotive equivalent of "I did not have sexual relations with that woman!"
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2011 | 09:42 AM
  #255  
Roidz's Avatar
Strength/Confidence
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,428
Likes: 2
From: Utah
Originally Posted by 9krpmrx8
Of course it is, you just bumped it
Touche!
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2012 | 10:43 PM
  #256  
YaXMaN's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX

Last edited by YaXMaN; Feb 11, 2012 at 11:44 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2015 | 08:56 PM
  #257  
R34me's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
slow if your below 7k rpm
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2015 | 12:18 PM
  #258  
Belalnabi's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
It's a fast little car however the low torque is def holding it back
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2015 | 01:19 PM
  #259  
9krpmrx8's Avatar
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 33,788
Likes: 462
From: San Antonio, Texas
Fast is relative. Man I remember this thread.
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2015 | 02:33 PM
  #260  
BigCajun's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 0
Likes: 2,703
Fast enough for me.
Torque is overrated, unless you want to pull trailers or tree stumps.
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2015 | 03:22 PM
  #261  
Gravey's Avatar
Unruly Newb
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 782
Likes: 12
From: Burlington Ontario
So did terch1 ever come back? did he ever have the guts to post again? Did he sell the 8 and move onto the next unsuspecting forum? Inquiring minds want to know!

I know 9k felt extremely betrayed... they were practically brothers!!!
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2015 | 04:51 PM
  #262  
New Yorker's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,319
Likes: 58
From: NYC
If you have to ask if the 8 is really all that slow, you're looking at the wrong car. A vintage VW van is slow. An original Fiat 500 is slow. The 8, which can do 0-60 in 5.9 seconds - is not slow. If you think that's slow, you just don't "get" the RX-8, nor should you get one. The 8's best qualities are not only unique, but also cannot be expressed in numbers. It's simply not a "numbers" car. If that makes no sense to you, buy a Mustang. I wouldn't be surprised if Apple products don't make sense to you either. You're probably an accountant, or worse, an engineer. Your brain simply isn't constructed in a way that lets you understand the appeal of the 8.

No worries; there are many ordinary cars that will appeal to you, and have the "numbers" to prove it.

Last edited by New Yorker; Jul 17, 2015 at 04:59 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2015 | 04:55 PM
  #263  
Rote8's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,574
Likes: 2
From: Boosted...
I would have to go with not slow.
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2015 | 05:35 PM
  #264  
9krpmrx8's Avatar
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 33,788
Likes: 462
From: San Antonio, Texas
TX

Originally Posted by Gravey
So did terch1 ever come back? did he ever have the guts to post again? Did he sell the 8 and move onto the next unsuspecting forum? Inquiring minds want to know!

I know 9k felt extremely betrayed... they were practically brothers!!!
Nope, he never returned. Well not under the username terch1 anyway.

I get the RX-8 and love them more than anyone really should. That said, not being much faster than a minivan in some scenarios can be disappointing. I got the chance to beat on a friends basically Stock (SARX coilovers and RB catback) R3 during a cruise last weekend and while I loved it, being used to a turbo RX-8 has ruined me from ever owning a NA 2 rotor ever again.

And let me just add that I have been test driving BMW's all week, specifically the 135i M Sport and the 335i M Sport and my butt dyno says that both are faster than my turbo RX-8 and both handled superbly
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2015 | 07:14 PM
  #265  
BigCajun's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 0
Likes: 2,703
BUT, and it's a big but, () will you be able to maintain it and work on it yourself as efficiently and cheaply as your 8?
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2015 | 07:16 PM
  #266  
BigCajun's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 0
Likes: 2,703
Originally Posted by R34me
slow if your below 7k rpm
Thanks for the thread revival, btw, Idk why people hate on them.
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2015 | 05:50 PM
  #267  
1.3L's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 656
Likes: 0
From: California
Originally Posted by BigCajun
Fast enough for me.
Torque is overrated, unless you want to pull trailers or tree stumps.
I disagree. The amount of torque and when (RPM) it occurs hugely affects the cars driving characteristics. Hugely.

In my many years of driving, I've rowed (manual) way too many cars that were not only low on torque, the amount available only occurred at lofty RPM's. And that includes the 2004 RX-8 I bought new and kept for almost 10 years. Without a doubt, my RX-8 was the best of all the small displacement cars I ever owned. However, I'd be remiss if I didn't confess that I've always yearned for a bit more. So, I traded in my beloved RX-8 last year for something that has low end grunt and high end HP, not to mention hugely better MPG.

I imagine you'd have to drive it appreciate it, but having full rated torque kick in at only 1400 RPM is sweet.
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2015 | 08:23 PM
  #268  
BigCajun's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 0
Likes: 2,703
That's cool. I don't miss what I don't have.
There are times when a little extra would be nice, but the absence of a lot of torque doesn't automatically make it 'slow', which is what most people point at when they argue it is slow.
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2015 | 09:42 PM
  #269  
1.3L's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 656
Likes: 0
From: California
Originally Posted by BigCajun
That's cool. I don't miss what I don't have.
There are times when a little extra would be nice, but the absence of a lot of torque doesn't automatically make it 'slow', which is what most people point at when they argue it is slow.
I agree. My RX-8 was the fastest and quickest car I'd ever owned until I bought my latest car. With the 8 being non-turbo and small displacement, you simply had to keep the RPM's up to get the power, which was quite rewarding.

My "problem" is not with the 8; it's just that I got tired of "rowing" gears to get the performance. Now, I just nudge the gas pedal and get instant push. :D
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2015 | 08:56 AM
  #270  
BigCajun's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 0
Likes: 2,703
Guess I'm old fashioned.
I like shifting through the gears.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2015 | 01:45 PM
  #271  
Gravey's Avatar
Unruly Newb
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 782
Likes: 12
From: Burlington Ontario
^ I do too BC.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2015 | 07:05 PM
  #272  
akagc's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: FL
Not slow if you can manage to keep it above 5 grand with a manual gearbox. Automatics are slow.
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2015 | 11:31 PM
  #273  
Razz1's Avatar
Mu ha.. ha...
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,361
Likes: 3
From: Cali
If you think the 8 is slow... you need to drive all the new cars.

They're all 4 cylinder gut less wonders. Lucky if you can still find a 6 cylinder anymore.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2015 | 10:38 AM
  #274  
Bmfrotary's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 24
Likes: 1
missing the obvious fact

I think a lot of people that bash them don't realize you're talking about a 1.3 litre engine that's producing around 200 hp. Now keep in mind I've built everything from pro drag to r/t and raced all of them. In a drag race I want my mk3 supra 3.8 pushing 52 pounds of boost on an alcohol engine. But I wouldn't dare try and run it on a road course. You really have to be someone who appreciates elegance and fine tuned handling abilities that are only truly comparable with high end expensive sports or exotics. Yes the 8 is finicky and requires a lot more maintenence but it's definitely one of my favorites for the money.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2015 | 10:46 AM
  #275  
Bmfrotary's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 24
Likes: 1
My 8 keeps up pretty well with the new mustang. Mines not stock either though. 2.0 tri rotor turbo haha. Can barely go's I mean camaros never know what hit em.
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:13 PM.