Notices
RX-8 Discussion General discussion about the RX-8 that doesn't fit in one of the specialty forums.

2005 Mazda rx-8 GAS!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 03-22-2011, 07:44 PM
  #51  
Registered
 
Jacob6875's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Springfield,IL
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by oltmann
"Many serious rotary racers bring their own low octane gasoline to tracks that supply only racing gasoline. From "How to Modify Your Mazda RX-7", by Dave Emanuel and Jim Downing, HP Books, 1987, ISBN 0-89586-383-9, p 47-8:

". . . the best results are obtained with conservative spark-lead calibrations provided the engine is fed a diet of low-octane fuel. The fact that both 1985 and 1986 IMSA Camel Lights championships were won with low-octane fuel is a rather definitive statement . . . ."
So if you want best performance from your NA rotary, you want lowest octane. The lower cost of it is a nice bonus."

http://www.turborx7.com/faqs.htm

I didn't realize this was the 1985 RX-7 forum.
Old 03-22-2011, 07:49 PM
  #52  
Registered User
 
Speed_8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Ottawa, ON
Posts: 1,089
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Jacob6875
I didn't realize this was the 1985 RX-7 forum.
hahaha wait its not ?
Old 03-22-2011, 07:54 PM
  #53  
Registered
 
oltmann's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 531
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Troll.
Old 03-22-2011, 07:57 PM
  #54  
Registered
 
Jacob6875's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Springfield,IL
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by oltmann
Troll.
that article was written before the RX-8 even came out. How am i trolling by saying it is irrelevant?
Old 03-22-2011, 08:00 PM
  #55  
Registered
iTrader: (4)
 
alnielsen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Buddhist Monastery, High Himalaya Mtns. of Tibet
Posts: 12,255
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by oltmann
"Many serious rotary racers bring their own low octane gasoline to tracks that supply only racing gasoline. From "How to Modify Your Mazda RX-7", by Dave Emanuel and Jim Downing, HP Books, 1987, ISBN 0-89586-383-9, p 47-8:

". . . the best results are obtained with conservative spark-lead calibrations provided the engine is fed a diet of low-octane fuel. The fact that both 1985 and 1986 IMSA Camel Lights championships were won with low-octane fuel is a rather definitive statement . . . ."
So if you want best performance from your NA rotary, you want lowest octane. The lower cost of it is a nice bonus."

http://www.turborx7.com/faqs.htm
I still have my copy of that book. I ran 87 octane in my RX7's. I use 89 in my RX8 (just because of the higher compression engine).
Old 03-22-2011, 08:31 PM
  #56  
Registered User
 
Speed_8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Ottawa, ON
Posts: 1,089
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
from what I was told from a mazda pr rep, ( back when i sold cars for mazda ) he said mazda put premium only on the lid as a "just in case" because not enough testing was done with the other fuels. So to be safe, mazda said premium only. He assured me using 87 octane would not hurt the car but not enough tests were made to prove that, but putting 89 octane would be just fine and no warranty issues would occur if they knew you used 89 octane in the car. 89oc is a form of premium fuel compared to the 87 octane. Now before people attack me, its just what I was told.
Old 03-22-2011, 11:57 PM
  #57  
I HATE SPEEDBUMPS!
 
monchie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 8,549
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Speed_8
Haha monchie is funny, I say just use lighter fluid

Do it!
Old 03-23-2011, 12:03 AM
  #58  
Registered User
 
Speed_8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Ottawa, ON
Posts: 1,089
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by monchie
Do it!
I did, nothing happened, then I had no fluid for my lighter and could not have my smoke
Old 03-23-2011, 12:14 AM
  #59  
I HATE SPEEDBUMPS!
 
monchie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 8,549
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
^ Keep trying...

Just use matches next time.
Old 03-23-2011, 08:01 AM
  #60  
Registered
 
Raptor75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,364
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by oltmann
"Many serious rotary racers bring their own low octane gasoline to tracks that supply only racing gasoline. From "How to Modify Your Mazda RX-7", by Dave Emanuel and Jim Downing, HP Books, 1987, ISBN 0-89586-383-9, p 47-8:

". . . the best results are obtained with conservative spark-lead calibrations provided the engine is fed a diet of low-octane fuel. The fact that both 1985 and 1986 IMSA Camel Lights championships were won with low-octane fuel is a rather definitive statement . . . ."
So if you want best performance from your NA rotary, you want lowest octane. The lower cost of it is a nice bonus."

http://www.turborx7.com/faqs.htm
Very well put and anyone with half a brain as to how the rotary works and why will see the relevance of this information to the RX-8.
Old 03-23-2011, 08:18 AM
  #61  
Registered
 
Raptor75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,364
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by 1.3_LittersOfFurry
I'm sorry that wasn't some type of personal attack or anything like it. I only said somethings because that's what the manual states. I personally know my car runs like poo on anything less than 91. I just dont understand why people who love their cars so much risk things like performance and life expectancy over $3. Maybe your car runs fine on 87 like some have said, but if I was one of those people I would be wanting to know y my car does fine on 87 and others do not.

I just think it's silly to risk a investment to save $3 a week.

I know you said other things but my home network is still down... So I'm not going to try to reedit my post.

-Shawn
..and I apologise for my over zealot reply. Yours and my decisions are a risk/reward analysis for using a specific grade of fuel. This decision is based on knowledge of the consequences of our choices. I can not answer why you have made your choice but mine came from a great deal of research and listening to and speaking with those who have far greater knowledge of the rotary then myself. For the most part these people run lower octane fuel for the reasons I have stated. These are people who work on Rotary's ever day and have seen failed engines and have a pretty good idea as to why they are failing. So based on the fact that most field experts use lower octane, the fact that I see no improvement from higher octane, the risk of engine failure in my climate is no greater and the addition cost of using higher octane. It was a no brainer to switch to the lower octane. At the same time I believe a great deal of people use the higher octane because Mazda stated they should in later models do so with out understanding why they are doing it.

Now, if you are at risk of knock or have a validly tested reason for using the higher octane by all means do so, otherwise do so only if it makes you sleep better because that is the only advantage you will be getting.
Old 03-23-2011, 11:18 AM
  #62  
Flame On!
iTrader: (4)
 
1.3_LittersOfFurry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: New Orleans, La
Posts: 1,897
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Raptor75
..and I apologise for my over zealot reply. Yours and my decisions are a risk/reward analysis for using a specific grade of fuel. This decision is based on knowledge of the consequences of our choices. I can not answer why you have made your choice but mine came from a great deal of research and listening to and speaking with those who have far greater knowledge of the rotary then myself. For the most part these people run lower octane fuel for the reasons I have stated. These are people who work on Rotary's ever day and have seen failed engines and have a pretty good idea as to why they are failing. So based on the fact that most field experts use lower octane, the fact that I see no improvement from higher octane, the risk of engine failure in my climate is no greater and the addition cost of using higher octane. It was a no brainer to switch to the lower octane. At the same time I believe a great deal of people use the higher octane because Mazda stated they should in later models do so with out understanding why they are doing it.

Now, if you are at risk of knock or have a validly tested reason for using the higher octane by all means do so, otherwise do so only if it makes you sleep better because that is the only advantage you will be getting.
All good brother,
Yes mine will "Ping/Knock" (whatever it is, its not smooth after +5krpms) on 87, that's what was in the car when I bought it. After my first fill-up on 93 with premix (I run about 1oz 2-stroke oil to 3 gallons of gas) the idle got smoother (wasn't perfect, but noticed a big difference) and acceleration was much better/smoother. The real problem was the coils/wires/plugs. After that it ran awesome and my MPG improved greatly. I tried 87 (with premix) one more time after and the ruff idle and high rpm issues reappeared (not as bad, but I did notice a difference). I cant really compare MPG though, I drive like 90% city and sometimes there is nothing you can do but idle all day trying to go 8miles.

I understand what your saying about 87oct though, my 7's ran great on it as well, but my 8 is a totally different story...

I never tried 89, not even sure why lol

-Shawn

Last edited by 1.3_LittersOfFurry; 03-23-2011 at 01:10 PM.
Old 03-23-2011, 11:40 AM
  #63  
turbo_8
Thread Starter
 
Unique_Rx-8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by terch1
OP I highly recommend natural gas. Now go read the manual and stop wasting our time with these stupid *** questions.
obviously this isnt a stupid *** question if im getting all these sorts of different answers like use 91+ or people saying there using regular and its fine. So im making sure dumbass.
Old 03-23-2011, 11:58 AM
  #64  
Registered
iTrader: (4)
 
alnielsen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Buddhist Monastery, High Himalaya Mtns. of Tibet
Posts: 12,255
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Unique_Rx-8
obviously this isnt a stupid *** question if im getting all these sorts of different answers like use 91+ or people saying there using regular and its fine. So im making sure dumbass.
The problem is that no one has the time & resources to find out if a certain octane of gas does harm to an engine or if which provides the most power/mileage. The sheep can blindly follow the book. The others can try something new and see if it works.
Originally Posted by terch1
OP I highly recommend natural gas. Now go read the manual and stop wasting our time with these stupid *** questions.
Maybe not NG, but propane would be interesting. Less carbon build-up too.
Old 03-23-2011, 01:52 PM
  #65  
Registered User
 
orochikid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No disrespect to your dad or anything but mist people that work at a dealer shop don't know jack squat. There's a difference from a car enthusiast and a car salesman. One loves cash and one loves cars. I would pay that extra 4 bucks to keep my bab happy. <3
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ironj221
RX-8 Discussion
34
11-27-2023 02:51 AM
ASH8
Series I Tech Garage
20
09-26-2022 11:55 PM
GracefulShanks
New Member Forum
9
08-18-2015 11:40 AM
akagc
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
7
08-11-2015 07:07 PM
nnsoch1776
New Member Forum
3
07-22-2015 04:16 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: 2005 Mazda rx-8 GAS!!!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:52 PM.