04 rx8 v 2007 crystler 300?
#28
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Under The Bridge
Posts: 1,420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#34
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bwahaha yeah I had a charger daytona go to race me because I passed him....I'm like really, really, you would own me! Haha for the 100th time we don't own drag cars!!!11!!
Also, yeah, what kind of 300?? 1987 300? 300M 300C???
Also, yeah, what kind of 300?? 1987 300? 300M 300C???
#35
Huge hole is huge
#39
Well I think it really depends on if the 300 has 32" rims, 10 different subs and
100 speakers while bumping 50 cent. If that's the case i'm pretty sure you will
smoke him.
100 speakers while bumping 50 cent. If that's the case i'm pretty sure you will
smoke him.
#40
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Milwaukee Wi.
Posts: 997
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No,
Power to weight ratio is .079 for the rx8 and .084 for the 300c. The 300c would be a little bit faster with equal drivers. Maybe 2 car lengths faster in the quarter, although a race might be even from a roll. The rx8 can stay with cars it should'nt from a roll.
#42
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Milwaukee Wi.
Posts: 997
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The rx8 has a slight advantage over the rsx-s in power to weight. The rsx-s would trail by 1 to 1/2 car lengths in the quarter. it would be a drivers race in most cases.
Last edited by Roaddemon; 03-21-2009 at 12:20 PM.
#43
The anti-ricer
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hillsdale, NJ
Posts: 1,888
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Speed is not all about power to weight, but also gearing and loss of power as it get's to the wheels (which the RX-8 has plenty of). There is no getting around it, the stock RX-8 is slow, and against similarly skilled drivers, it would lose to a type S.