Hey jeff,
if i get my turbo installed before getting it tuned on the socal dyno day and drive an hour on the freeway with the basemap installed will that damage anything? |
Originally Posted by \\Konig\\
(Post 2793097)
Hey jeff,
if i get my turbo installed before getting it tuned on the socal dyno day and drive an hour on the freeway with the basemap installed will that damage anything? In fact, its not far off what the final tune would be, pending proper MAF and injector scaling. |
okay good to know!
id be using the AEM intake and stock injectors |
Originally Posted by \\Konig\\
(Post 2793115)
okay good to know!
id be using the AEM intake and stock injectors As always, be cautious going into boost and start with the lowest possible boost setting until you are certain that the boosted AFRs are at least 12:1 or less. You may see boosted values as low as 9:1! I try to put the base calibration fuel values in a range that yield about 10.9:1, but MAF and injector variations screw with that quite a bit. |
okay, thank you very much jeff! =)
|
Yeah Konig it should work. I had that same base map when I installed the turbo. So its good to go.
Just drive carefully like Jeff says |
I just submitted my idle and cruise datalogs for scaling. Definitely a smoother process. :)
|
I know this has been asked once before but I just wanted to clarify.. replacing my CAT with a midpipe (mazsport, in this case) will not require a new tune correct? It will just "make available or free up" horses that the engine already puts out, yes?
|
I'll tell ya in a week weather permitting. Jeff has stated ad nauseum that a new tune is not required.
|
Jeff I think I messed up
:icon_no2: You sent me my first updated base calibration on 17 Dec and after running it for a few days I sent you the loggs LTFT was at -0.94. <- This is where I messed up I think. When sending the 11 Deadly Questions I left out my Turboxs exhaust that was sent for the previous calibration on 17 Dec. The current cailbration in question was recieved on 25 dec. I sent you an email on 29 Dec with proper loggs and the 11 questions voicing my concern as the LTFT was now at 5.3 and since sending the email it has gone to 7.
Just trying to let you know that I left out the exhaust in my previous email and this maybe the reason the ltft is off. SIDE NOTE- I have a huge hangover and this seems hard to read. Is it? |
We're supposed to watch our ltft? I'm just looking at AFR :P (though I browse everything when sending logs to Jeff)
|
Originally Posted by neXib
(Post 2794215)
We're supposed to watch our ltft? I'm just looking at AFR :P (though I browse everything when sending logs to Jeff)
Your watching your AFR so you don't blow your motor. |
Actually, running NA watching your AFRs isn't out of fear of blowing your engine. Our cars are factory / recall tuned so friggin rich that it takes forever to get it leaned properly... at least that's what I would call typical for us.
|
Originally Posted by ShellDude
(Post 2794252)
Actually, running NA watching your AFRs isn't out of fear of blowing your engine. Our cars are factory / recall tuned so friggin rich that it takes forever to get it leaned properly... at least that's what I would call typical for us.
|
Originally Posted by Mr.&Mrs.Magic
(Post 2793926)
:icon_no2: You sent me my first updated base calibration on 17 Dec and after running it for a few days I sent you the loggs LTFT was at -0.94. <- This is where I messed up I think. When sending the 11 Deadly Questions I left out my Turboxs exhaust that was sent for the previous calibration on 17 Dec. The current cailbration in question was recieved on 25 dec. I sent you an email on 29 Dec with proper loggs and the 11 questions voicing my concern as the LTFT was now at 5.3 and since sending the email it has gone to 7.
Just trying to let you know that I left out the exhaust in my previous email and this maybe the reason the ltft is off. SIDE NOTE- I have a huge hangover and this seems hard to read. Is it? Let me see if I understand what has transpired. You loaded v4.0, ran it and sent me logs. I sent you v4.0.1 and you sent logs again based on v4.0? Now you are on v4.0.2 and the LTFT is +7? You need to start over again. I do not maintain a file trace - just the last version and it assumes good logs based on the preceding version. |
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
(Post 2794347)
First of all, exhaust doesn't matter at all.
Let me see if I understand what has transpired. You loaded v4.0, ran it and sent me logs. I sent you v4.0.1 and you sent logs again based on v4.0? Now you are on v4.0.2 and the LTFT is +7? You need to start over again. I do not maintain a file trace - just the last version and it assumes good logs based on the preceding version. So how about we just start over right? |
You can just send me your previous logs for v4.0 and I'll send you a new v.4.0.1 and see what happens.
You shouldn't need to go through part 1 again. Just make sure you point out that the logs were your first set (for v4.0.) and not something else. That will save you some time. |
Hey Jeff,
I'm pretty anxious for these maps...:lol: |
cool beans done and done.
|
Got it.
|
Originally Posted by L337fpc
(Post 2794403)
Hey Jeff,
I'm pretty anxious for these maps...:lol: |
Originally Posted by shaunv74
(Post 2794773)
Today is a holiday. Jeff may be taking the day off like the rest of us.
|
Just checked out my logs and noticed the idle ltft got much worse with the 4.0.2 (+20), while in the other logs it went from negative a few to positive a few.
Oh, in between getting the tunes back I've been going back to my other tune since I've been driving a lot lately. The limit to the number of times you can flash is way off into the thousands right? |
there's a limit? :scratchhe
|
Originally Posted by Jedi54
(Post 2796336)
there's a limit? :scratchhe
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:06 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands