New MazdaManiac BASE Calibrations
PLEASE REFER ALL QUESTIONS ABOUT THE ACCESSPORT TO MY E-MAIL.
I DO NOT RESPOND TO PMs ON THIS FORUM. PLEASE READ THE "INSTRUCTIONS INSTRUCTIONS" THREAD IF THESE INSTRUCTIONS ARE THE LEAST BIT UNCLEAR. In fact, read the "Instructions Instructions" even if you believe you totally understand what is being explained here. MazdaManiac does not offer expressed or implied warranties on any calibrations offered and accepts no responsibility for any damages, either direct or consequential, caused by the use of these calibrations or the MazdaManiac Custom Calibration Service. Calibration turn-around time may vary. "Cobb" and "AccessPORT" are registered trademarks of Cobb Tuning. "MazdaManiac" and "Custom Calibration Service" are registered trademarks of MazdaManiac LLC. All rights reserved. ©2011 MazdaManiac.com |
Anyone else see the A/F ratio in the 16s during cruise with the BASE calibration? Oh well.. quicker death for the CAT! Midpipe to come!
|
Originally Posted by alz0rz
(Post 2762217)
Anyone else see the A/F ratio in the 16s during cruise with the BASE calibration? Oh well.. quicker death for the CAT! Midpipe to come!
Originally Posted by jackhain
(Post 2762279)
If the ambient temp is...lets say freezing (winter in Chicago)....do you need to wait the full 8 hours, or is it enough to just let the coolant temp return to the normal cold position? 60-80 degrees or something?
Really, any coolant temp below 120° is probably adequate.
Originally Posted by Mr.&Mrs.Magic
(Post 2762210)
Just for clarification we need to send you an email for base calibration if we have the MazSport ignition even if NA right.
The main point of the need for a custom start-up calibration was that there would be some people that had setups that wouldn't run at all without one. The MazSport ignition really doesn't fall into that category, but I figured there would be some with FI and that ignition that wouldn't be safe without a custom start-up calibration. Please people - Read the first post THOUROUGHLY. I am not going to answer questions that are directly addressed in it. |
I was wondering if you have calibrations for the esmeril turbo kit?
|
I know what I'll be doing on Friday night / Saturday. :fruit:
|
Jeff, still wondering on that AEM CAI thing. I plan to do this test with your new base map on saturday. Should I install the AEM CAI or should I keep the greddy intake? Please let me know so I can do this right the first time :D
I ask because this is not written in your post as something from the the 10 deadly questions and we have had this discussion before. But last time i installed it with the base map I have on right now my idl AFR's were horrible and sputtering. |
alien: whatever parts you plan on having on your car, do the testing with THAT.
These are new base maps, you should see different results. Even if you don't, then at least Jeff can work on getting you a map that works well with your setup. (48 hour turn around sounds nice) |
Based on Jeff's response, I'm guessing he found a way to tune the maps without 2nd and 3rd gear WOT which sounds AWESOME.
|
this is awesome!
|
Ok then I will test it out on friday. Hopefully this time around I can actuallyd rive the car with the intake haha. Last time it would turn off and everything :(
By the way Jeff, any update on my order?? I cant wait for those injectors so I can install the new turbo. |
Originally Posted by Daemos
(Post 2762635)
Based on Jeff's response, I'm guessing he found a way to tune the maps without 2nd and 3rd gear WOT which sounds AWESOME.
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
(Post 2761568)
NOTE:
These are BASE CALIBRATIONS. They provide NO PERFORMANCE BENEFIT over stock and are designed ONLY for the purpose of collecting data for proper calibration of your particular car. |
Jeff: Thanks for the clarification on the temperature. Chicago winters suck a little less now.
Now I just have to wait for Ray and the gang to ship my damn coil kit :eyetwitch |
I haven't had a chance to look at the new features yet, but from what I'm gathering, it now data logs? Does this mean we can just use this for the data logs for the performance oriented tunes? Or do we still need to use a separate data logger and make graphs?
And does this replace the previous method where we run the car with the starting map then choose the next map based on our fuel trim showed? And if so, will we need to do the WOT runs and data log them again? Just making sure because I'm almost done with graphing my data log and want to make sure to get it right the first time before I send this one off... These questions are directed at anyone who can answer... |
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
(Post 2762674)
NO! Please read the first post CAREFULLY.
I know the 'base' calibrations do not provide performance benefit but when I read "collecting data for proper calibration of your particular car" I mis-read that as getting a 'tuned' map for the car. Sorry had a very long night =) Makes sense now. |
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
(Post 2762552)
Well, that would be on the cusp, so to speak. But I guess "yes" should be the right answer since I actually said "MazSport Ignition" in the original post!!!!
The main point of the need for a custom start-up calibration was that there would be some people that had setups that wouldn't run at all without one. The MazSport ignition really doesn't fall into that category, but I figured there would be some with FI and that ignition that wouldn't be safe without a custom start-up calibration. Please people - Read the first post THOUROUGHLY. I am not going to answer questions that are directly addressed in it. No worries - follow directions - can do. :) |
Originally Posted by 8 Maniac
(Post 2762706)
I haven't had a chance to look at the new features yet, but from what I'm gathering, it now data logs? Does this mean we can just use this for the data logs for the performance oriented tunes? Or do we still need to use a separate data logger and make graphs?
And does this replace the previous method where we run the car with the starting map then choose the next map based on our fuel trim showed? And if so, will we need to do the WOT runs and data log them again? Just making sure because I'm almost done with graphing my data log and want to make sure to get it right the first time before I send this one off... These questions are directed at anyone who can answer... |
u rock!
|
Originally Posted by Derex'8
(Post 2762725)
As MM stated read the 1st post very carefully...everything you asked is answered in his FIRST POST! You only get one calibration
edit: found the 150+ miles thing in the email that was sent out when I first got it. It must have been edited out of his original method's post. |
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
(Post 2761568)
....You will receive a confirmation within 24 hours of your submission.
So we don't need a separate base for CA cars? |
Originally Posted by DynamicDookie
(Post 2762863)
Awesome.
So we don't need a separate base for CA cars? |
So we do the datalog procedure right after the second drive cycle of the install? Ie. the engine is at operating temperature when we start logging? Just making sure.
|
Originally Posted by 8 Maniac
(Post 2762870)
when you download your file it will ask you a series of questions which will take you to your file. It asks for model year, federal/california, MT/AT and NA/FI. Once you've gone through and selected all your things it has the link to download your file. So, in short, you will have a different one if your car is a CA car.
|
Originally Posted by neXib
(Post 2762878)
So we do the datalog procedure right after the second drive cycle of the install? Ie. the engine is at operating temperature when we start logging? Just making sure.
I'll clarify the first post further.
Originally Posted by DynamicDookie
(Post 2762974)
I checked 2004 and didn't see a CALIFORNIA option. 2005 and 2006-2008 have one, but not 2004.
|
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
(Post 2763042)
There is no difference between California and Federal models in 2004 (2003).
|
well, just finished my first drive cycle.
When I first got my AP a few months ago I found out I had an 05 version in my 04 car. But today when I went to reinstall it recognized it as being an 05 cali. I'm guessing it's nothing to worry about since it worked fine with the 05 cali file but any guess as to why that happened? Did something in COBB's update change the way it recognizes it? |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:32 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands