ATTENTION CURRENT MazdaManiac CUSTOM CALIBRATION CUSTOMERS
No - You guys are fine. That wasn't what I was talking about.
There were guys that were 2 and 3 versions into their calibration service that just "fell off the earth" after their last update who came in demanding service because "it was too cold" to drive their 8's for the last 5 months.
There were guys that were 2 and 3 versions into their calibration service that just "fell off the earth" after their last update who came in demanding service because "it was too cold" to drive their 8's for the last 5 months.
Well, that load makes me feel a bit better about missing yesterday's sessions. Being exhausted from crewing for Speedsource on Monday, 3 hour drive home, and immediately lifting heavy *** window air conditioners to install in our house did a number on my back muscles. By the time I got home from work, I was in no shape to go out logging again.
AP Manager on Mac
AP Manager DOES work on the Mac. I used it last night to submit files and load a new cal.
I running Snow Leopard (10.6) on an Intel MacBook Pro.
The bigger problem is that Google Voice does not run on a Mac...
That said, I was impressed by MM's ability to handle 40+ submissions last night, and still answer newbie questions for me
Last edited by Joe RX-8; Jun 1, 2011 at 12:44 PM.
I believe the confusion was about the GTALK client. There is not one for OSX. Files are submitted using the client.
I use http://ge.tt for file transfers for those that cannot use the GTalk client.
It is a major PITA for me, but at least it keeps things moving.
It is a major PITA for me, but at least it keeps things moving.
Jeff don't want to make it feel like Im tryin to rush you or anything but out of curiosity on Tuesday at the end of the session you said you had to go and you would Email our new calibrations to us later; (well at least thats what you said to me) when could we expect to have those?
Just received ver 4_0_5 through one of Jeff's sessions and really was anxious about flashing it to see if any improvements were made. Let me start off by being honest in saying I was a little discouraged at first with the performance of earlier versions and maybe had been expecting to much which may of brought on any scepticism. V 0_1 felt subtle improvements but nothing to be overly exuberant about. Then followed V 0_2, 3 & 4 again improvements in acceleration and bottom end torque but still felt maybe I was missing out on something........... again nothing to be crazily impressed about. Well let me tell you V 0_5 feels like a totally different animal and can't begin to convey in how much of a difference and how different this car feels. Jeff has indicated to me that one more version till the tune is spot on! Anybody considering Jeff's tune don't hesitate probably if not the best mod you can get for you car in a NA application..............can't imagine Jeff's tune in a FI set up! Thanks Jeff again !!!
Just received ver 4_0_5 through one of Jeff's sessions and really was anxious about flashing it to see if any improvements were made. Let me start off by being honest in saying I was a little discouraged at first with the performance of earlier versions and maybe had been expecting to much which may of brought on any scepticism. V 0_1 felt subtle improvements but nothing to be overly exuberant about. Then followed V 0_2, 3 & 4 again improvements in acceleration and bottom end torque but still felt maybe I was missing out on something........... again nothing to be crazily impressed about. Well let me tell you V 0_5 feels like a totally different animal and can't begin to convey in how much of a difference and how different this car feels. Jeff has indicated to me that one more version till the tune is spot on! Anybody considering Jeff's tune don't hesitate probably if not the best mod you can get for you car in a NA application..............can't imagine Jeff's tune in a FI set up! Thanks Jeff again !!!
Hmm... You see I havent seen a crazy difference... Maybe its just me
I will flash the MM Base tune then my V0_5 and compare...
Registered
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 228
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver, BC.
Install your OEM one for kicks and the difference will become quickly apparent.
Jeff,
I was able to purchase the wideband and get it replaced and calibrated, I installed it into my agency power midpipe, duel resonated (if that matters) where the stock second senor usually is.
I was able to log the lc-1 data simultaneously logging the access port data, but the afrs are about .4-.6 points different between the two.
also the sample rate is twice as much on my LC-1 datalogs vs the Cobb datalog.
should I try to scale the .4 afr difference out or leave it?
should I try to scale the time to make the sample rate match or leave it?
I was able to purchase the wideband and get it replaced and calibrated, I installed it into my agency power midpipe, duel resonated (if that matters) where the stock second senor usually is.
I was able to log the lc-1 data simultaneously logging the access port data, but the afrs are about .4-.6 points different between the two.
also the sample rate is twice as much on my LC-1 datalogs vs the Cobb datalog.
should I try to scale the .4 afr difference out or leave it?
should I try to scale the time to make the sample rate match or leave it?
Jeff out of curiosity on Tuesday at the end of the tuning session you said you had to go and you would Email our new calibrations to us later; (well at least thats what you said to me) when could we expect to have those new maps?
I have the accessport race software, that was emailed to me when they announced they where ending the rx8 support a while ago, I was readimg the manual and it said something about supported wo2 sensors, the lc1 being one of them. Is it possible to datalog the ap, and lc1 simultaniosly using the ap software?
Got my AP last tuesday -- With the base map you can already see a damn performance increase.
You just touch the pedal and it wants to take off.
Did my data logs today and i cant wait for tuesday.
You just touch the pedal and it wants to take off.
Did my data logs today and i cant wait for tuesday.
I have the accessport race software, that was emailed to me when they announced they where ending the rx8 support a while ago, I was readimg the manual and it said something about supported wo2 sensors, the lc1 being one of them. Is it possible to datalog the ap, and lc1 simultaniosly using the ap software?
I don't know about the RACE version.
Pretty cool if it is.
I'm at work and getting tuned...
No you did not. Unless you mean you are not prepared to submit logs because you do not have your AP with you.
There is plenty of time today for you to submit.
Get your datalogs and submit!
No you did not. Unless you mean you are not prepared to submit logs because you do not have your AP with you.
There is plenty of time today for you to submit.
Get your datalogs and submit!