Notices
General Automotive Discuss all things automotive here other than the RX-8

Are you telling me that this sucker is nuclear?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 10-27-2011, 06:45 AM
  #1  
Registered
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
EightCostsMoney's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Talking Are you telling me that this sucker is nuclear?

Are you telling me that this sucker is nuclear?

Some radiation charged cars are hitting the Japanese used car market.

http://www.nbclosangeles.com/news/we...132614218.html

Last edited by EightCostsMoney; 10-27-2011 at 06:54 AM.
Old 10-27-2011, 07:06 AM
  #2  
The Slow and the Serious
 
kvndoom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Communistwealth of Virginia
Posts: 730
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Would I buy a lightly radioactive GT-R at a considerable discount? **** yes.

110 uSv/hr isn't a lot, considering how little time people spend in their cars. Unless you lived in the damn thing...
Old 10-27-2011, 07:30 AM
  #3  
Registered
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
EightCostsMoney's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Just do not plan on having kids and do not mind that third arm or eye. It is all good!
Old 10-27-2011, 08:22 AM
  #4  
Administrator
 
zoom44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: portland oregon
Posts: 21,958
Received 115 Likes on 88 Posts
give it a good scrub and it'll be fine
Old 10-27-2011, 09:26 AM
  #5  
What am I doing here?
 
NotAPreppie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: 2017 Miata RF Launch Edition
Posts: 3,606
Received 649 Likes on 510 Posts
In case you wanted some perspective on how much radiation 0.3µsieverts is...
http://xkcd.com/radiation/

Keep in mind, the export LIMIT is 0.3µsieverts/hour. The is van putting out 110µsieverts/hour.

At 110µsieverts/hour, 2 hours/day, 365.25 days/year that's 80msieverts/year. That's awfully close to the 100msievert level that has been clearly linked to increased cancer risk. I wouldn't do it if you have a long commute.

On the other hand, I'm in my car maybe 2 hours/week so I'd probably be fine I'll take that $10K GT-R now.

Last edited by NotAPreppie; 10-27-2011 at 09:30 AM.
Old 10-27-2011, 10:21 AM
  #6  
*Redline Daily*
 
bananaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: NY
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So what happens when I'm minding my own business driving in my radioactive car, smoking a cigarette and talking on my cellphone???...A Trifecta?
Old 10-27-2011, 03:40 PM
  #7  
The Slow and the Serious
 
kvndoom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Communistwealth of Virginia
Posts: 730
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by EightCostsMoney
Just do not plan on having kids and do not mind that third arm or eye. It is all good!
Somebody watches too many movies. Did you see the one about the girl who had teeth in her vagina?

Not many folks would average 2 hours a day in a GT-R. All the same, gradual dose spread out over time has a drastically reduced effect versus acute dosage, because a healthy body easily replaces cells. And cancer risk never stopped anyone from buying cigarettes.
Old 10-27-2011, 05:11 PM
  #8  
Registered
 
Mr.ThunderMakeR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 247
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I guess the Godzilla name is even more fitting for that GT-R
Old 10-28-2011, 11:40 AM
  #9  
Original Turbo 'd Auto !!
 
09Factor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Surprise its Az!
Posts: 2,126
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by NotAPreppie
In case you wanted some perspective on how much radiation 0.3µsieverts is...
http://xkcd.com/radiation/

Keep in mind, the export LIMIT is 0.3µsieverts/hour. The is van putting out 110µsieverts/hour.

At 110µsieverts/hour, 2 hours/day, 365.25 days/year that's 80msieverts/year. That's awfully close to the 100msievert level that has been clearly linked to increased cancer risk. I wouldn't do it if you have a long commute.

On the other hand, I'm in my car maybe 2 hours/week so I'd probably be fine I'll take that $10K GT-R now.
Nice link to graphically compare the dose rates. I wonder though what the actual contanimates on the van are. Then we can figure out what the half-life and ultimately the total dose the van will emit.


just a general summation.
(example) now if it was emiting 110µsieverts/hour a month ago and one of the highly radioactive elements had a half-life of 14days. it would be less than the 110µsieverts/hour dose rate.
every 14 days the emitted radiation will to 50% of what it was. this formular isn't true in all elements and isotopes.
^^^
loosely based math and not knowing the exact contamination.
Also what is the dose inside the van? and where?
Old 10-28-2011, 12:48 PM
  #10  
T-29 years and counting
iTrader: (3)
 
lesper4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: North Fontana, CA.
Posts: 3,062
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think I would if I waere older but not now.
Old 10-28-2011, 02:30 PM
  #11  
2008 40th Anniversary
 
usnidc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I wonder if any of those have "slight" water damage, too?
Old 10-28-2011, 10:21 PM
  #12  
What am I doing here?
 
NotAPreppie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: 2017 Miata RF Launch Edition
Posts: 3,606
Received 649 Likes on 510 Posts
IIRC, much of the radiation was I-131 which has a short half-life (which is why it's used in medical procedures [ask me how I know]). I think it's around 8 days. Since we're well past that time period, whatever is left is probably the really bad stuff; Cesium-137 and Strontium-90 (and other similarly awful things). Those two will be half gone in 30-ish years.

Originally Posted by 09Factor
Nice link to graphically compare the dose rates. I wonder though what the actual contanimates on the van are. Then we can figure out what the half-life and ultimately the total dose the van will emit.


just a general summation.
(example) now if it was emiting 110µsieverts/hour a month ago and one of the highly radioactive elements had a half-life of 14days. it would be less than the 110µsieverts/hour dose rate.
every 14 days the emitted radiation will to 50% of what it was. this formular isn't true in all elements and isotopes.
^^^
loosely based math and not knowing the exact contamination.
Also what is the dose inside the van? and where?

Last edited by NotAPreppie; 10-28-2011 at 10:24 PM.
Old 10-29-2011, 12:29 AM
  #13  
I HATE SPEEDBUMPS!
 
monchie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 8,549
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Radioactive cars? We should be wearing full protective toxic suit when driving...lol
Old 10-29-2011, 10:33 AM
  #14  
What am I doing here?
 
NotAPreppie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: 2017 Miata RF Launch Edition
Posts: 3,606
Received 649 Likes on 510 Posts
Originally Posted by monchie
Radioactive cars? We should be wearing full protective toxic suit when driving...lol
Actually, the alpha particle radiation will probably be blocked by a decent pair of jeans and a hoodie. Beta particle and gamma radiation require aluminum and a few inches of lead (respectively).
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cliffkemp
Series I Trouble Shooting
7
10-03-2015 11:11 PM
duworm
Series I Wheels, Tires, Brakes & Suspension
1
10-01-2015 04:57 PM
Stubbs
Series I Wheels, Tires, Brakes & Suspension
0
09-27-2015 04:06 PM
Austin22
New Member Forum
5
09-23-2015 04:46 PM
WingleBeast
Series I Wheels, Tires, Brakes & Suspension
3
09-09-2015 10:10 AM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Are you telling me that this sucker is nuclear?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:49 PM.