RX-8 vs. S2K
#76
I still dont get why these two cars are compared. Generally speaking, the demographic of each car's target market is different...
How do you go from 4 to 2 seats and a 10G bump up? or similarly, If your looking for a 2 seater vert performance car and the S2k is in your budget why would you look at an RX8? Yeah these cars are similar in some respects but from a consumer stand point I see them as more different than anything else
How do you go from 4 to 2 seats and a 10G bump up? or similarly, If your looking for a 2 seater vert performance car and the S2k is in your budget why would you look at an RX8? Yeah these cars are similar in some respects but from a consumer stand point I see them as more different than anything else
#77
Coming thru in waves...
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Somewhere between Yesterday and Tomorrow.
Posts: 1,488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Deslock
...I searched around for this and didn't find anything. Can you provide more info?
Oh, and btw, if you want a stook, get one! I wish I could afford both, but for practicality, the 8 was first. Maybe I'll snag me a stook some way some day...
#78
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: University of Maryland
Posts: 2,510
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
since you have a beater, id go with s2000 over the rx8. Otherwise it depends on how hardcore you are and how much comfort are you willing to sacrafice for better performance.
s2000 is a highly regarded car no matter what forum you are on. Easily outcorners the RX8 and if launched correctly it can even give a 350z a run for its money on the straight line.
s2000 is a highly regarded car no matter what forum you are on. Easily outcorners the RX8 and if launched correctly it can even give a 350z a run for its money on the straight line.
#82
Blue By You
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by StewC625
Man, this thread is tailor-made for Ike The RX-8 Basher who says he's only here to "speak the truth"
#83
RX8 and a Truk....
Why do people feel threatened, on a personal level, if somebody points out where another car may be faster/better/whatever in different contexts?
I can say without hesitation an STI would out-perform my RX8 in every measurable test with the right driver. Does that mean I'm an rx8 hata? Does that mean I am 'trashing' the rx8?
The Rx8 is what it is...Reasonably Attractive/stylish...Handles Reasonably well...Goes straight Reasonably quick...seats four in Reasonable comfort.
I can say without hesitation an STI would out-perform my RX8 in every measurable test with the right driver. Does that mean I'm an rx8 hata? Does that mean I am 'trashing' the rx8?
The Rx8 is what it is...Reasonably Attractive/stylish...Handles Reasonably well...Goes straight Reasonably quick...seats four in Reasonable comfort.
#84
Originally Posted by ShadowX
And as for that BMI video, I honestly have to question the honesty in BMI's test drivers. They acted as if the RX8 was the worst handling car this side of a Pontiac Grand-Am. All I have to say is..which car is winning in real life races?
http://rotarynews.com/node/view/706
http://rotarynews.com/node/view/704 - (Not an RX8, but use Renesis motors)
http://rotarynews.com/node/view/690
http://rotarynews.com/node/view/685 - (Didn't win, but took fastest lap and pole)
http://rotarynews.com/node/view/684
http://rotarynews.com/node/view/706
http://rotarynews.com/node/view/704 - (Not an RX8, but use Renesis motors)
http://rotarynews.com/node/view/690
http://rotarynews.com/node/view/685 - (Didn't win, but took fastest lap and pole)
http://rotarynews.com/node/view/684
#87
Originally Posted by dmp
Why do people feel threatened, on a personal level, if somebody points out where another car may be faster/better/whatever in different contexts?
I can say without hesitation an STI would out-perform my RX8 in every measurable test with the right driver. Does that mean I'm an rx8 hata? Does that mean I am 'trashing' the rx8?
The Rx8 is what it is...Reasonably Attractive/stylish...Handles Reasonably well...Goes straight Reasonably quick...seats four in Reasonable comfort.
I can say without hesitation an STI would out-perform my RX8 in every measurable test with the right driver. Does that mean I'm an rx8 hata? Does that mean I am 'trashing' the rx8?
The Rx8 is what it is...Reasonably Attractive/stylish...Handles Reasonably well...Goes straight Reasonably quick...seats four in Reasonable comfort.
you shouldn't hafta justify your purchase to anyone but yourself.
#88
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: rialto ca
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i was also got down to both of those cars it just came down to 2 things the rx8 car was more fun to drive and s2k was not built for a 6 foot, 225 pound guy kinda tight in that thing
#89
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: rialto ca
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
well at cal speed way i raced a stock s2k when i was stock we both ran 14.5 i was at 96mph he was at 97 mph so both car are very close the rx8 gets off the line better but the s2k got a little more on top both cars u have to lunch at 6000k plus
#90
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: rialto ca
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
oh yeah the reason why this cars r compared is because claim hp is close 238 rx8 240 s2k tq is close also 159 for rx8 150 s2k both wieght from 2700 to 2900 both r rwd both have 6 speed, both cars r from japan and both dont cost that much off of each other with the s2k being a little more
#91
RX8 and a Truk....
Originally Posted by toca
oh yeah the reason why this cars r compared is because claim hp is close 238 rx8 240 s2k tq is close also 159 for rx8 150 s2k both wieght from 2700 to 2900 both r rwd both have 6 speed, both cars r from japan and both dont cost that much off of each other with the s2k being a little more
except stock 2.2L S2000s have a SOLID 30 more wheel HP than RX8s.
Last edited by dmp; 01-03-2006 at 08:13 PM.
#95
Blue By You
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by wiggum
124... u seem educated... as do others... isn't the 2007 S2K going to be completely redesigned??? If so I would have a hard time buying one now...
#96
Originally Posted by dmp
Why do people feel threatened, on a personal level, if somebody points out where another car may be faster/better/whatever in different contexts?
I can say without hesitation an STI would out-perform my RX8 in every measurable test with the right driver. Does that mean I'm an rx8 hata? Does that mean I am 'trashing' the rx8?
The Rx8 is what it is...Reasonably Attractive/stylish...Handles Reasonably well...Goes straight Reasonably quick...seats four in Reasonable comfort.
I can say without hesitation an STI would out-perform my RX8 in every measurable test with the right driver. Does that mean I'm an rx8 hata? Does that mean I am 'trashing' the rx8?
The Rx8 is what it is...Reasonably Attractive/stylish...Handles Reasonably well...Goes straight Reasonably quick...seats four in Reasonable comfort.
Because those people arent secure in their purchase/decision
#97
Coming thru in waves...
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Somewhere between Yesterday and Tomorrow.
Posts: 1,488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ah, that would be a shame, Ike. I think a lot of them. Shades of when I bought a '73 Fiat 124 sport spider right off the showroom floor. Why? Because I was single and it was a two seater convertible sports car. It suited my needs as well as my wants. Now, I'm going empty nest and the Stook looks very attractive to me.
btw, y'all know that it's affectionately called the "Stook" in some circles, cuz Stook is how S2K sounds, like if it was on a license plate? ("sss.two.kkk")
btw, y'all know that it's affectionately called the "Stook" in some circles, cuz Stook is how S2K sounds, like if it was on a license plate? ("sss.two.kkk")
#98
Originally Posted by wiggum
124... u seem educated... as do others... isn't the 2007 S2K going to be completely redesigned??? If so I would have a hard time buying one now...
Similarly, we have no idea when there will be a revamped S2000. Lord knows, it's due, but Honda doesn't make any money from the S2000, and seems uninclined to keep it up with its nominal competition, specifically the Boxster; the base Boxster now is clearly superior to the new S2000 (of course, it costs 50% more, so it should be).
The S2000 was introduced in late 1999, as a 2000 model year car, for the 50th anniversary of Honda. It was little changed until the 2004 model year, when they stroked the engine, making it more powerful, with more torque (and a flatter torque curve), but with an 8k redline instead of a 9k redline. By the same pattern, one might expect a significantly revamped S2000 in 2008. But it's all conjecture, not based on any actual knowledge.
#99
Originally Posted by Racer X-8
Ah, that would be a shame, Ike. I think a lot of them. Shades of when I bought a '73 Fiat 124 sport spider right off the showroom floor. Why? Because I was single and it was a two seater convertible sports car. It suited my needs as well as my wants. Now, I'm going empty nest and the Stook looks very attractive to me.
#100
Originally Posted by toca
well at cal speed way i raced a stock s2k when i was stock we both ran 14.5 i was at 96mph he was at 97 mph so both car are very close the rx8 gets off the line better but the s2k got a little more on top both cars u have to lunch at 6000k plus
I am guessing that you are a very good driver and the S2000 dude is not... It is hard to imagine that the RX8 takes-off better than the honda. If launched properly, the honda can run neck-and-neck with the 350Z.