Notices
General Automotive Discuss all things automotive here other than the RX-8

A Real World Sports Car MPG Comparison

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 03-05-2007, 10:38 AM
  #1  
Go Texas Longhorns!
Thread Starter
 
brillo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 1,818
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
A Real World Sports Car MPG Comparison

Since fuel economy is one of the greater complaints about the RX8, I thought I'd show the fuel economy per the new EPA model of some of the other sport/sporty cars on the road. Its kinda Interesting.

2007 RX8 Manual - 16 / 22 (I get more like 17 / 25 in real world driving)

2007 350Z Manual - 18/ 25

2006 Audi TT V6 Quattro - 17 /24 (there is no 2007 model)

2007 Honda S2000 - 18 /24

2007 G35 - 17 / 24

2007 WRX - 18 /25

2007 EVO - Not Available


Kinda interesting. Were really not that far off, and these numbers jive with many of my friends who have these cars. Just food for thought.
Old 03-05-2007, 12:10 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
toxin440's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 994
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
one thing to keep in mind just for fun too that I thought about is the fact that the Z has a 20.1 gallon fuel tank while we only have a 15.9 gallon tank.


Thats one more reason why a "miles per tank" figure sucks for our RX8.
Old 03-05-2007, 12:19 PM
  #3  
Banned
 
sunilseru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: So Cal
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My numbers:

14/22 with my RX-8. 14 mpg city with quite a bit of 3K shifting.

22 mixed (more LA traffic than highway) with my S2000. Didn't get to do a full tank on the highway yet. Knock on wood.

Last edited by sunilseru; 03-05-2007 at 12:21 PM.
Old 03-05-2007, 12:28 PM
  #4  
tjb
 
tjbourgoyne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 877
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Heard the industry will have to undergo a new gov mileage test. All those numbers should drop if they are going for more accuracy.
Old 03-05-2007, 12:44 PM
  #5  
Mulligan User
iTrader: (1)
 
ZoomZoomH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: caddyshack
Posts: 4,612
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
it's the highway cruising gas mileage that's really biting the RX-8, we just can't run as lean as the pistons in low load highway driving mode
Old 03-05-2007, 02:14 PM
  #6  
Go Texas Longhorns!
Thread Starter
 
brillo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 1,818
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by tjbourgoyne
Heard the industry will have to undergo a new gov mileage test. All those numbers should drop if they are going for more accuracy.

That is the new EPA test. These have dropped from before.
Old 03-05-2007, 02:17 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
playdoh43's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: University of Maryland
Posts: 2,510
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
it seems most MPG just dropped by 2... their relative delta stays the same
Old 03-05-2007, 02:31 PM
  #8  
Has the whole shit.
 
Rhawb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 1,772
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Weird, my 8 averages around 20mpg. Lately it's been real bad, I think I may have dropped into the 16s today, but usually it's an easy 19-20.
Old 03-05-2007, 05:23 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
adim_x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thats not a fair comparison. The 8 is underpowered to all those cars. That means a Z makes 50 more horsepower, but gets the same or better mileage. That is why the mpg sucks for our car. I would be happy to get 14mpg if my car made 300 horsepower.
Old 03-05-2007, 10:57 PM
  #10  
Mu ha.. ha...
 
Razz1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Cali
Posts: 14,361
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Better than an SUV any day.

But that Lotus Elise still keeps calling my name....GO fast 0-60 4.1 sec and 25 to 29 MPG!
Old 03-05-2007, 11:42 PM
  #11  
always filling [the c]up
 
Cody Red's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Alice, Texas
Posts: 1,267
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
actually, the '07 350z gets 20/26, my cousin just got his. his fusion was totaled, and yeah.

-Cody
Old 03-05-2007, 11:47 PM
  #12  
Registered
 
New Yorker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 3,319
Received 58 Likes on 51 Posts
Originally Posted by adim_x
Thats not a fair comparison. The 8 is underpowered to all those cars. That means a Z makes 50 more horsepower, but gets the same or better mileage. That is why the mpg sucks for our car. I would be happy to get 14mpg if my car made 300 horsepower.
But the 8 handles and feels better—more responsive and lively—than those other cars. And that's because the Renesis is way smaller and lighter than the engines in those other cars.

Who says what you get in return for lower mileage HAS TO BE horsepower??? I'm happy to get only 18mpg if my car handles SO responsively with that light, agile responsive "feel" only the RX-8 has. And the way it revs to 9K so fast and so effortlessly—the only thing better is a sportsbike. What I get in exchange for mediocre mileage is way more enjoyable than mega-horsepower!

Last edited by New Yorker; 03-06-2007 at 09:05 AM.
Old 03-12-2007, 10:38 PM
  #13  
lurking
 
Sephiroth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2007 Porsche 911 Twin Turbo 480hp - 16/ 23
Old 03-15-2007, 08:24 PM
  #14  
Forbidden Donut
 
dragula53's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Razz1
Better than an SUV any day.

But that Lotus Elise still keeps calling my name....GO fast 0-60 4.1 sec and 25 to 29 MPG!
I spent some time over on the lotus forums..

they gripe about some of the same things people here do..

For example: Practically speaking, a lotus is a 7 second car.. unless you eat the clutch on launch.

The grass is always greener on the other side...
Old 03-15-2007, 08:51 PM
  #15  
The anti-ricer
iTrader: (1)
 
Transam kid 01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hillsdale, NJ
Posts: 1,888
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by brillo
Since fuel economy is one of the greater complaints about the RX8, I thought I'd show the fuel economy per the new EPA model of some of the other sport/sporty cars on the road. Its kinda Interesting.

2007 RX8 Manual - 16 / 22 (I get more like 17 / 25 in real world driving)

2007 350Z Manual - 18/ 25

2006 Audi TT V6 Quattro - 17 /24 (there is no 2007 model)

2007 Honda S2000 - 18 /24

2007 G35 - 17 / 24

2007 WRX - 18 /25

2007 EVO - Not Available


Kinda interesting. Were really not that far off, and these numbers jive with many of my friends who have these cars. Just food for thought.
Link to your info?
I'd like to see what some other cars get like the vette or t/a maybe even a lotus
Old 03-15-2007, 10:00 PM
  #16  
Registered User
 
kartweb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Here's a couple of mine over the last 20 years or so;

74 Porsche 914 2.0 stock - 26 / 37 (55 limit back then, usually ran 65-70)
74 Porsche 914 2.2 with Webers & a few mods - 22 / 30
72 Lotus Europa 1.6 4 valve - 22 / 28
70 911S 2.2 Mechanical Injection - 20 / 30
85 928 Euro model manual - 16 / 21
86 944 Turbo 20 / 23
88 Fiero GT 3.4 liter + other mods - 22/30
94 Corvette 300 HP 6 speed - 18 / 24 (quickly dropped to 12 if you revved it much)
95 BMW 540 Wagon automatic - 16 / 23
97 Thunderbird (OK it's an old rainy day car we still have) 17 / 24
00 Chevy hightop conversion van 15 / 17
05 RX8 - 18/21 - (I rarely do any city driving in it)
07 Mazda5 24 / 28
07 CX7 AWD 18 / 24

I called a friend with a Lotus Esprit turbo V8 but forgot to ask him what year it was. He gets 15 / 25 but said a tank lasts him about 6 months.

The worst mileage I ever got was about 2 gallons per mile. That was in an MT5500 mining truck with a 360 ton load.
Old 03-15-2007, 11:41 PM
  #17  
Registered
 
j_tso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 490
Received 32 Likes on 29 Posts
Originally Posted by kartweb
I called a friend with a Lotus Esprit turbo V8 but forgot to ask him what year it was. He gets 15 / 25 but said a tank lasts him about 6 months.
Doesn't gasoline go to hell in 6 months ?
Old 03-16-2007, 03:12 PM
  #18  
Registered User
 
124Spider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: PNW
Posts: 759
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
14mpg commuting in our RX-8. Never have done a full tank on the highway.

23-25 commuting in the S2000; over 30 in pure highway driving. 9mpg on the track.

Don't kid yourself; the RX-8 has gruesome gas mileage compared to practically any other small car.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Dokuji
Series I Trouble Shooting
8
11-01-2016 02:51 PM
BigMikeATL
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
12
05-26-2016 12:31 AM
JakeKaminskisRacing
New Member Forum
13
08-23-2015 01:10 AM
dafiltafish
New Member Forum
4
08-21-2015 02:21 AM
AussieGray
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
0
07-16-2015 03:58 AM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: A Real World Sports Car MPG Comparison



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:05 PM.