Notices
General Automotive Discuss all things automotive here other than the RX-8

oh no... Honda misrates the power on 2004 s2000

Old Jan 2, 2004 | 05:48 PM
  #26  
PoorCollegeKid's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
From: Cambridge, MA
Originally posted by SDFLY
Good point Moogle...bottom line 2 seats vs 4....I recently drove (hard) a 2002 S2k and could not tell any difference in power (vs my stock 8) and that disappointed me as I expected a little more from that car based on what I've read over the past couple of years about it...the handling was impressive though.
Down low the Renesis has a definite torque advantage over the S2k's engine, but, since both cars put out similar torque numbers high in the rev range so neither one will "feel" any faster or slower than the other at full throttle. The S2K is decidedly faster than the RX8, however. The 2.2 L4 puts out, according to dyno tests, ~260-270hp and the Stook now does the 1320 in the high 13s. It seems to be just a hair faster than the 350Z is, actually, but doesn't give you the same push in the back that the Z does down low.
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2004 | 06:32 PM
  #27  
TybeeRX-8's Avatar
I REALLY LOVE THIS CAR!
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 268
Likes: 0
From: SE Coast
Cool Just one little thing...

While the S2K might be, (well is), up on hp compared to the 8, one thing got messed up that will hurt it in autox. Previously, the S2K would get up to around 65 in 2nd gear. The '04 tops out at 58 in 2nd gear (due to lower redline and gearing changes) necessitating an earlier shift with a commensurate loss in torque. This is reported in the latest issue of Grassroots Motorsports. The RX-8 6spd will run up to 67-68 in 2nd giving it a little advantage as far as autox is concerned. I've experienced this when autoxing my Miata which has a 6spd. It tops out around 58 in 2nd gear whereas the 5spd get to 63-64. This makes a lot of difference in autox performance. Just a thought...
:D
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2004 | 08:04 PM
  #28  
CMG13's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA
everyone makes mistakes...
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2004 | 09:29 AM
  #29  
JimW's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
From: South Florida
My front drive 03 Accord has 240 CHP. it dynoed at 195 WHP as well as everyone elses. it also has a 22% drivetrain loss. The S2000 is rear wheel drive and therefore loses more drivetrain energy due to its longer travel to the rear wheels, I think drive train loss is going to be much greater than 8 or 9 % and if so expect the Crank H.P. to be much greater than 250.
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2004 | 03:39 PM
  #30  
Ike's Avatar
Ike
Blue By You
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee
Re: Just one little thing...

Originally posted by TybeeRX-8
While the S2K might be, (well is), up on hp compared to the 8, one thing got messed up that will hurt it in autox. Previously, the S2K would get up to around 65 in 2nd gear. The '04 tops out at 58 in 2nd gear (due to lower redline and gearing changes) necessitating an earlier shift with a commensurate loss in torque. This is reported in the latest issue of Grassroots Motorsports. The RX-8 6spd will run up to 67-68 in 2nd giving it a little advantage as far as autox is concerned. I've experienced this when autoxing my Miata which has a 6spd. It tops out around 58 in 2nd gear whereas the 5spd get to 63-64. This makes a lot of difference in autox performance. Just a thought...
:D

Hmmmm I didn't realize, that might be a big deal. It will be interesting to see how the 04 S2Ks do next season. It's kind of sad how much 2nd gear makes or breaks a car in autox, it's always been my biggest gripe.
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2004 | 03:51 PM
  #31  
racerdave's Avatar
F125er/Future RX-8er
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
From: WI, USA
2nd gear isn't the end of the world. You just have to be good at shifting on an autocross course. It can be done, but it's something most autocrossers aren't used to doing.

Bottom line, the good drivers in the 04 S2000s will shift to third when needed and won't lose much if at all to the cars with the longer 2nd gear.

IMHO.... :D
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2004 | 02:14 PM
  #32  
newfinator's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Originally posted by JimW
My front drive 03 Accord has 240 CHP. it dynoed at 195 WHP as well as everyone elses. it also has a 22% drivetrain loss. The S2000 is rear wheel drive and therefore loses more drivetrain energy due to its longer travel to the rear wheels, I think drive train loss is going to be much greater than 8 or 9 % and if so expect the Crank H.P. to be much greater than 250.
Drivetrain loss in RWD is usually around 20%.
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2004 | 02:22 PM
  #33  
Ike's Avatar
Ike
Blue By You
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee
Anything not in the teens is a bit high for front or RWD if I'm not mistaken. I believe 17% is pretty standard for RWD...
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2004 | 02:38 PM
  #34  
revhappy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
Originally posted by IkeWRX
Anything not in the teens is a bit high for front or RWD if I'm not mistaken. I believe 17% is pretty standard for RWD...
Expect the drivetrain loss to be slightly higher in a front-engined RWD car than a FWD one.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2004 | 12:58 AM
  #35  
Supercharger's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 315
Likes: 0
Update

http://www.vtec.net/articles/view-ar...icle_id=171514
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2004 | 04:39 PM
  #36  
newfinator's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Originally posted by Supercharger
Update

http://www.vtec.net/articles/view-ar...icle_id=171514
Wow, Impressive.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ugafan97
SE For Sale/Wanted
3
Apr 28, 2016 03:35 PM
D13
Series I Trouble Shooting
5
Aug 28, 2015 12:21 PM
Redheddude222
New Member Forum
13
Aug 24, 2015 09:14 AM
JakeKaminskisRacing
New Member Forum
13
Aug 23, 2015 01:10 AM
Mr.Durden
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
4
Aug 12, 2015 02:21 PM


Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:
You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 2 votes, 5.00 average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:21 PM.