Notices
General Automotive Discuss all things automotive here other than the RX-8

Nissan 370Z pictures

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Nov 28, 2008 | 06:03 AM
  #251  
SiLVeRE8's Avatar
a.k.a. WhITeRE8
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,231
Likes: 0
From: Nor Cal *
damn nissan is coming out with all these crazy cars
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2008 | 01:04 PM
  #252  
saturn's Avatar
i pwn therefore i am
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,332
Likes: 3
From: Delaware, USA
Originally Posted by Renesis07
It's funny, 350Z owners arent really diggin the 370Z either.

350>370
That's not because the 350 is better than the 370. Based on the maturity level on the Z boards I have no doubt that it's because many of those owners are douchebags and don't want to admit that they don't have the best Z car anymore.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2008 | 02:02 PM
  #253  
PotatoSoup's Avatar
Polish-American Hammarrrr
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
From: South Carolina
Originally Posted by Renesis07
theyve always advertised that 53/47 weight distribution claiming it goes to 50/50 under WOT and if you apply brakes it gives you more traction for steering.

I still dont think that cleaver excuse covers the understeer
To basically borrow what you said in another thread, the 370Z will generate an impressive .99G of grip...as it understeers into a wall.

That still makes me lollerskates.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2008 | 02:20 PM
  #254  
ThecdnRX8's Avatar
OEM
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Don't think this was posted. It shows some of the new features vs the 350 and also shows and compares the auto blipping feature

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PSb_8Bai6nk

Last edited by ThecdnRX8; Nov 28, 2008 at 02:26 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2008 | 03:25 PM
  #255  
delhi's Avatar
Grand Chancellor
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,733
Likes: 62
From: Home of the NIMBYs
Originally Posted by saturn
That's not because the 350 is better than the 370. Based on the maturity level on the Z boards I have no doubt that it's because many of those owners are douchebags and don't want to admit that they don't have the best Z car anymore.
A montessori has more maturity than the the combined community of my350Z.com.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2008 | 03:38 PM
  #256  
wantan8's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX
At first I didn't mind the looks but now with seeing in person pictures, ugh. Not a fan. I still think all 8s including the 09s look better. I really don't understand how Nissan could make the car smaller and trim weight, and yet it really isn't that much thinner. Plus the cabin looks almost cruelly small.

Another thing that is increasingly criticized is how Nissan is pushing their Q serious engine too far in this and the G35. Edmunds talked of how the engine vibrated excessively at full throttle. Yuck.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2008 | 04:07 PM
  #257  
kersh4w's Avatar
Hit & Run Magnet
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 6,690
Likes: 3
From: DC Area
what do you mean ''to far in this?''

that doesnt make sense to me.

to me, the engine isnt pushed far back enough. or they should push the wheels farther forward.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2008 | 04:21 PM
  #258  
wantan8's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX
Originally Posted by kersh4w
what do you mean ''to far in this?''

that doesnt make sense to me.

to me, the engine isnt pushed far back enough. or they should push the wheels farther forward.
Trying to get too much juice out of it without a force induction.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2008 | 04:55 PM
  #259  
delhi's Avatar
Grand Chancellor
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,733
Likes: 62
From: Home of the NIMBYs
what's wrong with Nissan unrelenting tuning of the VQ engine? I think it's great that Nissan is doing that rather than toss in a brand new engine like so many car makers.
One main general complain is that the VQ engine drones alot in the Z. It gets annoying after a while. I wonder if they will still retain that "Moaning Cow" sound.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2008 | 06:05 PM
  #260  
dothackRAVE's Avatar
<3 Rotary
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 527
Likes: 0
I only have two gripes:

1) It's ugly as sin. Seriously. What's up with all the new manufacturers serving up uglier cars for the new generation? While the 240z was sex on wheels, this one looking like a smashed pumpkin.

2) Some people say the engine sounds nice. I think it's a horrible noise. It's just a noise..., and lacks the growl that tells you it's chucking out 332 horsepower. It sounds like a luxury sedan more than a sports coupe.

But will I buy it? Definitely, but only with a different bodykit and aftermarket exhaust.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2008 | 07:13 PM
  #261  
Jeison's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
From: Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
Base 16x next generation rotary car needs to be about 2750 lbs, so that GT would be about 2850 lbs. I wonder if Mazda can do it
http://allworldcars.com/wordpress/?p=7025

"Mazda will also develop parts from what it calls ‘micro-cell’ plastic which can save weight by up to 10 percent. 15 percent of the weight loss will come from lighter and improved chassis components"

if the micro cell thing works, it should help a fair bit, I've also read somewhere that Lexus or some other brand saves a bunch of weight by hollowing out the ends of bolts used in the construction of the car.
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2008 | 07:22 PM
  #262  
CyberPitz's Avatar
Huge hole is huge
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,191
Likes: 1
From: Joplin, MO
^Off topic much? Lol

I'm still waiting for more specs on the 16x ><
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2008 | 09:46 PM
  #263  
IronLu's Avatar
CONUS
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
From: National Capital Region
I actually liked the 350 styling but the 370 doesn't do it for me...
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2008 | 10:40 PM
  #264  
Mikeluvs8's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,250
Likes: 0
From: from the SF BAY to LAS VEGAS
the kabura will **** on that car!
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2008 | 01:29 AM
  #265  
To be named later's Avatar
Now with 25% more fluff..
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 537
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, TX
A little bulbous in the rear, but still a very sexy car.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2008 | 02:52 AM
  #266  
Potentiated's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
VQ has design compromises from the six in the 300z, which had a superior design that cost more. For anyone who remembers, that six was extremely smooth. Nissan wanted to cut costs. I read an article once but I don't remember the specific differences. Result from the cost-cutting design is a rougher engine with a lower redline. As you know, the 370z's engine only has a redline of 7500 rpm, which imo is unacceptable.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2008 | 07:11 AM
  #267  
Renesis07's Avatar
Vtak just kicked in yo!!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,053
Likes: 1
From: Lake County IL
Originally Posted by Potentiated
VQ has design compromises from the six in the 300z, which had a superior design that cost more. For anyone who remembers, that six was extremely smooth. Nissan wanted to cut costs. I read an article once but I don't remember the specific differences. Result from the cost-cutting design is a rougher engine with a lower redline. As you know, the 370z's engine only has a redline of 7500 rpm, which imo is unacceptable.
Bro, no offense, but I disagree with you.

I was a sales manager for a Nissan Dealer, those engines are tanks. There have been on wards top ten list for 16 years now. Its a great engine, good fuel economy, lots of power. The early 350Z problems were within the suspension and transmissions, and most of those bugs were ironed out by 2004.

The 350Z is a great car, just a bit boring. But they're reliable dont kid yourself Those engines arent meant to be high revving engines, it loses power by the time its at 7500 rpms anyways.

Ive worked for both Nissan and Mazda dealers and there were way more RX8s in for service than 350Zs
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2008 | 12:40 PM
  #268  
kvndoom's Avatar
The Slow and the Serious
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 730
Likes: 0
From: Communistwealth of Virginia
I'm very impressed with the looks, specs and performance for that price point. I'd get in trouble with that kind of power though. Would love to see it in yellow.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2008 | 12:46 PM
  #269  
Renesis07's Avatar
Vtak just kicked in yo!!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,053
Likes: 1
From: Lake County IL
If all that was with the looks of the 350Z, I would seriously consider buying one.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2008 | 01:41 PM
  #270  
wantan8's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX
Originally Posted by BlueEyes
For this year...because they haven't made a 370Z convertible yet...

More Red:
Looks like the little plastic mustache is getting popular among manufacturers.
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2008 | 01:43 PM
  #271  
Renesis07's Avatar
Vtak just kicked in yo!!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 4,053
Likes: 1
From: Lake County IL
Originally Posted by wantan8
Looks like the little plastic mustache is getting popular among manufacturers.
yea but we really have no room to talk about plastic mustaches with the new rx8's
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2008 | 01:51 PM
  #272  
wantan8's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX
Originally Posted by Renesis07
yea but we really have no room to talk about plastic mustaches with the new rx8's
That was the point
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2008 | 08:26 PM
  #273  
CarAndDriver's Avatar
2005 Black RX-8 GT 6M
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 6,350
Likes: 0
From: San Jose Area
I like the new Z. Seems to be a better overall package than the last generation and if the pricing is accurate--sounds like it should be competitive. Poor 8 - in need of a total redo.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2008 | 09:59 PM
  #274  
Brian Major's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
From: Sacramento, CA
Originally Posted by wantan8
Looks like the little plastic mustache is getting popular among manufacturers.
i'd rather bolt my front plate to that than the freshly painted front bumper.
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2008 | 03:43 AM
  #275  
Potentiated's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by Renesis07
Bro, no offense, but I disagree with you.

I was a sales manager for a Nissan Dealer, those engines are tanks. There have been on wards top ten list for 16 years now. Its a great engine, good fuel economy, lots of power. The early 350Z problems were within the suspension and transmissions, and most of those bugs were ironed out by 2004.

The 350Z is a great car, just a bit boring. But they're reliable dont kid yourself Those engines arent meant to be high revving engines, it loses power by the time its at 7500 rpms anyways.

Ive worked for both Nissan and Mazda dealers and there were way more RX8s in for service than 350Zs

Unfortunately, you're not in a position to disagree. Facts are facts. Ward's engine awards are completely irrelevant. This forum has discussed those awards years ago, and there are politics as well as other factors involved (e.g., how important an engine is to a segment or manufacturer in terms of sales).

The statements I made are from articles talking ONLY about the engine. It is a fact that the engine in the old 300zx is a superior, smoother, and costlier design. Period. There's no debate here.
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:48 PM.