Notices
General Automotive Discuss all things automotive here other than the RX-8

My god.... they BETTER detune this!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 10-26-2004, 04:20 PM
  #26  
Registered User
 
AbusiveWombat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How do you know the weight of the MS6? I didn't see one listed anywhere.
Old 10-26-2004, 05:02 PM
  #27  
Ike
Blue By You
 
Ike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Gord96BRG
Doubtful. By Mazda's own published performance numbers, the MS6 does 0-100 km/h in 6.6 seconds, and the RX-8 does 0-100 in 6.4 seconds. (MS6 number from Mazda's press release from the Paris show, RX-8 numbers as published by Mazda UK, look it up on their web site if you like). Don't panic - the stock RX-8 is still faster.

PS - FWD-biased AWD systems (part-time AWD) are inferior for handling purposes to real 50:50 AWD systems, the same way FWD is inferior to RWD. The advantages of part-time AWD systems like that are mechanical efficiency and manufacturing cost, but there aren't any performance advantages. Period!

Regards,
Gordon
Manufacturers claims are pretty bogus. Also like others have pointed out I bet Mazda is being a bit cautious with its claims. If the Mazda 6 comes out with 270hp then I think it will run neck and neck with the ForesterXT and Legacy GT (which are underrated). That makes it a good amount faster than the RX-8 in trap speed as well as timed speeds. Mid 5s 0-60 and very high 13s with around a 100mph trap speed is what I expect from the MS6, they fall short of that and I and many others will be disappointed.
Old 10-26-2004, 06:06 PM
  #28  
the Doctor
iTrader: (1)
 
Feras's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Bryn Mawr, PA
Posts: 1,783
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by IkeWRX
Manufacturers claims are pretty bogus. Also like others have pointed out I bet Mazda is being a bit cautious with its claims. If the Mazda 6 comes out with 270hp then I think it will run neck and neck with the ForesterXT and Legacy GT (which are underrated). That makes it a good amount faster than the RX-8 in trap speed as well as timed speeds. Mid 5s 0-60 and very high 13s with around a 100mph trap speed is what I expect from the MS6, they fall short of that and I and many others will be disappointed.

im so surprised at how fast the subies are with their numbers that are always comparable or lesser to inlines and v cars. could it really be the boxer engine is a superior design to inlines or V's...im beginning to think so, especially since my favorite manufacturer,porsche, uses them.
Old 10-26-2004, 06:57 PM
  #29  
Registered User
 
s13lover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The faster Mazda makes the MS 6 and MS 3, the faster the MS RX-8 is going to have to be. Maybe thats why the US hasn't gotten either of the 2 previous versions of the MS RX-8; because they haven't really been that different in performance and would have been out shadowed by the MS 6. Just like the stock RX-8 has to be faster than the 6, the MS will also have to follow the same idea. Meaning that if the MS 6 hits 60 in 5.5 sec. then the MS RX-8 will probably do it in 5.0 sec.

Or I could be wrong, but I hope not.

Last edited by s13lover; 10-26-2004 at 08:06 PM.
Old 10-26-2004, 07:04 PM
  #30  
Registered User
 
Dan_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unhappy

Originally Posted by Rotary Titus
"Ironically, the Mazdaspeed 6 will almost certainly accelerate faster than Mazda's similarly priced sports car, the RX-8."

NOOOOO!!!! why would mazda come up with something to compete with its own flagship sports car?!?!?!?
It IS odd yes.....

Dunno what to say.....
Old 10-26-2004, 08:24 PM
  #31  
Registered User
 
crossbow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 839
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
The 100:0 really comes into play when you compare it against other car's in its price range.

I'm not talking about mazda's max torque distribution ability, but its standard setup. 100:0 is FWD...and the front wheels don't have an LSD. (Only the rear).

Even the jaguar X-type has a 40:60 standard distribution (which can then transfer torque around). Its not about the fact that the ms6 can't be awd, its the fact that its setup like a FWD car, when in reality it should be setup like the G35x (which is 0:100 standard, and can transfer to 50:50).

Having autocrossed in a variety of vehicles (and been driven in many more) I can definitely say having a either a RWD bias or directly neutral standard distribution is far nicer then a FWD bias. FWD is for consumers...not drivers. (Yes I know this is ironic coming from a FWD family sedan owner). I mean really, who cares about mileage and efficency in a mazdaspeed. If you want mileage you'll get a standard 6i...not a 270 hp turbocharged AWD monster. Its not like you guys bought the 8 cause you care about filling up at the pump. I don't drive a 1974 grand am pontiac with a 6.6 liter v8 because its "economical", I drive it because it can powerslide without pressing any buttons...other then the pedal on the floor.

I'm still holding judgement on the car, and I'm a bit biased against it (being as I don't want to trade in my 6 to get one), but I really think they could have gone with a better system.

And please don't compare it to a 3,409 lb VW. (Standard 6i mtx is 3045 lbs) If the ms6 ends up that heavy, I'll be extremely disappointed. I'd hope it wouldn't gain 400 lbs in the transistion.

The whole reason I'm even on this site is cause I'm so disappointed in the ms6...and I'm watching and reading news about the rx8 so I can jump to a car with Right Wheel Drive....mmm wheres that supercharged 8 again... :D

Last edited by crossbow; 10-26-2004 at 08:32 PM.
Old 10-27-2004, 12:02 AM
  #32  
Registered User
 
PoorCollegeKid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MazdaspeedFeras
im so surprised at how fast the subies are with their numbers that are always comparable or lesser to inlines and v cars. could it really be the boxer engine is a superior design to inlines or V's...im beginning to think so, especially since my favorite manufacturer,porsche, uses them.
Both Subaru and Porsche have a tendancy to under rate the power of their cars, which makes them look slower on paper than they are in real life. Kind of like GM and its FBodies, or BMW and most of its cars (except the Ms). It's not really about superior design, it's about conservative marketing.
Old 10-27-2004, 12:27 AM
  #33  
Ike
Blue By You
 
Ike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by PoorCollegeKid
Both Subaru and Porsche have a tendancy to under rate the power of their cars, which makes them look slower on paper than they are in real life. Kind of like GM and its FBodies, or BMW and most of its cars (except the Ms). It's not really about superior design, it's about conservative marketing.
True, but damn I love the way the Boxer sounds. And its quirky little shimmy and shake just makes me love it that much more, some hate it but I think it's wonderful.
Old 10-27-2004, 07:53 AM
  #34  
Registered User
 
DreRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,959
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not worried one-bit--the MS6 is only further validation for me that Mazda will have a more powerful 8 in the coming years.
Old 10-27-2004, 10:38 AM
  #35  
Registered User
 
AbusiveWombat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ok, here's the article for those that are interested in reading the comparison of the VW R32, EVO, and STi
http://vortex3.rely.net/artman/publi...0.shtml?page=1
A quick synopsis, the R32, which has a very similar AWD system, was only 1 second behind the EVO and STi on TireRack's road course. Considering that the EVO and STi come with better tires, the gap could have been a bit closer. Not bad for a car with an extra 200 lbs and down 31hp to the EVO and 60 hp to the STi.

crossbow - I guess we'll have to agree to disagree and wait for the reviews. I can't wait to dig this thread up in a few months with a big "I told you so". :-)

Last edited by AbusiveWombat; 10-27-2004 at 11:24 AM.
Old 10-27-2004, 11:08 AM
  #36  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Rotary Titus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Vancouver, BC Canada
Posts: 782
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
oh so it's 100:0 until wheel slip eh?? so did they just pull the drivetrain from the Tribute SUV or something then??? hmm... cuts costs but......

and offtopic, hey Ike, does the Forrester SUV or other subarus have low range gear or hill descent control? Nowhere on the internet was I able to find that
Old 10-27-2004, 11:14 AM
  #37  
the Doctor
iTrader: (1)
 
Feras's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Bryn Mawr, PA
Posts: 1,783
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by IkeWRX
True, but damn I love the way the Boxer sounds. And its quirky little shimmy and shake just makes me love it that much more, some hate it but I think it's wonderful.
thats why porsche rules (subaru is cool too)
Old 10-27-2004, 12:29 PM
  #38  
Registered
 
Icemastr's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Redmond, WA
Posts: 605
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't forget about the Mazdaspeed 6's new direct injection power plant, supposedly 15% better MPG over if it was regular injection, better cooling, faster turbo spool up, should be interesting to see how large of a turbo they put on it and how well it responds to modifcations once it gets released.
Old 10-27-2004, 01:43 PM
  #39  
Registered User
 
crossbow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 839
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
oh so it's 100:0 until wheel slip eh?? so did they just pull the drivetrain from the Tribute SUV or something then??? hmm... cuts costs but......
Supposedly they took it from the Euro 6 Wagon, which is a 2.3 Liter with AWD. That would also explain both the distribution and the fact the transfer case is water cooled...big torque difference between the AWD wagon and the Ms6.

Abusive,

Thanks for the link! And ya, as I said earlier, I'm probably just embiddered that I'll have to trade in again . The main qualm I have about the article is they didn't put laptimes on it. They just stated (was a 9/10th of a second off) or what not. Well thats not much at all if its a min and 30 second course...but if it was 50 seconds a lap...you get the picture...(much larger difference).

In an autox where most courses take 55-65 seconds...beating someone by a second is usually considered "pwn3d!"

Technically given those three car's, if the ms6 can keep its weight down (and oh PLEASE have adjustable front camber), it's going to really beat down the competition with its superior suspension setup. (Doublewishbone baby!)

Last edited by crossbow; 10-27-2004 at 01:45 PM.
Old 10-27-2004, 03:25 PM
  #40  
Registered User
 
AbusiveWombat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ohh for those that want to estimate the MS6 0-60 and 1/4 mile times. The VW R32 runs:
0-60: 5.9
1/4 mile: 14.2 @ 97mph
weight= 3400 lbs
hp = 240

I expect that the MS6 will be the same weight or lighter with 30 more horses under the hood. Plan on this puppy smokin' an RX8 in a straight line.
Old 10-27-2004, 03:45 PM
  #41  
Registered User
 
DreRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,959
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Those are the fastest R32 time I've seen what's your source--all the magazines that I've seen have put it closer to 6 1/2 ticks. Either way--the MS6 will be faster than the RX8 in a str8 line.
Old 10-27-2004, 04:44 PM
  #42  
Registered User
 
AbusiveWombat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
vwvortex
Old 10-28-2004, 02:56 AM
  #43  
Registered User
 
Lyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DreRX8
Not worried one-bit--the MS6 is only further validation for me that Mazda will have a more powerful 8 in the coming years.

-I hope you are right, but that might not be the case. Look at what happened with the evolution and the 3000GT, the evo became mitsu's flagship car. But, mazda still has the seven, so I wouldn't worry too much about it.
Old 10-28-2004, 08:01 AM
  #44  
I don't buy Kool-Aid
 
DOMINION's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Vegas Baby!
Posts: 8,823
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Yea the 8 is not a straight line car, but it was made fot the ride home...
Old 10-28-2004, 08:22 AM
  #45  
Registered User
 
DreRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,959
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With Mitusbishi--the EVO has always been their flagship; even in Japan where the 3000GT was the GTO. So I wouldn't compare those two--especially since Mitsu is bleeding red ink.
Old 10-28-2004, 04:56 PM
  #46  
rotary courage
 
m477's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: :uoıʇɐɔoן
Posts: 1,208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yup, this thing will smoke an 8. But the 8 isn't a straight line car, and it doesn't need to be to make sales. It's kinda like the Miata, there have been other faster cars mazda has made during the Miata's lifetime, but it's still the best selling sports car ever, and one of the most fun cars to drive ever.

But alot of people here seem to be in serious denial and freaking out over the MS6, and I can't help but laugh. It is going to be a fast, sweet, fun car... but its existence isn't going to make any other car less fun to drive.

Last edited by m477; 10-28-2004 at 04:58 PM.
Old 11-01-2004, 04:34 PM
  #47  
I don't buy Kool-Aid
 
DOMINION's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Vegas Baby!
Posts: 8,823
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
"Denial"? "Freaking out" No way. If I wonted a fast straight line car I would have got a C5.
Just wait till the SEMA show. Then we can FI all day long.
Old 11-01-2004, 05:56 PM
  #48  
Ike
Blue By You
 
Ike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 8,717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DOMINION
"Denial"? "Freaking out" No way. If I wonted a fast straight line car I would have got a C5.
Just wait till the SEMA show. Then we can FI all day long.
The C5 handles pretty damn well, like I say all the time you can have both. I've been hearing about FI for the RX-8 for the last 18 months and have yet to see any real results. FI for this car still has a long ways to go and it's going to be very expensive for pretty moderate gains, at least at first...
Old 11-04-2004, 06:41 PM
  #49  
Registered User
 
snap-on's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,050
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FYI

http://www.mazda6tech.com/images/speed6_spec.pdf

http://www.mazda6tech.com/images/speed6.pdf
Old 11-04-2004, 07:25 PM
  #50  
Registered User
 
s13lover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hmmm....Black Cherry. :D


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: My god.... they BETTER detune this!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:41 AM.