Mustang GT vs. RX-8.....can't decide which to buy
Registered
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 997
Likes: 0
From: Milwaukee Wi.
Originally Posted by Japan
There is nothing wrong with the Mustang's engineering. <<<<<<<<<
True on most stangs, but I read on the mustang forum There were some serious recalls and major repair on the 2005 stang, something to do with the engineering
. I'll post it if I can find it.
ah, here it is http://www.svtperformance.com/forums...t=2005+recalls
There is nothing wrong with the Mustang's engineering. <<<<<<<<<
True on most stangs, but I read on the mustang forum There were some serious recalls and major repair on the 2005 stang, something to do with the engineering
. I'll post it if I can find it.
ah, here it is http://www.svtperformance.com/forums...t=2005+recalls
Last edited by Roaddemon; Sep 1, 2005 at 09:07 AM.
Int'l Man of Mystery
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,651
Likes: 0
From: Central Florida
TOD... no no... the idea which both you and he talk about is a"passive engineering." Thus the discussion about IRS and the V8 engine.
I agree... 300hp is not such a big deal, but at the price point that Ford offers it... that's pretty hot. I bet that they could have knocked the price of the car lower still if they had stuck with the 302 and just invested in further refining it. Oh well.
I agree... 300hp is not such a big deal, but at the price point that Ford offers it... that's pretty hot. I bet that they could have knocked the price of the car lower still if they had stuck with the 302 and just invested in further refining it. Oh well.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
