Notices
General Automotive Discuss all things automotive here other than the RX-8

MAZMART 13B vs 600 hp Corvette

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Jan 12, 2012 | 09:41 AM
  #26  
usnidc's Avatar
2008 40th Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
From: Virginia, USA
Laping the Lotus at least twice FTW!!
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2012 | 11:18 AM
  #27  
Silver_Surfer's Avatar
I4NI
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 833
Likes: 2
From: Hawaii
Nice vid! Anyone know what his Mazda looks like? **** the way they were blowing by cars. At work, cant surf too much.
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2012 | 11:48 AM
  #28  
Rxnincj's Avatar
zoom zoom
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 47
Likes: 1
From: Vallejo, Ca
Damn nice vid. I wonder how an rx8 will do with that engine.
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2012 | 12:29 PM
  #29  
Mazmart's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,794
Likes: 67
Originally Posted by Silver_Surfer
Nice vid! Anyone know what his Mazda looks like? **** the way they were blowing by cars. At work, cant surf too much.
I'll get some pics of it up later. Thanks Silver.

Paul.
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2012 | 12:44 PM
  #30  
nycgps's Avatar
Out of NYC
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 19,881
Likes: 36
From: Planet Earth
Like the anime initial d saids. The guy being chase will have much much more pressure and might eventually led to mistakes. Lucky it was a quick race. Otherwise the 7would have past him. But it looked pretty bad for the vette already consider a car thats a class lower almost had him
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2012 | 01:08 PM
  #31  
Atilla's Avatar
I am THAT guy
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 5,995
Likes: 13
From: Caca Cali
Great F'in vid!
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2012 | 01:55 PM
  #32  
TeamRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,937
Likes: 2,142
what is the weight difference between the two?
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2012 | 02:20 PM
  #33  
Mazmart's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,794
Likes: 67
Originally Posted by TeamRX8
what is the weight difference between the two?
I shall inquire sir.

Paul.
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2012 | 04:11 PM
  #34  
Mazmart's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,794
Likes: 67
This is what it looks like.

Paul.
Attached Thumbnails MAZMART 13B vs 600 hp Corvette-jeff-1.jpg   MAZMART 13B vs 600 hp Corvette-jeff-d-runoffs.jpg  
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2012 | 04:33 PM
  #35  
Mazmart's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,794
Likes: 67
Originally Posted by TeamRX8
what is the weight difference between the two?
The Corvette is STO Class and weighs 3200 lbs. It has a built 427 engine and makes over 600 flywheel hp. The RX-7 is running GT2 spec in the video and weighs 2030 lbs which is 230 lbs under it's normal GT3 weight. It also has it's intake restrictor removed.

Paul.
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2012 | 05:29 PM
  #36  
Silver_Surfer's Avatar
I4NI
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 833
Likes: 2
From: Hawaii
Originally Posted by Mazmart
This is what it looks like.

Paul.
Awsome! I didn't think it would have doors

Reply
Old Jan 12, 2012 | 10:06 PM
  #37  
YaXMaN's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
Is the Vette on slicks?
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2012 | 10:08 PM
  #38  
RIWWP's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 16,684
Likes: 267
From: Pacific Northwest
I think the term is "r-compound." So it doesn't have tread and thus looks like a "slick," but I'm betting that the tires are not at all like a 'slick' that would be selected by someone looking to drag race.

And both cars would be on r-comps. There isn't a point in door to door racing on anything less unless you aren't on dry pavement.
Reply
Old Jan 12, 2012 | 11:14 PM
  #39  
YaXMaN's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
Originally Posted by RIWWP
I think the term is "r-compound." So it doesn't have tread and thus looks like a "slick," but I'm betting that the tires are not at all like a 'slick' that would be selected by someone looking to drag race.

And both cars would be on r-comps. There isn't a point in door to door racing on anything less unless you aren't on dry pavement.
I wasn't referring to drag racing slicks, Captain Obvious.

He mentioned the Vette was running STO class. I'm no expert and I'm trying to learn something here, but apparently the STO class is not allowed to run racing slicks for the Runoffs where the GT3 cars can. I was wondering how much it contributes to the situation where the GT2 GT3 cars are faster in the corners, but the STO are faster on the straights.
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2012 | 12:02 AM
  #40  
Brent Dalton's Avatar
Sua Sponte
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by YaXMaN
I wasn't referring to drag racing slicks, Captain Obvious.

He mentioned the Vette was running STO class. I'm no expert and I'm trying to learn something here, but apparently the STO class is not allowed to run racing slicks for the Runoffs where the GT3 cars can. I was wondering how much it contributes to the situation where the GT2 GT3 cars are faster in the corners, but the STO are faster on the straights.
Bob(Corvette) is on Hoosier A6's. They are an extremely sticky tire/compound, but were built for AutoX so in a 30-45 minute race they start to fall off towards the end. No idea what Jeff was on. As you said, GT classes can run a full race slick which takes a lap or two to get up to temp, but will hold it's grip much longer.

Last edited by Brent Dalton; Jan 16, 2012 at 12:06 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2012 | 01:33 PM
  #41  
blackenedwings's Avatar
Life begins @ 30 psi
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,745
Likes: 0
From: Columbia, MD
I am at work so I haven't gotten a chance to watch the video yet, but I'm looking forward to it! That RX-7 is beautiful!

Originally Posted by Mazmart
The Corvette is STO Class and weighs 3200 lbs. It has a built 427 engine and makes over 600 flywheel hp. The RX-7 is running GT2 spec in the video and weighs 2030 lbs which is 230 lbs under it's normal GT3 weight. It also has it's intake restrictor removed.
Paul.
1200 lb weight difference is omfg HUGE. I don't know how much power the RX-7 is making, but even moderate power levels would put it significantly past the Corvette in p/w ratio.

Originally Posted by Brent Dalton
Bob(Corvette) is on Hoosier A6's. They are an extremely sticky tire/compound, but were built for AutoX so in a 30-45 minute race they start to fall off towards the end. No idea what Jeff was on. As you said, GT classes can run a full race slick which takes a lap or two to get up to temp, but will hold it's grip much longer.
Bingo. That is exactly the answer to why the Corvette was "sliding through the corners" at the end. A6s are Hoosier slicks designed for short stints with minimal heat cycles. They are the tire of choice for autocross and Time Trial racing (5 laps maximum). You cannot run a full length session on A6s, they just grease up and slide all over the place.
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2012 | 02:50 PM
  #42  
RIWWP's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 16,684
Likes: 267
From: Pacific Northwest
Equal P/W (5.33lbs per HP) if the RX-7 is at 380hp (ignoring "under the curve"). Since the video clearly shows the Corvette pulling on him quite easily, I'd bet that his power level is around 300hp (6.76lbs per HP) or lower.
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2012 | 03:21 PM
  #43  
nycgps's Avatar
Out of NYC
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 19,881
Likes: 36
From: Planet Earth
1200 lbs is a big freaking difference!

Oh well again if there were more corners the 7 wouldve got the vette already
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2012 | 03:05 AM
  #44  
Brent Dalton's Avatar
Sua Sponte
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by blackenedwings
Bingo. That is exactly the answer to why the Corvette was "sliding through the corners" at the end. A6s are Hoosier slicks designed for short stints with minimal heat cycles. They are the tire of choice for autocross and Time Trial racing (5 laps maximum). You cannot run a full length session on A6s, they just grease up and slide all over the place.
That's not exactly true. You CAN run A6's in sprint races (30-45 minutes) and many of the top guys have been for many years. They do start to fall off as the race progresses, but they are still predictable and faster than an R6.

I would guess the RX-7's engine has less than 300hp. My bet would be somewhere in the 250rwhp range. That is all speculation on the engine hp though.

Regardless, incredible car and an even more incredible driver!

Last edited by Brent Dalton; Jan 17, 2012 at 10:58 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2012 | 12:27 PM
  #45  
Mazmart's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,794
Likes: 67
Originally Posted by Brent Dalton
That's not exactly true. You CAN run A6's in sprint races (30-45 minutes) and many of the top guys have been for many years. They do start to fall off as the race progresses, but they are still predictable and faster than an R6.

I would guess the RX-7's engine has less than 300hp. My bet would be somewhere in the 250rwhp range. That is all speculation on the engine hp though.

Regardless, incredible car and an even more incredible driver!
I'm not at liberty to give his figures here but we'll just say he's comfortably above your estimates We have done more r&d on this guy than we've done in quite some time.

Thanks for the complements; Jeff does kick *** and holds lap records at a few tracks well.

Paul.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2012 | 12:43 PM
  #46  
Brettus's Avatar
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 20,860
Likes: 1,808
From: Y-cat-o NZ
Originally Posted by Brent Dalton
My bet would be somewhere in the 250rwhp range. :

I'll take that bet !
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2012 | 12:53 PM
  #47  
RIWWP's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 16,684
Likes: 267
From: Pacific Northwest
Paul, do you mean Bret's estimate? I'd agree that it's too low.

Mine? I could be off, but I doubt I'm all that low. At 380hp ("hp", not sure if the 600hp in the title of the vette is crank or wheel, but whichever it is, I'm using the same basis) they would have the same power to weight, and off the slow corners they would accelerate at roughly the same weight, although gearing differences could shift it around a bit. They both go through a few gears, so it's not a simple 1-gear ratio difference here.

Hmm. I know at some point, HP matters more than P/W for simple speed, as aero drag takes a larger and larger chunk of the power, dropping the effective p/w much faster for lower powered cars than higher powered (assuming the same coefficient of drag), but I'd still say that the 5.33 lbs per hp of the vette is superior to whatever the 7 has, but it's not glaringly drastic and getting 300hp out of an FD is a fairly simple matter for you, so it's AT LEAST that.

I can't see it being much above 350hp though. Of course, the "600hp" of the vette could be a rough number too, throwing much of this out the window

To make a closer guess I'd have to compare the elapsed time between two fixed points for each of them to quantify how much the vette is stretching it's lead, and since it's a known course, we can get the measurements fairly accurately. Then the only error rate left in the calculation is the gearing differences.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2012 | 01:02 PM
  #48  
bse50's Avatar
#50
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 7,521
Likes: 11
From: Caput Mundi
i'd say 320 flywheel hp, 280ish at th wheels.
Hp\lbs aside what really matters is the chassis setup. the fd3s is just faster, softer on the kerbs and with a lot more grip available.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2012 | 01:16 PM
  #49  
RIWWP's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 16,684
Likes: 267
From: Pacific Northwest
100% agree that it's more critical to the FD's lap times than it's power level. It's clearly faster through many parts of the course.

But the discussion turned to "how much power does the FD have", and for that, grip and chassis setup isn't a factor. I'm basing my estimates entirely on the rate at which the vette pulls away from the FD on the straights. FD enters the straights at a higher speed, but it's fairly quickly nullified by the vette's power.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2012 | 01:27 PM
  #50  
bse50's Avatar
#50
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 7,521
Likes: 11
From: Caput Mundi
the fd3s trany is probably a hewland or a holinger...
even a 300hp gap can be drastically reduced with a better chassis and drivetrain! the vette barely has a chassis... the divetrain is what it is too.
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:33 PM.