Notices
General Automotive Discuss all things automotive here other than the RX-8

mazdaspeed6 is out

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 09-29-2004, 02:44 PM
  #76  
Registered User
 
AbusiveWombat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by crossbow
1) A redesigned hood so they could fit a "top mounted intercooler"...yet absolutely zero airflow for the intercooler. Yay. Maybe they were going to put a scoop, decided against it, and didn't have time to put a front mounted intercooler on the car. Or maybe they don't care.
Did you work on the air flow for the MS6 intercooler? Do you have any air flow experience? Aerodynamics and air flow is a funny art. You never know how much flow is going through the grill, gliding along the hood, over the IC, and out the back of the hood. I will agree that a FMIC would have been best but I drive an EVO...of course FMIC is the best.

Originally Posted by crossbow
2) A FWD car, touted as AWD. Lots of fancy terminology and techno speak for a car that drives around as 100:0, and only splits torque to the rear when wheel slipage occurs, and only then (worst here) at a 50:50 ratio. Unlike car's such as the Volvo S60R (30:70), or subaru legacy (45:55 normally), Mazda's solution is basically "ultra" FWD.
The VW R32 has a similar setup and I've heard it has fantastic handling. One article that I read comparing it to the EVO and STi said the R32 was the most nuetral of the group. Also, the EVO is a 50:50 split 100% of the time and I doubt anyone will argue that it is one of the best handling AWD cars on the planet.

Originally Posted by crossbow
5) Mazda did nothing to the fender wells. Their still extremely narrow in the rear, and any type of aggressive rims (aka x8 inch wide wheels) require rolling. Their replacement mazdaspeed wheels are just heavier 18x7 wheels with 215/45/18 rubber. Sigh.
While I agree that wider tires would give it a little tougher look, this is an AWD car. AWD means you get TONS of traction. In my EVO when it's raining I can only chirp the tires...there's no spining, it just goes. The MS6 would look better but probably wouldn't perform any better. Also, with wider tires, you would increase the amount of driveline stress on hard launches. Remember, here in the USA we live a 1/4 mile at a time :D. More stress on the driveline means more worn clutches and broken drivetrains. By keeping the tire width small they'll probably save themselves some warrenty claims.


Originally Posted by crossbow
6) Cost...I think I'll take an Evo MR, Rx8, or used Z06 instead.
A stock Mazda 6s costs ~$25k....the MS6 will probably come in around $30k. what did you expect, SRT4 price range? At that price range it will do well directly competing with G35, RX8, and R32. To put it up against the EVO MR is a bit unfair. While the MR certainly has better performance, the MS6 has a much classier exterior and interior. You can't have everything.

Originally Posted by crossbow
7) Internals? Are they beefed up? A Standard 6i has a cast iron crank, standard pistons, and sinister forged rods. Its massive stroke of 94 mm leaves its rods extremely vulnerable to damage, even with minor boost levels (if they didn't beef them up heavily). See miata's for more information on long stroke piston motors.

I hope they aren't pulling an MSP.
The article did state that the rods are iron. While not very light weight, they will be strong. Time will tell but I expect we'll see plenty of these getting 300+hp will minor mods. If the weight stays around the same, that will be a pretty quick car.
Old 09-29-2004, 05:38 PM
  #77  
Free Autographed Pictures
 
Rotarian_SC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: PRC
Posts: 594
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think they should offer another version of it, similar to what the RS did, but not that extreme. Just take out all sound deadening and most of the luxury to make it an econobox to drop that weight.

Last edited by Rotarian_SC; 09-29-2004 at 06:15 PM.
Old 09-29-2004, 05:49 PM
  #78  
Mulligan User
iTrader: (1)
 
ZoomZoomH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: caddyshack
Posts: 4,612
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
^terrible idea, very few people will buy it, track ****** would want something on a smaller chassis, and daily driving enthusiasts will be repulsed by the lack of refinement.

btw MR is the highest-end Evo with everything in it. the RS is the stripped down street-legal track car.
Old 09-29-2004, 06:14 PM
  #79  
Free Autographed Pictures
 
Rotarian_SC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: PRC
Posts: 594
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry for the wrong Evo info, I am not saying to produce it in full, I am just saying to make maybe 500 at most of those cars, and I am not saying remove A/C, radio, etc, just have like an option to use lighter lower grade materials where you want, so you could customize it like the Scions with their numberous options are doing, it would allow for people to pick their compromises. It would make me consider to buy the car if they did that.

Your logic basically says the RX8 is not a good idea because there is not enough room for the people who want a 4 seat sedan and the enthusiasts who buy it won't appreciate the extra weight of the seats and special door reinforcement when they could go for a 2 seater.
Old 09-29-2004, 08:43 PM
  #80  
Mulligan User
iTrader: (1)
 
ZoomZoomH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: caddyshack
Posts: 4,612
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
i think we can be pretty safe to say that the RX-8 is NOT necessarily a track *****'s wet dream, so it's mainly aimed at *very* enthusiastic drivers looking for a comfortable (and nice looking!) ride without sacrificing too much sporting capabilities.

the target demography between RX-8 and MS6 is actually similar in that both provides excellent performance while also pampering the driver quite well, and the pricing reflects it. The only differences are, what type of drivetrain you're looking for, and whether passenger/cargo space is important to you.
Old 09-29-2004, 09:00 PM
  #81  
Still plays with cars
 
GotBass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Right Engine, Wrong Car - Stick it in the 3.
Old 09-29-2004, 09:26 PM
  #82  
Registered User
 
Audioslave8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Buffalo Grove IL
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
similar to the New 2005 Altima SE-R check the nissan website for details, i kinda like it
Old 09-30-2004, 08:04 AM
  #83  
Registered User
 
DreRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,959
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Altima SE-R with 260HP is nice--but damn that torque steer...I have a Millenia S with only 210HP and when its on boost I wrestle with the wheel--so I can imagine what its like in a 260HP Altima.
Old 09-30-2004, 04:22 PM
  #84  
Hall Monitor!
 
Don Vito's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Balls
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Too bad the ugly *** Altima doesn't have good looks like the Mazda 6 ( and mazdaspeed 6 ).
Old 09-30-2004, 04:35 PM
  #85  
Registered User
 
Audioslave8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Buffalo Grove IL
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
id perfer the looks of the SE-R over the mazda6
Old 09-30-2004, 04:44 PM
  #86  
Administrator
 
zoom44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: portland oregon
Posts: 21,958
Received 115 Likes on 88 Posts
Originally Posted by GotBass
Right Engine, Wrong Car - Stick it in the 3.
oh they will. give it some time.
Old 10-03-2004, 11:19 AM
  #87  
Zio
美浜ー先輩??!
 
Zio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Princeton, NJ
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
0- 60 in 6.6 s isnt that slower than the 8??
Old 10-03-2004, 02:21 PM
  #88  
Mulligan User
iTrader: (1)
 
ZoomZoomH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: caddyshack
Posts: 4,612
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
0-100 km/h (0-62mph) is 6.6 sec. they don't have a 0-60mph time listed, but I suspect it'll be 6 flat.
Old 10-03-2004, 04:41 PM
  #89  
Registered
 
Icemastr's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Redmond, WA
Posts: 605
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A 0-60 of 6 seconds seems very slow for that much power and AWD even though the test was with the UK model which has about 20hp less or so than the US model is supposed to have, I was expecting a 0-60 of under 5 seconds. It can't weigh too much more than the WRX yet it has a lot more HP and torque yet the WRX manages 0-60 in under 5.5
Old 10-03-2004, 05:40 PM
  #90  
Free Autographed Pictures
 
Rotarian_SC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: PRC
Posts: 594
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think that would mean the 6 either has horrible gearing, has a much worse AWD system, or somehow they added a lot of weight. Otherwise the only thing I can think of to account for it was the driver is horrible.
Old 10-03-2004, 09:16 PM
  #91  
Mulligan User
iTrader: (1)
 
ZoomZoomH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: caddyshack
Posts: 4,612
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
no one has timed it *yet* (those are *estimate* figures)

fyi, the subaru legacy GT runs a 5.9 0-60, i'd use that as a guideline rather than compare to the WRX, weight plays a big part in standing launches.
Old 10-04-2004, 08:44 AM
  #92  
Registered User
 
crossbow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 839
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
The VW R32 has a similar setup and I've heard it has fantastic handling. One article that I read comparing it to the EVO and STi said the R32 was the most nuetral of the group. Also, the EVO is a 50:50 split 100% of the time and I doubt anyone will argue that it is one of the best handling AWD cars on the planet.
Yes but your not seeing the reasoning behind their decision to use this distribution system. They basically took the AWD system off the car's in europe, then slapped it to a system pushing out over DOUBLE the torque. The transfer case CAN NOT HANDLE the increased torque, which is why the rear maxes out at a 50% torque distribution, and is also why its water cooled. This is a huge mistake in my eyes. Their using a patchwork system to use existing tech off a much weaker powered car (standard 160 bhp) and hoping it stays together. They should have completely redesigned the transfer case =/. This is also the main reasoning behind the car's standard 100:0 torque distribution. If the transfer case isn't being used, it can't break right?

I definitely see that transfer case snapping the instant people start throwing mods on it.

A stock Mazda 6s costs ~$25k....the MS6 will probably come in around $30k. what did you expect, SRT4 price range? At that price range it will do well directly competing with G35, RX8, and R32. To put it up against the EVO MR is a bit unfair. While the MR certainly has better performance, the MS6 has a much classier exterior and interior. You can't have everything.
My 6s MTX cost 18k...If I had to pay 25k, I would have gotten an base rx8 6spd . You can easily pick up a 6i MTX for under 16k. Estimating dealer markup, were looking at 32k+...mainly due to how exclusive most mazdaspeed car's are during their "inital" run. Of course now look at the msm, which is just sitting on lots, unsold, cause mazda produced WAY more then were selling.


The article did state that the rods are iron. While not very light weight, they will be strong. Time will tell but I expect we'll see plenty of these getting 300+hp will minor mods. If the weight stays around the same, that will be a pretty quick car.
Ah I missed that. Thanks for pointing it out. The fact that the standard 6i's stroke is 94mm really puts alot of stress on the rods when its boosted. Hopefully those are some rather buff iron rods.

I still disagree about the placement of the intercooler...but as you pointed out I'm no airflow mastar. I'm just following basic principals of heat rising...with you know, the intercooler sitting on top of the engine and all.

General weight estimates are 200-300 lbs+. Base 6i MTX is "about" 3000 lbs.
Old 10-04-2004, 10:15 AM
  #93  
Registered User
 
AbusiveWombat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by crossbow
Yes but your not seeing the reasoning behind their decision to use this distribution system. They basically took the AWD system off the car's in europe, then slapped it to a system pushing out over DOUBLE the torque. The transfer case CAN NOT HANDLE the increased torque, which is why the rear maxes out at a 50% torque distribution, and is also why its water cooled. This is a huge mistake in my eyes. Their using a patchwork system to use existing tech off a much weaker powered car (standard 160 bhp) and hoping it stays together. They should have completely redesigned the transfer case =/. This is also the main reasoning behind the car's standard 100:0 torque distribution. If the transfer case isn't being used, it can't break right?

I definitely see that transfer case snapping the instant people start throwing mods on it.
I certainly hope, for Mazda's sake, that this isn't the case. I'm sure the engineers did their homework. Only time will tell though.

Originally Posted by crossbow
My 6s MTX cost 18k...If I had to pay 25k, I would have gotten an base rx8 6spd . You can easily pick up a 6i MTX for under 16k. Estimating dealer markup, were looking at 32k+...mainly due to how exclusive most mazdaspeed car's are during their "inital" run. Of course now look at the msm, which is just sitting on lots, unsold, cause mazda produced WAY more then were selling.
I don't see how you could have got a 6s MTX for 18k unless it was used. Invoice on a bare bones Mazda6s is $20k. No way would a dealer sell for 2k less than invoice unless you're a employee (or related) for Ford.

I priced out a well equipt Mazda 6s at edmunds.com. The options I selected were: luxery package (leather, heated seats, power driver), sport package (spoiler, wheels, suspension), sun roof, stereo upgrade, and side curtain air bags. Invoice was $24923.
Old 10-04-2004, 12:18 PM
  #94  
Registered User
 
crossbow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 839
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Abusive,

S-plan, -250 rev-it up coupon, -1500 incentive, -500 grad-student. Or 2200 USD off of S-plan price, which is already 4% below invoice.

They actually had higher rebates a bit later after I bought (damn it). But it came out to be a bit below 18k (base model 6s MTX+ Sports package (I wanted black cloth)).

http://www.mazdamotorsports.com

I got S-plan through mazdamotorsports (above url) which is one of the perks of being a member. (Just have to do 2 autox's a year in ANY mazda, to get membership). Its pretty cool that mazda actually "rewards you" for racing your car. If you slap their logos on your car, and actually start placing, there are cash prizes to boot!

Here's the S-plan listing for the 04 Mazda 6's.
http://grohol.com/mazda/Mazda2004.pdf

So final price was...

S-plan 6s MTX + Sports 20200 USD
Incentives/Rebates -2250

Or 17,950 USD.

The 1500 USD incentive is still available btw. Rev-it up coupons expired though. Because S-plan is non negotiable, its still actually possible to get "below" this price through haggling...especially since the 05's are now on deck. I'd imagine you could probably net one for 17k or even the high 16's if you really wanted to haggle. I didn't, I like the no haggle process of S-plan, its like buying a saturn . (Btw my car had single digit miles on it when purchased)

Last edited by crossbow; 10-04-2004 at 12:35 PM.
Old 10-04-2004, 01:24 PM
  #95  
Registered User
 
AbusiveWombat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That is a sweet deal!
Old 10-05-2004, 09:07 PM
  #96  
Overport
 
Overport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 928
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
dont know to much about it, but i'm already loving it based on the spec sheet. i'm interested to see how it performs on the street....
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Kafka
Canada Forum
10
08-22-2008 11:13 AM
mazda6_1981
SE RX-8 Forum
193
07-11-2007 12:02 PM
Huskyfan23
RX-8 Discussion
114
09-22-2006 10:10 PM
ASH8
General Automotive
39
12-30-2005 04:29 PM
zoom44
RX-8 Discussion
41
11-29-2005 10:49 AM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: mazdaspeed6 is out



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:00 AM.