LMP2 Mazda Update?
Yes they are. The rules do state restrictor plate sizes and displacement limits (in conjunction with restrictor plate sizes) for all engines, including rotaries. I'm not sure how they classify the rotary as far as displacement goes but even if you doubled everything and had a 4 rotor, it still fits in. Where the rules are vague is in regards to rotaries and forced induction. The rules clearly state boost pressure limits and engine sizes and tells which engine sizes can and can't use forced induction. It even goes on to detail differences in these areas when it comes to 2 valve heads vs 4 valve heads and then of course the diesels have their own section of the rules. The rotaries however are not mentioned anywhere in the forced induction section where it clearly lists them in the naturally aspirated part of the rules.
Does this mean that forced inducted rotaries are not allowed to be used? It doesn't say they can't be but then again it doesn't say they can be either. Does this mean that they simply fall in the same displacement category that they do when naturally aspirated and hence the same boost level and restrictor plate rules? If this is so then which section of the rules does it fall under as they are different for either 2 or 4 valve engines. Which one is a rotary? You see how it's very vague when it comes to forced induction on a rotary in ALMS. I'm not sure how hard it would be to get some definitive rules written for it but as with any governing body, it probably isn't easy.
Here's a copy of the rules for 2007. Read over them and see how you interpret them.
http://www.mulsannescorner.com/chass.../2007LMP12.pdf
Does this mean that forced inducted rotaries are not allowed to be used? It doesn't say they can't be but then again it doesn't say they can be either. Does this mean that they simply fall in the same displacement category that they do when naturally aspirated and hence the same boost level and restrictor plate rules? If this is so then which section of the rules does it fall under as they are different for either 2 or 4 valve engines. Which one is a rotary? You see how it's very vague when it comes to forced induction on a rotary in ALMS. I'm not sure how hard it would be to get some definitive rules written for it but as with any governing body, it probably isn't easy.
Here's a copy of the rules for 2007. Read over them and see how you interpret them.
http://www.mulsannescorner.com/chass.../2007LMP12.pdf
Things like the FI rules for rotaries are not specifically stated in the rules and are one of the things that would have to be discussed and come to an agreement with both parties to make work.
In other words, you want to do a FI rotary, you propose something to the ACO, they look at it, and approve it or come back to you and discuss what needs to be done to make it legal. I have heard that is one of the reasons it would have been so hard to do and could have possibly even been discussed and no agreement could be reached.
The rotary is such a strange engine in that regard and the ACO is a little gunshy about them since they dont want to have them dominate like the 787 did, so it can make it really hard to get something approved that can be competitive.
In other words, you want to do a FI rotary, you propose something to the ACO, they look at it, and approve it or come back to you and discuss what needs to be done to make it legal. I have heard that is one of the reasons it would have been so hard to do and could have possibly even been discussed and no agreement could be reached.
The rotary is such a strange engine in that regard and the ACO is a little gunshy about them since they dont want to have them dominate like the 787 did, so it can make it really hard to get something approved that can be competitive.
I (like everyone here) would love to see a rotary w/ FI (in ALMS), however, I think there would be big problems with fuel consumption issues and I don't see how they'd overcome it.
A question regarding the GT program-The 20b they're running is basically a peripherally ported motor and isn't based on the renesis right?? Anyone care to enlighten...
A question regarding the GT program-The 20b they're running is basically a peripherally ported motor and isn't based on the renesis right?? Anyone care to enlighten...
Mazda's ALMS P2 Lola goes on the track for the first time tomorrow (in a few hours UK time), and ships out stateside on Wednesday.
On the RFQ, the rotary RFQ did go out, and it was to the usual RE historic racing suspects, and a few outside firms too.
Congrats to MazdaSpeed/SpeedSource for their 1st and 3rd today in Mexico City. The GT cars run 20B based motors with rotors, seals, and other misc from the RENESIS.
-Bern
On the RFQ, the rotary RFQ did go out, and it was to the usual RE historic racing suspects, and a few outside firms too.
Congrats to MazdaSpeed/SpeedSource for their 1st and 3rd today in Mexico City. The GT cars run 20B based motors with rotors, seals, and other misc from the RENESIS.
-Bern
yeah me too, speedsource made my day, and i am satisfied with the rotary effort, so now its 'acceptable' for the ALMS one to race without one
________
BUY E CIGARETTES
________
BUY E CIGARETTES
Last edited by Renesis_8; Sep 11, 2011 at 12:11 PM.
I think the only way you coul get the 550 hp needed for the ALMS is to rev the 20b to the 10,000+ rpm range, any one knows way they have so far keep the 20b in the 8,400+ rpm range?
I heard that if they went any higger they got over heating issues, even the speedsource cars have this problem too, is this true?
I heard that if they went any higger they got over heating issues, even the speedsource cars have this problem too, is this true?
With a restrictor plate and the way a rotary uses air, you wouldn't make any power up higher. Porsche revs their engines over 10K, and F1 for that matter, but they also have very short stroke engines. We just can't play around like that with rotaries.
it'd be cool if the 3-rotor could give the SS GT cars over 500hp when they need it, i.e short sprints.. overtaking, qualifying... etc.. at the expense of shorter engine life
the #70 was unbelievably quick in practice, their lowest time i saw was 1.28.5, thats almost a second faster than any other GT cars in mexico.
________
Peak Towers Condo
the #70 was unbelievably quick in practice, their lowest time i saw was 1.28.5, thats almost a second faster than any other GT cars in mexico.
________
Peak Towers Condo
Last edited by Renesis_8; Sep 11, 2011 at 12:12 PM.
Originally Posted by rotary crazy
thats why I said the speedsource cars where getting the same problem, the engine overheats when rev over 9,000, at least thats the info I have
thats what I thoug too, but any way the speedsource guys are doing great
another thing RG is if you notice how big the oil coolers on the #70 and #69 cars are, remember what we talked about some time ago about the oil coolers in the courage
Berm should get in here and tell us how the new car testing go
another thing RG is if you notice how big the oil coolers on the #70 and #69 cars are, remember what we talked about some time ago about the oil coolers in the courage
Berm should get in here and tell us how the new car testing go
Last edited by rotary crazy; Mar 5, 2007 at 12:28 PM.
Just to let everyone know. At SpeedSource we rev the engines to around 8600 rpm's. We do this mostly to get better fuel mileage in the race. With the intake runner lenghths we use the BSFC goes through the roof if we rev them to 9000. It really has nothing to do with engine tempature. Our water temps are always below 190F no matter what we do.
Thanks for all of the support from the Mexico race.
Thanks for all of the support from the Mexico race.
Last edited by Renesis_8; Sep 11, 2011 at 12:13 PM.
Originally Posted by David Haskell
Just to let everyone know. At SpeedSource we rev the engines to around 8600 rpm's. We do this mostly to get better fuel mileage in the race. With the intake runner lenghths we use the BSFC goes through the roof if we rev them to 9000. It really has nothing to do with engine tempature. Our water temps are always below 190F no matter what we do.
Thanks for all of the support from the Mexico race.
Thanks for all of the support from the Mexico race.
Originally Posted by David Haskell
Just to let everyone know. At SpeedSource we rev the engines to around 8600 rpm's. We do this mostly to get better fuel mileage in the race. With the intake runner lenghths we use the BSFC goes through the roof if we rev them to 9000. It really has nothing to do with engine tempature. Our water temps are always below 190F no matter what we do.
Thanks for all of the support from the Mexico race.
Thanks for all of the support from the Mexico race.
That's quite impressive that your coolant temps never go above 190*F. That's lower than street engines!
FYI there's an article about the LMP2 test today at
www.dailysportscar.com
It's normally a pay site but they're having issues so the login is available on the mainpage in red text.
No pics, but it's nice to know it fired up and is now on its way to Sebring!
www.dailysportscar.com
It's normally a pay site but they're having issues so the login is available on the mainpage in red text.
No pics, but it's nice to know it fired up and is now on its way to Sebring!
David,
It's time to go to bed. How do you do it? Build and test engines for more than one series, offer support for some teams and drive?
Are you human?
Actually, thanks for being so human and so real. May God continue to bless you in all that you do.
It's time to go to bed. How do you do it? Build and test engines for more than one series, offer support for some teams and drive?
Are you human?
Actually, thanks for being so human and so real. May God continue to bless you in all that you do.



