GM closing down pontiac or buick...
#1
GM closing down pontiac or buick...
Not sure if this is posted yet, but it looks like if Gm's pontiac and buick sales don't improve, they are going to axe one of them...
http://cnn.netscape.cnn.com/ns/news/...&w=RTR&coview=
Gm's product have been lack luster in recent years and they don't have alot in the pike that looks interesting, other then the Solstice. When are they going to get rid of thier grandpa thinking and actually put out a car that will appeal to today's buyers...
GTO? nice engine in a cavelier. What a waste.
G6? not bad looking but just ho hum performance...if I wanted a plain car I'd buy a toyota.
Cobalt? was this suppose to fill the gap between a vette and a aveo...they need to bring back an updated camaro/firebird.
http://cnn.netscape.cnn.com/ns/news/...&w=RTR&coview=
Gm's product have been lack luster in recent years and they don't have alot in the pike that looks interesting, other then the Solstice. When are they going to get rid of thier grandpa thinking and actually put out a car that will appeal to today's buyers...
GTO? nice engine in a cavelier. What a waste.
G6? not bad looking but just ho hum performance...if I wanted a plain car I'd buy a toyota.
Cobalt? was this suppose to fill the gap between a vette and a aveo...they need to bring back an updated camaro/firebird.
#2
Has the whole shit.
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 1,772
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you ask me, I think Buick is going to be the first to go. The Lacrosse seems to be their last-ditch effort to drum up interest in the brand among the "younger" crowd (young for Buick is relative, mind you) and it's simply not going anywhere. I really don't think Buick has anything left up their sleeves and are going to be forced to shape up or ship out. Seems that their only option as far as I can see is "ship out".
#3
they are in a serious dillema.
1) They continue to do a half-assed job on product styling and fit within their propposed market. They cant expect things to get better if they put no effort to change things. the GTO is a prime example of something that could have been so much better if they would have put a little more effort.
2) They have poor, poor, POOR branding... its very "old" and "dated" and unappealing
3) #1 and #2 fuel eachother... its like a vicios little circle
1) They continue to do a half-assed job on product styling and fit within their propposed market. They cant expect things to get better if they put no effort to change things. the GTO is a prime example of something that could have been so much better if they would have put a little more effort.
2) They have poor, poor, POOR branding... its very "old" and "dated" and unappealing
3) #1 and #2 fuel eachother... its like a vicios little circle
Last edited by TODreamer; 03-24-2005 at 09:07 AM.
#4
NOT SEARCHING
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Olathe, KS
Posts: 753
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nothing says you're ready to retire at 55 like a new Buick. IMO they carry the ugliest **** on the road. I feel sorry for Tiger Woods having to give up his Ford GT in order to keep driving and endorsing his grandpa's cars.
#6
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Seattle, Wa
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by rodrigo67
... When are they going to get rid of their grandpa thinking and actually put out a car that will appeal to today's buyers...
GTO? nice engine in a cavelier. What a waste.
G6? not bad looking but just ho hum performance...if I wanted a plain car I'd buy a toyota.
Cobalt? was this suppose to fill the gap between a vette and a aveo...they need to bring back an updated camaro/firebird.
GTO? nice engine in a cavelier. What a waste.
G6? not bad looking but just ho hum performance...if I wanted a plain car I'd buy a toyota.
Cobalt? was this suppose to fill the gap between a vette and a aveo...they need to bring back an updated camaro/firebird.
Both the G6 and the Buick LaCrosse are meant to appeal to the buyers who purchase the Camry, Accord, and their upmarket siblings. If they're successful (and the jury is definitely out on that question), GM will do well. If they're not, no combination of GTO's, Camaro's, Soltice's, etc. etc. will save them.
#7
Apexing at Oak Tree
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: The Blue, Educated State in the North
Posts: 717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This has been a long time in coming. What has always baffled me (and Chrysler got this recently) is how you have many brands that basically sell the same car. Plus, now that Toyota is the best selling brand in the US, they are really in trouble.
They've got to cut brands, or cut vehicle lines and consolidate. Have one company make cars in a bunch of diff't classes like Toyota does.
Get rid of Buick first altogether, make Chevy a truck only brand (except for Corvette maybe), make Saturn low cost, make Pontiac performance ONLY (and when I say performance, I don't mean put out a 3.5L V6 that only produces 200hp when Nissan has a 3.5L V6 that makes 280hp).
They've got to cut brands, or cut vehicle lines and consolidate. Have one company make cars in a bunch of diff't classes like Toyota does.
Get rid of Buick first altogether, make Chevy a truck only brand (except for Corvette maybe), make Saturn low cost, make Pontiac performance ONLY (and when I say performance, I don't mean put out a 3.5L V6 that only produces 200hp when Nissan has a 3.5L V6 that makes 280hp).
#8
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Gonzales, LA
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I work at a Buick-Pontian-GMC-Hummer-Saab dealership (Chevy and Saturn too) - NO I don't sell them! I do the graphic designs and marketing for the whole enterprise. They always ask me when I'm gonna trade in my 8. HA! I dropped off something at the Chevy store and parked on the lot. So many people went up to the car and were interested in it. Sorry, not for sale. I love leaving the dealership with everyone staring....heheehhee.
#10
Buick is next. I thought Buick would have went before Oldsmobile. It's a shame because Olds was just starting to come out with some interesting products again.
In the 30s 40s 50s Buick used to be a distinct "middle class luxury car". For 30 years now it's been a GM Mr Potato Headmobile like every other GM brand. The problem is people (like my Mom) who still think Buick is something special are dwindling pretty qucikly. Pontiac has been selling tons of Grand Ams so I don't think they're going anywehere.
In the 30s 40s 50s Buick used to be a distinct "middle class luxury car". For 30 years now it's been a GM Mr Potato Headmobile like every other GM brand. The problem is people (like my Mom) who still think Buick is something special are dwindling pretty qucikly. Pontiac has been selling tons of Grand Ams so I don't think they're going anywehere.
#12
Apexing at Oak Tree
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: The Blue, Educated State in the North
Posts: 717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by dos
Pontiac Aztec...
I can't even say anything else, this car makes me sick.
I can't even say anything else, this car makes me sick.
#14
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's bad when Lutz cals Buick and Pontiac as "Damaged Brands" - Now there's a way to sell cars!
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7275511/
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7275511/
#15
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Livermore, CA
Posts: 1,144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I will be crushed if they eliminate Buick. My family has owned, sold and modified Buicks for the last 75 years. I don't think it was any accident that Buick was the first American car sold in Japan when the trade embargos were lifted twenty years ago. It's also no accident that Buick is the best selling car in China right now.
Over the last 15 years the styling has been admittedly boring and geared towards a demographic I'm 50 years away from...that much isn't even debatable...but my God Buicks are fugging well made and reliable cars. My father put 190k miles on his '90 Buick Park Avenue (with touring package LOL) before giving it to me and buying a supercharged '00 Buick Park Avenue Ultra. I put another 140k trouble free miles on that '90 Buick before I traded it in for my '02 Nissan Spec V. I still see it driving around occasionally now as a taxi cab. The only work ever done on that car was about every 30k-50k miles the 02 sensor would need to be replaced. The car would start getting choppy at idle so I'd take it to Buick and $70 later it was fine for another 2 or 3 years. Other than the 02 sensor I can't recall anything...oh yeah...the catalytic converter was clogged up and needed to be replaced at 230k miles. But realistically that was a great car that didn't exactly get babied. Buick's 3.8L V6 has won countless engineering and reliability awards. For anybody that has driven one, it's possible to never go above 2K RPM's with that motor because of how much lowend torque it generates. I loved it and if Buick ever offered that engine in a compact or mid sized AWD or RWD car I would seriously consider buying it.
My grandfather sold Buicks for 10 years and drove them his whole life. Needless to say everybody in my family owned a Buick at some point. My cousin still drives a fully restored '68 Buick Skylark 4 door with a 455ci that he bought from my great grandmother. My little brother owns (but seldom drives) a fully restored '69 Buick Skylark GS400 with a stroked factory 400ci displacing about 422ci. It's more or less become our project car once it started cracking into the high 11's at 3k feet of elevation! It's so fast it lifts the front left tire off the ground. And my mom, aunt, uncle and I'm sure a bunch of others all own late model Buicks. If these cars weren't reliable they wouldn't have such a loyal following. If Buick gets dropped it's not because of the quality, reliability and fit & finish. The problem is uninspired design. And with the recent admission by GM that the ZETA platform has been dropped for production in the USDM I think this all but confirms that it will be much of the same at Buick for the foreseable future...reliable piles of boredom.
Over the last 15 years the styling has been admittedly boring and geared towards a demographic I'm 50 years away from...that much isn't even debatable...but my God Buicks are fugging well made and reliable cars. My father put 190k miles on his '90 Buick Park Avenue (with touring package LOL) before giving it to me and buying a supercharged '00 Buick Park Avenue Ultra. I put another 140k trouble free miles on that '90 Buick before I traded it in for my '02 Nissan Spec V. I still see it driving around occasionally now as a taxi cab. The only work ever done on that car was about every 30k-50k miles the 02 sensor would need to be replaced. The car would start getting choppy at idle so I'd take it to Buick and $70 later it was fine for another 2 or 3 years. Other than the 02 sensor I can't recall anything...oh yeah...the catalytic converter was clogged up and needed to be replaced at 230k miles. But realistically that was a great car that didn't exactly get babied. Buick's 3.8L V6 has won countless engineering and reliability awards. For anybody that has driven one, it's possible to never go above 2K RPM's with that motor because of how much lowend torque it generates. I loved it and if Buick ever offered that engine in a compact or mid sized AWD or RWD car I would seriously consider buying it.
My grandfather sold Buicks for 10 years and drove them his whole life. Needless to say everybody in my family owned a Buick at some point. My cousin still drives a fully restored '68 Buick Skylark 4 door with a 455ci that he bought from my great grandmother. My little brother owns (but seldom drives) a fully restored '69 Buick Skylark GS400 with a stroked factory 400ci displacing about 422ci. It's more or less become our project car once it started cracking into the high 11's at 3k feet of elevation! It's so fast it lifts the front left tire off the ground. And my mom, aunt, uncle and I'm sure a bunch of others all own late model Buicks. If these cars weren't reliable they wouldn't have such a loyal following. If Buick gets dropped it's not because of the quality, reliability and fit & finish. The problem is uninspired design. And with the recent admission by GM that the ZETA platform has been dropped for production in the USDM I think this all but confirms that it will be much of the same at Buick for the foreseable future...reliable piles of boredom.
#16
Originally Posted by 6speed8
It's bad when Lutz cals Buick and Pontiac as "Damaged Brands" - Now there's a way to sell cars!
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7275511/
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7275511/
Last edited by TODreamer; 03-24-2005 at 01:31 PM.
#17
Bummed, but bring on OU!
I think Pontiac can and will survive. Alot of people bash the GTO's exterior looks, and I agree that it's kind of bland, but obviously most people don't mind a little blandness if the Camry is the top selling car in the country. The overall quality of the vehicle (GTO) is where Pontiac needs to get it's entire line to.
Giving Buick the axe is the best thing that GM could do, imo. I don't know if the line is profitable or not, but the cost savings of cutting production would definately help. Cutting back on the ridiculous # of SUV models would help also. I think perhaps a general change in company management would probably be the best thing that could happen to GM.
Giving Buick the axe is the best thing that GM could do, imo. I don't know if the line is profitable or not, but the cost savings of cutting production would definately help. Cutting back on the ridiculous # of SUV models would help also. I think perhaps a general change in company management would probably be the best thing that could happen to GM.
#18
Originally Posted by therm8
I think Pontiac can and will survive. Alot of people bash the GTO's exterior looks, and I agree that it's kind of bland, but obviously most people don't mind a little blandness.....
would it have killed Pontiac to put a little more effort of something?
#19
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Montreal
Posts: 539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
When was the Miata introduced? 1984? Talk about an automotive gamble! That car became the best selling roadster in history (and probably saved Mazda). It single handedly revived the 2-seater open car concept in a time when convertibles had become dinosaurs. The formula proven so successful, car companies everywhere got back into that market. Z3, Z4, boxster, S2000.....
Here we are 20 odd years later, GM announces the Solstice. Sorry, 20 years too late. That's how american car companies do things. Japanese cars in late 70's were the butt of jokes. Until they surpassed american car companies in quality and durability. Then at Ford, they decided that quality is job 1. Again a decade or so too late.
American car companies are reactive and not proactive. They wait until someone else takes a gamble, then try to penetrate that market. So they always play catch-up. No auto executive will risk his options grant or bonus on a truly groundbreaking concept. They only thing they can do is reach back into the past, into its glory days and come up with retro-cars. Even then, T-bird is dead, prowler is dead, PT cruiser will die.
Watch how Nissan and Honda do in the pickup market. I'm not a pickup truck person, but I can appreciate the design elements incorporated in the Honda pickup. Clever, ingenious design. Toyota and Honda hybrids are selling like hotcakes. The americans autos are being left behind once again. All they seem to know how to do is dump a big engine into the engine bay and turn the car loose on the market.
Here we are 20 odd years later, GM announces the Solstice. Sorry, 20 years too late. That's how american car companies do things. Japanese cars in late 70's were the butt of jokes. Until they surpassed american car companies in quality and durability. Then at Ford, they decided that quality is job 1. Again a decade or so too late.
American car companies are reactive and not proactive. They wait until someone else takes a gamble, then try to penetrate that market. So they always play catch-up. No auto executive will risk his options grant or bonus on a truly groundbreaking concept. They only thing they can do is reach back into the past, into its glory days and come up with retro-cars. Even then, T-bird is dead, prowler is dead, PT cruiser will die.
Watch how Nissan and Honda do in the pickup market. I'm not a pickup truck person, but I can appreciate the design elements incorporated in the Honda pickup. Clever, ingenious design. Toyota and Honda hybrids are selling like hotcakes. The americans autos are being left behind once again. All they seem to know how to do is dump a big engine into the engine bay and turn the car loose on the market.
#20
Originally Posted by rodrigo67
G6? not bad looking but just ho hum performance...if I wanted a plain car I'd buy a toyota.
GM has done little right for a long time, but the Corvette, recently, is one thing they've done really right....
#21
Originally Posted by 124Spider
While I'm no friend of GM, which has made an artform of making drab cars for some years now, I couldn't let this comment pass, regarding the only American-built car which has me very interested. The C6 has received universal accolades for its performance, both straight-line and on twisties. It is, by any rational standard for car enthusiasts, a remarkable car, and a remarkable value. Check this Road & Track article out as an example.
GM has done little right for a long time, but the Corvette, recently, is one thing they've done really right....
GM has done little right for a long time, but the Corvette, recently, is one thing they've done really right....
Pointer: Fix up the cars that get you the substantial sales first and foremost... so that you can be around tomorrow to focus on your fancy specialty models.
Last edited by TODreamer; 03-24-2005 at 05:03 PM.
#22
Originally Posted by TODreamer
Yeah... too bad they did something right on the model car that is furthest from their bread and butter.....
Pointer: Fix up the cars that get you the substantial sales first and foremost... so that you can be around tomorrow to focus on your fancy specialty models.
Pointer: Fix up the cars that get you the substantial sales first and foremost... so that you can be around tomorrow to focus on your fancy specialty models.
They're focusing on what makes them the most money. And it's not G6s, GTOs or Soltices. It's where the demand is - SUVs! That's why they can charge $50K for a lousy Chevy suburban and $60K for an stinking Escalade. It's also why they crank out a new SUV every couple of months. They make big profits on SUVs and there's huge demand.
#23
Custom User Title:
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Mondaflore, Ikinburlistan
Posts: 702
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Originally Posted by Steiner
I will be crushed if they eliminate Buick. My family has owned, sold and modified Buicks for the last 75 years. I don't think it was any accident that Buick was the first American car sold in Japan when the trade embargos were lifted twenty years ago. It's also no accident that Buick is the best selling car in China right now.
Over the last 15 years the styling has been admittedly boring and geared towards a demographic I'm 50 years away from...that much isn't even debatable...but my God Buicks are fugging well made and reliable cars. My father put 190k miles on his '90 Buick Park Avenue (with touring package LOL) before giving it to me and buying a supercharged '00 Buick Park Avenue Ultra. I put another 140k trouble free miles on that '90 Buick before I traded it in for my '02 Nissan Spec V. I still see it driving around occasionally now as a taxi cab. ... If these cars weren't reliable they wouldn't have such a loyal following. If Buick gets dropped it's not because of the quality, reliability and fit & finish. The problem is uninspired design. And with the recent admission by GM that the ZETA platform has been dropped for production in the USDM I think this all but confirms that it will be much of the same at Buick for the foreseable future...reliable piles of boredom.
Over the last 15 years the styling has been admittedly boring and geared towards a demographic I'm 50 years away from...that much isn't even debatable...but my God Buicks are fugging well made and reliable cars. My father put 190k miles on his '90 Buick Park Avenue (with touring package LOL) before giving it to me and buying a supercharged '00 Buick Park Avenue Ultra. I put another 140k trouble free miles on that '90 Buick before I traded it in for my '02 Nissan Spec V. I still see it driving around occasionally now as a taxi cab. ... If these cars weren't reliable they wouldn't have such a loyal following. If Buick gets dropped it's not because of the quality, reliability and fit & finish. The problem is uninspired design. And with the recent admission by GM that the ZETA platform has been dropped for production in the USDM I think this all but confirms that it will be much of the same at Buick for the foreseable future...reliable piles of boredom.
My last four or five cars had been Oldsmobiles for one simple reason: My first cars were unreliable beaters and I was fed up with that. I needed dependable transportation. If you have only one car, it has to work. Oldsmobiles, boring as they were, worked, unlike so many shoddy U.S. cars. I've now kept my Olds with 100,000 plus miles on it (and no major work) for a winter car and have no qualms about driving it in the worst weather.
As was said, Olds was just starting to do some interesting stuff when it got the ax. But on the bright side, if they still made them, I'd probably be in an Intrigue right now instead of the 8.
#24
Originally Posted by 124Spider
While I'm no friend of GM, which has made an artform of making drab cars for some years now, I couldn't let this comment pass, regarding the only American-built car which has me very interested. The C6 has received universal accolades for its performance, both straight-line and on twisties. It is, by any rational standard for car enthusiasts, a remarkable car, and a remarkable value. Check this Road & Track article out as an example.
GM has done little right for a long time, but the Corvette, recently, is one thing they've done really right....
GM has done little right for a long time, but the Corvette, recently, is one thing they've done really right....
#25
Originally Posted by 124Spider
While I'm no friend of GM, which has made an artform of making drab cars for some years now, I couldn't let this comment pass, regarding the only American-built car which has me very interested. The C6 has received universal accolades for its performance, both straight-line and on twisties. It is, by any rational standard for car enthusiasts, a remarkable car, and a remarkable value. Check this Road & Track article out as an example.
GM has done little right for a long time, but the Corvette, recently, is one thing they've done really right....
GM has done little right for a long time, but the Corvette, recently, is one thing they've done really right....
He's sure as hell ain't comparing a 'vette with a Camry!
EDIT: Dammit rodrigo, don't post a few seconds before me!