Notices
General Automotive Discuss all things automotive here other than the RX-8

Delphi, GM and the Media

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 10-13-2005, 03:13 PM
  #26  
5Picker
 
rled's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by brillo
With the recent bankruptcy declaration of Delphi and the potential impending bankruptcy of GM as a result, I’ve found it interesting that the media is not taking the usual liberal spin on the situation. What I mean is, I would figure you would have all these articles on how the poor, union workers are being screwed by the big corporations, the usual class warfare stuff, but amazingly, the media seems to be exposing the truth behind the absolutely crazy compensation packages of these autoworkers.

This could be really interesting as the UAW decides what to do in terms of negotiations, because there cries for help are starting to fall of deaf ears. If they lose the media/PR war, they are really hosed, because the politicians will be even less likely to come to there aid. It puts the big 3 in a much better position to dictate terms, and the UAW basically has to take it.

On another random note, I wonder if the Delphi bankruptcy judge realizes he will be setting the precedent for the future structure and organization of the entire American auto industry, no pressure there.

Now, I for one don’t think that the UAW works should be making Macdonald’s wages, but by the same token, many of these workers make more than I do and I have a college degree and 5 years of banking experience. Many of these workers make including benefits, more than $100,000 a year, whether they work or not. This is ridiculous, and is going to have to change. I’m sorry, but I don’t feel sorry for you if your going to get your wages cut from $100K plus down to $50-60K a year as a line worker.

Actually, if the big 3 can modernize their plants, which would use fewer workers, the remaining employees would prolly get more than that.

Overall, these financial troubles will be a good thing, kinda like the increase in the cost of gas. It hurts at first, but something has to be done to improve the efficiency of the U.S. auto industry, or the whole thing will die. I’m sorry for those that are hurt by the cuts and changes, but the long term benefits will make it worth it.

Maybe, before I die, I will be able to drive an American car I actually want.
1. Union workers do not get paid whether they work or not! If you don't show up for work you don't get paid.
2.What do you call a Crazy compensation Package?
3.$100,000 a year? I work for a Large multinational Union company and in order for me to make that much money I would have to work 80 hours per week .
4.Companies who use unionized workers are 27 percent more productive, according to a recent report published in Scientific American.

The report revealed unionized workers have a strong system in place to negotiate for the rights and conditions that lead to improved productivity. Union workers also are more comfortable in bringing job specific changes to management because of job security.

The New York Federal Reserve Bank and Tufts University commissioned the report. It included more than 1,500 companies throughout the United States.
5.If you have never worked for a large company ,worked split shifts,forced to work overtime, forced to work all holidays,worked in extremely hot,cold,smoky,dusty,dangerous,and physical environment, you don't have a clue anyway!
Old 10-13-2005, 03:25 PM
  #27  
Go Texas Longhorns!
Thread Starter
 
brillo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 1,818
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by rled
1. Union workers do not get paid whether they work or not! If you don't show up for work you don't get paid.
2.What do you call a Crazy compensation Package?
3.$100,000 a year? I work for a Large multinational Union company and in order for me to make that much money I would have to work 80 hours per week .
4.Companies who use unionized workers are 27 percent more productive, according to a recent report published in Scientific American.

The report revealed unionized workers have a strong system in place to negotiate for the rights and conditions that lead to improved productivity. Union workers also are more comfortable in bringing job specific changes to management because of job security.

The New York Federal Reserve Bank and Tufts University commissioned the report. It included more than 1,500 companies throughout the United States.
5.If you have never worked for a large company ,worked split shifts,forced to work overtime, forced to work all holidays,worked in extremely hot,cold,smoky,dusty,dangerous,and physical environment, you don't have a clue anyway!
I'm speaking specifically about automotive unions here, not all unions in general. There are certain unions that have done well and helped advance themselves and their company, take Southwest Airlines for example.

The automotive unions however, the worst case of organized labor on the planet.
Old 10-13-2005, 05:05 PM
  #28  
Registered
 
Steiner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Livermore, CA
Posts: 1,144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Anybody who has nice things to say about their union is either a union rep or has benefitted from union representation in the past to get them out of some sort of disciplinary issue with their supervisor. I've been in 2 unions...UFCW and the Teamsters...and I can tell you that these union's biggest contributions of the last 10 years is fostering an increasingly nasty "us against them" relationship between workers and management. To this day the most lasting impression I have of both unions are 1.) the ridiculous union dues and 2.) lazy stoned losers retaining their jobs after repeated and multiple run-ins with management because the union "got their back".

Like the anti-trust suits of the early 20th century, Congress needs to begin reigning in these abusive unions. Like somebody said earlier, the pendulum has swung the other way. Whereas 100 years ago unions brought an end to unfair labor practices and unsafe working conditions, now they've essentially become a gang of bullies threatening work stoppages whenever something doesn't go their way.

If you want to see the end result of mass unionization go to France for a week. You've got minimally educated factory workers doing 32 hour weeks and getting 6-8 weeks paid vacation per year...yet every single fricken day there is a massive union organized strike. Every day! I work with many French born men and women and they see unionization and socialism as partners in crime. They'll readily admit that France is broken. There is no way for a hard working blue collar employee to get ahead because they're all just a small spokes in the giant unionized wheel.
Old 10-13-2005, 05:40 PM
  #29  
Mazda Mole
 
Magic8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by brillo
We haven’t even gotten into the macro economic implications of GM truly crashing and burning for the U.S. economy.
Yes this will hurt somewhat in the short term, but in the end a GM in bankruptcy will turn out better. At the minimum they can restructure their legacy costs associated with high union salaries and high pensions. I don't think GM, as an auto company, is that bad. Their overseas operation seems to be doing better. Also I don't think GM has quite the clout they had back in the days. There are other US companies that are much bigger, Walmart and GE comes to mind.
Old 10-13-2005, 08:42 PM
  #30  
'O' - 'H' !!! ...
 
RX8_Buckeye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Detroit (Westland), MI
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's about time something like this happened to get the ball rolling. It's a sad, sad situation for the thousands of workers who will be forced to change their way of life, but the reality is that whatever comes of this will be better for the long-term health of the domestic auto industry. Hopefully the union leadership eventually realizes that it is not in their best interests to strike. If the labor contracts are thrown out by the courts, and the union decides to strike, it will be a case of mutually-assured destruction. Sure, the workers will have stood up for what they believe in, but they will have nothing to show for it as their jobs will all be gone.

The UAW leadership and company management both share the blame for this mess. It's ridiculous to blame only one party or the other. The UAW leadership has been extremely greedy in demanding compensation levels that far exceed those of comparable workers, and management has been extremely short-sighted in agreeing to such contracts. Unfortunately, it's the average worker who pays the price for these mistakes. It's not only hourly workers who are suffering--thousands of salaried workers have been laid off as a result of the uncompetitive cost structure, and the layoffs will continue for quite some time.
Old 10-13-2005, 09:10 PM
  #31  
Bummed, but bring on OU!
 
therm8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 2,036
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
A UAW assembler makes on average, around $26 per hour. A skilled worker makes on average, around $32 per hour. I'm no proponent of unions, but these people have to work alot of overtime to earn $100,000 per year. That overtime actually saves the companies money, since they don't have to hire more workers and give them benefits. There are plenty of skilled professions, that don't require tons of formal education, where overtime can put you into 6 digits. Cutting the wage in half is not a good way to save the company. Those skilled workers will go away, and the product will just degrade. Streamlining production at all levels, and therefore minimizing the number of workers required is an exceptionally better way to cut employee costs. Bankruptcy might just be what is required to do that.
Old 10-13-2005, 09:25 PM
  #32  
Int'l Man of Mystery
 
Japan8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 3,651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rled
1. Union workers do not get paid whether they work or not! If you don't show up for work you don't get paid.
Based upon the construction example posted above, I think you may notice how you misinterpreted the words. You get paid to sit around idle at work.

2.What do you call a Crazy compensation Package?
100% of insurance costs paid for by your employer.

$50/hour for a job that requires no college education or no technical certification (tech school, cert program, etc... NO in-house "free" ****).

3.$100,000 a year? I work for a Large multinational Union company and in order for me to make that much money I would have to work 80 hours per week .
That's you. Are you a a UAW factory line worker at GM? I didn't think so. Besides... work 80 hours a week? yeah... and? I do about 50-55 hours a week... nice and relaxing compared to my previous job at a foreign IT company. Talk about a long day... 12-14 hours a day in the office and then I often did another 2 at home! There are many people who stay at work overnight or work so late they just sleep at work instead of going home. So prevelent there is even a word for it... tetsuya. You wanna learn about working your *** off... come work for a JAPANESE (not foreign) company in Japan.

As far as pay rate goes... my uncle works for a large multinational manufacturer. Actually he is a manager in the production line/factory. He makes pretty decent money. Maybe not $100k, but plenty good for someone without even a community college degree.

4.Companies who use unionized workers are 27 percent more productive, according to a recent report published in Scientific American.

The report revealed unionized workers have a strong system in place to negotiate for the rights and conditions that lead to improved productivity. Union workers also are more comfortable in bringing job specific changes to management because of job security.

The New York Federal Reserve Bank and Tufts University commissioned the report. It included more than 1,500 companies throughout the United States.
Got a link for that study? Sounds pretty subjective to me.

5.If you have never worked for a large company ,worked split shifts,forced to work overtime, forced to work all holidays,worked in extremely hot,cold,smoky,dusty,dangerous,and physical environment, you don't have a clue anyway!
Go back and read what I wrote under #3.

I've done shift work too and been asked to cover the next shift because someone is sick. That was 24x7 no holidays. Until only recently you could smoke in most if not all building/offices in Japan. You certainly could in the city hall I worked for and the Assistant Section Chief smoked like a chimney.

So what's your point?

Americans...
Old 10-13-2005, 11:01 PM
  #33  
Was a Z Guy...
 
280RX-8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Wichita Falls, Texas
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We have a Delphi plant here, and I've heard a lot of stories about ridiculous B.S. that goes on their. Some of the janitors there make as much as teachers, or more. This one clown got fired for sleeping on the job or something(not the first time it had been an issue), of course this is TOTALLY unfair, and he cried about it, so his "union boys" got him his job back, and his backpay, plus the overtime he WOULD have gotten since it was during a busy time of year. That's just one example. I've heard worse.
Old 10-14-2005, 06:01 AM
  #34  
'O' - 'H' !!! ...
 
RX8_Buckeye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Detroit (Westland), MI
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1. Union workers do not get paid whether they work or not! If you don't show up for work you don't get paid.
Except for the 4000+ Delphi workers (and tens of thousands of other UAW employees) who are in the "jobs bank". These people sit at home all day or go to the bar while receiving 90% of their pay--for years on end! It's a similar situation if a plant needs to be idled due to overcapacity--the labor contracts dictate that all the workers must be paid for doing nothing. Any non-unionized company, faced with this situation, could shed most of their unneeded workforce and take huge step towards returning to profitability. IMO, this is one of the most glaring flaws of the labor contracts. In such a competitive and rapidly-changing marketplace, the employer should not be forced to keep around excess labor.


2.What do you call a Crazy compensation Package?
Any way you slice it, UAW workers are making 2x to 3x what is considered a "competitive wage" for their services. Seems crazy enough to me. On top of that, these workers pay practically nothing for their health care costs, while salaried workers at the same companies (a large portion of whom take home less pay than the UAW workers) pay up to 30% of their health care out-of-pocket.

3.$100,000 a year? I work for a Large multinational Union company and in order for me to make that much money I would have to work 80 hours per week .
As mentioned in another post, $100k is easily achievable for many UAW workers with enough overtime. The problem is that most UAW workers feel that they are "entitled" to this overtime. If it gets taken away, they can do their best to make sure it gets reinstated, because the workers are not compensated based on job performance. It sounds crazy, but believe me, it happens a lot.

4.Companies who use unionized workers are 27 percent more productive, according to a recent report published in Scientific American.
That's funny, because I've read reports stating just the opposite. I find it hard to believe that any work environment that does not reward performance (or punish incompetance) is more efficient than one in which workers have incentive to do a great job. This exactly describes the way the union is set up.
Old 10-14-2005, 07:22 AM
  #35  
Mazda Mole
 
Magic8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 280RX-8
We have a Delphi plant here, and I've heard a lot of stories about ridiculous B.S. that goes on their. Some of the janitors there make as much as teachers, or more. This one clown got fired for sleeping on the job or something(not the first time it had been an issue), of course this is TOTALLY unfair, and he cried about it, so his "union boys" got him his job back, and his backpay, plus the overtime he WOULD have gotten since it was during a busy time of year. That's just one example. I've heard worse.
One of engineers I worked with used to work at a Delphi plant near Dayton. She said that they caught 3 guys smoking crack in the break room. Management fired them which is very reasonable. Of course 3-days latter the union got their jobs back!! If an engineer got caught smoking crack in the break room, this person will be fired with no hopes of getting his job back. She also tells me about the fact that the the UAW basically has a system where their kids are guaranteed a job in the factory despite qualifications. She had a lot of stories to tell about her 10-years at Delphi. After hearing them I can't imagine how the UAW is good for the company or their union members for that matter....
Old 10-14-2005, 06:34 PM
  #36  
5Picker
 
rled's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Steiner
Anybody who has nice things to say about their union is either a union rep or has benefitted from union representation in the past to get them out of some sort of disciplinary issue with their supervisor. I've been in 2 unions...UFCW and the Teamsters...and I can tell you that these union's biggest contributions of the last 10 years is fostering an increasingly nasty "us against them" relationship between workers and management. To this day the most lasting impression I have of both unions are 1.) the ridiculous union dues and 2.) lazy stoned losers retaining their jobs after repeated and multiple run-ins with management because the union "got their back".

Like the anti-trust suits of the early 20th century, Congress needs to begin reigning in these abusive unions. Like somebody said earlier, the pendulum has swung the other way. Whereas 100 years ago unions brought an end to unfair labor practices and unsafe working conditions, now they've essentially become a gang of bullies threatening work stoppages whenever something doesn't go their way.

If you want to see the end result of mass unionization go to France for a week. You've got minimally educated factory workers doing 32 hour weeks and getting 6-8 weeks paid vacation per year...yet every single fricken day there is a massive union organized strike. Every day! I work with many French born men and women and they see unionization and socialism as partners in crime. They'll readily admit that France is broken. There is no way for a hard working blue collar employee to get ahead because they're all just a small spokes in the giant unionized wheel.
First of all I am not a union rep nor have I been ""in some sort of disciplinary issue with my supervisor"" I find it ludicrous that you would classify all union workers as lazy stoned losers retaining their jobs after repeated and multiple run-ins with management because the union "got their job back". I have worked for my company for 31 years and have seen many advancements in safety and working conditions that would have never been implemented without good faith negotiations between the company and the union. When I started working for my company they killed on average 6 people a year due to unsafe working conditions! If you care to find the truth about the benefits of union labor in this country ,do some research for the truth , not just the political spin you read in the newspapers! Furthermore ,your asumption that all the jobs in union shops can be performed by stupid lazy stoned losers shows your lack of knowledge of the whole subject.
Old 10-14-2005, 06:45 PM
  #37  
5Picker
 
rled's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Japan8
Based upon the construction example posted above, I think you may notice how you misinterpreted the words. You get paid to sit around idle at work.



100% of insurance costs paid for by your employer.

$50/hour for a job that requires no college education or no technical certification (tech school, cert program, etc... NO in-house "free" ****).



That's you. Are you a a UAW factory line worker at GM? I didn't think so. Besides... work 80 hours a week? yeah... and? I do about 50-55 hours a week... nice and relaxing compared to my previous job at a foreign IT company. Talk about a long day... 12-14 hours a day in the office and then I often did another 2 at home! There are many people who stay at work overnight or work so late they just sleep at work instead of going home. So prevelent there is even a word for it... tetsuya. You wanna learn about working your *** off... come work for a JAPANESE (not foreign) company in Japan.

As far as pay rate goes... my uncle works for a large multinational manufacturer. Actually he is a manager in the production line/factory. He makes pretty decent money. Maybe not $100k, but plenty good for someone without even a community college degree.



Got a link for that study? Sounds pretty subjective to me.



Go back and read what I wrote under #3.

I've done shift work too and been asked to cover the next shift because someone is sick. That was 24x7 no holidays. Until only recently you could smoke in most if not all building/offices in Japan. You certainly could in the city hall I worked for and the Assistant Section Chief smoked like a chimney.

So what's your point?

Americans...
1. I do not have 100% insurance coverage!
2.My hourly wage is 18.79
3. I am an electrician with a 3 year apprentice program and ongoing training to be able to trouble shoot electrical systems , including programable logic controllers,RS logics,electromagnetic casting, crane repair,welding certification, Combustion training on remelt and tilting furnaces,Broadband networks,and the list goes on.
4.Sounds like you have a hard on for unions for some othe reason to me!
Old 10-14-2005, 06:57 PM
  #38  
5Picker
 
rled's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Japan8
Based upon the construction example posted above, I think you may notice how you misinterpreted the words. You get paid to sit around idle at work.



100% of insurance costs paid for by your employer.

$50/hour for a job that requires no college education or no technical certification (tech school, cert program, etc... NO in-house "free" ****).



That's you. Are you a a UAW factory line worker at GM? I didn't think so. Besides... work 80 hours a week? yeah... and? I do about 50-55 hours a week... nice and relaxing compared to my previous job at a foreign IT company. Talk about a long day... 12-14 hours a day in the office and then I often did another 2 at home! There are many people who stay at work overnight or work so late they just sleep at work instead of going home. So prevelent there is even a word for it... tetsuya. You wanna learn about working your *** off... come work for a JAPANESE (not foreign) company in Japan.

As far as pay rate goes... my uncle works for a large multinational manufacturer. Actually he is a manager in the production line/factory. He makes pretty decent money. Maybe not $100k, but plenty good for someone without even a community college degree.



Got a link for that study? Sounds pretty subjective to me.



Go back and read what I wrote under #3.

I've done shift work too and been asked to cover the next shift because someone is sick. That was 24x7 no holidays. Until only recently you could smoke in most if not all building/offices in Japan. You certainly could in the city hall I worked for and the Assistant Section Chief smoked like a chimney.

So what's your point?

Americans...
Heres one.http://www.sciamdigital.com/browse.c...5BE&sc=I100322
Old 10-14-2005, 07:02 PM
  #39  
Registered
 
Steiner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Livermore, CA
Posts: 1,144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rled
Furthermore ,your asumption that all the jobs in union shops can be performed by stupid lazy stoned losers shows your lack of knowledge of the whole subject.
How in the hec did you get that out of this sentence?

Originally Posted by Steiner
To this day the most lasting impression I have of both unions are 1.) the ridiculous union dues and 2.) lazy stoned losers retaining their jobs after repeated and multiple run-ins with management because the union "got their back".
You're the one who said all union jobs can be performed by stupid lazy stoned losers. I certainly didn't say that. I'm the one who said unions make it impossible for employers to get rid of dead weight employees. Are you saying that's not the case? When I was a bag boy in highschool I walked in to the bathroom and was greeted with a smoky smell I'd never experienced before. I grabbed one of the other baggers and he said it was crack smoke and Eric in the bakery usually takes 2 or 3 hits a day. Come to find out ol' Eric had been busted, crack pipe in hand, 6 months before that by the manager of the store. The manager gave him a chance to quit. Three months later the manager smelled it on him when he got to work and wrote him up. Guess who got disciplined? The manager because he wasn't "sensitive" enough to understand ol' Eric the crack-head baker needed rehab, not a write-up. The crack head got his job back, but the union threatened a discrimination suit against the manager because Erik was black and he was white. In the end, we had a known crack-head working in the bakery, a butcher who bought and sold steriods, and a bagger who sold meth and would try to get hit by customer's cars so he could sue. It was fricken great. Thank you local 428 for skimming off my hard earned $6.25/hr and using it to keep lazy stoned losers employed.
Old 10-14-2005, 07:07 PM
  #40  
5Picker
 
rled's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rled
1. I do not have 100% insurance coverage!
2.My hourly wage is 18.79
3. I am an electrician with a 3 year apprentice program and ongoing training to be able to trouble shoot electrical systems , including programable logic controllers,RS logics,electromagnetic casting, crane repair,welding certification, Combustion training on remelt and tilting furnaces,Broadband networks,and the list goes on.
4.Sounds like you have a hard on for unions for some othe reason to me!
Read this in depth study !
http://www.econ.ubc.ca/riddell/561lec24.pdf
Old 10-14-2005, 08:04 PM
  #41  
Administrator
 
zoom44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: portland oregon
Posts: 21,958
Received 115 Likes on 88 Posts
Originally Posted by Steiner
we had a known crack-head working in the bakery, a butcher who bought and sold steriods, and a bagger who sold meth and would try to get hit by customer's cars so he could sue.
and which one of them did you call the police on?
Old 10-14-2005, 08:23 PM
  #42  
Registered
 
Steiner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Livermore, CA
Posts: 1,144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by zoom44
and which one of them did you call the police on?
LOL...would you rather have a steroid monster, a crazy crackhead, or paranoid meth user pissed off at you. At 5" nothing and 100" nothing, I needed that like a hole in the head.

BTW...The steriod guy eventually got busted because one of his customers had a massive stroke. The guy was also a customer with a wife and three kids.
Old 10-14-2005, 08:27 PM
  #43  
Administrator
 
zoom44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: portland oregon
Posts: 21,958
Received 115 Likes on 88 Posts
you're blaming the union but every single person who knew about them and did not call the police is just as bad including you.
Old 10-15-2005, 10:26 AM
  #44  
Int'l Man of Mystery
 
Japan8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 3,651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rled
ubc.ca? The University of British Columbia? Ok...

Did you actually read that report summary? It gives pretty good support to the core points being made here. Simply that the gain in productivity are little if any while there is a significant loss in profitability directly proportional to wage gains made by unions. In addition market capitalization drop 3.8% as investors/shareholders flee due to the reduction in profit. Unions driving companies under if deemed "inconclusive" at this time.

I don't see how this study supports your argument.
Old 10-15-2005, 10:41 AM
  #45  
Northeast Pimpin'
 
VarneyMazda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I know from a meeting that i had at work last week that, with all the GM bankruptcy woes the company will never go bankrupt. Period. its just not going to happen, they could do this which was told to us. which would save the company millions of dollars but overall it would hurt the company image. 90% of the vehicles that the goverment uses are sold or leased by GM,
The Delphi bankruptcy is a no brainer. Look at all the products the produced in the last 5 years. HUGE money was invested to promote the Quadrasteer and Envoy XUV products when in less then a year the XUV's had over $6000 in rebates just to get rid of the products. Delphi's problem wasn't horrible products but more too expensive to make consumers want to purchase the products over the generic types. i remember when you could buy a regular x-cab pickup for $____ and the Quadrasteer was 6000 or so MORE. It was a need idea but for 120 more a month i would settle with what i have been using since GM starting making trucks.

sorry i am rambling. but GM is what puts food on my table, my family bought a GMC dealership back in 1991 and have made it the 6th largest dealership in the country. Gas prices haven't really done anything to hurt our sales either.

Last edited by VarneyMazda; 10-15-2005 at 10:43 AM.
Old 10-15-2005, 02:40 PM
  #46  
5Picker
 
rled's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Japan8
ubc.ca? The University of British Columbia? Ok...

Did you actually read that report summary? It gives pretty good support to the core points being made here. Simply that the gain in productivity are little if any while there is a significant loss in profitability directly proportional to wage gains made by unions. In addition market capitalization drop 3.8% as investors/shareholders flee due to the reduction in profit. Unions driving companies under if deemed "inconclusive" at this time.

I don't see how this study supports your argument.
The last statement in the study states that (Evidence to date states that unions do not reduce profitability to the extent that firms go bankrupt). You can believe what you want about the evils of union labor,fact of the matter is ,without the good paying union wages their would be about half the banks in the town I live in and the motor mile would be the motor 1/2 mile. I'm done!

Last edited by rled; 10-15-2005 at 08:29 PM.
Old 10-15-2005, 09:21 PM
  #47  
Int'l Man of Mystery
 
Japan8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 3,651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And you missed "evidence to date." As stated in the beginning, this means that their findings are not conclusive.
Old 10-15-2005, 10:16 PM
  #48  
Registered
 
Steiner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Livermore, CA
Posts: 1,144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by zoom44
you're blaming the union but every single person who knew about them and did not call the police is just as bad including you.
That may or may not be true, but it certainly has nothing to do with anything we're talking about here. We're talking about continued employment in the midst of habitual incompetence, not criminal prosecution. They are two very different things. The criminal acts they were commiting were also not directed at their employer or fellow employees. If they had been harassing coworkers or stealing from the store then yes...management would have likely called law enforcement AND the union to intervene. However their crimes indirectly effected their employment and, as such, the burden of proof to justify employee dismissal still falls entirely upon management. Moreover even criminal charges, by themselves, would not have been enough to guarantee termination. That's the thing about these damn unions. There are so many layers of bullshit that have been designed to protect the least common denominator of employee.
Old 10-16-2005, 09:22 PM
  #49  
5Picker
 
rled's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Steiner
That may or may not be true, but it certainly has nothing to do with anything we're talking about here. We're talking about continued employment in the midst of habitual incompetence, not criminal prosecution. They are two very different things. The criminal acts they were commiting were also not directed at their employer or fellow employees. If they had been harassing coworkers or stealing from the store then yes...management would have likely called law enforcement AND the union to intervene. However their crimes indirectly effected their employment and, as such, the burden of proof to justify employee dismissal still falls entirely upon management. Moreover even criminal charges, by themselves, would not have been enough to guarantee termination. That's the thing about these damn unions. There are so many layers of bullshit that have been designed to protect the least common denominator of employee.
I don't know where you get your information,but if you get caught doing drugs,fail a drug test,get caught stealing, come to work drunk,you are Fired. I don't know of anyone at my location who has gotten their job back after any of these occured.10 years ago if you were addicted to drugs or alcohol,you could be sent to dry out and then come back to work after signing a last chance document. That does not happen these days. Any criminal act will get you fired for good!
Old 10-17-2005, 09:22 AM
  #50  
'O' - 'H' !!! ...
 
RX8_Buckeye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Detroit (Westland), MI
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rled
I don't know where you get your information,but if you get caught doing drugs,fail a drug test,get caught stealing, come to work drunk,you are Fired. I don't know of anyone at my location who has gotten their job back after any of these occured.10 years ago if you were addicted to drugs or alcohol,you could be sent to dry out and then come back to work after signing a last chance document. That does not happen these days. Any criminal act will get you fired for good!
His statement is absolutely true. It happens all the time at UAW plants. It's just a matter of how strong the UAW chapter at a particular plant happens to be. I've worked in plants and seen some of these things firsthand--it's atrocious. It is very, very difficult to fire people even after multiple serious offenses, let alone poor job performance.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Delphi, GM and the Media



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:19 PM.