Notices
General Automotive Discuss all things automotive here other than the RX-8
View Poll Results: 335 or IS 350?
BMW 335
100.00%
IS 350
0
0%
Voters: 3. You may not vote on this poll

335 or IS350

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Sep 30, 2006 | 08:55 PM
  #51  
Shoafb's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by YaXMaN
Yah, well I saw the two of them near each other leaving work. The jpg of each them at similar angles was supposed to reinforce my opinion - just what I think.
I called the IS350 a glorified RWD Camry, because it's obviously better than a Camry, but looks like one, and has RWD.
We will just have to agree to disagree on this one
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2006 | 09:19 PM
  #52  
YaXMaN's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
Originally Posted by Shoafb
We will just have to agree to disagree on this one
Yep, and it was an good exchange.
I wonder if the djseto made a decision between the two... maybe he's busy driving around showing off the paper tags.
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2006 | 11:29 PM
  #53  
CarAndDriver's Avatar
2005 Black RX-8 GT 6M
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 6,350
Likes: 0
From: San Jose Area
Originally Posted by Shoafb
No you woudn't you seem like an enthusiast who enjoys driving, the Camry has no feel at all.

If you don't care about speed. It is peppy enough espicially at highway speeds. I drove the Camry just before getting the IS. It is faster.... heck it would woop up on an 8 off the line but it just did not float my boat. The IS interior is nicer and as you know RWD just feels better.

As far as not getting the 350 instead? That is another 8 grand or so I just did not want to spend.

The IS is base of of the GS not the Camry. The ES is based off the Camry.
Considering that most IS drivers specify the automatic, the IS250 automatic is left wanting. It was tested by C&D I think and it did okay, but really needed another 20HP to be competitive.

I think the price difference between the 250 and 350 is really severe.
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2006 | 08:19 AM
  #54  
Shoafb's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by CarAndDriver
Considering that most IS drivers specify the automatic, the IS250 automatic is left wanting. It was tested by C&D I think and it did okay, but really needed another 20HP to be competitive.

I think the price difference between the 250 and 350 is really severe.

I was lucky and they had a MT. I only found out afterward how hard they are to find.
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2006 | 01:22 PM
  #55  
Japan8's Avatar
Int'l Man of Mystery
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,651
Likes: 0
From: Central Florida
Originally Posted by Shoafb
No you woudn't you seem like an enthusiast who enjoys driving, the Camry has no feel at all.



If you don't care about speed. It is peppy enough espicially at highway speeds. I drove the Camry just before getting the IS. It is faster.... heck it would woop up on an 8 off the line but it just did not float my boat. The IS interior is nicer and as you know RWD just feels better.

As far as not getting the 350 instead? That is another 8 grand or so I just did not want to spend.

The IS is base of of the GS not the Camry. The ES is based off the Camry.
Aaaactually the IS is based off of the JDM Crown platform and as such compros have been made in JDM mags between the IS and the Crown Athelete (sport version).
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2006 | 04:01 PM
  #56  
RevTo9K's Avatar
1.3L is enough 4 anybody
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
From: Chicago Suburbs
335i. Definitely. Probably my next ride.
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2006 | 04:42 PM
  #57  
BlueSky's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
From: OC
Man I can't see how if you've driven both you could be asking this question. I drove a is250 (less power) but the things that mattered like the steering feel and the handling were terrible. Extremely boring car, made more boring by the fact that it has a auto only.

335i is a very expensive car. I'd say get a well-kept used or maybe new M3 instead of that car for around the same price. Or look at a few well-kept latemodel NSXs.

Depends on what you want though. You'll be very heartbroken when the new M3 comes out if you have the 335i. If you get a E46 M3 you know you've got a classic that is timeless. Same with the NSX, they aren't produced anymore so again, another classic.

Last edited by BlueSky; Oct 2, 2006 at 10:45 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2006 | 05:41 PM
  #58  
Shoafb's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
The 250 is not auto only. I have MT, 6speed. It had a decent enough feel for me. I wanted the Lexus reliabitly, service...... or at least I hope it turns out that way

They consistantly rank High in both.
Reply
Old Oct 1, 2006 | 07:04 PM
  #59  
RevTo9K's Avatar
1.3L is enough 4 anybody
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
From: Chicago Suburbs
Originally Posted by BlueSky
335i is a very expensive car. I'd say get a well-kept used or maybe new M3 instead of that car for around the same price...

Depends on what you want though. You'll be very heartbroken when the new M3 comes out if you have the 335i.
I'm sure you're right that the new M3 will be far beyond the 335i in performance, but I bet it's gonna be in a whole 'nother tax bracket.

I also think that the M3 will have a much harsher suspension than the 335i. Not that there's anything wrong with that... it's just not for everybody. My Type R gave me back problems, but I have no issues in the 8 or the STi. An M3 would probably send me back to the chiropractor.
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2006 | 08:54 AM
  #61  
playdoh43's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,510
Likes: 1
From: University of Maryland
the E92 M3 will pretty surely cost around 60k after taxes and tags with a few normal options. the E42 is already getting terrible gas mileage with such a highly tuned NA engine that makes more than 100hp per liter NA... Id hate to imagine how bad the fuel economy is with a 4.0L V8 making more than 100hp/liter NA... sounds as scary if not scarier as the sick performance that it will deliver
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2006 | 01:28 PM
  #62  
spork's Avatar
Foolio
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 501
Likes: 0
From: So Cal
Originally Posted by CarAndDriver
Originally Posted by playdoh43
IS has more advantages than just that.
1) interior quality
2) reliability
3) much better noise deadening
4) better electonrics, sound system, especially better Nav
5) less bumpy when running over imperfections in the road
------

But alas, it doesn't seem to be as much fun to drive.
This is a good way to look at it. The IS is an incredible car and has a lot of advantages over the BMW, but the 3 series is just much better in terms of fun to drive. The IS is pretty disappointing as a driver's car compared to the BMW. (I test drove the 330 and the IS350). But if you ignore the fun to drive factor IMO, the Lexus is the way to go.

Only you know how much the fun to drive factor matters to you. I found regrettably that it matters a whole lot to me. I returned my RX-8 lease and got a Mazdaspeed 6. Which is a very nice car, but loses out for me on the fun to drive factor, so I really don't like it. Even though I have no real reason to not like it and the sound dampening is SO MUCH BETTER than the 8, I just can't help but think "damn, I made a mistake, I should've just bought an 8 or gone cheap and saved money".

I know different things matter to different people. I know alot of people HATE the 8 because of the lack of torque, but for me personally, I'd gladly give up my 280 lb/ft torque for the 8's fun factor.
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2006 | 04:04 PM
  #63  
zaglo6204's Avatar
mine's better
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 808
Likes: 0
From: Aiken, SC
Originally Posted by BlueSky
If you get a E46 M3 you know you know you've got a classic that is timeless.
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2006 | 10:43 PM
  #64  
BlueSky's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
From: OC
Originally Posted by Shoafb
The 250 is not auto only. I have MT, 6speed. It had a decent enough feel for me. I wanted the Lexus reliabitly, service...... or at least I hope it turns out that way

They consistantly rank High in both.

Sorry, I meant the 350 is auto only.
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2006 | 10:53 PM
  #65  
BlueSky's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
From: OC
Originally Posted by playdoh43
the E92 M3 will pretty surely cost around 60k after taxes and tags with a few normal options. the E42 is already getting terrible gas mileage with such a highly tuned NA engine that makes more than 100hp per liter NA... Id hate to imagine how bad the fuel economy is with a 4.0L V8 making more than 100hp/liter NA... sounds as scary if not scarier as the sick performance that it will deliver

Well the E46 M3 gets better gas mileage than the RX-8 at least.

Also if the E92 M3 follows the path with which BMW took the latest M5 and M6, it's going to be a terrible car for purists. If they banglify, and then stuff more technology into then it will be ruined, and the E46 M3 (especially the CS and CSL) will be the best driver's buys as their prices will plummet when the new M3 arrives.

A 4.0 liter V8 is gonna add more weight. And more technology will add more weight. I hope BMW does the right thing like they did with the M Coupe and M Roadster. Keep it simple.
Reply
Old Oct 2, 2006 | 11:01 PM
  #66  
JeRKy 8 Owner's Avatar
Stuck in a love triangle
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,201
Likes: 3
From: Miami, FL
I only read the first and fifth pages of this thread, but in case it hasn't already been mentioned, the 335i Coupe is nearly as fast an M3. It's reaching 60 in 4.8 seconds, and 1/4 in 13.5. I'm sure a couple bolt ons will make those numbers even lower thanks to the turbo.

Basically there's no point in buying an IS350 anymore. The IS350 may still have a better looking exterior and interior, but other than that, it's a waste of money compared to this bimmer beast, which blows it away in both performance and handling.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2006 | 12:01 AM
  #67  
BlueSky's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
From: OC
^^^Speed isn't everything. Just because it has near M3 acceleration performance figures it does not mean it automatically a driver-oriented sportscar like the E46 M3 is. Handling, balance, steering feel, weight, chassis communication, shifter feel. These are the things that make sports car. Not saying the 335i is a dog, but it's just that it is not a "M" car meaning its not tuned to the level that a "M" car usually is.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2006 | 12:43 PM
  #68  
Design1stCode2nd's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 946
Likes: 0
Well if a 911 is an option then the lexus and bmw are not even on the table. e46 M3 is an awesome care, the 335 looks like it will be a great car as well but neither compare to a 911.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2006 | 01:03 PM
  #69  
r0tor's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,754
Likes: 1
From: PA
Originally Posted by BlueSky
^^^Speed isn't everything. Just because it has near M3 acceleration performance figures it does not mean it automatically a driver-oriented sportscar like the E46 M3 is. Handling, balance, steering feel, weight, chassis communication, shifter feel. These are the things that make sports car. Not saying the 335i is a dog, but it's just that it is not a "M" car meaning its not tuned to the level that a "M" car usually is.

not to mention the 335 is plagued with an open rear differential
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2006 | 06:44 PM
  #71  
BlueSky's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
From: OC
If you enjoy your 8, the IS will disappoint you because it won't handle nearly as good or be nearly as organic and communicative.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2006 | 07:23 PM
  #72  
JeRKy 8 Owner's Avatar
Stuck in a love triangle
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,201
Likes: 3
From: Miami, FL
Originally Posted by BlueSky
^^^Speed isn't everything. Just because it has near M3 acceleration performance figures it does not mean it automatically a driver-oriented sportscar like the E46 M3 is. Handling, balance, steering feel, weight, chassis communication, shifter feel. These are the things that make sports car. Not saying the 335i is a dog, but it's just that it is not a "M" car meaning its not tuned to the level that a "M" car usually is.
I'd be willing to put money that the 335i will trump the IS350 in all 6 categories you mentioned, except shifter feel of course, because the IS350 doesn't come in stick.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2006 | 08:38 PM
  #73  
BlueSky's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
From: OC
^^^Never said it wouldn't.
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2006 | 10:58 AM
  #74  
spork's Avatar
Foolio
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 501
Likes: 0
From: So Cal
Originally Posted by JeRKy 8 Owner
I'd be willing to put money that the 335i will trump the IS350 in all 6 categories you mentioned, except shifter feel of course, because the IS350 doesn't come in stick.
Even then the IS has their own advantages. BMW obviously destroys the Lexus in terms of being driver oriented. Lexuses really are more passenger oriented. Also they do incredible in terms of reliability. I seriously think that if I didn't really enjoy the actual act of driving, then there's a good chance I'd just go with the Lexus. Less to worry about most likely. But anyone that actually enjoys driving would definitely discount the Lexus.
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2006 | 11:59 AM
  #75  
FE9000's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
From: Irvine, CA
Even if IS350 came with stick it may not be any better. I drove the IS250 stick, and it was terrible.

Agree with spork, BMW is still way more fun to drive. As much as Lexus wants the IS to be sporty, it can't shake it's Luxes feel.
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:34 AM.