View Poll Results: 335 or IS 350?
IS 350
0
0%
Voters: 3. You may not vote on this poll
335 or IS350
09-30-2006, 08:55 PM
#51
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by YaXMaN
Yah, well I saw the two of them near each other leaving work. The jpg of each them at similar angles was supposed to reinforce my opinion - just what I think.
I called the IS350 a glorified RWD Camry, because it's obviously better than a Camry, but looks like one, and has RWD.
I called the IS350 a glorified RWD Camry, because it's obviously better than a Camry, but looks like one, and has RWD.
09-30-2006, 09:19 PM
#52
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Shoafb
We will just have to agree to disagree on this one
I wonder if the djseto made a decision between the two... maybe he's busy driving around showing off the paper tags.
09-30-2006, 11:29 PM
#53
2005 Black RX-8 GT 6M
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Jose Area
Posts: 6,350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Shoafb
No you woudn't you seem like an enthusiast who enjoys driving, the Camry has no feel at all.
If you don't care about speed. It is peppy enough espicially at highway speeds. I drove the Camry just before getting the IS. It is faster.... heck it would woop up on an 8 off the line but it just did not float my boat. The IS interior is nicer and as you know RWD just feels better.
As far as not getting the 350 instead? That is another 8 grand or so I just did not want to spend.
The IS is base of of the GS not the Camry. The ES is based off the Camry.
If you don't care about speed. It is peppy enough espicially at highway speeds. I drove the Camry just before getting the IS. It is faster.... heck it would woop up on an 8 off the line but it just did not float my boat. The IS interior is nicer and as you know RWD just feels better.
As far as not getting the 350 instead? That is another 8 grand or so I just did not want to spend.
The IS is base of of the GS not the Camry. The ES is based off the Camry.
I think the price difference between the 250 and 350 is really severe.
10-01-2006, 08:19 AM
#54
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by CarAndDriver
Considering that most IS drivers specify the automatic, the IS250 automatic is left wanting. It was tested by C&D I think and it did okay, but really needed another 20HP to be competitive.
I think the price difference between the 250 and 350 is really severe.
I think the price difference between the 250 and 350 is really severe.
I was lucky and they had a MT. I only found out afterward how hard they are to find.
10-01-2006, 01:22 PM
#55
Int'l Man of Mystery
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 3,651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Shoafb
No you woudn't you seem like an enthusiast who enjoys driving, the Camry has no feel at all.
If you don't care about speed. It is peppy enough espicially at highway speeds. I drove the Camry just before getting the IS. It is faster.... heck it would woop up on an 8 off the line but it just did not float my boat. The IS interior is nicer and as you know RWD just feels better.
As far as not getting the 350 instead? That is another 8 grand or so I just did not want to spend.
The IS is base of of the GS not the Camry. The ES is based off the Camry.
If you don't care about speed. It is peppy enough espicially at highway speeds. I drove the Camry just before getting the IS. It is faster.... heck it would woop up on an 8 off the line but it just did not float my boat. The IS interior is nicer and as you know RWD just feels better.
As far as not getting the 350 instead? That is another 8 grand or so I just did not want to spend.
The IS is base of of the GS not the Camry. The ES is based off the Camry.
10-01-2006, 04:42 PM
#57
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: OC
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Man I can't see how if you've driven both you could be asking this question. I drove a is250 (less power) but the things that mattered like the steering feel and the handling were terrible. Extremely boring car, made more boring by the fact that it has a auto only.
335i is a very expensive car. I'd say get a well-kept used or maybe new M3 instead of that car for around the same price. Or look at a few well-kept latemodel NSXs.
Depends on what you want though. You'll be very heartbroken when the new M3 comes out if you have the 335i. If you get a E46 M3 you know you've got a classic that is timeless. Same with the NSX, they aren't produced anymore so again, another classic.
335i is a very expensive car. I'd say get a well-kept used or maybe new M3 instead of that car for around the same price. Or look at a few well-kept latemodel NSXs.
Depends on what you want though. You'll be very heartbroken when the new M3 comes out if you have the 335i. If you get a E46 M3 you know you've got a classic that is timeless. Same with the NSX, they aren't produced anymore so again, another classic.
Last edited by BlueSky; 10-02-2006 at 10:45 PM.
10-01-2006, 05:41 PM
#58
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 416
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The 250 is not auto only. I have MT, 6speed. It had a decent enough feel for me. I wanted the Lexus reliabitly, service...... or at least I hope it turns out that way 
They consistantly rank High in both.
They consistantly rank High in both.
10-01-2006, 07:04 PM
#59
1.3L is enough 4 anybody
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chicago Suburbs
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by BlueSky
335i is a very expensive car. I'd say get a well-kept used or maybe new M3 instead of that car for around the same price...
Depends on what you want though. You'll be very heartbroken when the new M3 comes out if you have the 335i.
Depends on what you want though. You'll be very heartbroken when the new M3 comes out if you have the 335i.
I also think that the M3 will have a much harsher suspension than the 335i. Not that there's anything wrong with that... it's just not for everybody. My Type R gave me back problems, but I have no issues in the 8 or the STi. An M3 would probably send me back to the chiropractor.
10-01-2006, 09:23 PM
#60
Guest
Posts: n/a
Havent decided yet. Something may come up job wise..so I need to let it play out. If things come through, I may be skipping on both these cars and moving towards a Porsche Caymen or 911. It will be at least a month before I truely decide on a car, but I am enjoying the replies...
10-02-2006, 08:54 AM
#61
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: University of Maryland
Posts: 2,510
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
the E92 M3 will pretty surely cost around 60k after taxes and tags with a few normal options. the E42 is already getting terrible gas mileage with such a highly tuned NA engine that makes more than 100hp per liter NA... Id hate to imagine how bad the fuel economy is with a 4.0L V8 making more than 100hp/liter NA... sounds as scary if not scarier as the sick performance that it will deliver
10-02-2006, 01:28 PM
#62
Foolio
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: So Cal
Posts: 501
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by CarAndDriver
Originally Posted by playdoh43
IS has more advantages than just that.
1) interior quality
2) reliability
3) much better noise deadening
4) better electonrics, sound system, especially better Nav
5) less bumpy when running over imperfections in the road
------
But alas, it doesn't seem to be as much fun to drive.
IS has more advantages than just that.
1) interior quality
2) reliability
3) much better noise deadening
4) better electonrics, sound system, especially better Nav
5) less bumpy when running over imperfections in the road
------
But alas, it doesn't seem to be as much fun to drive.
Only you know how much the fun to drive factor matters to you. I found regrettably that it matters a whole lot to me. I returned my RX-8 lease and got a Mazdaspeed 6. Which is a very nice car, but loses out for me on the fun to drive factor, so I really don't like it. Even though I have no real reason to not like it and the sound dampening is SO MUCH BETTER than the 8, I just can't help but think "damn, I made a mistake, I should've just bought an 8 or gone cheap and saved money".
I know different things matter to different people. I know alot of people HATE the 8 because of the lack of torque, but for me personally, I'd gladly give up my 280 lb/ft torque for the 8's fun factor.
10-02-2006, 10:43 PM
#64
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: OC
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Shoafb
The 250 is not auto only. I have MT, 6speed. It had a decent enough feel for me. I wanted the Lexus reliabitly, service...... or at least I hope it turns out that way
They consistantly rank High in both.
They consistantly rank High in both.
Sorry, I meant the 350 is auto only.
10-02-2006, 10:53 PM
#65
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: OC
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by playdoh43
the E92 M3 will pretty surely cost around 60k after taxes and tags with a few normal options. the E42 is already getting terrible gas mileage with such a highly tuned NA engine that makes more than 100hp per liter NA... Id hate to imagine how bad the fuel economy is with a 4.0L V8 making more than 100hp/liter NA... sounds as scary if not scarier as the sick performance that it will deliver
Well the E46 M3 gets better gas mileage than the RX-8 at least.
Also if the E92 M3 follows the path with which BMW took the latest M5 and M6, it's going to be a terrible car for purists. If they banglify, and then stuff more technology into then it will be ruined, and the E46 M3 (especially the CS and CSL) will be the best driver's buys as their prices will plummet when the new M3 arrives.
A 4.0 liter V8 is gonna add more weight. And more technology will add more weight. I hope BMW does the right thing like they did with the M Coupe and M Roadster. Keep it simple.
10-02-2006, 11:01 PM
#66
Stuck in a love triangle
I only read the first and fifth pages of this thread, but in case it hasn't already been mentioned, the 335i Coupe is nearly as fast an M3. It's reaching 60 in 4.8 seconds, and 1/4 in 13.5. I'm sure a couple bolt ons will make those numbers even lower thanks to the turbo.
Basically there's no point in buying an IS350 anymore. The IS350 may still have a better looking exterior and interior, but other than that, it's a waste of money compared to this bimmer beast, which blows it away in both performance and handling.
Basically there's no point in buying an IS350 anymore. The IS350 may still have a better looking exterior and interior, but other than that, it's a waste of money compared to this bimmer beast, which blows it away in both performance and handling.
10-03-2006, 12:01 AM
#67
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: OC
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
^^^Speed isn't everything. Just because it has near M3 acceleration performance figures it does not mean it automatically a driver-oriented sportscar like the E46 M3 is. Handling, balance, steering feel, weight, chassis communication, shifter feel. These are the things that make sports car. Not saying the 335i is a dog, but it's just that it is not a "M" car meaning its not tuned to the level that a "M" car usually is.
10-03-2006, 01:03 PM
#69
Registered
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 3,754
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by BlueSky
^^^Speed isn't everything. Just because it has near M3 acceleration performance figures it does not mean it automatically a driver-oriented sportscar like the E46 M3 is. Handling, balance, steering feel, weight, chassis communication, shifter feel. These are the things that make sports car. Not saying the 335i is a dog, but it's just that it is not a "M" car meaning its not tuned to the level that a "M" car usually is.
not to mention the 335 is plagued with an open rear differential
10-03-2006, 06:36 PM
#70
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by Design1stCode2nd
Well if a 911 is an option then the lexus and bmw are not even on the table. e46 M3 is an awesome care, the 335 looks like it will be a great car as well but neither compare to a 911.
10-03-2006, 07:23 PM
#72
Stuck in a love triangle
Originally Posted by BlueSky
^^^Speed isn't everything. Just because it has near M3 acceleration performance figures it does not mean it automatically a driver-oriented sportscar like the E46 M3 is. Handling, balance, steering feel, weight, chassis communication, shifter feel. These are the things that make sports car. Not saying the 335i is a dog, but it's just that it is not a "M" car meaning its not tuned to the level that a "M" car usually is.
10-04-2006, 10:58 AM
#74
Foolio
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: So Cal
Posts: 501
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by JeRKy 8 Owner
I'd be willing to put money that the 335i will trump the IS350 in all 6 categories you mentioned, except shifter feel of course, because the IS350 doesn't come in stick.
10-04-2006, 11:59 AM
#75
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Even if IS350 came with stick it may not be any better. I drove the IS250 stick, and it was terrible.
Agree with spork, BMW is still way more fun to drive. As much as Lexus wants the IS to be sporty, it can't shake it's Luxes feel.
Agree with spork, BMW is still way more fun to drive. As much as Lexus wants the IS to be sporty, it can't shake it's Luxes feel.