Notices
General Automotive Discuss all things automotive here other than the RX-8

2007 STI Limited

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Apr 13, 2006 | 01:52 AM
  #1  
VikingDJ's Avatar
Thread Starter
Music and Cars!!! :)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,325
Likes: 0
2007 STI Limited

http://www.automobilemag.com/auto_sh...x_sti_limited/
Old Apr 13, 2006 | 02:27 AM
  #2  
terrypk1's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 403
Likes: 0
first to reply. nice picture
Old Apr 13, 2006 | 03:07 AM
  #3  
Japan8's Avatar
Int'l Man of Mystery
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,651
Likes: 0
From: Central Florida
Nice. Now THIS is an STI that I could consider purchasing...
Old Apr 13, 2006 | 03:12 AM
  #4  
NgoRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 10,239
Likes: 4
From: CA, Rowland Hts.
wow, 800 units in US; 1/2 white, 1/2 gray.
Old Apr 13, 2006 | 03:31 AM
  #5  
Sapphonica's Avatar
PingMobile
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 356
Likes: 0
From: Oakland
Hey, it's how an STi looks after 3 beers...

...I think I need another 3 beers before it becomes beautiful.

Such a shame...a champion chassis and powerplant with a U-G-L-Y body. Now, if you could put the STi engine & AWD setup in the 8, then you'd really have something.
Old Apr 13, 2006 | 03:50 AM
  #6  
FABRO's Avatar
Registered Ricer
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 858
Likes: 0
From: Renton, WA
Very nice, too bad the dealers are going to rape people on it and ask for at least $40,000 for it.
Old Apr 13, 2006 | 05:37 AM
  #7  
Rootski's Avatar
DGAF
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,953
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
Shame. They were so close to making it look good, and it still came out uglier than hand-painted sin.
Old Apr 13, 2006 | 07:02 AM
  #8  
snizzle's Avatar
Shakezula, the Mic Rula
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,466
Likes: 0
From: Richmond, VA
Better (but maybe it's just the lack of park bench spoiler).

I'm sure it shares absolutely no components with the WRX though
Old Apr 13, 2006 | 08:55 AM
  #9  
Animagix's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
this is the more mature STi that I'd definitely consider getting.
Old Apr 13, 2006 | 08:59 AM
  #10  
bascho's Avatar
.
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,306
Likes: 0
From: Motorcity
Better.......but still not there yet......keep working Subaru
Old Apr 13, 2006 | 09:25 PM
  #11  
saturn's Avatar
i pwn therefore i am
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,332
Likes: 3
From: Delaware, USA
Wow, they actually de-riced the STi a little and classed it up a bit. I guess this is the future of "econoboxes".
Old Apr 13, 2006 | 09:43 PM
  #12  
Renesis_8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Canada
It might be a limited production run next year, but wait one more year, it'll become a trim level. They did this with Legacy Spec B, limited in 06, a trim option in 07, and its beautiful, except for the exterior haha.

Check it out at Subaru.com, its a flash site, cant give you guys a direct link sorry. Its got a new intelligent drive thing, its like 3 different fuel maps, for fuel economy, and 2 sport modes, and you can manually switch it.

FYI, subaru refers to their leather trimmed option as "limited", just like GS and GT in RX-8, they have "i" and "limited"


Although we all agree on here that this de-ricing of the STi is uncalled for, but its actually a smart move by Subaru, could draw more buyers that want the power but cant take the unacceptable DUAL rice wings and Kia interior. I say good move subaru, and you can always add the wing back after if you like it.

Last edited by Renesis_8; Apr 13, 2006 at 09:49 PM.
Old Apr 13, 2006 | 09:48 PM
  #13  
9291150's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,453
Likes: 0
From: Georgetown
If they get rid of the turbo (hate lag, hate how turbos hang on to revs), the AWD (hate the understeer/oversteer transition), the ugly body, econocar roots, 3400 pound weight, etc....it would be a nice car.

STI...Stats Toy for Imbeciles.
Old Apr 13, 2006 | 10:02 PM
  #14  
mike1324a's Avatar
Need'd a Turbo
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,328
Likes: 0
That would not be an STI at all. You named everything about the car and said get rid of it....
Old Apr 13, 2006 | 10:28 PM
  #15  
BigOLundh's Avatar
#1 Legend
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,904
Likes: 0
From: TEXAS
Originally Posted by 9291150
If they get rid of the turbo (hate lag, hate how turbos hang on to revs), the AWD (hate the understeer/oversteer transition), the ugly body, econocar roots, 3400 pound weight, etc....it would be a nice car.

STI...Stats Toy for Imbeciles.
They already make your dream car. Its the Imprezza 2.5i

Unfortunately its still AWD, but has the other features you are looking for
Horsepower: 173 hp
Torque: 166 ft-lbs.
Curb Weight: 3067 lbs.
Old Apr 14, 2006 | 01:46 AM
  #16  
GULAMAN's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by mike1324a
That would not be an STI at all. You named everything about the car and said get rid of it....

wait...wait...wait...has it sunk in yet?? ;-)
Old Apr 14, 2006 | 02:03 AM
  #17  
Rhawb's Avatar
Has the whole shit.
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,772
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
I don't really know why, but I actually mourn the loss of the wing on that version ...Definitely needs a nice, subtle wing to set off the rear end a bit, imo.

And for the love of God, get rid of that pig snout! I want so bad to like the looks of this car!
Old Apr 14, 2006 | 02:18 AM
  #18  
djgiron's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 585
Likes: 9
From: Denver
Wow Ike, he kind of sounds like you talking about the 8 all the time haha. Getting a little touchy are we?
Old Apr 14, 2006 | 06:52 AM
  #19  
sti_eric's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
From: Apalachin, NY
Originally Posted by 9291150
If they get rid of the turbo (hate lag, hate how turbos hang on to revs), the AWD (hate the understeer/oversteer transition), the ugly body, econocar roots, 3400 pound weight, etc....it would be a nice car.

STI...Stats Toy for Imbeciles.
Jealous because an econobox outperforms your precious RX-8 on all levels?
Old Apr 14, 2006 | 09:05 AM
  #20  
yiksing's Avatar
the giant tastetickles
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,758
Likes: 0
From: in the basement
See.... a big wing looks better on a STI
Old Apr 14, 2006 | 11:42 AM
  #21  
9291150's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,453
Likes: 0
From: Georgetown
Originally Posted by sti_eric
Jealous because an econobox outperforms your precious RX-8 on all levels?
Eric...or STI Eric...your car does not "outperform" an 8, its faster yes, but it does not outperform as an everyday sportscar. Smoothness, refinement, ride quality, feel, etc. are also "performance" indicators, but you are so dim and one dimensional that you don't see this. Hence you own a STI...stat toy for imbiciles.

By the way, if it is all about being faster, even my slowest motorcycle can crush your STI.
Old Apr 14, 2006 | 12:15 PM
  #22  
sti_eric's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
From: Apalachin, NY
Originally Posted by 9291150
Eric...or STI Eric...your car does not "outperform" an 8, its faster yes, but it does not outperform as an everyday sportscar. Smoothness, refinement, ride quality, feel, etc. are also "performance" indicators, but you are so dim and one dimensional that you don't see this. Hence you own a STI...stat toy for imbiciles.
Hmm...all the ways that the RX-8 is "better" are all subjective and immeasurable. Everything that is objective and measureable points to the STi. Funny how that works out that way.
Old Apr 14, 2006 | 12:31 PM
  #23  
9291150's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,453
Likes: 0
From: Georgetown
You are actually proving my point.

Subjective? Smoothness and refinement...every car scrib went on about this with the 8 and its rotary, same thing with its ride. Hardly sbjective. The same scribes refer to STIs an EVOs as uncompromising, which is fine if thats what you want, but I'll take a better rounded package anyday. I don't take my racebike to work, rather I take my other bike that a better all rounder, what do I got to prove???

As for feel, yeah thats more subjective. But many MANY enthusiasts think that a front-mid engine rear wheel drive car (non-live axle) is the best layout, especially when its light.

Maybe 'cause I'm 38, I've moved beyond stats. Maybe one day it'll be a secondary consideration for you too.
Old Apr 14, 2006 | 12:40 PM
  #24  
sti_eric's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
From: Apalachin, NY
Originally Posted by 9291150
You are actually proving my point.

Subjective? Smoothness and refinement...every car scrib went on about this with the 8 and its rotary, same thing with its ride. Hardly sbjective. The same scribes refer to STIs an EVOs as uncompromising, which is fine if thats what you want, but I'll take a better rounded package anyday. I don't take my racebike to work, rather I take my other bike that a better all rounder, what do I got to prove???

As for feel, yeah thats more subjective. But many MANY enthusiasts think that a front-mid engine rear wheel drive car (non-live axle) is the best layout, especially when its light.

Maybe 'cause I'm 38, I've moved beyond stats. Maybe one day it'll be a secondary consideration for you too.
It's not a Mercedes S-class, it's supposed to be a sports car. In a sports car that is designed for performance, I would much rather be in tune with the road than isolated from it.

But, the real question here is, why are you so insecure about your car that you feel the need to post in every STi/Evo thread about how much you hate these cars? Obviously there is something about these cars that you fear. These are both cars that are loved by automotive mag writers and car enthusiasts alike. Yet you continually enter these threads to bash and call names. You're 38? More like 8. How about you go back to enjoying [insert mod edit here] Car.

Last edited by Ajax; Apr 16, 2006 at 10:50 AM.
Old Apr 14, 2006 | 12:46 PM
  #25  
VikingDJ's Avatar
Thread Starter
Music and Cars!!! :)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,325
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by 9291150
You are actually proving my point.

Subjective? Smoothness and refinement...every car scrib went on about this with the 8 and its rotary, same thing with its ride. Hardly sbjective. The same scribes refer to STIs an EVOs as uncompromising, which is fine if thats what you want, but I'll take a better rounded package anyday. I don't take my racebike to work, rather I take my other bike that a better all rounder, what do I got to prove???

As for feel, yeah thats more subjective. But many MANY enthusiasts think that a front-mid engine rear wheel drive car (non-live axle) is the best layout, especially when its light.

Maybe 'cause I'm 38, I've moved beyond stats. Maybe one day it'll be a secondary consideration for you too.
While I agree with you to a point, but the fact remains that you have some inferiority regarding the STI, otherwise you'd never have made those negative remarks for all to see. Why can't we just be secure with the cars we own, and appreciate others for how they are built. It's all a bunch of nonsense. You're 38 years old, obviously you should know better not to stoop to the level of criticizing a purpose built car. It shows a partial, and narrowminded personality. You're not any better then the guys criticizing the RX8 on other forums. The STI is a better performer PERIOD, but to get that performance you have to compromise in looks and refinement. The RX8 has all the tools for a great overall sports car, but it lacks what the STi has, and like the STI, it has it's share of dislikers. Again, it's a compromise. I think whether STI and RX8 owners want to admit it or not, they envy what the other car brings to the table. Most will live in the land of denial, but negative comments always point to somre level of insecurity, jealousy, defensivness, or flat out inability to give another car credit, feeling it's somehow making the car you own seem inferior. Same story, different day. Be happy with what you own, and don't cut down other cars for the intention they are built for. Just enjoy your RX8, and leave the bashing to the young ones. You're too old for that nonsense.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:16 AM.